C)F"t1~L=rt P~lO. ~a'!C~~'c'
Cl! ~~=fil.ii•IG i1F- i'• ~.;i~; ;.C;I-: i 4!l) J'f fa f''<i'-iTi:)It''•~' '--!_~>~!f'i=ii~~1~tJ~S
i.'Ti .;i17.'. t~F?-. i':;`~~~1 f~iii'}' U1" I.JC-'~:Ci~:l_?'rte ' C'Ci} ~ _.j}C~i'Y "Ir?t 1GTl tpciCjE '-~'
~._ :!'i';iS... Qi'i~2: i'~0~.~'i;:~rlf:l~ ':il?l=t~Tlr'!f_'Cj t)1J ,C~i'lnl'.:~'-.,].!~T'~F?Y ~f1}'~3T1~ _`'r
~r-t unanimously approved by a vote of 4-0-0, t`~a ha~P R~-~.~.ci
~~T~,ca Isrir.,3e ::?e[_af„4-nent• +-~r~c) t.h~ C=.oi_tnty El~.fd~.tor- r-c>~~ i~w ~;he try ~~_.
d i~ ~ C i l ?l E ~ i?. ! =' ~+. L iJ i' I" i i_~ (~ O i_l T".`, ~ + i '~' Fl .a T'1 0 4 ? 1. Tl )_ iJ Tl O 'f- ~ ll C^ f"i Y" E~ V 1 B W .
MEMORANDUM
TO: Commissioner's Court
FROl12 Leonard Odom, Jr., Road Administrator
DATE: November 4, 1991
RE Recommendation for Purchase of Rollers
The Court received two bids for the purchase of the smooth drum roller.
The Dresser roller bid of $25,000.00 was lower than that of the Hyster,
however, the only common factor in the two machines is the size of the drums.
The Dresser roller is out of specifications for the following reasons:
1. Weight -lighter machine by 8%
2. Fly wheel H.P. -under Hyster by 34%
3. Peak Torque -under torque by 27%
~' 4. Maneuverability is less w/hoses sticking out of side, also maintenance
on hoses are higher. To replace any one hose requires 10' of line. No
modification changes on these hoses has been done for the last 10-15
years.
5. No compatibility w/other machine as for as parts and filters.
Defeating purpose of standardization of equipment and making it easier
to have parts available.
6. Waukesha Pearce never looked at specs. They found out we were
bidding 66" drum and they bid the only one they had in their rental fleet
which was in Houston. Salesman has never seen the unit. Salesman did
not know what year model it was.
7. The only one around in this areas for me to look at was in Boerne and
they use it essentially in the static mode to roll in the seal coat. It is
not used as we intend to use it.
$ . It has a maintenance problem with grommets due to its design.
._ Therefore, it is my recommendation to accept the bid from Anderson
Equipment for both units for a total price of $71,640.00.
ANDERSON MACHINERY SAN ANTONIO, iNC.
P.O. BOX 200380 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78220.0380 PHONE 512-861.2368 FAX 512.681.4971
October 24, 1991
County of Kerr
700 Main
Kerrville, Texas 78028
Honorable Commissioners' Court:
Anderson Machinery Company is pleased to offer the following machinery
for your consideration.
One (1) Hyster Model C830 Vibratory Soil Compactor S/N 1644 5 "`"O`~"`~
with all attached equipment.
Net Bid Price F.O.B...Kerrville, Texas ................$38,880.00
One (1) Hyster Model C832 Vibratory Tamping Soil Compactor ~„r'~_P ~z4',
p S/N 1522 with all attached equipment.
Net Bid Price F.O.B...Kerrville, Texas ................$32,760.00
Total cost for two (2) rollers ........................$71,640.00
Thank your for giving us the opportunity to quote on your equipment
needs.
S~ ely, ,~ ,
r
•' Bob Clark
Sales Representative
Anderson Machinery Company
BC/ph
enc.