ORDER N0. 19944
APPROVAL FOR THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TO PURSUE INDIAN CREEK BRIDGE
AS A BRIDGE RELOCATION RATHER THAN A BRIDGE REHABILITATION
PROGRAM AND TO PLACE INDIAN CREEK BRIDGE AHEAD OF LANE
VALLEY BRIDGE FOR COMPLETION
On this the 13th day of November 1990, upon motion made by
Commissioner Baldwin, seconded by Commissioner Ray, the Court
unanimously approved by a vote of 5-0-0 to approve the State
Department of Highways and Public Transportation to pursue
Indian Creek Bridge as a bridge relocation rattler than a
bridge rehabilitation program and to place Indian Creek
Bridge ahead of Lane Valley Bridge for completion. County
Judge Edwards is to notify the Highway Department in writing
of the Court's decision.
• PI FASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND SEVEN COPIES OF THIS REQUEST AN DOCUMENTS
TO BE REVIEWED BY THE COURT_
MADE BY: Gerry Menefee
MEETING DATE:
November 13, 1990
OFFICE: County Engineer
TIME PREFERRED:
SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC): Consideration and discussion of Off-system Bridge
Program.
ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION:
IF PERSONNEL MATTER -NAME OF EMPLOYEE:
NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT:
Bill Tucker -Highway Department
Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter Is posted in
accordance with Article 6252- t 7 is as fol lows:
• Meetings held on second Monday: 12:00 P. M. previous Wednesday
• Meetings held on Thursdays: 5:00 P. M. previous Thursday.
If preferable, Agenda Requests may be made on office stationery with the above
infprmatlon attached.
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED 8Y:
LR
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON: 11-7-90 p 9:30 a.m.
All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine If
adequate Information has been prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at
time of Court meetings. Your cooperation will be appreciated and contribute towards
your request being addressed at the earliest opportunity.

COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ENGINEER-DIRECTOR
ROBERT H. OEDMAN, CHAIRMAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION R. E. STOTZER, JR., P.E.
RAY STOKER, JR. P • O • BOX 951
WAYNE 8. DUDOLESTEN Kerrville, Texas 78029-0951
November 13, 1990
Hon. Danny Edwards
Kerr County Judge
Kerr County Courthouse
Kerrville, Texas 78028
IN REPLY REFER TO:
Subject: Indian Creek Bridge Relocation
.~
Dear Judge Edwards:
This letter is to inform you of our proposal to relocate Indian Creek
Bridge at the Cliadalupe River crossing. The wndition of the existing
bridge is such that rehabilization is not practical and replaoanent of
the bridge is preferred. The proposed aligrmnent will enable the existing
dam to remain in place.
In aco~rdance with the criteria of the Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation
Program, any additional approach road work in excess of 150 ft. fran the
ends of the bridge shall be 100$ funded by the participating county. Belaw
is a breakdown of the estimated county cost for this project.
20~ of Bridge Construction Costs $ 114,700.00
100$ of Additional Approach Road $ 17,000.00
± 0.6 Ac. Right of Way @ Prevailing Costs
If the County approves of this relocation and wishes to pursue this project
as a bridge relocation rather than the bridge rehabilitation project, please
send us a written confirmation so we may forward this information to our
Austin Office.
If you have any questions or require further information concerning this
matter, please contact us at the Kerrville Office.
Sincerely,
g, l/, r!'I. T~,~~
DGH:jb
oc: Leroy A. Surtees, Jr., P.E.
cc: County Commissioner Precinct 1
cc: County Coinnissioner Precinct 2
cc: County Catmissioner Precinct 3
cc: County Commissioner Precinct 4
cc: Clerk of Kerr County Court
Bill M. Tucker, P.E. bdr~
Supv. Resident Engineer
~., ~A C.~
~ ,z tia
~~~~• v
f!X-~~
DANNY R. EDWARDS
COUNTY JUDGE, KERR COUNTY
KERRVIILE, TEXAS 78026
PHONE: 512.267.8711
November 14, 1990
Mr. Bil! M. Tucker, P.E.
State Department of Highways & Public Transportation
P. O. Box 951
Kerrville, Texas 78029-0951
Re: Indian Creek Bridge Relocation
Dear Mr. Tucker:
.,
Thank you for your informative appearance before Commissioners' Court on
November 13, 1990 relative to the captioned project.
As you heard, after due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that we
should proceed on the project as outlined by you. We understand that you
will proceed on this project as a bridge relocation rather than a bridge
rehabilitation project.
Also, it is our understanding that you wilt plate the Indian Creek project
as a first priority as to the other projects pending in Kerr County. We
would prefer to see it given preference under the circumstances.
Thank you for your attention and consideration in this matter and if I can
be of further assistance, please advise.
Sincerely,
~G~
DAN R. EDWARDS
County Judge
DRE/Ir
/~ ~ E1 ~A.A Q..f Ala " /r ~w • v .r ... w .o ~.
,~.u I
v 'TEXAS jR~ I
LOCATION (SEE ATTACHED MAP)
rr.~ ~w .i1 aA ~ " ~ A Jr ~ ~ri1
C(xJN'1'Y / c' /' ~ `
HIGHWAY ~ ~ l s l
CS1
L~~,'1?i .~..~.~ MI
TRI~FFIC 110T
S- rn~. a'~ ~.
REOONSTRUCT EXISTING ( } NEW LOCATION ~ EXIST NOW WIO'IH FT
LAYf•7T1t•1' S t)RSCR I PTI Oi. _ ` ~ ~"[./ G ~ /Yeti D r/ _lQ e
OF PROPOGED SabRK C'an~ _ /, C7
-~
~' ,9~0~ ~o a c h e s
EXISTING IMPROVEhIEtITS
PROJi;'CT CAST
GRADItJG .............................. S . [O ,USD.
SMALL DRAINAGE S"I'ItUCT ................ S . , .. •
LARGE DRAINAGE STRUCT (Span b Culy}.. $ ~ , ~ ,
, r
CRAn(: St:['ARATIONS (ARIDGES).......... S . . •
rsn~;r ................................. S ~-, 44 b
.,
st;Itr•1,cE .............................. s I ,87Q
MoaIL = ~ ....................... s .940.
SUB-TOTAL ................ S . /3 , [o ZQ
~ ~ Co r S ~r• ~• E & C........... S , .~ . ~o ~.
Pry ~ m,
• ___======az...._saa===s.am.:zsexns=aa===:aa=n~a=
GRAND TQTAL ............................•.... $ . ~ 1•Q~ ~•
• ROW COST ................................... S , ~ •
~RC~~x~ ~~Pp ~ /~ , ~~90 DSO
---~ r
~y ,_.,; ~ ~ ,~,~ ~ ~_. RESIDENT ENGINEER t°PJGR NO
--~
~C'2 ~y.~s ~~ 08-$Q
~~ av o
~Oo ~..+ i
~~
/~ ~