2.1 Review option for computer hardware related to move of Tax Office. Tommy Tomlinson handed the Commissioners' a study which he had done on the Computer Systems. The Cost was not discussed because of the Options given and he doesn't knave which of the options the Tax Assessor will need to have to function in her office. A workshop will be scheduled for March 2, 1993, to have this discussion. COMMISSIONERS' COURT AGENDA REQUEST _. PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND FIVE COPIES OF THIS REQUEST AND DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE COURT MADE BY: fir%'i%. ~; ice;; ~'~ ~~; ~~~ MEETING DATE: ~~~ ~.? SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC) OFFICE: ~iJ~i~7~/~/- TIME PREFERRED: ~~ EXECUTIVE SESSION REDUESTED: YES __ NO k PLEASE STATE REASON FOR EXECUTIVE SESS l ON ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION: PERSONNEL MATTER - NAME OF EMPLOYEE: NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT: Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter is posted in accordance with Article 6252-17 is as follows: * Meetings held on Monday: 12:00 P.M. previous Wednesday THIS REGlUEST RECEIVED BY: THIS REQUEST RECE1 VED ON : c~ All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine if "' adequate information has been prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of Court meetings. Your cooperation will be appreciated and contribute towards your request being addressed at the earliest opportunity. See Agenda Request Guidelines. IiERR COUNTY COMPtJTER SYSTEt4 STUDY Thi;> analys:LS is to explore alternative solutions to the pr-ohlem rel<:itive to moving the Tax Collector to the Administr~itive bui:Lding. The options :included are not all inclusive; they do not .include a cash pur.rhrl:iF' or :-.alternate fln~incing. Thct opt:i_ons pi°e~entc~d assumr. ~i 5 year lease. Since we need to go through the bidding izrocess to obtain a system, I did not list the sourr,c.~ of my i.nform~ztion. Option A ,a:;sume:> that we will keep our cur rent Tax, Motor and Voter software, le~.+sc~ IBM ecJuipment thr.it will serve 7.5 users and continuo to tzse the curr°ent hardware and soft.warr for the remainder of the courthouse. This option wotzlci free up ~.2 l~orts ~antim~it~ the-+t. we would need to ~tdd disk sp~lce in the third yc>ar-. Option B :zssunu°s t.liat we would not keep our present software. r.,ontr~tct: for .z .; f:rSric;r: th<:tt includes software and h.~zrdware for a fix<~cl f.cc anci continue rise o£ thc~ current hardware rand software for thf~ rernaind~~r of t:ho courthou::~e as in Option A. Option C ~z:;sumc~~~ thrt-t we would continue. -to u: e the current software for ~tll users anc:i lc~a:7e ecXuipment for the Tax Office and new c~clti.ipment for the courthouse. Total users would be 80. Each option shows the dish requirement for each year for 5 years and tYtc tota]_. For each option I have also calrulatc:d the incremental ra;h r.c:~quir~ment, In ..ununrar~y, I will rclatc:~ some additional farts dnd ob:,ervations. Opt-icins A ~znd B ~tre very c Lose in terms of ca h requirements; the m<:tjor dif.fer~ence bE:inq the ~zoftware far the: Tax Collector. This tc~.l.]_s mf: that t.hc~ ~>oftware mark~:t f.or County C,overnment is very r;ompetitive; thus the deter°mining factor for selecting software: i.s c3u:ality. Thc~rc~ i.~ concern a}.~otit the time required to produce tax st~itementa. P~+rt. of th~~ pr~b Lem i:~ the convex rsion of Appraisal Distrir_t data to rnec.~ia read~iJa.l-e by otir- system. We will continue to have this problr~m its lonq a; our .;oftware i:~ different from the ApprGiisal Di::,tr.i_ct; however thE~ t:imr, required for this process will bc~ gre~it-iy rr'ciuc;eci with new equ_i.pment. Our current c~cluij>rnent contains only ~ MB of random arces.> memory (RAM); thi:~ is c~qu~tl to or less RAM than personal r_omputers :told today. RAM dc~tc~rm-inev the spec>ci of pror.essing. Producing tax :t~.tterncnts rc°c~tlirf';> rn.iny }io+trs of pror_essing t:i.me. Options A and B -^ inc lucle ~a m:iri.i.murn cif 16 MB of RAM. It is easy to see what these ;,ptions could dc~ t.o spc~frd ut, the tax statement procca;s.> . As stated earlier, the at~sence of the Tax Collector on the current .~ :;y::;tem would create free disk space and 7.2 port expan:,ion on the current system rout would not increa.ac the speed a noticablc amount. Option C br Cngs 64 MB RAM with word processing and spre~~dsheet. ec3ual -to LOTUS and WORDPFRFFCT al_5o available for the Tax Collector in opt-ion A. Option C also offers flexiability to change or add additional software as desired anti to add disk space if. neec{ed for 25~ of the cost to ~tc.ad c.ii:~k :;puce in our current h._ir<~ware . It. would ~ilso increase daily operating efficie~nr.y for all users. with Options A and B in price, it is not an _ibsolur_e necessity to replace hardware in the c..otarthousc~ at this time; however we know that-. it wil)_ be in the futut:~e. I inc]_uded Option r to show what. could bc~ ~.-dded with re lat.:ively l~-ttlc incrc:mrntal co t, $4, 800 pr r y~~ir over a 5-year. per~ioci. KERR COUNTY COMPUTER SYSTEM STUDY FEBRUARY 23, 1993 YR i YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 OPTION A: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Annual NCR Maint 15,061 15,814 16,604 18,935 19,807 Annual maint. on Tax Collector Software 8,544 8,967 9,415 9,886 10,380 Annual lease on [BM 6000 9,588 9,588 9,588 9,588 9,588 IBM System maint 525 2,673 2,673 2,673 2,673 Purchase of disk space - on current hardware 15,000 Total 33,714 ------ 37,042 ------ 53,28C ------ 41,082 ------ 42,448 ------ 207,566 ------ OPTION B: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Annual NCR Maint 15,061 15,814 16,604 18,935 19,807 Lease Complete Tax Service 21,600 21,600 21,600 21,600 22,600 Purchase of disk space on current hardware 15,000 -- Total 36,661 37,414 53,204 40,535 41,407 209,221 OPTION C: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Lease on IBM 6000 T/C 9,588 9,588 9,588 9,588 9,588 System Maint T/C 525 2,673 2,673 2,673 2,673 Software Maint T/C 8,540 8,967 9,415 9,886 10,380 ease on IBM 6000 C/H 19,632 19,632 19,632 19,632 19,632 System Maint C/H 2,520 6,168 6,168 6,168 6,168 Tota[ 40,805 ------ 47,028 ------ 47,476 ------ 47,947 ------ 48,441 ------ 23!,697 ------ INCREyENTAL CASH REQUIREMENTS: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Current System 23,602 24,354 40,144 27,475 28,347 Option A 33,714 ------ 37,042 ------ 53,280 ------ 41,082 ------ 42,448 ------ [ncrementai 10,112 12,688 13,136 1.3,607 14,101 63,644 Option B 36,661 ------ 37,414 ------ 53,204 ------ 40,535 ------ 41,407 ------ incremental 13,059 13,060 13,060 13,060 13,060 65,299 Option C 40,805 ------ 47,028 ------ 47,476 ------ 47,947 ------ 48,441 ------ Incremental 17,203 22,674 7,332 20,472 20,094 87,775 der Hake view °pti°n e°ofOffa.~. related ~ n~ OnlY~ (Disc~si°n