f-a F'1='ROVi-1{_ OF" RIrIE_adLil:Ni~ rtCihiD I3'"SUE L)n tr:i..., kl'ie lf3ti~~ dad,' nl' i~i:trbu=r.. 1'y`9.3, ~.ipnn riution iriridt_~ {~y C;c.,mmi=,:::i~~riE•r~ i-Ita].ekamp, sec~_,rided by C:t:ioiRiS=.lUT1F•t- llefllei', ri~E• {~o~_ir-t unanimously approved by a vote of 4-0-0, t~ :: ArdU LEVY`l:ING l"t-IF Tfa:x Ihd F'RYME"I~L.i. "t"I-IE.f%EOF". _.. , ~h~.s 7-ac>.~.i.ty w:i7.,. he i.`3..: ben +•~.~c.?_1.i1,y to ir~icl~_ic7m t1-icr prtapei..+. G• acq~_ti.=.i~tion ~alar~g 4Jiti'i ~ifficr? SF~ace, Jail, Hms,ll Gta~_ir~tr~uom, I~lpa.~tta-iet-', cirtt:l J. I-'. CL{: .fiCr?. OCT 06 '93 12 18 DT STEFRNOiSRNT0PETR0 RRCHITECTS P.2r3 ., ~ .. RtR& C0U11TY C0~lBIliED OOi1HTY/CITY JO6TIC8 C RSTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST i CONSTRUCTION (74,000 $F ~ $76/SF) - ARCHITSCTURAL/ENGINE$RIDTG 8EE FURNISHINGS - OWNER FIIRNISBED EQUIPMENT - LANDSCAPING - UTILITIES - OWNER FIJRNISFi SURVEY & SOIL REPORT - CONTINGENCY @ 5$ - TOTAL PROJECT OUTLAY+ $5,624,000 450,000 45,000 25,000 20,000 140,000 7,000 261,000 $6,642,000 *THE ABOVE DOES NOT INCLIIDE ATTORNEY OR FINANCIAL ADVISOR FEES, NOR DOSS IT INCLUDE LAND COSTS OR STREET IMPROVEMENTS COSTS (ESTIMATED TO HE $88,000 9Y THE CITY OF RERRVILLE). TSESE COSTS, IF THEY ARE REQUIRED SHOULD BE ADDED TO T82S FIGURE SUBMITTED BY DI STEFANO/SANTOPETRO ARCHITECTS INC. 10/4/93 OCT 06 '93 12 19 DI STEfRNOiSRNTOPETRO RRCHITECTS P.3i3 ,r ~ F K6RR COtl1iT! LAN ENFORCSNEY7t CE'ASSR 86TIMAT6 O1P PBO~EA8I.8 COST ~ CON3TRIICTION (52,000 SF @ $88/SF) - $4,576,000 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING FEE - 366,000 FDRNZ3HINGS - 45,000 OWNER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT - 25,000 i LAND3CAPING - 15,000 -! ~ ~ Z UTILITIES - 200,000 OWNER FURDiISH SIIRVEY & SOIL REPORT - 5,000 CONTINGENCY @ $53 - 229,000 i TOTAL PROJECT OVTLAY* - i $5,961,000 *THE ABOVE DOES NOT INCLUDE ATTORNEY OR FINANCIAL ADVISOR FEES, NOR DOES IT INCLUDE LAND COSTS. THESE COSTS, IF THEY ARE REQUIRED, SHOULD BE ADDED TO THIS FIGURE. SIIBMITTED BY DI STEFANO/3ANTOPETRO ARCHZTECTS INC. 10/4/93 RERR COUNTY 192-BED COMBINED CITY/COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER DOWNTOWN LOCATION BUILDING STATISTICS AND COST ESTIMATE FLOOR 1: r PARKING/DRIVES/SALLYPORT - 26,550 SF CITY ADMINISTRATION - 15,300 SF COUNTY ADMINISTRATION - 11,500 SF FLOOR 2: CITY ADMINISTRATION - 6,500 SF COUNTY JAIL - 46,850 SF FLOOR 3: COUNTY JAIL (SHELL OUT) - 33,750 SF ESTIMATED COSTS: METHOD NO. 1 - AREA BASIS FLOOR 1 - PARKING, ETC. - 26,550 SF @ $28 = $ 743,400 FLOOR 1 - ADMINISTRATION - 26,800 SF @ $50 = 1,340,000 FLOOR 2 - ADMINISTRATION - 8,600 SF @ $50 = 430,000 FLOOR 2 - JAIL - 44,750 Sf @ $100 = 4,475,000 FLOOR 3 - SHELL - 33,750 SF @ $38 = 1,282,500 TOTAL METHOD NO. 1 = $ 8,270,900 METHOD NO. 2 - PER BED BASIS 192 BEDS @ $29,000/BED = CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS (2400 SF @ $65) _ PARKING/DRIVES/SALLYPORT = SHELL 3RD FLOOR = TOTAL METHOD NO. 2 METHOD NO. 3 - TOTAL AREA 113,900 SF @ $70/SF METHOD AVERAGE METHOD NO. 1 METHOD NO. 2 METHOD NO. 3 TOTAL $5,568,000 156,000 743,400 1,282,500 $7,749,900 $7,973,000 _ $ 8,270,900 = 7,749,900 = 7,973,000 _ $23,993,800 AVERAGE ESTIMATED COST ($23,993,800 _ 3) _ $ 7,997,933 SUBMITTED BY DI STEFANO/SANTOPETRO ARCHITECTS, INC. 10/5/93 r RERR COUNTY 192-BED COMBINED COUNTY/CITY JUSTICE CENTER DOWNTOWN LOCATION ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST CONSTRUCTION (113,900 SF @ $70/SF) - $7,973,000 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING FEE - 638,000 FURNISHINGS - 45,000 OWNER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT - 25,000 LANDSCAPING - 12,000 LAND ACQUISITION - 1,000,000 DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS - 120,000 OWNER FURNISH SURVEY & SOIL REPORT - 5,000 CONTINGENCY @ 5'c - 395,000 TOTAL PROJECT OUTLAY* - $10,216,000 *THE ABOVE DOES NOT INCLUDE ATTORNEY OR FINANCIAL ADVISOR FEES. THESE COSTS, IF THEY ARE REQUIRED, SHOULD BE ADDED TO THIS FIGURE. SUBMITTED BY DI STEFANO/SANTOPETRO ARCHITECTS, INC. 10/5/93 3HRl NER ~~ _ _ _ _ ~--- - - 2 GItY~ 4 J, '10%164°I4r8~r FI0.5T FLOOR PI-/+i~ , ® ~ ~jCALG I'~ ~ $O~ -- . ,~-~ _~ r N ~ j PEKING I 1 I I ~ U l 1 P(~tY6~ I N INTAKE courmf ~le,il- ADM• I15'r lo(d= IZ,DOO~ annLL.Y PORT ' I lllll~I~ fl , 2'1o C^P~[aP. UuE _ . ~~~ x"""_ OT-- c~a9 JEFFERSON Y A ~"' Ill 0 DI STEFANO / SANTOPETRO ARCHITECTS, INC. lu- 5• ~3 ~-- ~ ® SCGOND F1.00R PLAN s JAfL °>GCOND P1_Ot)R 27o'x125'- 33,75oM _ 44 p ,JP{L 7N{RD FI-~ CsN~-L) 270' x { 25` = 33.750 ~' 270' UiY JAIL ADM. I+jS' x 64' = 4600 COUNTY JAIL 135'x g I ' * 11,000/ i J D[ STEFANO / SANTOPETRO ARCHITECTS, INC. /n-5- ~!3 SIGNATURE IDIiNTIFICATION AND NO-LITIGAT~!1N CERTIFICATE THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF KERR We, the undersigned, hereby certify as follows: (a) This certificate is executed and delivered with reference to that issue of KERR COUNTY, TEXAS LIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 1994, dated February I, 1994, in the principal amount of 55,900,1100. (b) We officially executed and signed said Bonds by manually executing or by causing facsimiles of our manual signatures to be imprinted or lithographed on each of said Bonds, and we hereby adopt said facsimile signatures as our own, respectively, and declare that said facsimile signatures constitute our signatures the same as if we had manually signed each of said Bonds. (c) The Bonds are substantially in the form, and have been duly executed and signed in the manner, prescribed in the order authorizing the issuance of said Bonds. (d) At the time we so executed and signed said Bonds we were, and at the time of executing this certificate we are, the duly chosen, qualified and acting officers indicated therein, and authorized to execute same. (e) No litigation of any nature has been filed or is now pending or, to our knowledge, threatened, to restrain or enjoin the issuance or delivery of said Bonds, or which would affect the provision made for their payment or security, or in any manner questioning the proceedings or authority concerning the issuance of said Bonds, and that so far as we know and believe no such litigation is threatened. (f) Neither the corporate existence nor boundaries of said issuer is being contested, that no litigation has been filed or is now pending which would affect the authority of the officers of said issuer to issue, execute, and deliver said Bonds, and that no authority or proceedings for the issuance of said Bonds have been repealed, revoked, or rescinded. (g) We have caused the official seal of said issuer to be impressed, or printed, or lithographed on each of said Bonds, and said seal on said Bonds has been duly adopted as, and is hereby declared to be, the official seal of said issuer. EXECUTED and delivered this OFFICIAL TITLES County Judge County Clerk County Treasurer The signatures of the officers subscribed above are hereby certified to be true and genuine Security State Bank & Tryst BANK SEAL By Authorized Officer RECEIPT FOR PROCEEDS THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF KERR The undersigned hereby certifies as follows: (a) This certificate is executed and delivered with reference to Kerr County, Texas Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1994, dated February 1, 1994, in the aggregate principal amount of $5,900,000 (the "Bonds'). Bonds. (b) The undersigned is duly qualified to execute this receipt on behalf of the issuer of the (c) The Bonds have been duly delivered to the purchasers thereof, namely: LASALLE NATIONAL BANK Chicago, Illinois (d) The Bonds have been paid for in full by said purchasers concurrently with the delivery of this certificate, and the issuer of the Bonds has received, and hereby acknowledges receipt of, the agreed purchase price for the Bonds, being $5,900,054.30 (which amount is equal to par plus a premium of $54.30), plus accrued interest from February 1, 1994 to the date hereof. EXECUTED and delivered this _ day of March, 1994. L County Treasurer CERT]FICATE FOR ORDER TAE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF ICERR I, the undersigned County CZcrk of Kerr County, Tbras (the 'County"), hereby xrtify as follows: ]. The Commialoncrs Cktutt of the County auttvened in SPECIAI,TERM ON THS ]BTI; DAY OF pCPOBER, 1993, at the County Courthouse, and the tall was called of the duly carstitulcd ot5cets and members of said Commicsioneo t3JUrt, m wit: W.O. "Bill` Stacy, County Judge Glctm IG Ho]clcamp, Pttxinct 3 Itay Lehman, Precinct 1 Bruce Oehler, Precinct 4 T.$ Butch" Luckey, Precinct 2 end all of said persons wcm present, thus constituting a quorum. Wherouptm, among other btainess, the following was transacted at said Muting: a written APPROVAL ON AMENDING IIOND ISSUE (the "Order') was duty introduced for rho consideration of said Cotnmtsaionets Court. it was then duty moNed and seconded that the Order be adopted; and, ai'ter duo ditcusskm, Bald motirm carrying wilt it the adoption of the Order, prevailed and carriod by the Coltuwing vote: AYES: ~ NOES: 0 ABSTENTIONS: tl 2. A true, full and wrrect copy of the aforcxaid Order adopted at the Meeting descrltrcd in the atxtvc and foregoing paragraph is attached to and follows this Cottificate; the Order has been duly rceorded is said Commissioners Court's minutes of said Mooting; rho slxrve and foregoing paragraph is a true, Cull and correct excerpt from said Cotnnti+aioners Court's minutes of said Mceting pt:rtaitting to the passage of the Order; the pcnom named in Iho above end foregoing paragraph are the duly chosery qualiccd and acting ofRcers and members of said Cotnmissionera Court as indicated thcmin; each of the ofliccrs and members of sold t~tmmissloncta Court was duly and sufficiently noticed officially attd personally, In advance, of the time plarx+ and propose of the aforesaid Meeting, sad the Order wtmld be introduced and considerod for passage at said Mooting, and Hach of avid otfioerx and members t:onsentod, in advantxi, m the holding of said MceUna for such purpose, and said Mceting was open m the public and public not(ce of the Hme, place and purpose of avid meeting was given, ail as requtrcd by Chapter sst, Texas Owettttttent Code. 51C9NED AND SF.AY.6D the 2nd dny o[ Man:h, 1994. (sEAr,) --l~ty~