iJMMII:=~'l.C]NF_~`' CUU~~T Ct'.~NVLfNFID IN R~lr~'ULfaR SESSION t~N l"~_resdaY,
~pril '1'~., I~3'~o wr.:h e n tow:.ng J tr.cer-s preserr-.
w. G. Stacy, l.o~.mty .J~-rdge, Ray Lehman, Comm. I'rect #f 1, I. H.
Lackey, Comm. Prect # c, Glenn I:. Holekamp, Comm. F'r-ect # u,
a.nd Br~.rce Oehler, Comm. F'rec~t # 4 and the following
proceedings were had:
ORDER IVU. c13Ei1
ACCEPT-ANCE C7f- UF'DATF_D JUR DESCRIF'f:[ONS
F=UR COUNTY [=:MF'LC]YEF_S
C]n this the 1~th day oi- April 199:, came on ~to be considered
the updated ,iob descriptiorrs> for all C:o~.rnty Employees. Upon
motion made by i~ommissioner~ Holel<ainp, seconded by
Commissioner Uetrler-, the Go~_rrt unanieously approved by a vote
of 4-0-0, to accept t[-ie ~.rpdatecJ job descriptions presented to
the Coy-rrt provided, however, that after hearing the evidence
presented by District Ji_uige Stephen R. RbLes that as a matter
of law:
1. District Court Reporters and Dis.tr'ict Coy-rrt Coordinators
are exempted from Fair- C_abor^ Standards Act.
~. The District is responsible and 1ia61e for these
employees.
-t'HE CDURT HERERY DECLARES THATo
Listric~l. Co~..rr•~t Reporters and Distr~ic~t Co~_rr•t Coordinators,
while req,-rued to provide a job description, ar-e exempt from
the application of the Kerr Co~_rnty Personnel Policy since
they are not co~_rnty employees and f~-rrther orders that:
1. These empaoyees are to be notified of the recommendation
given by the District Ji_rdges, (Stephen R. Ables and Emil
Kar•1 F'rohl+.
~. A letter firom the District Ti-rdges is to be p~_rt in the
Kerr Coy-mty Personnel F'nlicy I~laniaal stating Kerr Co~_rnty
is riot liable and r-espnnsit_~le for• these employees.
..,. J~-rdyes Hbles is 'to ta14< to the District Attorneys, Ron
S~_rtton, and Nr~.rce Curry aboi_rt there employees as well..
Pc-rGL 1Vi