~/~sl.I Item No. ~.4 Consider whe'ther' or' not the Y. U. Ranch Road and Habermacher Road are County Roads. Mr. Oehler stated that Mr. Jack Klein has asked him to take the r•nad off the Ca~_inty maintasned list? 4Je ar•e hzr•z to find o~_,t whether or not these roads have been co~_mty maintained. I wo~.ild like to hear what everyone has to say on this matter. Attorney, Felix 1:lein addressed the Court stating he is representing Mr•. Warren Klein on whether or not the Y. U. Ranch Road is a co~_,nty maintained road. Ir-~ 1900 the Commis=_ioner•s" L'o,.ir•+. adopted a list of La~.,nty Road=: which list the Y. G. Ranch Road a=> a Co~.,nty Road. The Unitized system was developzd in 1900 with vario~.,s roads on the list. The ScF;r-eir,er•s" have i_ised this road since the 195"s. In 1951 this road was built by the Schreiners" after the permission was given by Mr-. Warren Klein. l"he road was relocated at a later date in 1906. The Schreiners asked to be able to p~.,t i.n an improved road aid I wa=_ told the Schreiners had done the war4< with their 'Y~ands and at na time has the Co~_,nty maintainc~~cJ the r-aacJ. Ri~t Jon - Rttor'ney far Mr. Schreiner stated I-~e wo~.,ld o~_ttline the Schreiner's ~_tnderstanding and position. T'he Schreiners and Warren Klein are very close. Basically in 1995 there has been a mis~_,nder-standing beca~.,se this road has been maintained since the 195"s. [n the late 190N"s the co~.tnty paved the road and has always been maintained by the County. From 197 to the pr•zsent the public has came and Bane on this road at will for over- 50 years. There has been no req~_ies.t to ~_,se the read or a denial to ~_ise th,e road. Commercial. I7eliveri.es have ~_,sed this road, Sctu;aJ. B~.tses, C~~.,est of` the Schrziner•s" and in recent history landowners have ,_,szd the road to gain entrance to tl-,eir• property. Mo or,e has ever been stopped from .,sing the road. In 1900 the Coi_mty confirmzd it was county maintained. The Schreiner family has requested a dac,_,ment from Iris. Klein stating this but they have oat r•ec•eived it as of yet. They can't agree to non-stat~_,s and cannot permit it to be n.rt off from usagz. Warren Klein -- stated Mr•. 1='ollard drew ttp a doc~_,ment and tho~.ight the Sct,r•einer-s had 'received a copy. Rt times I wo~_ild call the eo~.,nty after a bad rain and ask if thev woi_,ld come and clear the road aF~F. As far as the Co~_,nty coming o~_rt to work on the road I don't ever remember hear-~ing any work being dare on the road. Rttor-ney far Mr•. Klein reminded the i:o~_,r•t of Article E,8 "v" Sub section R the Co~_mty may acq~_,ire roetd by p~_,rchase, condemnation, ar- dedication. pRGF: 60 There ha; oat peen any co~_rrt determination. It also states that yo~_r m~_rst publish and r-et;ort a doc~.rment strowing acgi_risition, and give written notice to each landowner. None of the prerequisites have been followed. Mere maintainance 01= the road does not establish adverse possession. It is not a road that is private it is a pi_tbl is road. flit Jons - F'riar' to 1981 most r~_rral roads were covered ~..rnder this section, this statue only addresses private road. This case doesn°t address public roads prior to x981. 'The list confirmed that the roads were maintained. Rit Jons -- L;y it being an the Coi_rnty road list does not imply it way dedicated to the Ca~anty. 'this is a co~_rnty road and is designated as a p~_rblic road. Attorney Klein -- h~_restion: Mr. Oehler-, do yoga know where this road i.s located? Yes Sir, it is 17 miles west of Mt. Fiume consis~tinq of i.~/1~ miles of a road ~_rp to the gate. This road doe=:. ga thro~_rgh Warren K.lein's property. Attorney What I am asl~inq for is this road to be taken off the Co,_mty road list'' Commissioner Holekamp, Rre we going to be reimbursed on work already done on road? Answer: I tho~_rght the Schreir~ers' had paid ror' t.tre work that was done on road. Gary Kersey spoke for the Haber'macher-'s .and their road, He stated that H.aberm~:,cher Road is also known as K].ein Leinweber- Road. This road goes thr^o~_rgh the Klein property. We have affidavits signed by Ex-Commissioner-=. Roger Stone, Hilly Gutherie, Lee GoFf and Milton Lee a i~o~_mty Maintainanr_e Employee. A petition signed by the landowners wishing to have the work done or. the roads. The Co~_rnty has maintained thr.s road for over 40 years. We have bills where paving and L-ase were dune on the road by Jack Smith who was an administrator o~F the Road and Aridge Uepar~tment at that time. TI-re bill is a total of $E,10k1.N0 dating 1985-1986. Tn 1988 there was a list s~_rbmitted to the Co~_rrt .t.o acce.pt the roads in the County. Several of these roads were in vario~_rs conditions and Habermacher-Klein Leir~~weber Road is or. this list as being co~.mty maintained. There is a r_o~_mty order # 18~1~ that states this road is a co~_tnty maintained road ire Prect # 4. Rit ,Jons the Y. 0. Ranch Road has been neglected for the past two y˘rars and I wo~_,Id like for i.t to contirv_re 'to be co~_rnty maintained. h1r. Odom, Road and Fridge Administrator stated 2 years ago he had looked at the two roads. On October ,:;0, 198E we did some work on the roads tataliny $1, 149.Nt?~. I have not done arry mair~tainance c~_rr-rently nn the road d~_ie *.'o it being in litigation. bJarr'en Klein - if the Coi_rnty did do same work on the road the County didn't have permission to do so. Ted Lackey, a Co~_rnty Employee stated I mair~ta:ined bath roads when Commissioner- G~_rtherie and Commissioner Stone were in office. PAGE 6i Charles Habermacher• - the Cn~anty did do r^o.ad work and I don't thin4< ±:he County wo~_rld he,ve spent this money to have repairs done if it was oat a co~_inty road. Mr. Klein ~- Commis..=_iwner G~_rther'ie did maintain it and wo~_rld come o~_rt everytime I called. Especially when i~t was election time. The Co,_rnty took and removed all metal cattle g~.tard=_ and replaced them with cement. Neil 1{lein ~-- how ar•e we si_rpposed 'to I