.[~l=en's hio. ~~~..., t~.1i37`[LYLCd'L.LiJ'I'I cri~ tYar;or i•:~•F1~s'L t..c~L.i.r...: i.. "rcii~~r i~•Ic;. 2i°;ia r. ~Ftfrp~rovaa, ut~ f:c>vi=_>io'n=_: of i~li.r~crr G1at and Fte-.F~lai': t.J i"fJ f3"f i:.'..L StS 1':,1 .. ll_i:i Ll fl'C. I::.1l~:L iiE P"'f'} .... agEmcia :i~tc>rn w<:~~~ d:i.=.>c~_[=_~e>r::•d, i:;ou"r'C: .'.o ~_ .. irr'ab.iert"~ wizi~; J.,aL.Jrt u"rn~~=r .'.L,~tie;, ~~~r;n it sha.ti. ~r'en~~aa.r; 'cP'~ia san;cs:.. COMMISSIONERS' COURT AGENDA REQUEST "PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND FIVE COPIES OF THIS REQUEST AND DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE COURT MADE BY: Franklin Johnston. P.E. MEETING DATE: October 14 1997 OFFICE: Road & Bridge Department TIME PREFERRED: SUBJECT:(PLEASE BE SPECIFIC): Clarification of Minor Replat Court Order # 21586 EXECUTIVE SESSION REQUESTED: YES NO XX PLEASE STATE REASON: Clarification of Court Order # 21586 ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION: 10 minutes PERSONNEL MATTER -NAME OF EMPLOYEE: NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT: Franklin Johnston. P.E. Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter is posted in accordance with Title 5, Chapters 551 & 552 of the Government Code is as follows. Meetings held on first Monday: 5:00 P. M. previous Tuesday Meetings held on Thursdays: 5:00 P. M. previous Thursday THIS REQUEST RECEIVED BY: THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON: All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judges Office to determine if adequate information has been prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of Court meetings. Your cooperation will be appreciated and contribute towards your request being addressed at the earliest opportunity. See Agenda Request Guidelines. •-- 4P10 San Antonio Hwy. Kerrville, TX 78028 .... IEg®~Qll ~ I~>rn~l~c~ ~zs30) 257-2993 FAX (830) 896-8481 TO: Commissioners' Court FROM: Franklin Johnston, P.E. DATE: October 14, 1997 RE: Clarification to Minor Replat Order # 21586 1. Clarification of one question in Minor Replat Order # 21586 and that is: Does this apply to lots in ETJ or only lots outside ETJ.? 2. I thought it applied only to outside ETJ Subdivision, however there is some confusion the way it is outlined in the Court Order. I thought the Minor Plat is specified in # 1 & #2, (Court Order attached) and # 3 gives conditions to #1 & #2. Other interpret it differently. Clarification please. ,~' _ I\~, ORDL'-:(: NO. c.:.33E AF'F'RUVAL OFT REVI`_-ilOfdS ~OF MINOR F'LRT ra~)u Rr-:r-'L.r-~r oRnER ~t ~ IsaE <,- On this L-he ;_7i:h d,ay of Se~ptemher 1994, upon motion made by Commissioner Hole)«mp, seconded by Commissioner Lehman, the Co~_r r•t unanimously approved by a vote of 3-0-0, to r-evise Order• No. ._1686 to t•ead as follows: Order No. 215Q6 AF'F'RUVRL OF REVISIONS OF MINOR FLAT AND RC: F>I_ia'1' C7RDER #21SB6 On this the c7th day of September 1994, upon motion made by Commissioner Hulekamp, seconded by Commissioner Lehman, the Court unanimoi.rsly approved by a vote of ~_a-0, to the revisions as follows: 1, Combining lots to make one larger lot. Adj~sstmcnt of property lines between two lots or other F"" items to maF Does not involve constr~_retion mf a p~_rblic water systerti, c) Not adiaeent to State Higt,way which requires Texas Department 'of Transportation approval, c;) Does nut req~.rire the constr~.rction of drainage ways, or drainage strut^t~_n•es, ~ ~) Lots, ~~i,e,l.l he rtiir~i.m~.rm of .:..v acres, '~) and coca) p1~ct shall greet all other- req~_rirements of i;et-r' Cu~_rnty S~_rhdivisions R~_rles and Regulations. ,. Tl;a aGoce mrmt xoneci F'l:ats shall he Imown as "MINOR FLATS OP. RF=RLATS" and m~~y be a{?proved by the County Enyineer^, County Ei~v irenmenCal He.aitt, CJ i'i'icer, anti Commissioner of the F'r ec in~_+. and recorded ~~r::i:t'~o~,rt: a~ tiurr by the Conuni.se.iuners+ Co'.rrt.