i-•i}!.'F<:L.i 'I ._ r_ia ~ .,.~. -' ~ t_._ _.-- f.: .. :.?..:r I _...._I ,t_~ _..lJ':F ~_ . lid iy} ,..jt, h ',l~t:_'i-! '--E~-tf._1;_. '::.t. as_...~'_' ~,.,IF~{:: :-:I__L..tr~.a r .. _ - _.. , y ~::'ol.r t unanimously approved by a vote of 4-0-~, +:±:, ~~.; ~:~~-~:,,:,> " , ~. , I_ i 3 ~:' I v :. _ 1 - - o. : .: ~_.. ~ ... :~~ i :1; _ .. `11.1 .~~. ~( '., ~4 1. ~. .. _.. _. _. _ ,_ COMMISSIONERS' COURT AGENDA REQUEST *PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND FIVE COPIES OF THIS REQUEST AND DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE COURT MADE BY: County Judge MEETING DATE: 8/24/92 OFFICE: TIME PREFERRED: SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC) S.on id and annrnv th K ville Federicksburg Local Planning Area Local Solid Waste Plan. EXECUTIVE SESSION REQUESTED: YES _ NO PLEASE STATE REASON FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION: PERSONNEL MATTER - NAME OF EMPLOYEE: NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT: Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter is posted in accordance with Article 6252-17 1s as follows: ~ Meetings held on Monday: 12:00 P.M. previous Wednesday TH i S REQUEST RECE i VED BY: THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON : ~ All Agenda Requests w111 be screened by the County Judge's Otflce to determine 1t adequate information has been prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of Court meetings. Your cooperation w111 be appreciated and contribute towards your request being addressed at the earnest opportunity. See Agenda Request Guidelines. H~ iG-1 ~1- i'?'~2 1 ~ ~ 51 FROM ""'T~LA~:KWELL ENI~ . I NC . TO "' 1512792385© P . 91 BLACRWELL ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 9020 CAPITAL OF TEXAS HIGBWAY NORTS GREAT SILLS CORPORATE CENTER II, SUITE 550 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759 (512) 346 -7655 VOICE (512) 794-9676 FAX ~'AX TRANSMITTAL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The documents accompanying this telecopy transmission contain confidential information which ie legally nr~.vlledged and intended only for the use of the recipient named below. You are hereby notified that any disC].asure~ copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this telecopied i.n~ormation ie Strictly prohibited. DATB s 08/14/92 TIME 02:38:37 TO RANDY G. THOMAS KERRVILLB, CITY OF 800 UUNCTION bIGHWAY KERRVILLB TX 78028 FAX NUMBER SENT TO: (512)792-3$5Q NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING IBIS COVER SKEET) - 12 COMMENT This is a Dopy of what we faxed to ACCOG. Hi_~G-1 a -1'~'?2 1 a ~ U5 FROf~I ~aBLA~~KWELL Et PJ . I tdC . TO 1 S 127y238~~t P . O 1 I(ERRVIL.L~ a FREnFRlCKSBURQ LOCAL PLANNING AR~4 "~ LotrAt sawn wASrE PI.A1V TASK 1 - INVENTORY OF EXISTING SOUd WASTE MANAdEMENT SYSTEM AND PLANNING AAEA CHARACTER/ST1CS !n this task, Kvrrvllle d fiederlcksburg Local Planning Area w111 gather and summarize data from eexisting reports, plans, end dais bases as well as collecting data through investigation of e~osting facUlf/es. Kerrvlge ~ Frederioksburg Loeat P/art»Iny Aroa will geitrer data from all perrrtltted Landfills and will survey large arld speclel waste generators, haulers, recycling and composting program operators and solid waste management facility operators in the Planning Area. Korrvlll a b Frederloksburg Looa! Planning Area will gather available cement end historic information on: Size and/or remaining capacities, service areas, general design, operating plans, annual quantity of waste handled end permit status of solid waste management facilities within and Ln close proximity to the Planning Area including existing, proposed and recently closed facilhies (Including sanitary landfills, open dumps, waste U!@ sites, Construction and demolition fills and other specie/ waste disposal sites including illegal disposal sites): • Demographic data Including population and housing panerns (residerttialsingle-family and multi-family) and average household-sizes for municipalities and counties in the Planning Ares: * Source, quantity and composition of solid wastes disposed within and In close proximity to the Planning Area: * Current efforts ro minimize production of municipal solid waste (including municipal sludge) and efforts to reuse, recycle, compost and Incinerate waste, including Information an the source, quantity and composition of these wastes in the Planning Area: * Existing refuse collection practices including costs, frequency of collection and cusromer types (commercial, residential, etc.): * Prlvete haulers operating In their Planning Area, their seroiCe areas slrtd Schedule of charges: * Existing storage and transportation systems and transfer routes in the Planning Area: Prevailing solid waste management policies, Institutional arrangemerns, public and private management agencies and special districts or authorities within and in close proximity to the Planning Area including identifieatian of these entities responsibilities: • Current and planned solid waste management activities within and in close proximity to the Planning Area: Gurrerrt revenues, costs and/or tipping f9es re/sled ro solid waste management within and in close proximity ro the Planning Ares: • Source, quantlry and types of waste transported into and out of the Planning Area - . AACOG Subnag;nn 1!1 Page 1 Sviid We9te MerrsgemeiH Plan -1?iaeusaion Pepsi August 13, 1882 ~:.J HUG-1-1-1'?'?~ 1:'S~ ~~='t=~•' ~'_H~~F-.;~:E'J_ E '';. 1I ~. '~i 1`1~'~"?~l~E<<=~ F'.~i~ " History of violadans and actions for haulers acrd solid waste management facility operators: Applicable state, regional and local plans and studies: And Volumes end handling methods used fa so//d waste managed on-sire. The data gathered in Task !will enable Kemn7le & Frederlcktbutg Local Planning Area to: Characterize the existing solid waste management syst+~ms and programs in the Planning Area: Develop an ACCT/rate and reliable data base to facilitate tutors solid waste management planning efforts: and Estimate currern disposed, recycled, campOSted, lncirrerated and generated solid waste quantities and composition. In add/tlon, sufficient dAt+~ w/l! be gathered in Task I to allow for the fo/low/ng objectives to be accomplished in Task 2: Project generated And disposed solid waste quantities and oompasltlons in the Planning Area: Assess the adequacy of the current solid waste management programs and systems end determine the solid waste managemenn needs in the Planning Area: Identity poterrilal Impacts to future generated waste quanalrles. Task lA - Sopd Waste Mariagemont Facility Survey A critical step of the Plan will be to evaluate existing municipal solid waste management acrd county faC/Ilf/es Currently In operairon. !n order ro effectively perform this work as detailed, a survey of the existing permitted lartdti!!s within and in close proximity to the Planning Area will be performed by Kerrville 8 Fredericksburg Local Planning Ares. The Survey data will be collected throughout and in near proximity to the Planning Area, as necessary, to account for disposal of all waste from the Planning Area. Data on all permitted Type 1 and Type ll sites will be gathered, such es current waste loads, service area, location, size, geolog/c sert/ng, permit status &»d other valuable intarmadan. Task 78 -Hauler Survey The hauler Survey will Bid in the identlflcatlon of solid waste management fac;llues to which waste is transported in the Planning Area and outside the Planning Area, as well es the amounts going to each laclllry, methods of cal/ecdon and transfer, major highway routes currently used ro AACdG Subregion Ill Pags 2 Sorld Waste ManRyement Phm - piacusalan Paper AuOust 13, 1x01 ~,. I-i_~_~-.'.--~.~'=ac' ~_;~,,_ F='_'' =!_Hi,`•.--- ~ ~.~. ~~'.~~~. TII l~l~~'i?~~'~~ F'. U3 transport solid waste, areas where collection service is nor available, and current collection, transportat/on and disposal costs. The survey results could also provide useful input to the analyses of res/dential, commercial, institutional, tecreafiona/ and industrial waste generation and of landrl/ing practices. Teak i C -Large Weata Generator Survey Large waste generators, such as certain industries, educations! instRutions, and federal or stare facilities, Rte linportant since they cormfbute large amounts of waste and have a large, single point impact upon waste disposal programs. They also often provide excellent opportunities for source reduction and recycling programs. Task iD • Aecycling artd Compasiing Program survey The data collection process for recycling and reuse programs is often limited by several factors. Tire lave! of recyclirre and reuse actlvlry varies widely from community to oommunity, depending on governmental initiative, citizen interest and the industrial end commercial mix M addition, data coJlectlon is complicated by the fact that recycled and reused waste often moves ro the end-users !ry a variety of paths, and marry d/7fering types of entitles in both the public and private sectors may do some recycling and reuse of wastes. ideally, therefore, information should be gathered from recycling and reuse program operarors, recyclab/es brokers or salvage dealers, end-users and all types of waste generators. How6Vl.'I, -Y /S arlpC/paled mat me other surveys, particularly the waste generator surveys, will provide an Indication of the amount of recyccling and reuse currently taking place in the Planning Area. Teak 1E - Specfal Waifs Generator Survey Special wastes include infectious wastes, used oil, /eadacid batteries, munlc/pal sludge, Industrial wastes from large generators, mining wastes, egrtcultural wastes, demolition and constiucdon waste, white goods, waste tires and hazardou8 wastes (including small quarnity and household hazardous wastes). Kerrville d Fraderlcksburg Local Plannlrtg Area will conduct the Special Waste Generator Survey throughout the Plannr'ng Area Talk 1 F - Estlmatlon et Guneni So/ld Waste Quantltiea and t:ompasltfon Kerrville ~ Fredertckstwr$ Lott Ptarrrting Area will use the previously gathered data to estimate current solid waste quantities generated, recycled, composted, incinerated and disposed !n the Planning Ares. Transport of waste irno and out of the Planning Area will t16 taken Into account /!AGOG Subisgio» III Solid wo~ro Management Plan - Dlaouoelon Paper Pane 3 August Y3, iee2 when developing these estimates, These projections will ba presented by origin or source (l.e., residerrtlal, commercial, instrtWona/, recreational, Industrial, etc.) to the extentpossible. Per capita w&ste loads w/ll be developed wfthln the Planning Ares. Emerging from this task will be a picture of the Planning Area's current 'wasresheds,' or net waste flows across the Area. Kerrville ~ Fredericksburg Cocat Planning Area will also prepare estimates of the current generated, recycled, composted, incinerated and disposed waste composifions In the Planning Area based on the data collected, and waste eompos/tivn studies performed in the stare of Texas ~r irr areas similar t0 the Planning Area. Tv the extent required, the U.S. EPA report (updated In 1988) entitled 'Characteriradon of Munlc/pal Solid Waste in the United States, 1960 to 2000' wilt be used to supplement local and regional data. Adjustments tv data from outside the Planning Area will be made as necessary to characterize the unique aspects of the Planning Area. Such adjustments would primarily be based on the characreristlcs of the Planning Area's cornlrierciellindustrial beseand the types and quantifies of special wastes generated and disposed of in the region. TASK 2 - PRCJEt^TIoNS of wAS~ QUANTl1Y AND COMPOStT/aN AND NEEbS ASSESSMENT Task 2A - ProjQCtfons al Papulatloa Kerrville b Fredericksburg Local Planning Area will project the Population of the Planning Area by use of the tJ.S. Bureau of Census 1980 data. Population projections and demographic analysis shall be performed over a 20 year period. Task 2B - ProJectiana of Waage Quarruty and Composition The data gathered and current waste quantity and composition estimates made in Task 1 will enable Kerrville & Fredericksburg Lac~tt Pia~ning Area ro make projections of generated and discarded waste quantities and eomposidon over a 20-year period. Trio wasteshed analysis performed by KemiAe & Fredericksburg Local Plann/n8 Area will include: Baseline projecfions of generated solid waste quantifies and composition by we/gM, volume artd sector (/e., residential, commercial, institutional, recreafional, industrial, etc.) assuming current waste minimizafion and source reduction activities !n the Planning AfeEi remain •status quo': Baseline profecilons of reused, recycled, composted and incinerated waste quanfides assuming that current actlyIdes In these arses remain 'status quo': and Basellr}s projections of disposed solid waste quantities and composition by weight, volume and sector assuming that current waste minlmlzsfion, recycling, composting and incineration activities remain 'sfetus quo'. pgCOQ Suhreglon 111 Peg6 4 5otld Waste Maneyement Plan -Discussion Pspet Au~wt t3, r;Da2 Task 2C • Assessmerrt of Current Efforts to Minimize Waste Production end Rtuse, Recycle. Compost end Mcinerate 1Ntrnicipal Solid Waste based on the data gathered in Task i and the waste quantity tirtd composition projections developed, Ketrvtlle & Frodericksburg Local Planning Arta will make a shortterm end tong-term assessment of the adequacy of existing efforts in the Planning Area [o minimize waste production end reuse, recycle, compost and incinerate municipal solid waste, Including municipal sludge, in the Planning Area. 77ris assessment will be made based on a variety of criteria including: * Potential fvr consetvetion of landfill life: Technical and economic Considerations: * Envlronmentsl and safety consldetafions: and * Public accepferrCe. TASK 3 - GC7MPAAlSON Pt` D131~'OSAL ALTEANATNES Kerrvlile & Frvde~ricksqurs focal Planning Area will develop cost comparisons for various dl8posel options available fn the Subregion. These options will include: t;orrtinued Operation Of Existing Landfills -which will include analysis of operations under Subtdl8 D Conditions Joint Apresmerrt for Subregions! Landfill Irrc/neratiprt of Waste For Co--generati¢n - Many d/fferent forms of;nc/nerstion are possible, and the best form to be used will be analyzed within this feasibility report The techndogy available cgrt reduce the solid waste stt~am by as much as 8596 of the present volume to the landfill, however high costs have usually deterred the construction and operation of mesa rypQS of facilities. Due to the higher costs that Subtitle D will present, Incineration acrd cogeneration may be getting close to becoming an economical altemerrve of writs reduction. Use of A Trensfe~',~(ation To Allow Waste To Be Hauled To LandTlls In The San Antonio Area. TASK 4 • tJdBiLt7Y CONS/DERAT1aNS Kerrville dr Fredericksburg Lvca1 PlvnningAras w!l! sumrnerize the liability considerations for dte various solid waste disposal options available In the Subregion, including continued 18nd~i11 operation and transfer of waste to another fr;eitiry. ,u+coa s„h~RQ;o„ m Paga 5 Solid Wesre MenagamQnt Plan • biscwsion Paper Aupuet 73, iDC2 TASK 5. OPTIONS FOR CONTINUED OPERATIaN OF THE EXISTING IJINDFILLS Karrvtlle & fr9derickaburg Local Pl~tnning Ares wi!! evaluate possible scenarios for continued operation of the Kerrville landfill. These will include: * Closing Out The Existing Portions of landfills; * Pursu/ng A Permit Amendment Thai A11ows Additional Height at existing /andfllls; * Accepting Waste From Outside The Subregion; * Use Of Alternative Liner And/Or Cover Systems TASK B - SU9TITLE D AEQUTAEMENTS AND GQSTS Kemrilla ~ Frederlclrsbury Local Planning Area Wlll provide a complete description of the various Su4tltle D requirements and t)teakdown of the costs essooi8ted with each one. These requirements and costs include: * Re-design And Permitting of Landfill(s) " Liner Construoti0n (Includes Testing) Construction of Lsechate Collection System{8} * Leachate Treatment Cosr * Consvuction of Manltoring Wells * Maniroring Well Sampling And Analysts * Inspection Program For Incoming Waste * Perimeter Fencing Or Other Barrier * Construction of Methane Yents & Monitoring * Post Closure Care: Malritenanca of Cover, Continuing Leachate 8 Gas Monitoring, Continued Leachete Treatment rASK 7 -WASTE STREAM REAuCnON ~aLTERNATNEs KelriAls ~ Frathricks6urg Luca! Planning Area will provide an evaluation of alternative methods for wsstestream reduction. These will include; * Drop-Off Centers, * Curbside Recycling, * Material Recovery Facilities, * Yard Waste Composting Operations, and * CommerCis! Recycling Progrsrris. * Cogeneratlon/lrtcineration Also included wiJ! be an evaluation of the feasibility of implementing a volume based rate structure. For each of these programs, we wilt evaluate: AACOO SuW~fion J!1 Page B Solid Waete Martagament Plan - Olscusslon ~+~ August 13, 188? ~~~ Potential Mount of Waste Reduction Capita! Costs oI Facilities Typical Operational Goats TASK 8 - IDENTIFY ADOlTtONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR SOl1D WASTE MINIMIZATION AND RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES FOR /MPLEMENTATION The Kem+lfle & Fr~edericksbury Local PIa»ning Area sha1J ident/fy additional opportunities in all facets of an integrated approach to eliective solid waste management within the Kerrv11le b Fredsrickaburg LvCal Planning Area region. The advantages and disadvantages of developing subreylona! systems as opposed tv focal facilities shall be evaluated. TASK 9 - DEVELOPMENT OF STRATEGIES TO REDUCE lU.EQALANA/OR HAZARDOUS HANDLING O1= SOLID WASTE To discourage unsound solid waste management practices that negawely imp$ct the region's environment Snd economy, such as open bum/ng In densely populated areas, roadside and ditch dumping, and Illegal operation of dump sites. A three-pronged approach Is required to eccompllsh this objective: 7J tougher litter abatemern laws and enforcement, 2) educational efforts targeting ohe problems end 3) provision of acceptable and reasonable disposal options for rural res/dents. The overall work effort required is divided into & number of subtasks. The >ina/ work product will be a stand-alone sect/on o1 the Subre~glonsl SolJd Waste Plan ttlat incorpotefes recommendations and supporting data for solid waste service programs or upgrades, Including the parties who will be responsible for the services, whet the programs will cost and how they should be financed and administered. Educatlona/ and enforcement recommendadons will also be Included. Teak 9e -Survey of Illegal dumping A survey will be used ro establish the extent of dumping in the various parts of the Subregion. This will serve es a baseline for assessing the success of the measures implemented as a result of ttre Subregional Plan. More Importantly, the survey will provide data on the areas affected by illegal dumping. It will allow us to see whether measures such as county collection sites help to alleviate illegal dumping. We cart assess to what degree the Illegal dumping problem is worse in areas where municipal larxl(ills ar8 closed to out-of-city residents. The data developed in the survey will a15o be useful for die educational eti`ort required to help reduce die amount of Illegal dumping. AACOCi 3utxeyiwl 111 _ - Page T Solid Weate 6fana8ement Plan - Dlacusa/on Paper Aupuat t 3, t ~2 r~ Task 9b - tnvestlgatlon of Legal, Political Brad Economic Feas/blltty of Proposod Altem~ttfves for Providing Services We will interview representatives from various Goes, counties, districts that era considered to be poss/ble csndldates Jor providing and billing for solid waste servfcas. The legs! and political issues involved will be assessed and discussed with the Kerrville 8 Fredericksburg Local Planning Area committee. An aQOnomic assessment will be dev~eloped for each a/temative with the bottom line being cost per household. A summary paper on the findings will be presenoed to the Kerrvl/le b Fredericksburg Lncai Planning Area advisory committee for review. Tsek 8c - Fducatlonel F.florte to Addreee rtes Illegal Dumpirt~ Prodlem We will request input from local residents, and from agencies such as Keep Texas Beautiful who cleat with various illegal dumping issues as to the best way to target edueet/on efforts aimed at discouraging the illegal dumping of waste. Posslblllties would be mass media campaigns through focal TV and radio andlor billboards. These campaigns could also Include efforts aimed at controlling dumping/litter in speclflc areas such as dliches end envlronmentaHy sensitive areas. Specific additions ro the existing solid waste programs in the schools Could be alined at the !!legs! dumping/buming prablems. The extension service could posst7~ly incorporate some of this into ihe/r exlsting programs. Funding possibilities far implementation of educational programs will be addressed. The work product for this subtask is a plan far various educational streregles and programs as well as outlines for fhe media campaigns or curricula proposed. Tavk Fd - AvcommandatlQrra for Upgrades lrt Uttar Abatement Ordinances and Enforcement Policies The survey may help to discern if existing variations in ordinances and enforcement policies are making a noticeable difference in the extent of illegal dumping. Litter abatement is becoming an Important Issue across ilia state, with passible funding ava/lable through TWG grams. We will pursue this aptian and also will investigate the types of ordinances and policies being Implemented !n other locations. A review of these progrerris and the associated results will enable us to mak® recommendations for appropriate changes in Valley communities. TASK 10.1DENTIt=Y PLANNINQ AAFAS AND AGENCIES WITH COMMON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMI:I~IT PA08LEMS HAVING POTENTIAL FOR JOINT ACTION The Kerrville S Fredtrfckabury Local Planrtitag Area will identify altematlve, potential organizational structures ror lrrtergovemmental cooperation within local governments of the Kerrville & Fredericksburg Lnca/ P/annfng Aria region to resolve common problems through the development end implementation of regional and subregions! systems. AACOQ Subregion 111 Solid Weatu Menagemant Alan - Qiscusslon Paper Page 8 August t3, t 982 ,~ TA5K 11 - DEYELOf' INTEALOCAL GOALS AND Q6.lECTIIfES, AND ALTERNATNE ACTIpNS Within t!]ia work element, the Kerrville b Frederlcksbury Local Planning Area shall prepare the plan goals and objectives relating to source reduction, recycling and reuse, waste fo en8rgy, inoineraton, methane recovery facilJties, the development of cooperative regional systems, extension of teeiliry and site life, environmental and safety concerns, cost effectrveness, program incentives, putrllc education end participation, etC_ TASK 12- PAEPAAE A RECOMMENDED FLAN OF ACTION. INCLUD/NQ lN57TTU7~ONAL ARRANDEMENTS, RESPONS191LITIES, TIME LINES AND ESTIMATED IMPLEMENTATION C0575 At the completion of the previous work elements, determination of waste flow9, 8valuation of Incentives for, and barriers % effective waste management, and the testing of floe/ altematfire actions, the Kvrrvllle $ Frederlckaburg Luca! PlannlnB Area shall draft a recommended plea of action. Thi9 plan Shall meet the guidelines as stated in Sutrehapter O, and shall Include the consider8tion identified in afJ work elements. In addition to estr'tnatiny p/Rn Itnp/ernentatian costs, the Korrvillo 8 Frederrcksburs Local Plannlnq Area shall draft an imp/omentation strategy and schedule tl]at will perrnlr completing the programs and achieving the goals and objectives of the plan in a timely manner. MCOG Subrbg]on !tl Page ~ Solid Waste Maneyamar-t P/art - Disct+3sion Pgpnr August 73, f 882 ~~ Schedule !ae a Eart~llle/Praderiebtrnrq Local Salid Raata Mgt Dl.ta ~ ,' lleeponeibly ~ City o3 ltarn111e L-af wte : A/1//92 Bi06 Scbedala Plla : 2131tRPREO r_ L '1~ De~emdeNCia6 7 ILLSC9J, 91A.4TE 6IaDL]]iG Ili !2 93 '- 6tart Sod Eag Sep Oat Rar DRC Jan Y•b ii .. Task b:au Oate Dats 71 16 21 ! ]9 26 9 13 7 11 1 19 1 0 ~~ -1 2NrCDQ lbalniatratiaa 9/ 1192 2119197 I71V. 0.a EIISTSBG 8137191 9l 1192 101 7192 ~ s ?11CII,I17 8071P6Y 9! 1112 9/12/!2 ~ a r~ 3RIQ1B cm~uxca s3ava7 ADClCfdlfO/CODPORPI~a 538410' ~asu D4a1E cea. s00rvsr C'Wtt~ tll&79 QDAA. i 001@. 110158E ]AOJ./1IEED5 ASSSe9611T PaPOLLTIOtl P0.0JtlCTI0118 c3rteo12~ 1r1usTE ~. >lrronrl 7l1BTE PBOOtlCTLOtla alsaasec 2aLTtaB. co1~IVlIaaal l:1DbILi2T COBSIDEP1TIOtla 3GIILEIEC retlOruaS a1-rtoxs 838. D REpDIR301ENT4 i C069'S 70i8TE RirD3Cf20tl 15.'7QTAMVaA IIIOtl STlRiT50:IB8 IId~J.I, 10MTE Bi107LING 1uDa4at 11r I3.LEGiL a31VIE0 IEABI3IILITY or arasDSaTlvsa EDUC1TIOtldI, Elr0A15 YDI3t7 -4+GR>1TI455 SttmLOCJL C06IJ aEOaDOa1DD;m PI.iS or ]~csIatl i+ot+li Jt01tQ Cao~utar Prot' Eng Pros m4r 'S11ah/Draft 5,108.00 -r!~__ 400.00 8,800. D0 520.00 1,400.00 aeD. oD 1ao.o6 aeo. 00 2ao,oo 180.00 180,00 eaD.oo 1e6.oo eeD.6D 2ao.oa 400.00 1,100.00 520.00 400.00 1,3]0.00 100.00 110.00 140.00 200.00 440.00 1,000.00 2,200.00 1,560.00 1,049.00 2,1oo.aa s2D.oa 1,400.00 400.00 2,100.00 1,040.08 400.00 2,100.00 1,010.00 1,000.00 S20.OD 11,000.00 5,710.00 S44.O0 a,aao.oo 2,iao.oD sio.ao 2,200.00 1,610.00 2,700.00 1,010.00 2,100.00 1,010.00 2,100.00 1,040.00 1,400.00 2,100.00 .ro~~,,. ~• 0,400.00 2,400.00 ~ s.r~ 5,460.00 3+000.00 ~•em.. /5,310.00 e•a~,ru IA,200.10 ~uu.~r 3,748.00 Total 5,000.00+ 11,120.00+ 1,150.00 1,118.00 1,160.00 I,l4o.DD 1,160.00 5,320.00 1,720.00+ 460.00 440.00 410.90 t,7d0.00+ i,oID.DD• /,170.00+ 3,040.00+ 3,840.00• 1,!20.00• 17,280.90• 7,sio.oD 3,210.00 3,200.00 3,200.00 3,210.06• 7,000.00+ 7,000.00+ 75,280.90• I~ L I r- ll 'li Ai isl ~.~ u~ i~ I~ m r r m ii G r C9 ~. PY -1 ~_D 1~ ~ 1sl fji cn G T r ti- TINE LIlts Taak va Rasoarca Cat @epott sLorinq Total Oollan ~tLER N0. 21061 APPF~IVAL OF I{ERfiT17~IErFi~IERIQ(.S6URG IDCAL PIAl~i7NG AF~A TDC~L 99LYD LdASPE. PLAN At~qust 24, 1992 Vol S, Page 709