AF'F~RUVAL_ OF ADVEf1l It7Il•~Ila F-Ufi BIi:~S FIND F'izCiE='[iSALS F=CJR A i_:OMF'UTER ;3YS~I-I. h1 1=0F~ fF-IL~ TAX A:3SE;:~5C1R/C:OLL_ECTOEl Qn this the 9th day of hl~arc•h 199ti;, ~_ipon motion made by t~ommissioner Lehman, seconded by C;ommi~sioner, Lackey, the Co~_~r-t unanimously approved by a vote of 4-~-0, to aclver~t:ise for bid proposals or. an IBh1 Kisk System 6iZt~~/::;4tLi and E~~~~/:_;6~ for the F`.err Co~_inty ~i`ax Assessor/Collector,. CoMM I SS I oNERS~ COURT AGEND~4 REQUEST PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND FIVE COPIES OF THIS REQUEST AND DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE COURT MADE BY: -,; ~ ~„e ~ i ~>> ,/i', ; ~ C,. .-~ ~, .~, MEETING DATE: -' ~ ~ - %-J OFFICE: ~'~/~- ~~-~''~~ TIME PREFERRED: SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC) ~%~~~.~~ ~%-~% ~?;"~", '~=;'~%+~' % '~~~ r~' . . /. ~~ ; ( Cam! ' ~ 7`~F'I'•~_ ti? __ -f-~; ~/-~ `?~7iF _ _ _ l~ :»'~' F-'~~'~ !f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; .~ ~ __ ~--'~'L'r_ ' l~ ~ - ~'~ EXECUTIVE SESSION REQUESTED: YES _ NO PLEASE STATE REASON FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION: PERSONNEL MATTER - NAME OF EMPLOYEE: NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT: Time for submitting this request for Caurt to assure that the matter 1s posted in accordance with Article 6252-i7 is as follows: * Meetings held on Monday: 12:00 P.M. previous Wednesday THIS REQUEST RECEIVED BY: THIS REDDEST RECEIVED ON : ~ All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine if adequate information has been prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of Court meetings. Your cooperation will be appreciated and contribute towards your request being addressed at the earliest opportunity. See Agenda Request Guidelines. KERB COUNTY COMPUTER HARDWARE UPGRADE 3-9-93 This recommendation to acquire computer hardware for Kerr County resulted from a Commissioners Court decision to move the Tax Collector to the Kerr County Administrative Building and the need to improve efficiency of the Courthouse system. Central to a decision on the kind of hardware is software. The Tax Collector has ex~imined software different from that supplied by The Software Group (TSG) in terms of cost, support and quality. I have obtained similar information from software vendors and user. Our findings do not. present any reason to discontinue using TSG software. With the recommendation to u;,e TSG software, we must acquire hardware that will drive the software and that will also utilize RIOr11tOr:, and printers now in use. We also need a hardware that will give us expandability, duality system software and flexibility in an open systems environment. Hardware that will Satl^afy those requirements are as follows: Tax Collector IBM RISC System 6000/340 7.6 MB RAM Memory 1 GB Disk 16 User Configuration 525 MB Tape Drive 3.5 Diskette Remote Diagnostic Modem System Console UPS Courthouse IBM RISC System 6000/30 h 4 MB RAM Memo r~y 2 GB Disk F,~1 User Configuration 8 mm Tape Drive 1/4" Tripe Drive 3.5 Diskette System Console UPS ORDER N0. 21328 APPROVAL OF ADVERTISING FOR BIDS AND PROPOSALS FOR A COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR THE TAX ASSESSOR/COI~TOR March 9,1993 Vol S, Page 888