oonseoutive xseka in the offio Sal mewepaper of Kerr County, ea required by lax.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
R0. 9282 READING AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
', Thie the 8th day of Ootobsr, 1962 the Court unaaimouely approved the reading of the MSnu
of Commiaeioners~ Court of Kerr County, Texas, from page 566 thru 572, oa motion duly made by
Commissioner Bartel and aeaonded by Commiaeiowr Sohwethelm.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
9283 TRANSFER OF $2500.00 FROM GENERAL TO OFFICERS SALARY FVND
Oa Lhis the 8th day of Ootober, 1962 after motion "dply made and ssoonded by Commisnionera
Bartel and Sohvethelm, the Court unanimously approved thaC the sum of $2500.00 be transferred
Prom General to Oifioera Salary Fund and that the Clerk and Treasurer bs direoted to make the
above Iran sfer on their records.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o
N0. 9264 APPORTIONMENT OF $5000.00 FROM ROAD do ffiiIDGE FUND
This the 8th day of Ootober, 1962 after motion by Commiaeiowr Stone, aeoondsd by Co:mnia-
sioner Sohwethelm and approved by the Court. that the County Clerk and Treasurer be, and are
hereby direoted to apportion the following amounts out of Road & Bridge Fund to the following
Commiasionerr~ Preoinote as followai
Road k Bridge No. 1 $1700.00
Road do Bridge No. 2 900:00
Road & Bridge No. 800.00
Road k ffi~Sflge No. fj 1600.00
o-o-o-o-O-p-O
COURT.ADJADRSED at 4130 0~olook on Oatober 8, 1962
o-o-o-o-o-o-o
is the Diatriot Court Room
COURT CONVENED IN SPECIAL SESSION on October 26th, 1%2 at 9500 o block a.m.,/with Judge
Julius R. Nevnhoffer and Comniseioners Sahwethelm, Bartel and Stow present, for the purpose
of hearing the petition filed on September $4.th, 1962 for the creation of Kerr County Watsr
Control & Improvement 9letriot No. 1, pursuant to notice issued as of same date. Following
Sa the letter from the law firm of Gib non, Spenos k Gibaoa of Austin, Tsxae dated October 23rd
1962: ~
Law Offices
GIBBON, SPENCS k GIBBON
Capital National Baak Bldg
Austin 1;.Texas
Ron. Julius Neunhoffer Ootobsr 23, 1962
County Judge, Kerr County
Kerrville, Rexaa
Dear Judge NeuahoPfer:
Inaeowch ae it appears. that cones derable opposition has developed amongst the property
owners xlthin tho proposed Kerr Covnty Water Control and Improvement Distriot No. 1, the oom-
mittee representing the petitioners has decided that a hearing oa the matter might xell result
is some controversies arising at the hearing that Would not be in the Sate re et of the aommunit
For that reason, the committee has instructed me to request the Commiss lows Court to deny th
petition at the hearing sat Por Friday, October 26th, ae the petitioners do not Pssl that the
district oould be suco sea 11:1 even if oreated in the Enos of the oppoe it ion that appears to hav
develops d.
We therefore formally requs at the Co}mnlaeioners Court to deny the petition which we filed "'
with you oa September 2;, 1962, or to take euoh other action ae the Court deems exps dient. We
will not be present at the hearing Ln support of the petition.
Thanking you for your courts eie a'in the matter, we are
Yours vary truly,
j JPG:EGS /s/ Gibaoa. 3penos. Gibson