`s~"'r No. 5031. ACCEPTANCE OF FARM-TO-MARKET RIGHT-OF-WAY p1341, CYPRESS CREEK. - This the 10th day of Jenuery, A, D, 1951, came on to be examined by the court, the plans 'I and petition of R. H. Ziegler, Resident State Engineer, District ~15> of Kerrville, Kerr County, Teaes, establishing the location of the right-of-way Farm-to-Market y1341, extending from Wheless Avenue in the City of Kerrville to Cypress Creek, about 10.068 miles, end it appearing to the court that Lhia protect is a very important route for Kerr County ae a whole, end that the court should accept the right-of-way as designated and staked out by said Engines , and that Kerr County agrees to be liable for securing the right-oP-way Sf final approval is granted by the State Highway Department. Therefore by motion duly made by Eckstein, seconded by Powell and unanimously approved by the court, that Ferm-to-Market Right-of-Way p1341 es ~ presented by R. H. Zi eglar, be accepted according to the plans left in pose easion of the court _ and that every attempt will ba made to satisfy the property owners 1n securing the right-of- ~~ way and that Kerr County agrees to be liable for securing the right-of-way when final approver I is granted by the State Highway Department. -o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o ro- ~, No. 5032. POLICY OF THE COMMISSIONERS COURT IN ACCEPTING FARM-TO -MARKET RIGHT-OF-WAY p1341 ~ I This the 10th day of January, A. D. 1951, after motion having been duly made by Ecka tein, i seconded by Goff end unanimously approved by the court, and it is hereby declared to be the III policy of the Commissioners Go urt of Kerr County in connection with the right-of-way for the Ill improvement end rebuilding oP F'arm-to-Market Road (/1341, commonly known ea the Gypr ass (.reek l Road; that said County will move ell fences that need to be moved by reason of said co natruct- jion, end replace said fen cee on the new right-oP-way line in ea good a co nd Stlon as they are ill now; end in such areas where new fences need to be built by reason of said - - - construction, said Kerr County will construct and build said fences in a good workmanship like manner of I Ilstanderd materiels end suitable for controlling ell livestock. Said new Fences to be of the '~ common or low type and not deer proof fences. Kerr County will reimburse to the property ~~I~, owner at the rate of $600.00 per mile, if such property owner, so des it ea Lo build his own III fan ce end furnish his own materials. This policy to be effective only in such cases where it the lend owner donates the land to Kerr County. -o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o- ~~III No. 5633. COURTS! RECESS, JANUARY 10, 1951 AT 5:00 P. M. UNTIL JANUARY 22, 1951 AT 10: UO A. ~~ M. FOR THE MATTERS OF 75SUING BONDS OR WARRANT'S. -o-o-o-o -o-o-o-o-o-o- The foregoing minutes from page 498 to 515 Sn clue Sve, were reed in open court end found _~ l to be true and correct, and hereby are approved this the 22nd day of January, A. D. 1951. ATTEST: / ,p County ~er c, Ie r oun,y, rPexas ~ Ly urge, err oust y, 'Pezae -O-O-O-O-D-D-D-O-O-O-O- NO. 5034. COURT kECONVENED ON MONDAY, JANUARY 22, A, D. 1951, AT 10:00 A. M. ~ Pura uant to ad,{ournment taken by thle court on Wednesday, Jahuery lU, 1951, et 5:00 P. i M., the following off Scera were p*esent Lo-wit: ~ Honorable John R, Leavell.........000nty Judge I Henry Eckstein ....................COmmiaeioner precinct //1 Iii V. D. Powell .....::::::::::::.:::.Commissioner Precinct ~/2 Ches. A. Molter.. .Commissioner Precinct y3 i Lee Coff ..........................Commission e* Precinct ,d4 Earl Garrett ......................Sheriff end Lawrence Stephens ......................County Clerk end the court having been reconvened for the primary purpose oP discussing a bond issue when taken in connection with House Bill #10~, which authorizes the several counties oP this State to levy, assess and collect sd valorem taxes upon ell property for County purpo sea ea cept the first $3,000.00 value of residence homestead, not to exceed 3U~ on each $100.00 valu- ation, provided the revenue there Prom should be used fo^ the construction and me intenance oP Farm-to-90arket end lateral road or for flood control. After thorough consideration, the court decided to let the tez pe yers decide by petltlon oP lcr,4 of the quelifled property tea paying voters, as shown by the returns of the last general election. -o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o- No. 5035. AGREEA~NT WITH THE STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTEaErIT FOR THE ERECTION OF CATTLE CUAFmS FOR FM X1341. This the 22nd day of Jen eery, A. D, 1951, it is so o^dered, adjudged end decreed by the court Lhet Ke^r County enter into the foregoing agreement with the State Highway Depsrt- went for the erection of five cattle gusrda located on FM Hwy j/1341, which agreement is es follows to-wit: "Control 1135-3-1 F. M. Hwy. 1341 K6rr COUnty STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF TRAY I3 THIS AGREEE~NT, made this 22nd day of January, 1951 by end between Kerr County, Teaea, hereinafter called the "County", Party of the First Fa*t, acting by end through its Com- misaionera' Court end the State of Texea, party of the Second Pert, acting by end through Sts State Highway Engineer. WHEREAS, the County has requested the State to Seclude in its plans the installation of five (5) cattle guards located on F. M. Highway 1341 end the State has agreed to this on condition that the County will ^e imburse the State fo^ the total cost thereof, end WHEREAS, the County is to pay Lhe total Coet of the construction of these cattle S/~ gusrda including engineering end contengen ci ee items eed it is estimated the County's share ~ of the cost of this improvement is Four Thousand Dolls^s ($4,000.00). NOW, THEREFORE, St is understood that this proposed work will be constructed in eccord- ante with the plans, end the County will transmit to the State, with the return of this agreement executed by the County, a werrnnt made payable Lo the State Treasurer Account oP Trust Fund No. 163 in the emo ant of Four Tho us end Dollera ($4,000.00) to be used in pe ying Por the proposed work conaisting oP the installation of five (5) cattle gusrda located on F. M. Highway 1341. It is further ~nd~*stood that the State will construct only those items Por the County which ere included in the plena end all other work required by the County end not included in the plans will be constructed by the County end the entire cost of such work will be borne by the County. IP upon receipt of bids by the State end/or the actual construction or approved changes in the contemplated improvements, SL is found that Lhls amount is ins ufficlent to pay the County's portion, than the County upon request oY the State will forthwith supplement this amount by an amount equal to the County's Pull share of the cost of Lhis work lase the amount previously paid to the State. Sn the event the amount ee paid to the State is mo^e than the actual coat, then the eaceas amount will be returned to the County, Zt Sa understood that the work to be done on behalf of the County ae herein provided will include the coat of engineering and contengen ties items. IN TESTIBaONY WHEREOF, the pe rues hereto nave caused these presents to be executed