Item No. 2.4
Consider and discuss Contract with Kerrville South Volunteer
Fire Department.
David Motley addressed the Court stating that. he: felt
Commissioners' Court should not get involved in the by-laws of
the Kerrville South Volunteer Fire Department. Turtle Creek
is providing a month to month service. There is a conflict
between the Kerrville South Vo:iuntecr b'ire Department and the
Community Arti.on Croup on the by-laws. Jeanne Douglas states
that they are willing to work with the Community Action Croup
hut. the changes that were done are items that the fire
department can't live with. Mr. Pearson stated that the
by-Maws ar.e different from what was di.scusserl in the joint
meeting. Mr. Parsons rough draft on policies anti procedures
and k>y-law:; were discussed with Susan F31oom of the Turtle
Creek Fire' Department. If the Court wants an audit they are
free to see it. Danny Hays, the Rx-Chief of. the Kerrville
Vo:Lrzntce:~r Fi.rr--. Department stated the Community Action Group
refuses i..o support the KVFD if they don't establish the
by-:Laws that they :>et out.. Mr. Motley is right that
Commissioners' Court doesn't have the right to dahb.le in the
by l.txws of the department, The suggestion from the Court is
to talk to David Motley and present the contract to him and
then come back t.o the Court with the Contract.
Item No. 2.4
Consider and discuss Contract
with Kerrville South Volunteer
Fire Department
April 12, 1994
Vol T, Page 386