__._ i I'i"tt_'VfiL. UF- N!'kLfdC; 71r :,i!-_r~la!'I ':~t=1CI~i~.J{~L~-i~t.ti fl>{C~I~T~~~C.I~~z_ ih.it:. !- iJt I i!i-_ III ~ ~ Lta ti I ~ ~= L ._I'v! I a. t.-:I ~,' ~Y U IIi G ! i t 5_ f. l ! 4.' .i t, i:. C] Ei V O "I '~J C L [ [:; e r i i 4 .:J a I ~ [i O rl ir! :rL i o r~ I I' 6 J r: t~ `. . ~ ',... r~c,~c::~-~ i; i_crmu,i ~ -rrtVr t zcl<:^' `. .. t_~.Irnn: ,.:;~L:rr,~a~' rlc ~':L:.,.;r~,, -- ,.-. .. ._ ~. ~~rr,~ C.o!tr-~+. unaniAOUSly approved by a vote of 4-0-0, ~t c:; !:-.,,-~_. t:: :i. <:,tef.:~rrc:,:"(=~«r~tof_=et:r~:; :=irc!-~it;rrc"l!,, it-. r.. j,rr;., l:h:• r:;=r~~~ I__~.v i::n ;~~r ~,:: elr: :an+ j-.:, l.:i L ~. F:y -~-~i-; nr y~aLiat~ rn .~: Fi. _•~ct+:ior-, ;::t .i.-i c, C: I.t Y'~-Br''G rYi.=. f: 111 [j ... O'fllr <"t C: t:. ... ~..._.W.u.._ .. .~~:..... ~.~. ;L _et .v..W.. ~._ - i DI STEFANO/SANTOPETRO i ARCHITECTS, INC. i i STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS nk: ~~~u~~$~a~R +. ~. ».3~E~':~ r m~`b.Wa~F~. '~2t?;€~ ~r "'~,:scm,a~a~.tfi~w,~'vkaus~.+r~sw~~~.,~Mw..~..., :. .W.,,.,w.~..._ I INTRODUCTION DI STEFANO/SANTOPETRO ARCHITECTS, INC., is a professional corporation providing architectural services to the public. The firm was originally organized in 1956 under the name of Distefano & Cerna, Architects/Engineers with offices in Victoria and San Antonio, Texas. In 1959, the firm was reorganized as CHRISTOPHER DI STEFANO AND ASSOCIATES with offices in Victoria and Houston, Texas. The firm subsequently incorporated under this name in 1972 with the Houston office being the only base of operation. DI STEFANO/SANTOPETRO ARCHITECTS prides itself on the successful projects which our office has performed for Texas Counties and Cities over the past thirty years. Public clients are especially vulnerable to the watchful eye of the citizens and media of their local area. A firm that cannot be responsive to the community at large will only tend to cause problems for the governing body as well as itself. We take particular pride in the fact that much of our work is for repeat clients who have gained strong confidence in us once we have had a chance to work together. During the past fifteen years, our firm has built a national reputation for the design of functional, safe and economical Correctional Facilities. with over thirty five completed facilities, four presently under construction, and another four in design, our experience in this specialty is vast. Cost of all work in place is i approximately $270 million. At present our Houston office has a total compliment of sixteen (16) individuals, of which six are Registered Architects. In keeping with current and emerging technology, our firm utilizes the latest state-of-the-art hardware and software to produce the highest quality construction documents. At present, we are running AUTOCAD RELEASE VERSION 11 software on an IBM Compatible DKT 486/33 SX Computer with 16 MB RAM and 230 MB hard disk. Monitor is a 20" ' HITACHI Superscan color monitor. Input device is a 12" x 12" Calcomp Drawing Board II Digitizer with 16 button wireless puck (mouse). Plotting in-house is accomplished on an AMT INTELLI-PLOT ACCEL 535 Plotter. Additional plotting is performed by Modem on Laser Plotters located at the offices of various reproduction companies. 1 Specifications are prepared on a Packard Bell 386/25 SX Computer utilizing MICROSOFT WORD for the Word Processing Software. Specification originals are printed on an EPSON LASER PRINTER. II EXPERIENCE . DI STEFANO/SANTOPETRO ARCHITECTS, INC., h as designed a number of County Jails in the past ten years. The following is a list showing the facility, size and cost. All complet ed projects listed have been certified by the State Commission on Jail Standards upon completion of construction. YEAR . PROJECT SIZE/SF BEDS COST COMPLETED FORT BEND COUNTY 48,520 104 3,100,000 1980 AUSTIN COUNTY 11,535 49 1,200,000 1982 SAN PATRICIO COUNTY 33,627 79 2,500,000 1982 CHAMBERS COUNTY 26,000 50 1,729,000 1983 HIDALGO COUNTY RENOV. 48,000 216 893,000 1983 FORT BEND COUNTY ADDN. 16,650 128 1,139,500 1984 VICTORIA COUNTY 72,000 134 5,465,000 1984 LIBERTY COUNTY ADDN. 11,000 91 1,200,000 1985 ORANGE COUNTY 33,848 97 1,852,000 1985 CAMERON COUNTY DETENTION 41,832 288 2,150,000 1985 COMAL COUNTY 40,800 145 2,801,000 1985 HIDALGO COUNTY ADDN. 13,900 184 854,000 1986 STARR COUNTY 22,740 124 1,412,000 1987 CALDWELL COUNTY MIN.DET. 3,760 49 157,000 1987 FRIG COUNTY 42,000 186 3,011,000 1988 BEE COUNTY 35,500 132 2,670,000 1989 WILLACY COUNTY ADDN. 8,900 37 807,000 1989 NACOGDOCHES COUNTY 41,000 148 3,500,000 1989 CALDWELL COUNTY 32,500 148 3,000,000 1990 WILLIAMSON COUNTY 128,000 342 8,500,000 1990 DeWITT COUNTY ADDN. 5,100 25 1,200,000 1991 LAMAR COUNTY 46,500 196 4,000,000 1992 WASHINGTON COUNTY 31,800 100 3,152,000 1993 DENTON COUNTY MED. DET. 77,000 384 4,300,000 est 1993 WHARTON COUNTY 35,200 148 3,300,000 est. 1994 FORT BEND COUNTY 231,700 594 23,900,000 est. 1995 KENDALL COUNTY ADDN. 11,600 35 1,050,000 est. 1994 TOM GREEN COUNTY 91,200 50b 12,500,000 est. 1995 In addition to design for the above referenced facili ties, our firm has performed Correctiona l Facility Feasibility Studies over the last four years for the follow ing Counties: Bastrop County, Texas Caldwell County, Texas Goliad County, Texas Liberty County, Texas Kerr County, Texas Lapeer County, Michigan Taos County, New Mexico Oklahoma County, Oklahoma III SERVICES analysis, schematic design, preliminary cost estimate, design development drawings and final construction documents (plans and specifications). Other in-house services include assistance during bidding and contractor negotiations and finally, construction contract administration. In-house services include all programming, site evaluation and Disciplines other than architecture are accomplished through the use of consultants who are expert in their particular field, primarily in the design of Criminal Justice Facilities. These engineers are not only experienced in this very specialized building ,type, but have worked with us many times before. IV PROJECT APPROACH Our firm uses a strong management approach for each project. For this reason, all projects are managed by the principals of the firm. This management is on-going throughout the entire project from initial programming through the construction phase. The Project Manager will have the single source responsibility to the Client for the successful completion of the project. A close working relationship between the Project Manager and the Client is crucial for the success of any project. The reason our projects turn out so well is due to this understanding and our eagerness to establish and maintain this relationship. We perform all services listed under "BASIC SERVICES" in the American Institute of Architect's Owner-Architect Agreement, B141. These services are schematic design, design development, construction documents, bidding and negotiations, and construction contract administration. Our firm also provides, as part of our service, the following items listed as "ADDITIONAL SERVICES" in this Agreement. They are: analyses of Owner's needs, site evaluation and analyses, providing for future expansion, preparing drawings in connection with change orders, and providing assistance to the County for this project beyond the sixty day cut-off after Substantial Completion. V PROJECT COMMITMENTS DI STEFANO/SANTOPETRO ARCHITECTS, ZNC., will have no difficulty meeting any schedule established by the Client. Working together with our consultants as part of the team, we are constantly striving to produce the highest quality contract documents in the shortest amount of time. our office handles each project on a "one at a time" basis. Since we are presently finishing up schematic design on the most recent project we have in the office at this time, we would be able to start on any project immediately. { .. ~ `r.at ~... r fw c ~ r..a..n ... s~ ...~ . du a v: e..a;..i.'.4..1 ~-:...: .e.x4:v:...u. .. .. ~.[.. ., ~, .. .:.iA.i,. .~,r..xu , ~.mru..v.....ui w.rr..~.. ....~.. l u». ........ r VI STAFFING JOSEPH M. SANTOPETRO. AIA will serve as Project Manager for this project and shall be the liaison between Distefano/Santopetro Architects, Inc., and the Client. Santopetro is a principal of our firm and has over 26 years experience in architecture. Experience includes the 586-Bed Fort Bend County Jail, Denton County Medium Security Facility, Nacogdoches County Law Enforcement Center, Williamson County Criminal Justice Facilities, Bee County Jail, Caldwell County Minimum Security Facility, new Caldwell County Sheriff's Department and Jail, orange County Jail, Liberty County Jail, Freeport City Jail, and the Comal County Courthouse Annex. A Registered Architect, Santopetro is a member of the American Institute of Architects, Texas Society of Architects, Houston Chapter AIA, and certified by the National Council of Architectural, Registration Boards (NCARB). Santopetro is also a professional member of The American Correctional Association, The American Jail Association, a contributing member of The National Institute of Justice, author of a number of jail studies and has served on round-table discussions with, and testified before, The Texas Commission on Jail Standards. In January 1989, Santopetro was appointed as a member of The National Committee of Architecture for Justice, and in November of 1989, he was appointed to The Texas Commission on Jail Standards Life Safety Review Committee. CHRISTOPHER DI STEFANO, AIA will serve as Project Designer for this project and shall bring with him in-depth experience in design gained through over 40 years in the architectural profession. Distefano is senior principal and founder of our firm and is responsible for all design produced by our company. Experience includes the design of thirty-two (32) County Jails in Texas; County Courthouses for Victoria, Fort Bend, Chambers, Comal and Williamson; County Libraries for Victoria and Chambers; and a County Administration Building in Conroe, Texas; as well as City Jails for seven (7) Texas Cities. A Registered Architect, Distefano is licensed in Texas, Louisiana, Tennessee, Florida and Michigan. Memberships include the Texas Society of Architects, The American Institute of Architects, American Correctional Association, Houston Chapter AIA, and certification by The National Council of Architectural- Registration Boards (NCARB). Distefano has served, and continues to serve in an advisory capacity, to the Texas Commission on Jail Standards with regard to design standards. BRYAN F. HORN. Project Production Coordinator. Senior Associate and Director of Production for Distefano/Santopetro Architects, Inc., Horn has the responsibility of ensuring that the construction documents (plans and specifications) are prepared in a timely manner. A Registered Architect, Horn has 17 years experience in the profession, with 9 years tenure with our firm. Experience incudes the preparation of plans and specifications for fourteen (14) County Jails including most recently, the 586-Bed Fort Send County Jail, the Lamar County Jail in Paris, Texas; the Lapeer County Jail in Lapeer, Michigan; the Williamson County Justice Facilities in Georgetown, Texas; the DeWitt County Jail Addition in Cuero, Texas; and Nacogdoches County Jail in Nacogdoches, Texas. .. [... a.i P ..,..~ •.a.. ~ u ...., .:r. _:...,e .... .....:..: ... ._._. _ ;... +wt^.+ ..m(y4~ ~,. tSd.....ri.G / t ..a.:a:_s.mn,aw. a.,x,1', ..,~ . ,:... _._. .,. As Project Production Coordinator, Horn will be responsible to the Project Manager for the completion and coordination of the construction documents. Will coordinate all necessary and required engineering drawings with architectural drawings, as well as specifications with drawings. During the bidding phase of the project, Horn will render interpretations as requested by general contractors add issue Addenda to all interested bidders. VII COST CONTROL Cost control is maintained throughout the programming, schematic, design development and contract document phases. In-house budget estimates are performed during all these phases to monitor the project with regard to the Owner's financial restrictions. outside cost control consultants and/or services are also utilized to assure that the project will be within the established budget. The Project Manager has the responsibility of seeing that all engineering disciplines design their particular portions of the work so as not to restrict the budget allocation of any other discipline. Cost information is based on the most up-to-date data available for that geographic location. Figures will also include adjustments for projected inflation and escalation up to the time of bidding. Using our own cost monitoring procedures, along with those provided by an expert consultant, Distefano/Santopetro Architects, Inc., can maintain the project budget as established by the Client. The following are recent examples of our firm's ability to maintain budgets and reduce costs: CALDWELL COUNTY JAIL WILLIAMSON COUNTY JAIL NACOGDOCHES COUNTY JAIL DENTON COUNTY MED. SECURITY LAMAR COUNTY JAIL BUDGET BID SAVINGS 3,200,000 3,015,000 185,000 9,000,000 8,500,000 500,000 3,552,000 3,509,951 42,049 4,850,000 4,300,000 550,000 4,200,000 3,970,000 230,000 VIII CONCEPTS There are many concepts that our office considers paramount to good correctional facility design. Some of these are required by different standards, some are dictated by practical and common sense, and others emanate from our experience as Criminal Juatice Architects. Rather than list all of them, we would like to mention those that we feel should be most important to the Client. 1. SAFETY - The facility should be safe not only for those who are confined there, but also for those who work there. 2. STAFF EFFICIENCY - A jail should be designed to take maximum advantage of the one guard to fifty inmate ratio. Only proper planning during design will ensure that this is the case. u~;i &Pa 4~ X'N$~~ n xvrt+sr.., ._ ~.~.". n`as...w~'~z.~w~.,wwc'~v~a'".z t ..,~. ~' .,.+~.wm.~::.,~u..,.... '~, ..,..r, .~._ 3. MAINTAINABILITY - Because of the very nature of this type of building, it must be easily maintained so as not to interfere with the normal operations which take place 24 hours a day. 4. ECONOMY - In addition to economy in operating (staff efficiency) and maintenance, the facility must be designed as economical as possible. Correctional Facilities, if properly designed, can be constructed for under the average cost of one hundred thirty five dollars per square foot. IlC STRATEGY 1. SITE SELECTION: we will review any sites that the Owner feels it would like to investigate as possible jail sites.. The review would include attention to sufficiency of land, availability of utilities, drainage, room for expansion and traffic circulation patterns. Topographical considerations shall also be weighed during this process. After all these analyses have been made, a recommendation will be made to the Client. 2. MASTER PLANNING: The entire project will be master planned for suitable vehicular and pedestrian traffic for the initial Detention Center as well as for any future expansion. The Master Plan will take into consideration the relationship of the buildings to the surrounding neighborhood, as well as open spaces and gathering areas. 3. PROGRAMMING: Based on the Owner's projected requirements, all necessary spaces shall be determined with approximate square footages of each. Also at this time, the relationship of each of the various spaces shall be reviewed with respect to departmentalization and functional necessity. This program will be the cornerstone of the Master Plan and will be used to determine a project budget. while this is a very simplistic explanation of this phase, it should be noted that it is during the programming that a very close collabora- tion between the Architect and Client is required to ensure the ultimate success of the project. Programs and procedures will be reviewed to give us a full understanding of how the facility is to be operated. Utilizing present information supplied by The •Israel Prison Service, and forecasting based on population statistics, present and future requirements can be determined. 4. ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION ALTERNATIVES: Our office will work with the Client to determine the most cost effective manner to provide construction for this project. 5. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: Complete working drawings and specifi- cations shall be prepared so as to exactly describe the construction work expected from the general contractor. All the architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical work, including materials, equipment, workmanship, finishes and any related site work shall be shown in these documents. These documents shall be used to obtain bids from general contractors prior to beginning construction. 6. CONSTRUCTION OVERVIEW: During construction, a specially assigned field representative will monitor the progress of the project and observe the construction to guard the Client against non-compliance on the part of the contractor. For the duration of this project, we will provide construction contract administrators who are experienced in both architecture and construction. The assigned individual will attend all site meetings with contractors, check all required shop drawings, prepare and maintain field reports and verify contractor requests for progress payments. guy..wc~vc o-~.. . . ..:.s...,,. -. .... .... .. , .... CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROJECT'S NAME: TOM GREEai OOQN7.'Y JAIL ORIGINAL EST .: $12,500,000 LOCATION: Sari Angelo, Texas BID AMOUNT: N/A SIZE: 136,800 S.F. Beds: 500 FINAL COST: N/A COP'IPLETED: November, 1994 (est.) REFERENCE: Hon. Bill Moore, County Judge 915/653-2385 NAME: WHARTON OOUNTY JAIL ORIGINAL EST .:$ 3,200,000 LOCATION: Wharton, Texas BID AMOUNT: N/A SIZE: 35,000 S.F. Beds: 144 FINAL COST: N/A COMPLETID: August, 1994 (est.) REFERENCE: Hon. I. J. Irvin, County Judge 409/532-4612' NAME: KENDALL OOUNTY JAIL ADDN. ORIGINAL EST .: $ 1,100,000 LOCATION: Boerne, Texas BID AMOUNT: N/A SIZE: 10,000 S.F. Beds: 34 FINAL COST: N/A CO[4PLETID: May, 1994 (est. ) REFERENCE: J. M. Mitchelhill, County Engr. 210/249-3982 NAME: NEW FORT BEND OOUN.CY JAIL ORIGINAL EST .: $23,500,000 LOCATION: Richmond, Texas BID AMOUNT: 23,900,000 SIZE: 231,700 S.F. Beds: 594 FINAL COST: N/A COMPLETED: March, 1995 (est.) REFERENCE: Comm. Bob Lutts, Jail Expansion Committee 713/34 6-1432 NAME: LAPEER OOt1N'1R JAIL ADDN. ORIGINAL EST .: $ 6,100,000 LOCATION: Lapeer, Michigan BID AMOUNT: $ 6,000,000 SIZE: 58,000 S.F. Beds: 152 FINAL COST: N/A COMPLETID: July, 1994 (est.) REFERENCE: John Biscce, County Manager 313/667-0366 NAME: DEN1Oli 00. M®IUM SECURiT7C ORIGINAL EST. : $ 4,850,000 LOCATION: Denton, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 4,300,000 SIZE: 77,000 S.F. Beds: 384 FINAL COST: N/A COMPLETID: May, 1993 (est.) REFERENCE: Comm. Don Hill, Jail Expansion Committee 817/383 -8399 NAME: FT. BEND 00. JWENILE C3'R. ORIGINAL EST.: $ 3,200,000 LOCATION: Richmond, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 3,198,000 SIZE: 38,400 S.F. Beds: 56 FINAL COST: N/A COMPLETED: September, 1993 (est.) REFERENCE: Comm. Bud O'Shieles, Juvenile Expansion Comm. 713 /342-4513 NAME: WASHINGTON ODUNTY JAIL ORIGINAL EST.: $ 3,200,000 LOCATION: Brenham, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 3,152,000 SIZE: 36,000 S.F. Beds: 148 FINAL COST: N/A CGMPLETID: August, 1993 (est.) REFERENCE: Hon. Dorothy Morgan, County Judge 409/836-9374 NAME: DEMON QORJNTY MINIM[A~f SECURIT7C ORIGINAL EST.: $ 500,000 LOCATION: Denton, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 540,000 SIZE: 14,400 S.F. Beds: 192 FINAL COST: $ 570,000 COMPLETED: November, 1992 REFERENCE: ~~ Comm. Don Hill 817/383-8399 -- ..-o.--r--..-.~. NAME: LAMAR OOUNTY JAIL ORIGINAL EST.: $ 4,200,000 LOCATION: Paris, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 3,970,000 SIZE: 46,500 S.F. Beds: 196 FINAL COST: $ 3,992,000 COMPLETED: May, 1992 REFERENCE: Hon. Deane Loughmiller, County Judge 903/737-2410 NAME: CAhDi~iEL COUNTY JAIL ORIGINAL EST .: $ 3,200,000 LOCATION: Lockhart, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 3,016,000 SIZE: 35,500 S.F. Beds: 148 FINAL COST: $ 2,993,000 COMPLETID: September, 1990 REFERENCE: Hon. Rebecca Hawener, County Judge 512/398-2213 NAME: WILLL4MSSON OOUNTY JUSTICE CTR. ORIGINAL EST .: $14,000,000 IACATION: Georgetown, Texas BID AMOUNT: $13,797,000 SIZE: 204,200 S.F. Beds: 342 FINAL COST: $13,903,000 CONII~LETID: March, 1990 Courts: 6 .' REFERENCE: Hon. John Doerfler, County Judge 512/869-4418 NAME: NACD®OCIiES COUNTY JAIL ORIGINAL EST .: $ 3,550,000 LOCIiTION: Nacogdoches, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 3,490,000 SIZE: 38,000 S.F. Beds: 148 FINAL COST: $ 3,409,000 COMPLETID: January, 1990 REFERENCE: Joe Evans, County Sheriff 409/560-8871 NAME: BEE COi11dTY JAIL ORIGINAL EST.: $ 2,600,000 IAC.ATION: Beeville, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 2,689,000 SIZE: 28,800 S.F. Beds: 134 FINAL COST: $ 2,665,000 COMPLETID: June, 1989 REFERENCE: Hon. Robert Walk, County Judge 512/358-1394 NAME: HIDALflO O0. MINIMUM SECURITY ORIGINAL EST. : $ 600,000 LOCATION: Edinburg, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 533,000 SIZE: 12,000 S.F. Beds: 144 FINAL COST: $ 556,000 COMPLETID: May, 1989 REFERENCE: Hon. J. Edgar Ruiz, County Judge 512/318-2000 NAME: FORT BEND CO. CO[JRTHOUSE ANNEX ORIGINAL EST. : $ 6,000,000 LOCATION: Richmond, Texas BID AMOUNT; $ 5,565,000 SIZE: 102,300 S.F. Courts: 2 FINAL COST: $ 5,846,000 COMPLETID: March, 1989 REFERENCE: Comm. Bob Lutts, Courthouse Expansion Comm. 7 13/346-1432 NAME: FRIO COUNTY JAIL ORIGINAL EST. :$ 3,300,000 LOCATION: Pearsall, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 3,011,000 SIZE: 42,000 S.F. Beds: 169 FINAL COST: $ 3,015,000 COMPLEI'ID: June, 1989 REFERENCE: Hon. Sid Williams, County Judge 512/334-2154 NAME: CAI,DWELS, CO. MIN. SECURITY ORIGINAL EST. : $ 160,000 LOCATION: Lockhart, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 157,200 SIZE: 3,760 S.F. Beds: 48 FINAL COST: $ 157,000 COMPLETID: May, 1987 REFERENCE: Hon. Rebecca Hawener, County Judge 512/398-22 13 NAME: HIDALflO COUNTY JAIL ADDN. OkiGINAL EST. : $ 900,000 LOCATION: Ed~.nburg, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 879,000 SIZE: 13,900 S.F. Beds: 184 FINAL COST: $ 886,000 COMPLETID: September, 1987 REFERENCE: Hon. J. Edgar Ruiz, County Judge 512/318-2000 ~~ r i ,~ NAME: STARR ODUNTY JAIL ORIGINAL EST.:$ 1,500,000 LOCATION: Rio Grande City, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 1,412,000 SIZE: 22,800 S.F. Beds: 124 FINAL COST: $ 1,412,000 COMPLETED: January, 1987 REFERENCE: Hon. M. M. Martinez, County Judge 512/487-230 7 NAME: OOMAL OOUDITY OOURTHO[JSE ANNEX ORIGINAL EST. :$ 5,000,000 LOCATION: New Braunfels, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 4,252,000 SIZE: 93,800 S.F. Courts: 2 FINAL COST: $ 4,317,000 COMPLETED: November, 1986 REFERENCE: Mary Hitch, County Administrator 512/620-5501 NAME: LIBERTY COl1tiTY JAIL ADDN. ORIGINAL EST. : $ 1,200,000 LOCATION: Liberty, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 1,200,000 SIZE: 18,000 S.F. Beds: 97 FINAL COST: $ 1,200,000 COMPLETID: Auqust, 1985 REFERENCE: Hon. Dempsie Henley, County Judge 409/336-807 1 NAME: COMAL OOUNTY JAIL ORIGINAL EST. : $ 3,000,000 LOCATION: New Braunfels, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 2,726,000 SIZE: 40,800 S.F. Beds: 145 FINAL COST: $ 2,805,000 COMPLETID: June, 1985 REFERENCE: Mary Hitch, County Administrtor 512/620-5501 NAME LOCATION: SIZE: COMPLETED: REFERENCE: NAME: LOCATION: SIZE: COMPLETID: REFERENCE: NAME LOCATION: SIZE: COMPLETID: REFERENCE: NAME LOCATION: SIZE: COMPLETID REFERENCE: NAME LOCATION: SIZE: COMPLETID REFERENCE: NAME LOCATION: SIZE: ORANC~ OOIJNTY JAIL ADDN. orange, Texas 33,848 S.F. Beds: 97 March, 1985 ORIGINAL EST.:$ 2,000,000 BID AMOUNT: $ 1,680,000 FINAL COST: $ 1,853,000 REFERENCE: Hon. John C. McDonald, County Judge 409/883-7740 CAMERON CO. DETENTION CTR. ORIGINAL EST.: $ 2,300,000 Brownsville, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 2,100,000 41,800 S.F. Beds: 288 FINAL COST: $ 2,152,000 January, 1985 Sheriff Alex Perez 512/544-0860 VICTORIA COUN'PY JAIL ORIGINAL EST.: $ 6,400,000 Victoria, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 5,465,000 72,000 S.F. Beds: 134 FINAL COST: $ 5,485,000 August, 1984 Comm. John Hammack 512/578-8212 FORT BEND COUNTY JAIL ADDN. - ORIGINAL EST.: $ 1,300,000 Richmond, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 1,128,000 16,650 S.F. Beds: 128 FINAL COST: $ 1,140,000 July, 1984 Hon. Jodie Stavinoha, Former County Judge 713/34 2-4373 HIDALflO 00. JAIL RENOV. Edinburg, Texas Existing Beds: 226 October, 1983 ORIGINAL EST.:$ 1,000,000 BID AMOUNT: $ 850,000 FINAL COST: $ 886,000 Hon. J. Edgar Ruiz, County Judge 512/318-2000 CHAMEE[LS OOUNTY JAIL ORIGINAL EST .:$ 1,800,000 Anahuac, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 1,729,000 26000 S.F. Beds: 50 FINAL COST: $ 1,735,000 September, 1983 Sheriff C. E. Norris 409/267-6761 NAME: AUSTIN COUNTY JAIL ORIGINAL EST .: $ 1,000,000 LOCATION: Bellville, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 1,009,000 SIZE: 13,400 S.F. Beds: 36 FINAL COST: $ 1,009,000 COI4pLETED: June, 1982 REFERENCE: Hon. J. Lee Dittert, Jr., County Judge 409/865-5911 NAME: SAN PATRICIO COi1NTY JAIL ORIGINAL EST .: $ 2,300,000 LOCATION: Sinton, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 2,226,000 SIZE: 33,600 S.F. Beds: 79 FINAL COST: $ 2,224,000 CGMPLETID: April, 1982 REFERENCE: Sheriff Leroy Moody 512/364-2251 NAME: FORT BEND COUNTY JAZL ORIGINAL EST .:$ 3,300,000 LOCATION: Richmond, Texas BID AMOUNT: $ 3,149,000 SIZE: 48,500 S.F. Beds: 104 FINAL COST: $ 3,100,000 COMPLETID: August, 1980 REFERENCE: Former County Judge Jodie Stavinoha 713/342=4373