v
ORDER X10. 20843
REJECTION OF ALL BIDS FOR THE
SEAL COAT PROJECT FOR THE
ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPAi~T~•IENT
On this the 23rd day of March 1992, upon motion made by Commissioner
Holekamp, seconded by Commissioner Lackey, the Court UNAIvIi<iOUSLY
APPROVED BY A VOTE OF 4-0-0, to reject all bids for the seal coat
project read on March 9, 1992. This will allow work on roads that
are torn up due to our weather conditions to be repaired before the
seal coat is done.
~..':.
COMM I ~- ! nNERS' COURT ~C~~~NDA REQUEST
~'~-PEASE FURNISH ONE O{~ I G I Nf\l_ Af~l[~ 1= I V[= CO (~ I f~.`~ ~ ~[ ~[-[ I I S P,EC~UEST H.ND
DOCUMENTS TO BF Rf~VI(-WED [~`r ~[-f I[- ('i~~ !~'~i
IADE BY: Leonard Odom,~7r _ _ _ l`)I I ~ ~. ~. Road & Bridge_
-1EE! ING DATE: March 23, 1992 -l lf'i~ "'f?FFERRED:
SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIE=1Cf)~~~- Recommendation for Seal Coat Bid
`: EXECUTIVE SESSION REC~UES~1-[f-~: 1'I~:~
-.~ XX
PLEASE STATE REASON Recommendation for Seal Coat Bid opened March 9 , 1992
ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENT,~1 1~ i oN:
10 minutes
PERSONNEL f 1~~TTER - N,~1r1E Of= I:i l[~l_~)1'L::
NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING, lfll: i'c:~U[~.L.
Leonard Odom, Jr.
Tfine for submitting this request for Court t~~ ~~ssure tl~~Jl the ria" ~~ ;posted in zccordznce
v.~fth Article 6252-17 1s as follows:
~ Zyeetings held on second Monday; 1 2,00 P.I-1. previous VJednesd,:~~.
'~ tleeting5 held on Thursdays: 5:~0 (~.P~1. 1?rc'~,~lous 'T'hrr_rs~lay
T`IS REQUEST RECFI ~,~[_[~ f~l':
T: ~ I S REQUEST RECE I VE~~ ~~~J
,x,11 Agenda P,equests wlll he scre:~nc~i by the ~~~, ~ ~- .'s ~?(fi e ~'~tArr~~~~~. if
C l ~ v _ _ _
~- ?dequate information has peen prci~~rreci for the r'~~~,rr~~' ~ rr~,al consideration 2nd 2ct{cn
at time of Court meet ln~s. Four conl~F~rr~l ion ~~~ 111 h,~ .~ ~ :',prod and contr`h~_~`e ' .~.~, r~~s
~~eur req~_~~st ,,lino ~rjr,~~~: <,r~~~i ~' ~ hr` cnri I~~~;t ~ ~. ~,o:, ~ .,~~~~ - - --
MFMC)RANDUI~
Ta Commissioners' Court
FROM: Leonard Odom, Jr., County Road Administrator
r~ DATE: March 23, 1992
RF:. Recommendation for 1992 Seal Coat Bid
Due to heavy rainfall, there has been a lot of unforeseen road damage,
and our normal maintenance has had many interrt,ptions. Kerr County
Road & Bridge Department would be hard pressed to have all roads
ready for seal coating at the same time this year,
Therefore, at this time I would like to recommend that the
• Commissioners' Court reject all bids for the 1992 Seai Coat Bid that
were read aloud March 9, 1992.
This would allow us time to repair water damages, and prepare the
roads for seal coating. Kerr County Road and Bridge employees could
.~-, then seal coat each road or area as it is completed.