ORDER NO. 27.849
APPRc~VAL, of REPZ,AT OF' TRACT ~ OF'
Ho[JSTON ESTATES
c)n t.hia the 1_st c]ay of March 1994, upon motion made by
Comm:issic>ner Lar_.key, ser_.onded kay Commissioner oehler, the
Court unanimously approved by a vote of 4-0-0, to approve
t.rart. 1 of Houston Est.at.es contingue>nt. on signatures needed
for the ~>lat.
COMMISSIONERS' COURT AGENDA REQUEST
"PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND FIVE COPIES OF THIS REQUEST AND
[DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEWED BY TAE CO~JRT
MADE BY: Franklin Johnston ,P.E.
OFFICE: Road & Bridge Department
MEETING DATE: 1 11[,~rcf? 1, 1994
TIME PREFERRED:
SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC): Repeat of Tract 1, Houston Estates, Precinct 2,
(Preliminary and Final Combined)
EXECUTIVE SESSION RE6~UESTED: YES N O __ C~-
PLEASE STATE REASON : Final Repeat of Tract 1, Houston Estates
ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION: 10 Minutes
PERSONNEL MATTER -NAME OF EMPLOYEE:
NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT: Franklin Johnston, P.E.
Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter is posted in accordance
with Article 6252-17 !s as follows:
Meetings held on second Tuesday: 12:00 P.M. previous Wednesday
Meetings held on Thursdays : 5:00 P.M. previous Thursday
THiS RE6~UEST RECEIVED BY:
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON:
All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine if adequate
information has been prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of
Court meetings. Your cooperation will be appreciated and contribute towards your request
"'tieing addressed at the earliest opportunity. See Agenda Request Guidelines.!
ROUE !NG SLIP FOR P~_ STS
----------------- - -- ------------ ---- --
.._. This application is for' [ ] Preliminary Plat [ /] Final Plat
please check one)
FROM: ~i~2e~ _~__.~o~s,~ ~? C~-
---- -~-- / Q~J ~ (~ ; ~
PLAT NAME: lJ_C~~~ °_~ ~~, f ~ l~,s~ ~~S,~f~.f
AGENDA DATE REQUESTED: /tea.-'~i /, /~9~ M~
tPlats are to he considered and accepted for the Agenda only on Road & Bridge Day which
is the first Tuesday of each month)
1. Plats are to submitted to the Ken County Engineer for review 15 days
prior to next Road & Bridge Commissioners' Court ate.
Signature• _ ______ _ ____
ranklin Johns n)
Z. Copy of Plat to County Clerk and arrange for payment of fees per Kerr
County Subdivision Rules & Regulations.
~ 6
Amount Paid $ ~~ _ ~~
Signature: ~ _
.. .. (Pat Dye)
3. Environmental Health Department
Permit application
_-
Fee Amount Paid $
Signature: __ ___ ___ __~
(David Litke)
4. Check with the Post Office for address numbers. _
Signature: /~/J•/li~~

S . 911 STREET NAMES (if applicable)
The street names shown on the plat are approved by the 911 Board
according to their guidelines. (Add this as signature block on plats.) _
^.o s r~c E'c= T~ ~ .- vo / vsel
Signature: _~ ~'~,-___
(911 Director)
6. If Platting includes any changes to an existing easement, approval
shall be obtained from Utilities involved:
1. Telephone Company ______,~_~ ~_____ _
. Electnc Utilit /v ~__
3. Water ----------- - f - --
4. Cable TV ___________ ~/~! ~_/'~__
(This shall be added to Plat if applicable)
7. If Platting has access to State maintained road you must take copy to
the Texas Department of Transportation Engineer, Bill Tucker for
review.
__ ~. ~-_ Signature:
(Bill ucker) ---- `' -~
8. Tax Certificate (See Subdivision Rules & Regulations 7.03.C.2.a.) .from
all School District, county or other Tax Districts which indicate all ad
valorem taxes have been paid on all land included in Platting.
9. Return to County Engi~neer:7 days before Road & Bridge Commissioners'
Court Agenda Date.
COMMENTS concerning this plat by any of the above offices:
t
--
To: Commissioners Court
From: Franklin Johnston, P.E.
Date: Wednesday, February 16, 1994
Subject: Replat of Tract 1, Houston Estates (Preliminary and Final Combined)
1. This is a Reptat of Platted Subdivision, in which there are two owners. With
acreage greater than 25 acres. One owner is replating 9.32 acres to self to the other
owner. Official notification is not required since both parties are involved in the
transaction.
2. There are no county roads involved.
3. This is almost a "minor replat", but does not fall into the definition because it creates
anew lot (1-A), and not just remove a lot line. I recommend the preliminary and final
replat be combined.