ORGER N0. 20069 APPROVAL OF HIRING THE FIRM OF ALLISON & ASSOCIATES, AUSTIN, TEXAS, TO PREPARE THE REDISTRICTING OF KERR COUNTY, TEXAS On this the 24th day of January 1991, upon motion made by Commissioner Holekamp, seconded by Commissioner Oehler, the Court unanimously approved by a vote of 4-0-0 to hire the firm of Allison & Associates, Austin, Texas, to prepare the redistricting of Kerr County, Texas. i ,. JAMES P. ALLISON ALLISON 8z ASSOCIATE„ c at WAHRENEERGER HOVSE 2OH WEST 14TH .STREET t~US7'IN. TEXAS '78701 1612) d82-0701 FAX: (618) 480-I1a(12 January 8, 1991 Hon. W. G. Stacy Kerr County 3udge Kerr County Courthouse Kerrville, TX 78028 RE: REDISTRICTING Dear Judge Stacy: JAN ~ ~ t99t CAREY B. BOETHHL Roeear T. Bwss DAVID C. PAYNC C. RE% HALL..)R. Following our meeting with the Commissioners Court, we have reviewed the recent mapping work performed on behalf of Kerr County. The use of these documents will expedite the redistricting effort. Therefore, we can offer our services for redistricting for Kerr County at a reduced rate. We propose discounting $1,500.00 off the total fee, thus making the total for all services to be performed by Allison & Associates $13,500.00. _ As .you. will recall, our written offer will provide all services necessary to complete this project and obtain all necessary approval by the U.S. Justice Department. If our offer is acceptable to the Commissioners Court, please sign this letter and return it to me in the enclosed, self-addressed envelope. Upon receipt of this authorization letter, our staff will begin work on this project. Thank you for. the opportunity to serve you. sincerely, ~ /a~s.,r,~ G~ Gam. ~_ DANES P. ALLISON Hon. W. G. Stacy Kerr County .Judge , PEDIS T:karr.01 ~nMMISSIONERS' COURT AGENDA REQUEST • PI Fn~F FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND SEVEN COPIES OF THIS REOUESTAND DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE COURT. MADE BY: Gordon Morean MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC): for re-district OFFICE: (lommi csi oner Prt 1 TIME PREFERRED: ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION: IF PERSONNEL MATTER -NAME OF EMPLOYEE: NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT: ,,~ ,- ~ ~`_~ ~9r~z/it, ~~~n' Commissioner Pct. 1 Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter Is posted In accordance with Article 6252- t 7 Is as fol lows: • Meetings held on second Monday: 12:00 P. M. previous Wednesday • Meetings held on Thursdays: 5:00 P. M. previous Thursday. If preferable, Agenda Requests may be made on office stationery with the above Information attached. THIS REQUEST RECEIVED BY: THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON: All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine If adequate information has been prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of Court meetings. Your cooperation will be appreciated and contribute towards your request being addressed at the earliest opportunity. oi~Ex No. 20069 APPFmVAL OF HIRING THE FIRri OF ALLISON & ASSOCIATES, AUSTIII, TEXAS, TO PREPARE THE REDISTRiCTPidG OF KERR COLRVTY, T^r.XAS January 24, 1991 Vol. S, Pg. 124 ALLISrr//O+~N & ASSOCIATES UG~Ile~w~'r6~~. WARRSNSERO&R $OL:BS 208 WEST 141H AveTIIV. TEZwe 78701 ~~ ~~1 F.:. cm~ aeo~ouon ' KERR COUNTY, TEXAS -CURRENT I9 Lt h1E:ER DF F:EGISTEFCED VOT'EFiS ' AS OF JANUARY 1, 1991 VDTERS.... Precinct ..................... Count .. Sub-Total for Precinct 1 521 2 , .ua- o-a or resin,, ,o e+ l E' Suh-Total for Fre~-inr_t 4 184 9 ~ .u ~- o a or recant 1 _ Suk~-Total for Fre~~inct 6 2,78t~ „' Suk~-Total for Fre~_inct 7 53[+ 15. ,e ~ Suh-Total for -Frecinc£ -8 -~-3~ v ,e~ Suh-Total for Precinct zi ~r8 o~ ~; Suh-Total for Precinct i~~ 174 Suk~-Total fer Frei=inct 12 l,r.+58 Suk~-Total for Precinct 13 1,4~?8 nc SuY.~-Total for Precinct 15 2,192 , Suh-Total. for Precinct 16 s 2,359 su ~- a a or recin~- Suh-Total for Precinct 18 ., ~+ 963 Total Nurnher of Re~3istereci Voters 2r?,ci33 i f i COMMISSIONER MORGAN #1 Prcts. 1 Kerrville Municipal Auditorium 7 Turtle Creek School 13 Mt. Wesley Chapel 18 Trinity Baptist Church No. Registered Voters as of 1-1-91 2,521 530 1,408 963 COMMISSIONER LACKEY #2 2 First Bapt. Church, Center Point 1,310 11 Motley Hills Baptist Church 1,340 15 Hill County Youth Exh. Center 2,192 COMMISSIONER HOLEKAMP #3 3 Cypress Community Center 8 Lane Valley School 12 Kerrville Apostolic Church 19 Calvary Baptist Church 17 Zion Lutheran Church COMMISSIONER OEHLER #9 4 Sunset Baptist Church 5 Hunt School 6 Point Theatre (HCAF) 9 Divide Presbyterian Church 10 Midway Store 16 St. Paul's United Meth. Church 230 237 1,058 948 970 180 744 2,780 98 174 2,3b0 AS OF JAN. 1, 1991 THE TOTAL REGISTERED VOTERS IN THE FOLLOWING COMMISSIONERS' PRECINCTS ARE: 1. Commissioner fdorgan #1 5,422 2. Commissioner Lackey #2 4,842 3. Commissioner Holekamp #3 3,443 4. Commissioner Oehler #4 6,326 TOTAL VOTERS 20,033 INITIAL ASSESSMENT _ OF KERR COUNTY, TEXAS - POLITICAL BOUNDARIES FOR - PURPOSES OF REAPPORTIONMENT __ By Allison & Associates Attorneys At Law The Wahrenberger House ._ 208 West 14th Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 482-0701 Voice (512) 480-0902 Fax H Table of Contents Tab 1- Initial Assessment The Initial Assessment is a narrative description of the data contained in the ® PL94-171 files provided by the Census Bureau, together with an explanation of the impact such data may have upon the County in light of state and federal law. - Tab 2-Appendix A Appendix A defines the various ratios, formula and procedures utilized in the _ analysis of county population. These ratios, formula and procedures have been largely developed in case law in the field of reapportionment, together with generally recognized methods of sociological study. Tab 3-Appendix B Appendix $ , otherwise known as the "Working File" , is a summary of each major ,_, County elective office elected from precincts. These files analyze each such elective office, i.e. the offices of County Commissioner, Justice of Peace and Constable, by election precinct. ~` In the 1990 census, election precincts are described as a Voter Tabulation Districts, or VTDs. It should be noted that the VTD is an approximation of the actual voting boundaries, since Public Law 94-171 requires that the VTD utilize -- census blocks as its component parts. In some cases, county election precincts have been drawn in prior yeazs in a manner that prevents exact duplication by census block. In these cases, the State of Texas has created, for tabulation purposes only, M what is known as a "pseudo voting district" which may vary significantly in area from the actual election precinct. In most cases, the population variance between the actual and the "pseudo" election precinct is minimal. All future election precincts should be based upon census blocks to avoid this discrepancy. Tab 4-Appendix C Appendix C is an analysis of the ethnic characteristics of the entire county population, by current Commissioners Court Precinct. This data is provided for both the entire population, regardless of age, and by voting age (18 years or above) .While "One-Person-One-Vote" balance between the four Commissioners Court °` Precincts is based upon the entire county population, the availability of voting age populations is also important in two respects. - First, each county should assess the size of existing election precincts. State law limits the size of election precincts in counties that continue to use hand counted paper ballots to not more than 2,000 voters per election precinct. Counties that have implemented a "voting system", i.e. an optical scan, punch card or other form of automated vote count system are allowed larger election precincts based upon total population. Counties with a population in excess of -- 250,000 may have election precincts of not mare than 3,000 registered voters. Counties with a population of 175,000 or more, but less than 250,000 may have 4,000 registered voters in an election precinct. Counties of less than 175,000 may have 5,000 registered voters in an election precinct. (Art. 42.06, Texas Election Code, V.A.C.S.) Second, in counties inhabited by a significant minority population, the need to create one or more Commissioners Court Precincts that assure minority representation requires utilization of voting age information. Tab 5-Appendix D Appendix D is a representation of the County population demographics in chart -- form, by Commissioners Court Precinct. Tab 6-Appendix E Appendix E contains a representation of Commissioners Court Precinct No. 1 by total population demographics and by voting age population. Tab 7-Appendix F Appendix F contains a representation of Commissioners Court Precinct No. 2 by total population demographics and by voting age population. Tab 8-Appendix G Appendix G contains a representation of Commissioners Court Precinct No. 3 by total population demographics and by voting age population. Tab 9-Appendix H Appendix H contains a representation of Commissioners Court Precinct No. 4 by total population demographics and by voting age population. Tab 10-Map 1 Map 1 depicts, in color, the four Commissioners Court Precincts in both urban and rural aspects. Each VTD component of the various Commissioners Court Precincts is also depicted. Please note that discrepancies between the actual election precinct boundaries and those of the computer based VTD may exist, as explained in the note for Appendix B. Map lA depicts population distribution county wide. Map 1B depicts population distribution in the city of Kerrville. Tab 11-Map 2 Map 2 depicts, in color, the Hispanic population by concentration across the entire county, as shown by the percentage of population in each census block. It should be noted that in some census blocks, the total population may be very small, and the resulting color shading may therefore result in some misperception of actual population totals. Correlation of the map depiction with the data contained in chart form in Appendix A-H is necessary to assure accuracy of any assumptions or projections for reapportionment purposes. All computer generated matters contained in this report, including statistical ratios or formulas, are derived from information taken directly from the Public Law 94-171 files of the United States Census Bureau. Neither Allison and Associates nor Map Resource, Inc. shall be responsible for errors which may occur in the PL94-171 data. Tab 12-Map 3 Map 3 depicts, in color, the Hispanic population by concentration in the urban areas of the county, as shown by the percentage of population in each census block. It should be noted that in some census blocks, the total population may be very small, and the resulting color shading may therefore result in some misperception of actual population totals. Correlation of the map depiction with the data contained in chart form in Appendix A-H is necessary to assure accuracy of any assumptions or projections for reapportionment purposes. All computer generated matters contained in this report, including statistical ratios or formulas, are derived from information taken directly from the Public Law 94-171 files of the United States Census Bureau. Neither Allison and Associates nor Map Resource, Inc. shall be responsible for errors which may occur in the PL94-171 data. Tab 13-Map 4 Map 4 depicts, in color, the Black or African-American population by concentration across the entire county, as shown by the percentage of population in each census block. It should be noted that in some census blocks, the total population may be small, and the resulting color shading may therefore result in some misperception of actual population totals. Correlation of the map depiction with °- the data contained in chart form in Appendix A-H is necessary to assure accuracy of any assumptions or projections for reapportionment purposes. .,. All computer generated matters contained in this report, including statistical ratios or formulas, are derived from information taken directly from the Public Law 94-171 files of the United States Census Bureau. Neither Allison and Associates nor Map Resource, Inc. shall be responsible for errors which may occur in the PL94-171 ` data. Tab 14-Map 5 ,~ Map 5 depicts, in color, the Black or African-American population by concentration in the urban areas of the county, as shown by the percentage of population in each census block. It should be noted that in some census blocks, the total population may be very small, and the resulting color shading may therefore result in some misperception of actual population totals. Correlation of the map depiction with the data contained in chart form in Appendix A-H is necessary to ~° assure accuracy of any assumptions or projections for reapportionment purposes. All computer generated matters contained in this report, including statistical _ ratios or formulas, are derived from information taken directly from the Public Law 94-171 files of the United States Census Bureau. Neither Allison and Associates nor Map Resource, Inc. shall be responsible for errors which may occur in the PL94-171 data. "' Tab 15-Map 6 Map 6 depicts the Justice of the Peace and Constable Precincts, and the _ respective VTD components of each such precinct. Reference should be made to Appendix B for demographic analysis of Justice and Constable precincts. It should be noted that these offices are not considered either "One-Person-One-Vote" offices or "representative" offices subject to Voting Rights Act analysis under either - Section 2 or 5 of that act. (42 U.S.C. 1973c) Counties are not required, therefore, to make any changes to existing justice or wnstable precincts by federal law. -• However, Article 5, Section 18 of the Texas Constitution sets population requirements for the number of justice precincts required. Each County should carefully examine the number of justice precincts required by law to determine if a reduction or expansion of existing justice/constable precincts is feasible. 1 o- a JAMES P. ALLISON ALLISON a~ ASSOCIATES ~Cla~r~nrr~ at ~ua WAHRENBERGER HOUSE 208 WEST 14TH STREET AUSTIN. TEXAS 78701 (6121482.0401 FAX:(5121480-0002 December 3 TO: COUNTY JUDGE AND VOTER REGISTRAR FROM: ALLISON & ASSOCIATES RE: DEADLINES UNDER ELECTION CODE C AREY B. BOETHEL ROBERT T. BA55 DAVID C. PAYNE C. REx HALL. Je. 1991 You should have recently received a letter from the Secretary of State regarding the obligation of your Voter Registrar to issue new voter registration certificates no later than December 6, 1991. (Art. 14.01, Texas Election Code, et seq.) Additionally, the filing period deadline for individuals seeking office in the March Primary is January 2, 1992. (Article 172.023, Texas Election Code, et seq.) Last night, the three judge panel in the U.S. District Court of Washington, D.C. refused to extend deadlines for the State of Texas elections and additionally refused to consider the revised House of Representative plan submitted by Attorney General Morales. This decision casts severe doubt upon the ability of the State to hold elections in March. The resolution of this situation will not be known for some time. A portion of the requested relief was the extension of deadlines imposed by Texas law. The Court, in its opinion, refused to extend the deadlines at this time. As result of the massive uncertainty that surround Y.he political boundaries drawn by the Texas Legislature for the House of Representatives, the State Senate and the Texas Congressional delegation, all county redistricting plans are behind schedule, and as a result, candidates do not know under which lines to file, and likewise the County Voter Registrar is unable to determine which lines apply to•the required notification to voters. At this time, political boundaries adopted by the Commissioners Court have not been precleared by the United States Department of Justice. Since the Voter Registrar must issue voter registration certificates no later than December 6, there is confusion and doubt as to which political boundaries should be used for the determination of election precincts by the Voter Registrar. After careful consideration of the legal issues presented by this situation, we would outline the following options which are available: 1. DO NOTHING AT THIS TIME: Until judicial opinions are rendered by the various state and federal courts having jurisdiction over several cases involving state redistricting and/or the Department of Justice preclearance, there is no way to project when elections will be held and what district lines will be utilized. For this reason, there is some support for no action until more clarity is available. Unfortunately, two issues argue against this course of "non- action." a. Failure to issue voter registration certificates would constitute a violation of State Election Code law, and constitute a potential basis for litigation against the County/Voter Registrar, including possible removal from office for purposeful disregard of requirements of office. b. Practically speaking, we must assume until judicial orders to the contrary hold otherwise, that elections will be held on the second Tuesday in March. (Art. 41.007, Texas Election Code). The Voter Registrar must issue new voter registration certificates, obtain return of the non-forwardable postage, and purge voting lists in time for the March Primary. Even under the best of circumstances, if a March primary is held, the Voter Registrar should have no less than 60 days in which to conduct voter notification, list purging, and issuance of final poll lists. This means that an extension of the notification deadline from December 6 should not extend beyond January 12, 1992 under any circumstances. 2. ISSUE CERTIFICATES UNDER EXISTING "OLD" LINES: Existing political lines have been determined to no longer refJ.ect numerical balance ar_d/or minority representation standards required by the Constitution and laws of the United States. Although these lines are well known, and issuance of voter certificates under the old lines could be readily accomplished, there is every reason to believe that preclearance will be obtained within approximately 3 weeks time, thereby rendering the existing lines null and void, and requiring reissuance of voter certificates for the new lines. Not only will voters be confused by the receipt of two separate voter certificates, each possibly requiring the voter to cast his or her ballot in a different election precincts, but the duplication in effort and costs will be considerable. We do not recommend that certificates be mailed under the old lines for the following reasons. a. The existing lines are, without question, legally unsound. We have adopted a reapportionment plan which will alter these lines, although at this time we are unable to state when those changes will be precleared. Therefore, it does not seem prudent to issue notice under lines which we know are no longer legally valid. b. The duplication of effort and costs to issue one set of certificates now, merely to comply with the election code requirement, and a second certificate when revised lines are precleared is deemed fiscally and administratively unwise. c. Voter confusion will be compounded by duplicate certificates, thereby harming turnout and increasing confusion on election day. 3. ISSUE CERTIFICATES UNDER PROPOSED "NEW" LINES: Although these lines have not been pre-cleared by the Department of Justice, we have every reason to believe that these lines will be approved. We therefore recommend that you issue voter certificates under the proposed lines for the following reasons: a. Cost savings achieved by a single mailing will be considerable. In the event that the reapportionment plan is not pre-cleared in whole, we will in most cases be able to make relatively minor changes to achieve compliance, thereby necessitating a limited second mailing to those voters affected by any requirement modification of the proposed lines. b. Reduced confusion by the elimination of conflicting voter certificates. c. We expect to obtain pre-clearance on the county reapportionment plan with two or three weeks. Therefore, the decision to issue certificates under the proposed plan is considered a "safe" procedure. However, there are problems by this recommendation. i. The proposed lines have not been precleared. Federal law preempts state law, and has the effect of causing any election held under such lines to be potentially subject to legal challenge. We firmly believe that the proposed lines will be pre-cleared eventually, and that the potential for legal challenge minimal, but you should be aware that if you elect to issue certificates under the proposed lines that you may be "implementing" a change in election policy, procedure or methods that has not been approved by the Department of Justice. 3 ii. We believe that issuance of voter certificates under the proposed lines is the best option under very adverse circumstances. Should you elect to follow our recommendation, you would be entitled to assert a defense of reliance upon advice of legal counsel should you be legally challenged. A challenge might come from an interested party who believes that the proposed lines are discriminatory. Fortunately, in virtually every case, the old lines are more discriminatory than the proposed, so the ability of any interested party to show a discriminatory purpose or effect appears minimal. Realistically, there is the potential of a legal challenge under any of the options, but we have attempted to suggest the most balanced course of recommended action taking all factors into consideration. 4. SEEK A JUDICIAL RESTRAINING ORDER DELAYING THE MAILING OF VOTER CERTIFICATES: Should the Voter Registrar feel that he or she is simply unable to comply with the requirements of Article 14.001, Texas Election Code, a Temporary Restraining Order might be obtained from a local District Court judge. A restraining order is good for 10 days, and may be extended in proper circumstances for additional time as the court deems appropriate. However, for the reasons stated, until it is known when the state primary election will be held, we are unable to offer the court much guidance as to how long an extension will be necessary to accomplish the purpose of any delay. Therefore, we would have a difficult time obtaining any extension beyond the initial 10 days. While this might be sufficient in some cases, particularly if the situation involving state lines is clarified, in other cases 10 days might not be sufficient to obtain formal preclearance from Department of Justice for county boundary changes. Additionally, the logistical difficulty in obtaining a restraining order in all counties may be an impossible task at this late date. 5. FILING DEADLINES: The County Chair for each political party, or the county judge for independent candidates, is the official authority empowered to receive applications for a place on the primary ballot. These officials are not, under state law, given any authority to accept multiple filings for the old versus new lines, and we do not believe that they can appropriately hold the application "unofficially" until a determination is made as to which lines prevail. We are seeking a vehicle by which a statewide remedy might be had, but we are unable to assure you that such a remedy is available. 4 Most counties will receive preclearance before the expiration of the filing period on January 2, 1992. It is entirely possible that action by the state or federal courts now considering the redistricting cases will enter orders that will extend filing period and delay the March Primary, However, until these matters are resolved, any speculation on what might happen is just that, speculation. Therefore, we suggest that if you have not been precleared by December 20, that a judicial order to extend the filing period be obtained in your own District Court. The procedure for such a temporary restraining order is similar to that described above in relation to the notification of voters. CONCLUSION: Please review these options and notify us as soon as possible of your decision. Should you determine that a Judicial Restraining Order in appropriate, we will need to discuss this issue with you since additional costs to the county will be incurred. These costs will include travel costs and additional legal fees since our contract does not provide for litigation expense. Your earliest attention is appreciated. Please respond by FAX as soon as you determine what course of action is appropriate. lY, Bo B s ~/ 5 INITIAL ASSESSMENT OF KERR COUNTY, TEXAS -- POLITICAL BOUNDARIES FOR PURPOSES OF REAPPORTIONMENT By Allison & Associates Attorneys At Law The Wahrenberger House -- 208 West 14th Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 482-0701 Voice (512) 480-0902 Fax i GENERAL OVERVIEW Kerr County, Texas has a population of 36,304 according to the 1990 Federal Census. This reflects a numerical change of 7,524, or a 26.14 percent change from the 1980 population of 28,780. As a very general rule of thumb, any statistical change of more than 5~ will indicate a potential need for reapportionment. Only in rare circumstances will a county experiencing a population change in excess of lOg avoid the need for rather extensive reapportionment of the county Commissioners Court precinct lines. However, any assumption that a population change of less than 10$, or even 5~ will not require reapportionment is ill advised. Populations will shift within a county over time. Every County, even those with a rather insignificant overall population change, should carefully examine the actual population demographics relative to their existing political lines to determine the need for reapportionment. Of the 7,524 change in Kerr County population, the "Urban" population -- accounted for 1,547, or 20.56 percent of that number. "Urban" population is defined as that portion of the county population living within an incorporated town or city. _,_ Rural population change amounted to 5,977 or 79.44 percent of the total population change. It should be carefully noted that these comparisons between urban and rural areas of the county reflect the percentage of "change" each experienced. "Change" may not directly correlate to "different" or "new" population. For example, a single family may move from the rural area to the urban, and impact both categories. We use this particular data to determine whether or not the percentage of total change since 1980 demonstrates a trend, and this data's value is of more statistical than practical value. ~` Kerr County experienced significant growth over the decade, and that growth followed a growing trend toward significant population increases in unincorporated areas. While the city of Kerrville grew by more than 13$, the unincorporated area -- increase was much more significant. This trend creates even more demand for services upon County government, and requires greater attention to rural areas in any redistricting plan. Traditionally, urban centers have beet the primary focus of reapportionment efforts, but the unincorporated population will necessarily weigh heavily in Kerr County upon all decisions related to numerical balance and, to a lesser degree, in the minority representation question as well. With this general overview of Kerr County, we will evaluate each layer of political boundaries, and attempt to determine whether or not reapportionment should be undertaken by the Commissioners Court. Our assessment will point out ._. areas of potential conflict with state and federal law, and will also suggest areas that may be considered for purposes of cost effectiveness and voter/resident convenience. ASSESSMENT OF ELECTION PRECINCTS Election Precincts are the building blocks for all other political boundaries. Therefore, our assessment begins with this primary political unit. According to Article 42.006, Texas Election Code, V .A. C . S. , each election precinct must contain _ not fewer than 50 registered voters and not more than 5000 registered voters. ~~ (exceptions apply depending upon county population) . For the Initial Assessment, no attempt has been made to acquire actual registered voter information. However, for any final reapportionment plan, we will acquire registered voter files and -- "download" this information into our data base. This will allow us to use actual registered voter numbers in sizing the election precincts. For purposes of this Initial Assessment, we are relying upon the population figures derived from the Census Bureau PL94-171 file, and gross percentages of the voting age population. For purposes of the Initial Assessment, we make some assumptions that allow us to estimate the probable number of registered voters that might reside within an W election precinct. Using the voting age population demographic information contained in Appendix B, E-H, we assume that the percentage of actual registered voters would never exceed 70~ of the total "eligible" voters over the age of 18 years. ._ This assumption will generally hold true, but in some isolated cases, the actual number of registered voters may exceed 70~ of total eligible voters. In counties that continue to use hand counted paper ballots, an election precinct "` may not exceed 2000 registered voters under state law. In counties under 175,000 in population that utilize some form of "voting system" , i. e. optical scan, punch-card or other automated counting system, the size of election precincts may be increased - to 5,000 registered voters. Counties above 175,000 in population but below 250,000 may have not more than 4,000 registered voters in an election precinct, and in counties of more than 250,000, the election precinct should not exceed 3,000 registered voters. Therefore, as a general rule of thumb, Counties that cast more than 3000 ballots in a single commissioners court precinct should consider moving to an automated vote - counting system, and upsizing their election precincts to achieve greater efficiency and lower costs in holding elections. By reducing the number of election precincts, where appropriate, the overall costs of elections can be reduced; but this reduction must be coupled with other factors, such as automated vote counting, in order to insure that election returns can be quickly and accurately tabulated in the resulting larger election precincts. With automated vote counting systems, smaller polling place staff can accommodate larger numbers of voters, and achieve overall reductions °" in the costs of elections. INITIAL SUMMARY FINDINGS ON ELECTION PREGINCTS: Election precincts should be significantly modified. CONSOLIDATION FACTORS A limiting factor in wholesale consolidation of county election precincts will be the restraints imposed by Art. 42.005, Texas Election Code, V.A.C.S., which °- restricts county election precincts to that territory which does not contain more than one commissioners precinct, justice precinct, congressional district, state representative district, state senatorial district, ward of a city with a population of 10,000 or more, or a State Board of Education District. We are not presently informed as to the nature of the city governments within -. Kerr County. Should any of these cities exceed 10, 000 residents, or should any city utilize single member election precincts for its city council positions, these city "wards" must be considered in the construction of county election precincts. In any plan for county election precincts within a city having single member election districts, city ward lines must be followed to prevent a violation of state law. Therefore, all cities within the county should be encouraged to participate and cooperate in the reapportionment process. Although state law does not require the county election precincts to conform to independent school district election precincts, it only makes prudent sense to ,_ consult with any independent school district in your jurisdiction to determine if school board members are elected from single member districts. We are not presently aware of the nature of school district configurations within Kerr County. If, however, any single member districts are utilized, and if the school board would '" wish to participate in the county reapportionment process with the County by agreeing to utilize single member districts that are compatible with proposed county election precincts, then a three way agreement between the County, cities of more - than 10, 000 in population or in smaller towns or cities having single member election wards, and independent school districts electing board members from districts could result in considerably less confusing and more economical elections for all three entities. INITIAL SUMMARY FINDINGS REGARDING CONSOLIDATION OF ELECTION PRECINCTS: We do not recommend consolidation of current rural election precincts. However, the following urban election precincts are too large without benefit of automated vote counting equipment: Election Precincts 1, 6, 11, 15, 16 all have voting age populations of such size that violations of Article 42.006, Texas Election Code will occur unless the County adopts an automated vote counting system. Should such a system already exist in Kerr County, the size of other precincts - should be adjusted to take full advantage of the, potential savings in labor costs that larger precinct afford. If Kerr County continues to hand count ballots, the named precincts are in violation of state law. i - ELECTION PRECINCT RE-NUMBERING Consideration should be given to "standardization" of election precinct "' numbering. A two tiered system that would allow the voter registrar and the voter to identify the proper polling place by the commissioner precinct and assist the voter to identify the location of the election precinct as well should be considered. For example: _ Election Precinct 12 is presently located in Commissioners Precinct No. 3. A renumbered election precinct might be 312, which would tell the voter registrar and voter that voting box 312 was a component in all elections having to do with Commissioners Precinct No. 3. Additionally, some consideration should be given to "` reordering the number of the election precincts to reflect some organizational system tied to the actual box number. Under a two tiered organizational system, the first digit of an election precinct number would signify the Commissioners Precinct in which that particular Election Precinct would vote. The lest one or two digits of the election precinct would signify the election precinct location within the County, with that number assigned in a clockwise manner from the Northwest corner of the county - and continuing throughout the county until all election precincts are numbered. This system would allow an observer to immediately determine not only the election precinct in which a particular voter was eligible to vote, but also provide a general idea of the geographic area of the county in which that voter would necessarily ~~ reside, and where the appropriate polling place might be located. r ASSESSMENT OF JUSTICE OF PEACE AND CONSTABLE PRECINCTS m Kerr County presently has 4 Justice of the Peace/Constable precincts. Kerr County has a total population of 36 , 304 persons, according to the final census count. (The 1990 Census is subject to a possible adjustment due to allegations of an undercount of minority population contained in federal litigation now pending. A decision to "adjust" the final count will be made July 15, 1991. ) Article 5 , Section 18 of the Texas Constitutional provides that each county of the -- State having a population of 30,000 or more shall be divided into hot less than four and not more than eight precincts. Counties having a population of less than 18,000 shall be composed of a single justice/constable precinct, unless the Commissioners Court determines that not more than four such justice/constable precincts are needed. Counties having a population of less than 150,000, but which contain a city having a population of 18 , 000 or more inhabitants, shall provide for not less than two justices of the peace to service the city(s) having 18,000 or more inhabitants. In each precinct so created, there shall be elected a Justice of the Peace and a Constable, each of whom shall hold office for four years. Based upon these Constitutional requirements, Kerr County could have as few as 4, and not more than 8 Justice of the Peace/Constable Precincts. "' It is recommended that Kerr County reconsider the actual need for justice/constable precsncts, and consider whether that need suggests change in the present configuration of justice/constable precincts. Article 292.001 Local -- Government Code and Article 27.051, Government Code address the location of Justice of the Peace courts. In counties having a population of less than 30, 000, the County Commissioners Court may locate the justice courts either in the precinct served that justice court, or may centralize the courts in the County courthouse. In counties having a population greater than 30,000, the justice courts must be physically located in the precinct they serve. -° Additionally, it is suggested that the Justice and Constable Precincts be renumbered so as to track the Commissioners Court Precinct numbering system. Additionally, at the present time the Justice/Constable Precincts;are no co-extensive __ with the Commissioners Court precincts. While local conditions may justify this approach, there are considerable administrative advantages to having the Justice/Constable precincts mirror the political boundaries of the Commissioners Court. ASSESSMENT OF COMMISSIONERS COURT PRECINCTS - Numerical Balance In order to determine numerical balance, a few "ground rules" should be ._ discussed. Over the years, the Courts have adopted what now can be safely said to be a 10$ rule of thumb. This 10$ rule generally means that so long as the total maximum deviation between commissioners court precincts does not exceed 10$ from top to bottom, there is a presumption that the existing political boundaries are `° constitutional, in terms of "one-person-one-vote" evaluations. To determine Total Maximum Deviation, the total county population (36,304), is -_ divided by the number of commissioners precincts (4), to arrive an at "Ideal" precinct size (9,076). Once the ideal precinct size is known, a comparison of the existing political lines in terms of population is possible. The commissioners precinct with the smallest population above the ideal precinct, and the commissioners precinct M' with the largest population below the ideal precinct are selected. The difference between their respective populations are reduced to a percentage of deviation, and added together. This figure, known as the total maximum deviation, is the key -°- number in an initial evaluation of commissioner precinct for purposes of reapportionment. ,_ Comm;cc;oners Precinct No. 1 presently contains 10,254 persons, which is a deviation of 1,178 persons above the "Ideal" precinct of 9,076, or 12.98 percent above the ideal standard. Commissioners Precinct No. 3 presently contains 6,401 persons, which is a deviation of 2,675 persons, or 29.47 percent below the "Ideal" "" precinct size of 9,076. The Total Maximum Deviation for Kerr County is therefore 42.45 percent. w Of the two remaining Commissioners Court Precincts, Precinct No. 2 contains 9 , 511 persons, which is a deviation of 435 persons, or 4.79 percent above the "Ideal" precinct. Likewise, Commissioners Precinct No. 4 contains 10,138, a deviation of 1,062, or 11.70 percent above the ideal precinct size. Although the Total Maximum M.. Deviation is based only on the largest and smallest precinct, for comparison purposes, Commissioners Precinct No. 2 and Commissioners Precinct No. 4 demonstrate a total maximum deviation of 16.49 percent. The Total Maximum Deviation figure for Kerr County, again, is arrived at by adding together the deviations from the ideal precinct size in Commissioners Precinct No. 1 and Commissioners Precinct No. 3. This number is crucial factor in any determination of need for reapportionment. Any Total Maximum Deviation value in excess of 10$ is presumptively unconstitutional. Any county experiencing a Total Maximum Deviation above 10$ will be required to reapportion. Any county '" experiencing a Total Maximum Deviation only slightly below 10$ should seriously consider reapportionment. Counties should strive for as close to equal balance as possible, but it is permissible to take other considerations, such as road mileage, .- location of county precinct barns or other public buildings, location of available voting places in the final determination of political lines, so long as the total maximum deviation does not exceed 10 percent. Population imbalance between the four Commissioners Court precincts is rather extreme in Kerr County, particularly between Precinct No. 1 and Precinct No. 3. Additionally, the physical size of the four precincts (and corresponding road mileage) appears to be excessively disproportionate. As shown in Maps lA and 1B, population distributions aze significantly dispersed in Precinct No. 4 that a larger area is to be expected, but there should be an effort made to balance road mileage -° with population. Precinct No. 1 presently includes the most highly concentrated population centers, both rural and urban, and these populations should, where possible without fragmenting minority populations, be divided between the smaller precincts. INITIAL SUMMARY FINDINGS REGARDING NUMERICAL BALANCE: '° Reapportionment will be necessary to comply with 'One-Person-One-Vote' standards. Minority Representation: Where the total minority percentage exceeds 25$ of the total population, there is ample justification, where possible, to create a commissioners precinct which ~~ contains a potential voting majority of minority residents. In concentrations greater than 40$, consideration should be given to creating at least one commissioners precinct with a potential voting majority of minority residents, with the possibility -- of as many other such precincts and the minority population may demand to achieve equality in the polling booth. Where the total minority concentration exceeds 40$, the issue of "Packing" becomes a consideration, meaning that minority populations cannot be "packed" into a single precinct, but must be allowed to influence as many precincts as the total minority population may without efforts to fragment otherwise contiguous concentrations of minority population. °~ Kerr County has a total minority population of 19.28 percent. Of the total minority population percentage, 16.51 percent aze Hispanic, 2.07 percent are Hlack or of African-American heritage, 0.29 percent aze American Indian, and 0.35 percent .. are Asian, leaving 0.06 percent in what is known as the "Other" category. "Other" is used when the census questionnaire is not completed in the racial category, or when some other racial description is used by the person answering the census questionnaire. With this racial profile, minority representation must not be diluted, and where possible, a voting majority of minority residents should be created: In order to - achieve the maximum minority representation within the demographic and geographic limitations in existence, it will be necessary to determine which VTDs, and which census blocks, contain the highest percentage of minority population and to take such reasonable measures as will insure the highest possible minority voice in county government. To achieve this goal, some attention must be paid to voting age minority residents. 13.72 percent of the total voting age population is Hispanic, 1.84 percent Black, 0.30 percent Asian, 0.30 percent American Indian, and 0.05 percent Other. This reflects a total voting age minority percentage of 16.21 percent. Commissioners Precincts No. 3 and No. 2 have the highest relative percentage of minority populations. A determination of whether or not the minority populations in these precincts could be joined in a single precinct, or perhaps concentrated in an effort to maximize minority impact upon elections is difficult to assess without a - more detailed evaluation of historical voting patterns, racial demographics, and the realities of political boundaries. When taken with the numerical imbalances that must be addressed, it would appear that if at all possible, minority populations might be concentrated in Precinct No. 3 to the maximum degree possible to achieve the highest potential minority concentration. Other possible constructions of precinct lines might well result in a favorable racial profile, but at least initially, Precinct No. 3 appears the most readily suitable for minority concentration. Minority population is concentrated principally in the city of Kerrville. When considered in relation to the rather extreme population imbalances between Commissioners Precinct No. 1 and Commissioners Precinct No. 3, there would appear to be a significant degree of fragmentation of the Hispanic population that could be cured in any effort to achieve numerical balance. INITIAL SUMMARY FINDINGS REGARDING MINORITY REPRESENTATION: Minority population concentrations are fragmented by current political boundaries. Political lines must be redrawn. General Housekeeping -. Some attention should be given to "straightening" political boundaries into more uniform shape. Public Law 94-171, which directed the Census Bureau to develop a uniform mapping and demographic profiling approach for use by small computers, _ required that all voter tabulation districts (VTDs) follow census block boundaries. In many cases, county voting districts had been previously drawn in a manner which did not follow a census block boundary. This required the State of Texas, acting in conjunction with the State Data Center and the Texas Legislative Council, to move --- the actual voting district boundary to coincide with a nearby census block boundary for tabulation purposes only. The resulting VTD was no longer "actual," but an approximation referred to as a "pseudo voting district." Every reasonable effort has been made to conform the pseudo voting district to actual VTD boundaries. However, due to the nature of the available data base, and the requirements of Public Law 94-171, there may be occasions in which the pseudo - voting districts, or the resulting Lines between commissioners court precincts, aze different from those that actually exist. Again, the use of the pseudo voting district was for tabulation purposes only, and any apparent differenceibetween actual and _ apparent political lines should be considered as minimal. - However, since all later census counts will be undertaken upon the census blocks, there could be a valid argument that a necessity to alter current election "' district boundaries to match the census block format exists. Under these circumstances, new political lines will be required to avoid conflict with census block Lines that do not match current political area definitions. _ In Kerr County, we have encountered significant differences between the actual political lines and the pseudo lines forced upon the data base by the census block _ approach. Should the Commissioners Court determine that future planning requires a consistency between actual political lines and the census block data base, then reapportionment would be required, since new lines would result that might vary the existing tabulation result. e While matching census blocks to actual political lines would not, in and of itself, generally support a decision to reapportion under the circumstances that exist in ~` Kerr County, there is a justifiable combination of factors that would support a reapportionment decision. These factors would include: 1. Redrawing election precincts to increase voter convenience. 2. Consolidation of election precincts where practicable. - 3. Res~z;ng election precincts to achieve greater efficiency. 4. Harmonizing actual political lines with pseudo voting districts based upon -4- census blocks. 5. Redrawing all lines to achieve "one-person-one-vote" deviations of the ._ smallest possible percentage. CONCLUSION While the primary task of reapportionment will concentrate on the issue of numerical balance and minority representation in the formation of the formation of commissioners court precincts, other valuable improvements could also be achieved -~- in the political wellbeing of Kerr County by redrawing existing lines. The method and manner by which these less direct goals aze accomplished is a responsibility imposed upon the Commissioners Court beyond those expressly required by the Voting Rights Act or the Constitution, but which may have just as much value to the general public. Cost efficiency and voter convenience in elections that might be achieved by a serious evaluation of election precincts, and the elimination of unnecessazy confusion by cooperation with other governmental entities are only two -° of the benefits that might be achieved by reapportionment beyond the legal duties required by law. _, Another issue which should be considered is the actual need for Justice of the Peace/Constable Precincts. While local demand for Justice/Constable services may well justify the current number of justice courts, the cost of maintenance and administration of these particular governmental offices should be carefully `" evaluated. Finally, the county should consider a wholesale renumbejring of its election precincts in order to simplify future elections. Consolidation should be considered where possible, subject to limitations imposed by state law and were possible by agreement with any Independent School Districts in the County. _ Reapportionment should be viewed as an opportunity for streamlining county organization, and a chance to address as many issues as possible to achieve greater participation and involvement in county government. This is the time to plan for --~ future growth, anticipate costs of government operations, and to involve the public in the process of county government. We look forwazd to working with you in this exacting, but rewarding process. Kerr County, Texas Statistical Measures o f Population Equality Appendix A ration Po wlation Deviation Deviation Ideal Population i s defined to be 25%of 0,254 9,076 1,178 12.98% total county population. Absolute and 9,511 9,076 435 4.79% Relative (%) Deviations are difference in 6,401 9,076 -2,675 -29.47% actual and ideal. •2,675 Absolute Range i s the spread in absolute deviation from the smallest precinct to the to largest. 1,178 •29.47°~ Relative Range i s the spread in relative deviation (%) from the smallest precinct to the to largest. 12.98°k 1338 Absolute Mean Deviation i s the average deviation which i s calculated by adding al I the absolute deviations (Ignoring their +and • signs) and dividing by 4. 14.74% Relative Mean Deviation i s the average deviation which i s calculated by adding a l l the relative deviations (ignoring their+and -signs) and dividing by 4. 181 3 Standard Devietion of Population i s the square root of the the sum o f the squares o f al I the absolute deviations divided by 4. 19.98°k Standard Deviation of Relative Deviations i s the square root o f the sum of the squares of al I the relative (%) deviations divided by 4. 42.45% Total Maximum Devietion i s the sum of the relative deviations(%) of the smallest and largest precincts, ignoring +and - signs. 58.95°h Total Absolute Deviation i s the sum of ali relative deviations ignoring +and - mputer generated matters contained in this report, including statistical ratios or formulas, are delved from iafion taken direcdy from Public Law 94-171 files of the United States Census Bureau. r Allison 8c Associates nor Map Resource, lac. is responsible for errors which may occur in [he PL94-171 data Law 94-171 required that all voter tabulation districts (VTDs) follow census block boundaries. Tn many cases, voting districts had been drown in a manner which did not follow a census block boundary. This required the State as, acting in conjunction with the State Data Center and the Texas Legislative Council, to move [he actual voting t boundary to coincide with a nearby census block boundary for tabulation purposes only. The resulting VTD was m "actual" , but an approximation of the voting district referred ro as a "pseudo voting district." reasonable effort will be made to confomr the pseudo voting district to actual VTD boundaries. However, due [o the of the available data base, and the requirements of Public Lew 94-171, there may be a necessity to alter voting t boundaries to match the census block format. In this event, every reasonable effort will be made [o insure cy while retaining [he integrity of the data base upon which reapportionment must rely. Allison & Associates Map Resource, Inc. Wahrenberger House 208 W 14th St. Austin, TX 78701 A B C D E F G H 1 2 __....._..._ ...........................:...... Kerr Count Te Y, xas : 3 .........................;......................,...... Working File .................... ....................... ....................... 4 _ __.__ Appendix B __... , 5 6 ........___........._.:__.._..........._..L..........__.__.;......_..._..._..i.._........_.......i ._............_... ~~~~~ ...._..._.. ~~~~ ~ ~ _ .....__....... ~~~ ~~ 7 COMMISSIONER PRECINCT 0001 8 Universe: To _...... tal Po ,ula .. __..P.. tlon ~ ._._._.._._..' ................ ~ . ~ ' 9 Name .............. ......_Anglo... . ......-.Black.. ....-.Indian .._.-__Asian. ..__Hispanic.. ....-..Other Total.-. 1 0 CP0001 ....._ .,. 8,876 ..... 89 ...._ 38 ........ 41 ._..._.._1,404 ........_ 6 10 254 11 VTD0001 4,056 63 18 32 731 4 4,904 1 2 VTD0007 ....... .........~.:086 .............._._? ...---°---~ 3 -----------~ ---------?~~~ ----........_?. ..........~.~271 1 3 VTDQ013 ....... ........_2,375 ................._ ..............._5 ................_6 ...............?_~.`'. ................_~ ........_2,491 14 VTD0018___. ......__1.159 _________2_`~. ._......._.._2 -..__.-_..__3 _._......_._398 ..__....__._?. .___...1_,§813 1 6 COMMISSION ER PRECIN CT 0002 17 Universe:_To tal,Popula tion 1 8 Name .............. ......_Anglo... .....__Black.. ......Indian ._.,--_Asian_ __-_Hispanic-. .....__Other. -..-.._Total_.__-_ 19 CP0002 7,527 99 26 44 1,811 4 9,511 20 VTD0002 ....... ........_2,008 ................._6 ..............._9 .......-~--~--~--6 -~--~----....._292 ................_0 .........2,321 21 VTD0011 ........ ........-2365 .............._66 ............_12 ............._25 .............._943 ................_3 ........_3,41_4 22 VTD0015....... ..___-3,?54 .............._27 ------_..._5 ............._?_3 .............._576 ----~-------?~ ------3,778 2 4 COMMISSIONER PRECINCT 0003 ' 25 To Universe: tal Popula tipn ~ '~ 26 -_ Narne .............. . ......_Anglo-.- .-.---_Black.. .._._.Indlan ._.._._Asian .Hispanic.. ......_O[her. ..._.__Tptal.... 27 CP0003 .......... ......__3,824 ...-----_521 ._........._14 .............?_3 ------_2'01~7 ~--._......._?_ _......_6,401 28 VTD0003 ....... ............ 359 ......---~-~-~--._~ ..............._~ ................_0 .......-~-~---245 ................_`x. ..............609 29 VTD0008 354 0 0 0 98 0 452 30 VTD0012-- .... ............_976 ................~.~ ._-------5 ._..._._...__~ ..............x_94 ..---------_4 --......1.1_85 31 VTDOUI4....... ..-~-~-----~-674 ..........._439 ..............._4 ...........--~--_~ .............._879 ................_4 ........_2,000 32 VTD0017 ....... ......__?.,.461. ............_-~~~ ~-~-----~--._`~. ..............? 3 .............._601. ..------~---_3 ..__.._2,1-55 34 COMMISSION ER PRECIN CT 0004 ..................._( __.._._______._______ ' 35 Universe: To Populatipn tal 36 ._ Name .............. ._ ......_Anglo.. . ... 81ack.. ..._..Indian -Asian _Hispanic.. ...._._Other_ _..._..Total..... 37 CP0004 ..... .... 9,276 .... ,...._43 . .26 ....... 30 ......... 762 ....... 1 __-_10,1-38 38 VTD0004 436 0 0 1 37 0 474 39 VTD0005 1,164 4 4 0 147 0 1,319 40 VTD0006 ....... ........_4,.1-81? -----~----16 .._._...__1 ~ _......_.......~ ...............307 ...------~~--?- -----~-4,523 41 VTD0009 . ...... 118 .............. 0 ..................- 0 ~~--~-~--~--~-~-- 1 -................. 38 ...................._ 0 .................. 152 ............._ 42 o VTD001 221 0 0 0 0 0 221 43 VTD0016.--- ........_3r?57 .............._Z3 ..............._r'. ............._26 --------~~-238 .._............_0 ....._._3,449 45 COMMISSIONER PRECINCT 0001 46 Universe: Vo ting_Age.Population I 47 Name .. ..._Anglo...._.._._Black_. ._....Indian _Asian -Hispanic.. ..._.._Other. ......_Total..... 48 CP0001 --- -- 8 8i35 _.. 64 -- ........... 25 29 __-__-_- 909 _...... 2 ....... 7_914 49 VTD0001 3,333 _._- 47 ____- 1 4 ____._ 23 _____ 475 ____ 1 _____. 3,893 50 . _ _ VTD0007 --- 759 ------ 1 ~---'-...'-__. 6 ................. 0 .................. 107 ................._ 1 ............_.... 874 _........ 51 VTD0013 . _ ..... 1.884 .............. 0 ................ . 3 ................. 5 .................. fi2 ................ 0 .................. 1 X954 .......... 52 8 VTD001 909 1 6 2 , 265 0 1,193 54 COMMISSIONER PRECINCT 0002 55 Universe: Vo tin_g__Age-P opulation 56 Name -Anglo _Black_. ...._.Indian ......_Asian .Hispanic Other Total 57 CP0002 .......... ........_5.932 ......._-..._68 ........_.._22 _~--~----~---28 ..-~--~--_?.,.?_69 ._......__..._2 ..__....x.221 58 VTD0002 . ....... 1,532 .......... 4 ...._...--- 7 . ---.._.._ 4 _._........_ . 192 ................ . 0 ......._......._ 1,739 .._...--' 59 1 VTD001 1 .923 55 1 0 ~ 7 5, 7 1 2623 60 VTD0015 ....... ........_2,.477 ....._.....---9 -------5 -----_._._.~ .__..........360 .--..............?. ..........2,859 61 ......................... ...................... ..................... ................... ..................... ........................ i....................; ........................ 62 COMMISSION ER PRECIN CT 0003 i 63 Universe: Vo ting Age P opulation 64 Name _ . _Anglo .Black - Indian - __._Asian -Hispanic... _.__._. Other _ _ _ Total 65 CP0003......_. .. ..3,136 .... 36.2 ..... 14 ...............7 .._?.,249 .... 8 .....4,776 66 VTD0003 .......................... 286 ...................... 0 ..................... 0 ................... 0 ..................... 130 .............. 3 419 67 VTD0008 . ...... 291 .............. 0 ................... 0 ................. 0 .................. 54 ............... 0 ... 345 ............-. 68 2 VTD001 859 8 5 0 125 0 997 OF PEACE PRECINCT 0001._ OF 1 __ 1 1,65( _,__._ 0 1 ,1 9£ ............... . A B C D E F G H 137 JP0002 ...... ..... .........1,532........ ........._4 ..... .........._? ... ..............4 ... ..........._7.92 .... ............_0 .... ......1.739 138 VTD0002 1,532 4 7 4 192 0 1,739 13 9 ..._....--___. .__. _.------_.-~---- ---.__- ..._ _.__._..... ~ . .... .................: ... ...........-----~ --- _..........._.; -.._ ..._.......__.. 1 40 JUSTICE OF PEACE PRECINCT 0004 141 Universe: Vo ting Age._Population..' ..... ...............' ... .................~ ... .....................' .... ....._..._._.~ ... ._......._....... 142 Name ......... ..... ......_Anglo . Black. _. .. _Ind?an. ... ..._Asian.. ... _Hispanic .Other . ..Total 1 43 JP0004 4 438.... ._8 _.... 1 7 ... ..... .. 1. . ... 314 .-. -_.-. 1. ... .. __4,779 144 VTD0004 .... 309 ...------ ~--- 0 ------- .... 0 _........... ... 0 ............._ ... 31 ............. - -- 0 ------- -- 340 ---- 145 VTD0005 929 4 4 0 ~ i 3 ~ 1.050 146 VTD0006 .. ..... ........_3,200........ ..-~----~-4 ---~- ~--~--._~.3 ... ..............?. ... ..........._7.70 .... ............_?. .... ...._3,389 147 .____.._---_ __.i ......__..__....'~,. _..- i"-.. ..-__.__.. L ... ................. i.. ..............._-- `- ---------- '- ~ -- 148 JUSTICE OF PEACE PRECINCT 0005 ._ ... -_.._... --- ------...._. ... ._ .................. .... ................ r... ................... 149 Universe: Voting_Age Popu lation : . 150 Name II Anglo,_ -_-_-_. Black.. .-_. _.Ind?an. ._. ....Asian .Hispanic I .Other Total 151 JP0005 ~ .. 279 .. 0 ~ 0 ~ 1~ 25 0 ~ 305 152 VTD0009 105 .. 0 0 1 25 I 0 131 153 VTD0010 ... 1.74 ...0 .... 0 ... ..... ~ ... ..... .....0 .. ...0 ..... 174 154 '' ___ _ __ ___ _ _________ 1 55 CONSTABLE PRECINCT 000 1 156 Universe: To tal Population 157 Name .................. ..... ...___Anglo_.. . ......_. Black Indian -Asian -Hispanic.. .,. .Other .-Total 158 CNP0001.. ..... .._. 201463 .... 726 _... . ...74 . ..... 118 . 41835 .... ........._1 ~ 26,233 159 VTD0001.. ---------- ..-- ~-----4'056 ........ ......_63 .... ........_18 ... .........._32 .. ............_731- -- -------..4 ._ ....._4.904 160 VTD0007.. ..._ _._...1.,.086 ..._... __....._?. .... ..._._13 _ __-_._...._0 .. .-.._......_1-7~ -- -----..__._?. ... ..._.?.~271 161 VTD0011 ... ..... ........_2,365 ........ ......_66 .... ........_i~ ... .........._2 § .. ............_943 .... ............_3 ... ....._3414 162 VTD0012 .. ..... ............_976 ........ ......_1~ .... ......_--_5 .. _............_~ -- --------?-94 -- --------- ... .......1.1.85 163 VTD0013 .. ..... ........_2,375 ........ ........._~ .... ..........._6~. ... ............._6 .. ............_?_05 .... ....---....._0 ... ....._2.491 164 VTDOQI4 .. ..... ............_674 ........ ..._439 .... ............4 ... ............._~ .. ............_879 -~-- ~~-~---....._4 ... ....._2,000 165 VfD0015.. _-- ---._3,.L54 __-_ __..._2] .... .....__....`~ . ... ...........~_3 .. ..._......._576 ... ..__......_x. _. ......3.776 166 VTD0016- ---- ------3,.16 .......- -----23 _.- ------~-6 -- -._._.. 26 .. ............_238 .... ............_0 ... _..._3.449 167 VTD0017 ..................... ..... 1,461 ...................... ........ 72 ............. ..... 5 .............. ... 1 S ................. .. 601 ...................... .... 3 ................ ... 2,155 .................. 168 VTD0018 .. ..... ........_?.,.?_6~.9 ........ ......_25 .... ..........._~ ... ............._3 .. ............_398 .... ............_?. ... .......1.588 169 _...___.._...... ..._ __.........____ ........ .._......... '--- --------" -- ..-._..........i .. ._........._._.__ .-... ....--'-`--- '-- -- .............. 170 CONSTABLE PRECINCT 0002 ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ 171 Universe: To tal Population. . ... ~ ' ~ ~ 172 Name ......... ..... I_..._._Anglo_._ ....__.. Black.. .___ ..Inilan_ ._. _..Asian.. ._ . Hspanic.~ _.._ ..Ottier _._ ....Totaf___ 173 6NP0002- --... 1..._..._2,008 ....... .------s ~-~- ---....__9 ~... .....__...._S~ _ 292 ._ .... ............_~ ~ 321 174 VTD0002 .. ..... .........2.008 ........ ..........6 .... ..........._9 1... ............._611 .. ......... ... .292 ... .............0 1 ... 2 321 .___2.~ 175 =._. _.__._... ~_. _........_... .. _.....-...__....._ ;._. ....-...._._ _ 176 CONSTABLE PRECINCT 0004 ... _.._...... 177 Universe. .To tal_Population 178 Name ~ ~~~~~ .Anglo ~ . Black Indian .Asian ~ .Hispanic .... Other .............. ~~~ Total ~~~~~~~ 179 CNP0004 . ..... 5,780 .............. ........ 20 ........... ..... 21 ............ ... 3 ............... ... 491 .............._ . .... t .............. ~-- 6,316 ~-~--~-~-~- 180 VTD0004 436 0 0 ' 3 x 0 474 181 VTD0005 .. ..... ........_?.,.?_64 ........ ..........4 ..... .........._4 ... ............._~ .. ............_?.4~ .... ............_~ ... .......1.31.9 182 VTD0006 ------------- --- 4,180 ------------ ---- 16 -------- -- 17 ------ .... ... 2 ........_....... ~- 307 ------------.. _.. 1 ................ ... 4,523 ................... 183 , , , 184 CONSTABLE PRECINCT 0005 t_.. .........--- ?_. .._._......_.. .. ...._.......----_ t_. _............ _ ....----__. 185 Universe: To tal Population ~ i 186 Name .................... ..... A to ........._R9....... ........ Black ............. .... Indian ............... ... Asian ................. ... His anic .......P........... .... Other ................ ... Total . 187 CNP0005 .. ..... ............_339 ........ ........._0 ..... .........._~ ... ..............?. ... ...............33 .... .... .......0 ..... .............. 373 188 VTDOO49.. .....~ ............_?_?_8 ........ ........._Q ~..... .........._Q ~... ..............?.~ ... .............._33` .... .. ......... 0 -_- _--_-_-__-_ 789 VTD0010.. ..-- -------221- ---- ------~ -- -----.._~ ... ............_~ ... ..................~` .- .. 1 -------0 .... ..........221 190 ..... ...............: .... ........_....... . 191 CONSTABLE PRECINCT 000 1 ..... .............. '.-- .................i ... .....................: .... ................i . . 192 Universe: Vo ting Age Popu lation ... .................. 19 3 Name ......... ..... ......_Anglo... ......_ Black.. ..... .Indian. .._ ..._Asian_. ... H?spanic . _.-. ...Other .Total.-_- 194 CNP0001 16,529 ........ 502 ........ .-.. 59 ....... . ... 79 .........- ... 3,108 ............. .... 9 ..........°" __ 20,286 ....-. 195 VTD0001_ .._. ~.....~3,333 47 -' 4 23 475 ~ 3893 _. 1 96 VTD0007. --- ------759 .- ..... ........._?. ..... ...._...._6 ... ............._0 ... .........._1_07 .... ............_?. .... 874 .. . .. 197 VTD0011 .. ..... .........1 .923 ........ ......_55 ..... ......._10 ... .........._?_~ ... ..........._617 .... ............_?. .... _ ... . ......2.623 198 VTD0012 .................... ..... 859 ...................... ........ 8 ............. ..... 5 .............. ... 0 ................. ... 125 ..................... .... 0 ................ ... 997 . 199 VTD0013 .. ..... ......... ~.,.884 ........ ........._~ ..... .........._3 ... ............._6 ... .............._6~ .... ............_o . .... ................. ......1.954 200 VTD0014 .................... ..... 498 ...................... ........ 312 ............. ..... 4 .............. .... 0 ................. ... 547 . .............. ... 4 1,365 201 VTD0015 .. ..... .........2,477 ........ ..........9 ..... .........._6 ... ............._~ ... ..........._360 .... ............_?. ..... .......... ....._2.,859 202 VTDQ016 .. ..... ........_2,685 ...-.... ........1.2 ..... .........._6 ... .........._?_9 ... ..........._1b7 .... ............_x .... ....._2.878 203 VTDQQJ7 .. ..... .........?.,.202 ........ ......_4_2 ..... .........._5 ... ............._~ ... ..........._393 .... ............_?. .... ......1.650 204 VTD001E 909 16 2 1 265 0 1,293 m ABLE PRECINCT 0004 e: Voting Age Population 79 OS ._ 74 Kerr County, Texas Analysis of Population in Commissioner Precincts Based on1990 Census Data Appendix C Ethnic Background of Entirs Population Precinct An to Black Indian Asian Hia sole Other Prec Total °k of Coun Precinct 1 8,676 89 38 41 1,404 6 10,25 28.24% Precinct 2 7,527 99 26 44 1,811 4 9,511 26.20% Precinct 3 3,824 521 14 13 2,017 12 6,401 17.63% Precinct 4 9 276 43 26 30 762 1 10,138 27.93% Coun Total 29 303 752 104 128 5 994 23 36 304 100.00% °A of Coun 80.72% 2.07% 0.29% 0.35% 16.51% 0.06° 100.00% Ethnic Background es a % of Entire Population Precinct An to Black Indian Asian Hia snit Other Total Precinct 1 84.61% 0.87% 0.37% 0.40% 13.69% 0.06% 100.00% Precinct 2 79.14% 1.04% 0.27% 0.46% 19.04% 0.04% 100.00% Precinct 3 59.74° 8.14% 0.22% 0.20° 31.51% 0.19% 100.00% Precinct 4 91.50% 0.42% 0.26% 0.30% 7.52M° 0.01 % 100.00% Ethnic Background of Voting (over 18) Population reclnct n to lack ndlan As an la anlc Other ree oral % of Coun reclnct 1 6,885 64 25 29 909 2 7,914 28.39% Precinct 2 5,932 68 22 28 1,169 2 7,221 25.91% Precinct 3 3,136 362 1 7 1,249 8 4,776 17.13% Precinct 4 7 402 20 22 21 496 1 7 962 28.57% ount oral 23 355 514 83 85 3 823 13 27 873 100.00% °~ of Coun 83.79% 1.84q° 0.30% 0.30% 13.72% 0.05% 100.00% Eihnic Background as a %of Voting Population reclnct An to lac Ind an Asian His enlo Other oral reclnct 1 87.00% 0.81% 0.32°k 0.37% 11.49% 0.03% 100.00% Precinct 2 82.15q° 0.94% 0.30% 0.39% 16.19% 0.03% 100.00% Precinct 3 65.66% 7.58% 0.29% 0.15M° 26.15% 0.17% 100.00% Precinct 4 92.97% 0.25% 0.28% 0.26% 6.23% 0.01% 100.00% Allison & Associ ates Map Resource, Inc. Wahrenbergv House 208 W. 14th St. Austiu, 1'X 78701 04-19-91 ^ Precinct 4 Precinct 1 ~ Anglo ~ Black .++ ....... ':.': +'.':::.:'+ ®Indlan ............ +: iiiii •y.y.tir1rti + ::::::. yr1 ++ + + ®Asian ;;;, , , ~ Hispanic €.. ^ Other Precinct 3 © Anglo ~ Black +++++ ..... " " " " " ' +++.+.++++. ®Indlan ..... +~ ~ + ry f~, ftirti ftirL ~'~'~'~"' r r r r•r.r ®Asian y 4 1 ~ Hispanic ^ Other Precinct 2 © Anglo ~ Black +++ ....,... ++++++++++++ ®Indlan ............ • + + + + • .ti.ti S 1 1 :'::::+ r•rrr i i i i i i ti fL jti fti. ++;;; ®Asian , 0 Hispanic .. .< ^ Other Precinct 4 ~ Anglo ~ Black +++++ ........ " " " " " ' ®Indlan +++++++ titi ........ '~++++++ ®Asian Q Hispanic ^ Other Allison & Associates Map Resource, Inc. W ahrwberger House Indian, Asian and Other categories may not be visible in chart zog w. tam sc. small percentage. Aus~u.,'tac7g~ot Kerr County, Texas Statistics by Voting Tabulation District i ~, Appendix E ', Commissioner Precinct 1 Entire Population VTD An to Black Indian Asian His anic Other VTD Total % of Prec VTD0001 4,056 63 18 32 731 4 4,904 47.83% VTD0007 1,086 1 13 0 170 1 1,271 12.40% VTD0013 2,375 0 5 6 105 0 2,491 24.29% VTD0018 1,159 25 2 3 398 1 1,588 15.49%. 0 0.00%. 0 0.00%, 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%I 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%i 0 0.00% 0 0.00%i 0 0.00%. 0 0.00%I 0 0.00%'. 0 0.00%i 0 0.00%i 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00 Ethnic Total 8 676 89 38 41 1 404 6 10 254 100.00% °h of Prec 84.61 % 0.87 % 0.37 % 0.40% 13.69 % 0.06 % 100.00% Allison & Associates Map Resource, Inc. W ahrenberger House 208 W. 14th SL Austin, l'X 78701 04d9Ai Kerr County, Texas Statistics by Voting Tabulation District Appendix E Commissioner Precinct 1 Voting Age Population VTD An to Black Indian Asian His enic Other VTD Total % of Prec VTD0001 3,333 47 14 23 475 1 3,893 49.19% VTD0007 759 1 6 0 107 1 874 11.04%~ VTD0013 1,884 0 3 5 62 0 1,95 24.69% VTD0018 909 16 2 1 265 0 1,193 15.07% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 Ethnic Total 6 885 64 25 29 909 2 7 914 100.00% °k of Prec 87.00% 0.81 % 0.32 % 0.37 % 11.49% 0.03% 100.00 Allison & Associates Map Resource, Inc. W ahrenlxrger House 208 W. 14iL St. Austin, TX 78701 0449-91 Kerr County, Texas Statistics by Voting Tabulation District Appendix F Commissioner Precinct 2 Entire Population VTD An to Black Indian Asian Hia anic Other VTD Total °k of Prec VTD0002 2,008 6 9 6 292 0 2,321 24.40% VTD0011 2,365 66 12 25 943 3 3,414 35.90% VTD0015 3,754 27 5 13 576 1 3,776 39.70% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00 Ethnic Total 7 527 99 26 44 1 811 4 9 511 100.00% % Of Prec 79.14% 1.04% 0.27% 0.46 % 19.04 % 0.04 % 100.00 Allison & Associates Map Resource, Inc. Wahreo0erger House 208 W. 14th St. Austin, TX 78701 04-19-91 Kerr County, Texas Statistics by Voting Tabulation District Appendix F Commissioner Precinct 2 Voting Age Population VTD An to Black Indian Asian His anic Other VTD Total % of Prec VTD0002 1,532 4 7 4 192 0 1,739 24.06%i VTD0011 1,923 55 10 17 617 1 2,623 36.32% VTD0015 2,477 9 5 7 360 1 2,859 39.59%~ 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%, 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%, 0 0.00%. 0 0.00%i 0 0.00%i 0 0.00% 0 0.00%I 0 0.00%I 0 0.00%i 0 0.00% 0 0.00%i 0 0.00%'. 0 0.00%i 0 0.00%'I 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Ethnic Total 5 932 68 22 28 1 169 2 7 221 100.00% °k of Prec 82.15% 0.94% 0.30% 0.39% 16.19% 0.03% 100.00% Allison & Associates Map Resource, Inc. W°Ivmbergv House 208 W. 14th Sc Austin, TX 78701 04-19-91 K err Coun ty, Texas Statistic s by Voting Tabulation District Appen dix G Co mmissioner Precinct 3 Entire Po pulation VTD An to Black Indian Asian His anic Other VTD Total % of Prec VTD0003 359 0 0 0 245 5 609 9.51% VTD0008 354 0 0 0 98 0 452 7.06% VTD0012 976 10 5 0 194 0 1,185 18.51% VTD0014 67 439 4 0 879 4 2,000 31.25% VTD0017 1,461 72 5 13 601 3 2,155 33.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Ethnie Total 3 824 521 1 4 1 3 2 017 1 2 6 401 100.00% % of Prec 59.74% 8.14% 0.22% 0.20% 31.51 % 0.19% 100.00% Allison & Associates Map Resource, [nc. Wahreoberger House 208 W 14th SL Austin, TX 78701 04-19-91 Kerr County, Texas Statistics by Voting Tabulation District Appendix G Commissioner Precinct 3 Voting Age Population VTD An to Black Indian Asian Hia snit Other VTD Total % of Prec VTD0003 286 0 0 0 130 3 419 6.77% VTD0008 291 0 0 0 54 0 345 7.22% VTD0012 859 8 5 0 125 0 997 20.88% VTD0014 498 312 4 0 547 4 1,365 28.58% VTD0017 1,202 42 5 7 393 1 1,650 34.55% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%j 0 0.00%i ~ Q.l)~%i <) ~.~~%i 0 0.00%i ~ 0.~~%i 0 0.00%i ~ 0.00%. ~ 0.00%i 0 0.00%I ~ 0.~1)%i ~ ~.~~%i 0 0.00%I ~ ~.l)!)°~ li 0 0.00%i () 0.00°/a ~ 0.~0% ~ 0.~0% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%I ~ D.~l)% 0 0.00%I 0 0.00%i 0 0.~0%i Q 0.00% 0 0.00%' 0 0.00% ~ ().~0% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% ~ ~.~~% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% Ethnic Totel 3 136 362 1 4 7 1 249 8 4 776 100.00% °.6 of Prec 65.66% 7.58% 0.29% 0.15% 26.15% 0.17% 100.00 Allison & Associates Map Resource, Inc. Wahrmberger House 208 W. 14th SL Austin, l'X 78701 OM1-19-91 Kerr County, Texas Statistics by Voting Tabulation District Appendix H Commissioner Precinct 4 Entire Population VTD An to Black Indian Asian His anie Other VTD Total °k of Prec VTD0004 436 0 0 1 37 0 474 4.68% VTD0005 1,164 4 4 0 147 0 1,319 13.01% VTD0006 4,180 16 17 2 307 1 4,523 44.61% VTD0009 118 0 0 1 33 0 152 1.50% VTD0010 221 0 0 0 0 0 221 2.18% VTD0016 3,157 23 5 26 238 0 3,449 34.02% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%I 0 0.00% 0 0.00%i 0 0.00%j 0 0.00%i 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%i 0 0.00%I 0 0.00%j 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00°/ 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00% Ethnic Total 9 276 43 26 30 762 1 10 138 100.00% % of Pree 91.50 % 0.42% 0.26% 0.30% 7.52 % 0.01 % 100.00% Allison & Associates Map Resource, Inc. W ahrmberger Houu 208 W. 14th S[. Austin, TX 78701 01-19-91 K err Coun ty, Texas Statistic s by Voting Tabulation District Appen dix H Co mmissioner Precinct 4 Vo ting Age P opulation VTD An io Black Indian Asian His anic Other VTD Total % of Prec VTD0004 309 0 0 0 31 0 340 4.27% VTD0005 929 4 4 0 113 0 1,050 13.19% VTD0006 3,200 4 13 1 170 1 3,389 42.56% VTD0009 105 0 0 1 25 0 131 1.65% VTD0010 174 0 0 0 0 0 17 2.19% VTD0016 2,685 12 5 19 157 0 2,878 36.15% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00°k 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00°k 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Ethnic Total 7 402 20 22 21 496 1 7 962 100.00% % of Prec 92.97 % 0.25% 0.28% 0.26% 6.23% 0.01 % 100.00 Allison & Associates Map Resource, Inc. W°hrenberger House 208 W. 14tb St. Austin, TX 78701 04-19-91 ~, :,. KERR COUNTY with City of Kerrville ,:- -, CP0004 Precincts ^ Mop 1 Miles Allison & Assoc./MOp Resource, Inc. i i I C I I E t i [ { ( I t i i CP0004 TXKERR BIoc4< ^ Comm.Precinct ---_ __- Populration Distribution I__J ;' 1 t•_~ 1 F i~ i~5 to ~",0 ~ I ^ 251 to 660 Miles I ~~ 0 5 10 ' M1lap 1A Allison & Assoc./Map Resource. Inc. - ' 1 ~ t t __-- t t ~f t ~ 1 ERR C~~NTY -- - T , - ~~~r~nd. ~XKE RR population [Hisp V ^ r ~^ Miles 1•~~~ wi~son x ~sa~1 urn 2 ~\ rnrn ~ I I i T Q r-'- C' ~ ~~ ~ ~- ~ z ~-, ~ ~ j ~, ~' I ~I ~ N ~ it _'_. _J L. - -~ ,. _ = Q ~~ _ X ~ ~ T - - ~ ~ ~ I ~' 6 T ~ 7 O - _ __ i .. r } 1 ~ 1 i , ~ ~ ' of ~~rrv~~lle ^ ~,-r-~ - c~~~y - ~ r, TXKGR" a p pulotion 1 M~r~ ~ ~ } i l4 ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ' 1 } t KERB CQU NTY CP0004 ~~ TXKERR Q Q a~ky population ^ Mi4es -.__~ Alison & Aesac./Mop Reams Map 4 ~ w t t _---- 1 ~ ~ 1 o~ ~errvilie _ ~,, ~~~~Y -City n ~X~EKK ack pulatian 1 ~1~iles C~~aoo5 CNPOQQ4 ~~~onnt~1 Resource, M°~ JJtison & Assoc./MoP f