ORDER NO. 19944 APPROVAL FOR THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATIt7N TO PURSl.1E INDIAN CREEK BRIDGE AS A BRIDGE RELOCATION RATHER THAN A BRIDGE REHABIt..ITATION PROGRAM AND TO PLACE INDIAN CREEK BRIDGE AHEAD OF LANE VALLEY BRIDGE FOR COMPLETION On this the 13th day of November 1990, upon motion made by Commissioner Baldwin, seconded by Commissioner Ray, the Court unanimously approved by a vote of 5-0-0 to apprc,ve the State Department of }{ighways and Publir_ Transportation to pursue Indian Creel: Bridge as a bridge relocation rather than a bridge rehabilitation program and to place Indian Creek Bridge ahead of Lane Valley Bridge for completion. County .Judge Edwards is to notify the Highway Department in writing of the Court's decision. • PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND SEVEN COPIES OF THIS REQUEST AND DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE COURT. MADE BY: Gerry Menefee OFFICE: County Engineer MEETING DATE November 13, 1990 SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC): Program. TIME PREFERRED: Consideration and discussion of Off-system Bridge ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION: IF PERSONNEL MATTER -NAME OF EMPLOYEE: NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT Bill Tucker -Highway Department Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter Is posted In accordance with Article 6252-1 7 is as follows: • Meetings held on second Monday: 12:00 P. M. previous Wednesday • Meetings held on Thursdays: 5:00 P. M. previous Thursday. If preferable, Agenda Requests may be made on office stationery with the above information attached. THIS REQUEST RECEIVED BY: THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON LR 11-7-90 @ 9:30 a.m. All. Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine If adequate Information has been prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of Court meetings. Your cooperation will be appreciated and contribute towards your request being addressed at the earliest opportunity. COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ENGINEER-DIRECTOR AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION R. E. ST0T2ER, JR., P.E. ROBERT H. DEDMAN, CHAIRMAN RAY STOKER, JR. P • O. BOX 951 WAYNE B. DUDOLESTEN Kerrville, Texas 78029-0951 November 13, 1990 Hon. Danny Edwards Kerr County Judge Kerr County Courthouse Kerrville, Texas 78028 Subject: Indian Creek Bridge Relocation Dear Judge Edwards: IN REPLY REFER TO: This letter is to inform you of our proposal to relocate Indian Creek Bridge at the Guadalupe River crossing. The condition of the existing bridge is such that rehabilization is not practical and replacement of the bridge is preferred. The proposed aligranent will enable the existing damn to remain in place. In accordance with the criteria of the Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program, any additional approach road work in excess of 150 ft. fran the ends of the bridge shall be 100$ funded by the participating county. Below is a breakdown of the estimated county cost for this project. 20$ of Bridge Construction Costs $ 114,700.00 100 of Additional Approach Read $ 17,000.00 ± 0.6 Ac. Right of Way @ Prevailing Costs If the County approves of this relocation and wishes to pursue this project as a bridge relocation rather than the bridge rehabilitation project, please send us a written confirniation so we may forward this information to our Austin Office. If you have any questions or require further information concerning this matter, please contact us at the Kerrville Office. Sincerely, ff g/~~ /~ uc.Gv,} DGH:jb cc: Leroy A. Surtees, Jr., P.E. cc: County Commissioner Precinct 1 cc: County Commissioner Precinct 2 cc: County Cc[t[nissioner Precinct 3 cc: County CcamlLissioner Precinct 4 cc: Clerk of Kerr County Court Bill M. Tucker, P . E . ddr ~y'~~ Supv. Resident Engineer STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ,; ,.~~ _.~, ~ ,_. ~ '~~~i ., .~~~;r~'i~yJ ~', ;~ 7~i;~ ~:11 E~c~(;"(i`._C:; ~ €. n,S 7829-Q9~1 Clerk of Kexr C~ur~t~r Court WPP C 0 `tia r ~ { ~ fl ?~ X ~S DANNY R. EDWARDS COUNTY JUDGE, KERR COUNTY KERRVILLE, TEXAS 78028 PHONE; 512.257.8711 November 14, 1990 Mr. Bill M. Tucker, P.E. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation P. O. Box 951 Kerrville, Texas 78029-0951 Re: Indian Creek Bridge Relocation Dear M r. Tucker: Thank you for your informative appearance before Commissioners' Court on November 13, 1990 relative to the captioned project. As you heard, after due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that we should proceed on the project as outlined by you. We understand that you will proceed on this project as a bridge relocation rather than a bridge rehabilitation project. Also, it is our understanding that you will plate the Indian .Creek project as a first priority as to the other projects pending in Kerr County. We would prefer to see it given preference under the circumstances. Thank you for your attention and consideration in this matter and if I can be of further assistance, please advise. Sincerely, ~lcJGws~'`~ DAN R. EDWARDS County Judge DRE/lr ~Il ~ 3E1 ~III.r71L.1-=-~ a " Jr- w .r ~ .r ar w rs r •~~ ~_ .~.~ I4 'fYM I •tEx~s ;~~ LACATION (SEE ATTACH® t4AP ) CUUN~t"Y /~~' /' /" HIGHWAY C /~ /S CS1 LEf~"1f! ~ MI TAJ~FT~'IC AI)T 1 .I: ill. ~•. r~i 1~ MII ~~~ s~..._......C_~~~..~._... ~,1~..,..._.z,_:. RECONSTRUCT EXISTING ( ) NEW LOCATION (}~ EXIST ROW WIDTH ET LAYMJ~td'S 1)FSCRI PTI Ot. _ ~_~ - _/----` - - - _ ~ . OF Pf~P0.`iCD wl7RK ~OnS~rC/G ~" ~L' ~ fir/ c~'9e ~' A,~~r"oachPs EXISTING IMPROVEMEtITS PROJL•'CP OOST GRADIt~ .............................. S . (D , OSQ~ SMALL DRAINAGE 5"I'RUCT ................ $ , , LARGE DR~'1INJIGE STRUCT (Span 6 Culv).. $ ~ , ~ , J ~RAnI' Sf:PARATIONS (F3RIDGES).......... $ >3r~~r ................................. S . 40 `~ ~ s~~tzr• AcE .............................. S / , 87v . SU0-TORIAL ................ $ , /.,3 , [o ZD• ?s . Pr'c ~r m, ~ Con 5 t ~~ 3~t E & C........... S .~ •.~G~~. ________________~___==-=====cans=ssass==saa=="=° .GRAND 'ITAL ................................ $ , 17,Da O• ROW Ot~ST ................................... $ , , PREI'ARFD ~/~~ ~' /~ , ~~ 90 Py -a~ ~ ~~ ,~~ ~~ RESIDENT' ENGINEER hTIGR NO ------=~ ~ ~ y OA-8Q ~ /`02 c/~.cJ ~/ - ~Oc ~~, = /~ o~ ° //4; ° °-- .~ ~/7~D .~ 0 ~` ~4 ~ ', ~~ , ~~~~ Co~~'~y P~r~~crpa;~ion Q~ ~1 ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~C ~; ~ , ~~ /SJ <-f~ `~ I 1 f~f Lr~ e ~ ~.. i ~~ 0 ~ ' \ \ \ ~~~ ~ we D`~˘~~ { ~``""~ ~'" r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rvP ~9 ,_ ~ P~ 5.~8°?'0 ~ ~~~ ~,~~ ~ = ~' _ ~~ I~~~~ ~~ ~ f ~ ~ ~~~ ~ N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 0~' o~ ~ ~, _ , ~ ~ ~ ~~ ro ~~ ,~ ` 3 ~.. 5 ~. ' ~. ~l ~ `~ ; ~' ~ ~ S ,.. r `~°GV ; ` < <,7e . ~ .` f ~J i ~~ E ~ (; N~fi S,ab ,r 'A = ~~ c , i ~~ ,~ v ~ ,o ~~ ~ < ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ,~ ~ ~ '' ~o, ° c~ ~r~~, ~ ~; `~ ~ ~r~i .7 C~~C~ 1,' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~- \ C'~~5~'~ 6r-~d 9~ ?~. 70 ~ ~ `' ,~ „ f Roa`~'"`~Y ~~ - o - ,_ -.,~ ~- t~a~~ ,-off a f ~- r o . ~~ a~ a, ``~~_ /_ ' .,----~ '. o ~ 40l , o /UG Sf QQ2 , ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `7 lVf f,~ L, ~a ~ d i x _ -" a ... y " ~ _ SECTION EXISTINGA„ A ° 1 ~ .- 0 ~ ~,oa~~aY' °~ ~'` 0 V I - 4" ~- ` - - ~~ ~ '~`~ a aa3 `a _1-- ~c˘ru~t '~ ~~an~ I .~ ,I / 7 ,' _= ~ ,- ~~a-~ " ~ SECTION EX1SI,I,N ~,~ B ~~ n 1~ ~~ ~`~,+. ~` n ~~~~ ~~~~. d~3-, S ~0 n 5 a ~D~ ~~ti ~~ ~~~ ~~~ '~ ^2 u f 3 ~'a~o ~!a'~' QQ(~9e ~~ ter, '~~ U ,~ .,' 'P~(. ~ ~i ~, ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ , CaKe m ~ g,-a Ole ~,~ `~~ "' ~~~ l ~ ~ ~~ .~ ~~ h~ ~~ w~ ~~I ~l \\ scatE ,,. , so' BRIDGE OFF-STATE SYSTEM LAYOUT MENT 4F COUNT ADA~UPE RNER REPL CREEK ROR ~ o A TY~U ~~NpIAN ~~ r~r ~5 > k k~`~ f}Ct. _.....-- /'OrJt~ft~! ~ i''~ r~^~".. .,~----^ .~,,,"'"~~ 1. 1 1 ~t ~' ~ ~ ~°ad ~r~~~ ~a, ~ ~ ~ C° Ool 15 ~ i;'ndt~ D aA ,R rX a~-~~r~P~ I~~'~~ r i+re ~ MgC ,, 2~~l~ l~f"0 o u Clear ~ w, y ~~ G~ i ~h ~ ~ tiera . ' tr Wrd D ' _ G. J ~3 ~ 2 f ~~.~{ . ` Ra~'~~Q~ -~Xl~ t~'r Y 7g 0 ,~ l ~,~ ' ~oS˘i,~~ ~ ~a~ `~~ ` to 1 `q ,, W ~~, ~ /5( ~1 ~~~r~~ ti jnCl~~ ~' °P ;' _DOZ 33.,aq 0`~~ e R~ i1 e~ C l~f~~~,ada'~ g~~2'xt~, ~~~~ ~~ ~'~ ~~w~' - ;` ~,~0 ~'~~arl, ~,~,j~~h . l`~, -a ~ ~ .tort 'Na ~po~t'~g ~c~° `J~n ek' R~, ~a ~~,Y ~~ ~,~ ;; re _~G3 ~~ ~ ,~;upP ~m Soa~'S~ ~, , ~ ~ ~~, 0 9 9 , ~ ,, X ~~ S ~~~ ~ ~ , , ~,1,~~~h , ~,~ , D .~ ' ~ ~a ~, ng ~! Z ~- t t y Ra t; ~9 !r~ ~/~~' ~~ ~ ~ ~`b ~45"~' ~~ r' 0 0 I, ~ I .~ f ~~ 1 '~ ~ i ~, r~ ,. ~ ~. ~~~ , ~.. ~- ~ `t~~- ~, ~~,,~~ ~. 1 ~~, ~~ ~~, ~, ~~ ~ App~~v51n Subject. to I ~ „Prglim~narY " ~, ,. /- r ~ Y >> \~ i~ `c t 2 ~, tio. c, ~~ ~~}~- c~ ~~ ~. ,~r~n~ ,~~,~, ~~ ~- ~x~~ „a,,co~ ~,r, ~u