UT5iCL1r;SI01~a OF COh1HINED DTSPf?Tr~I IItdL=~ WT'S; I 9 1 -l.
i=iND TI-a +:Il'Y OI=- i{ERP2VIi__i_(=
On thi=; tF;e f:th day of September T99~i, i_ipon motion mach by
Coinm:i:.ion~-•~= Hnlel{ampp (:t?L)OP1ijEd by Commissioner Oehler, thc-
Court unanimously approved by a vote of 4-0-0, to a~ffi.rm and
accept the reccrmrner-~datior~ of tt;e Shertiff to c;o Common Di. =.E7atr..h
for eci.ir;~: Oar-uii.y t7eca~.isra of her ir.;risdiction.
Date: September 6, 1994
To: Honorable Commissioner's Court l
From: Sheriff Frances A. Kaiser ~~
RE: Common Dispatch
Since Sheriffs in all counties in the State of Texas are issued county
and district warrants and indictments to maintain, serve and process, it
is apparent the Sheriff is responsible and liable for the complete
process of these warrants. Although no one has been able to find any
specific, written mandate that it is the County Sheriff's responsibility
and liability to have and confirm the hard copy warrants, all the
Sheriffs in the State of Texas that I have talked with maintain to me
that they are responsible.
The Alamo Area Council of Governments 9-1-1 Regional Plan includes 12
counties, Kerr County is the only county that 9-1-1 is not dispatched
out of the Sheriff's Department.
It is apparent the Brazos County Sheriff's Department is maintaining the
warrants for some reason, of which they are checking for me. The Brazos
County Common Dispatch DOES NOT maintain the warrants.
At present, the Brazos County Sheriff's Department employs nine (9)
dispatchers and one (1) dispatch supervisor. This equals three (3)
dispatchers per shift, 24 hours a day.
The responsibilities of their dispatchers are as follows:
1. Confirmation of warrants - they have custody of the warrants.
2. Sending teletypes and performing checks for their investigators.
3. Dispatching for three (3) work release crews.
4. Assisting in booking (evenings).
5. Controlling their jail Sallyport entrance.
6. Handling incoming telephone calls to the Sheriff's Department.
From the information I received, their 9-1-1 Common Dispatch handles for
the Sheriff's Office:
1. Emergency 9-1-1 type calls.
2. Dispatching or sending out deputies on the calls.
The five (5) dispatchers that Kerr County now has employed handle all of
the above except #3,4 & 5 and dispatch for ICM, TABC, Constables and any
other agencies that may call in. They also man 3 emergency telephone
lines weekdays and 10 telephone lines weeknights and weekends plus
9-1-1, Crime Stoppers and Volunteer Fire phones at all times.
-1-
why have a common dispatch that handles only Emergency calls aqd
dispatches officers on calls which will cost the county extra? Also,
why pay Administrative dispatchers to handle other dispatcher duties as
Brazos County does when our dispatchers are doing all of that now for
approximately $21,337 each annually which includes benefits?
The new jail facility will have to have someone manning the
phone/reception area 24 hours a day, which our dispatchers are now doing
and can continue to do.
-2-
CHAPTER 85. SHERIFF
SUBCHAPTER A. SHERIFF AND SHERIFF'S PERSONNEL
Section
85.001. Oath and Bond.
85.002. New Bond Requirement; Removal.
85.003. Deputies.
85.004. Reserve Deputies.
85.005. Guards; Penalty.
85.006. County Police Force in Counties of 210,000 or More.
[Sections 85.007 to 85.020 reserved for expansion]
SUBCHAPTER B. MISCELLANEOUS POWERS AND DUTIES
85.021. Execution of Process: Penalty.
85.022. Execution of Legislative Process; Penalty.
85.023. Unfinished Business.
WESTLAW Electronlc Research
See WESTLAW Electronic Research Guide Following the Preface.
SUBCHAPTER A. SHERIFF AND SHERIFF'S PERSONNEL
§ 85.001. Oath and Bond
(a) A person elected as sheriff, before beginning to perform the duties of
office, must execute a bond with two or more good and sufficient sureties.
(b) The bond must be:
(1) approved by the commissioners court of the county;
(2) made payable to the governor;
(3) in an amount established by the commissioners court, but not less
than $5,000 or more than $30,000; and
(4) conditioned that the sheriff will:
(A) faithfully perform the duties of office established by law;
(B) account fot and pay to the person authorized by law to receive
them the fines, forfeitures, and penalties the sheriff collects for the use of
the state or a county;
(C) execute and return when due the process and precepts lawfully
directed to the sheriff, and pay to the person to whom they are due or to
the person's attorney the funds collected by virtue of the process or
precept; and
(D) pay to the county any funds illegally paid, voluntari]y or otherwise,
to the sheriff from county funds.
416

:TY OFFICERS
Title 3
Atty.Gen.1951 No.
',4lore
he sheriff may
1 determine the
tppointed. The
;ty police. The
rs court. The
. terminate the
led under this
I all laws of the
tme extent that
h this section.
by automobile
county located
;hall devote all
related to that
t rules adopted
he figure as
Bence to the
of the Code
~puiation" to
nisi census.
[rase "police
under "rules
[the revised
:ruction Act
SHERIFF
Ch. 85
Historical Note
Prior Law:
Acts 1929, 41st Leg., ch. 150, p. 326.
Vernon's Ann-Civ.St, arts. 6869d, §§ t to 3.
§ 85.021
Iaw Review Commentaries
Annual survey of Texas law: Challenges to and Michael H. Collins, 35 Southwestern (Tex.)
local government action. Charles L. Babcock L.J. 447 (1981).
Library References
Sheriffs and Constables X18, 79.
CJ.S. Sheriffs and Constables §§ 22, 37.
Construction and application 1
Notes of Decisions
ling that part of county outside of the corpo-
rate limits of the county seat, by reducing the
number of sheriffs deputies patrolling within
incorporated areas of county, where there was
no evidence that sheriff did not maintain a
force of at least six deputies who devoted their
entire time to patrolling that pan of the county
outside limits of the county seat. Weber v.
City of Sachse (Civ.App.1979) 591 S.W.2d 563,
error dismissed.
1. Conattuctton and appBcatlon
County commissioners' court did not fail to
comply with Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 6864d
(repealed; now, this section) which imposed a
duty on the commissioners to fund a county
police force of not less than six patrolmen who
should have devoted their entire time to patrol-
Revlsor's Note
(End of Subchapter)
(1) V.A.C.S. Article 6865, relating to the election of sheriffs, is omitted From
revision because it is substantively identical to parts of Article V, Section 23,
and Article XVI, Section 65, of the Texas Constitution. It is the general policy
of the legislative council's statutory revision program to omit from revised
codes provisions such as these because a statute that is substantively the same
as language of the constitution is not only superfluous but may foster the
erroneous belief that a constitutional requirement is merely statutory and
subject to amendment through the ordinary legislative process.
(2) The revised law omits a part of V.A.C.S. Article 6869 and omits Section 4
of V.A.C.S. Article 6869d, which relate to Fees collected by sheriffs, because
they are impliedly repealed by V.A.C.S. Article 3912e, which is revised by
Chapter 154.
[Sections 85.007 to 85.020 reserved for expansion]
SUBCHAPTER B. MISCELLANEOUS POWERS AND DUTIES
+rtitle 6869d
of of county
.r 152, gives
n of county
Hatted after
§ 85.021. Execution of Process; Penalty
(a) The sheriff shall execute all process and precepts directed to the sheriff
by legal authority and shall return the process or precept to the proper court
on or before the date the process or precept is returnable.
(b) The sheriff commits an offense if the sheriff:
(1) fails to return a process or precept as required by Subsection (a); or
431
_,....,--T . - . .. .
§ 85.021
(2) makes a false return.
COMMISSIOIITERS & COUAiTY OFFICER
Title
(c) An offense under this section is punishable by the court to which tt
process is returnable, as for contempt, by a fine of not more than $100.
fine collected under this section shall be deposited in the county treasur
(d) The sheriff is liable for all damages sustained by a person by reason <
an offense committed by the sheriff under this section.
Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 149, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987.
EDstorical Note
Prior law: Rev.Civ.St.1895, art. 4901.
Acts 1846, 1st Leg., p. 265, § 8. Rev.Civ.St.1911, art. 7130.
P.D. SI15. Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 6873.
Rev.Civ.St.1879, art. 4525.
Cross References
Executions,
Failure to lery or sell property subject see, V.T.C.A. Civil Practice & Remedies Code, § 34.06
Improper return of writ, see V.T.C.A. Civil Practice & Remedies Code, § 34.064.
Improper sale, penalty, see V,T.C.A. Civil Practice & Remedies Code, § 34.066.
Official misconduct, failure to perform duty, see V.T.C.A. Pena! Code, § 39.01.
Law Review Cotntnentaries
Practicing law with 1981 Texas rotes. Jack
Pope and Steve McConnico, 32 Baylor L.Rev.
485 (1980).
Library References
Sheriffs and Constables 4:+87, 97, 10t, Is3.
C.J.S. Sheriffs and Constables §§ 44, 52 et
seq., 56 to 62, 209, 220.
Arrest werranta, Ilablllty on bond 1l
Attachment, liability on band S
Commissloneca court Ilablllty 14
Custody of property 2
Damages 17
Defenses 16
Dudes of sheriff 1
Habeas corpus 18
Indemnity bond 3
Injury to sequestered property, Ilablllty on
bond 10
Levy and failure to levy, llablllty on bond 7
Laabillty on bond 4-12
In general 4
Notes of Decisions
Mandamus 19
Petldon 15
Protection from Ilablllty 13
Release of property, llablllty on bond 9
Return on execution, Ilablllty on bond 6
Taking of property, Ilablllty on bond 8
Wrongful eviction, Ilablllty on bond 12
Wrongful levy or other taking of propert;
llablllty on bond 8
1. Duties of sheriff
Arrest warrants ll Where testimony of both sheriff and count
Attachment 5 clerk established that clerk and not sheriff a~
Injury to sequestered property !0 tually posted notice of hearing of applicatic
Levy and failure to levy 7 to admit will to probate on service had i
Release of property 9 probate court, improper service was equivalei
Return on execution 6 to no service, notwithstanding attempted ra
Wrongful eviction 12 ification of clerk's acts by sheriff, and fact th;
Wrongful levy or other taking of property a custom existed for such practice and hens
8 judgment rendered by probate court admittit
432
JAiTY OFFICERS
Title 3
:ourt to which the
:ore than $100. A
county treasury,
arson by reason of
x901.
130.
art. 6873.
:medies Code, § 34.065.
e. 4 34.064.
§ 34.066.
39.01.
Ity 13
lability on bond 9
Ilablllt_v on bond 6
abtllty on bond 8
blllty on bond t2
ter taking of property,
both sheriff and county
clerk and not sheriff ac-
,f hearing of application
bate on service had in
er service was equivalent
hstanding attempted raa
s by sheriff, and fact that
such practice and hence
probate court admitting
SHERIFF
Ch. 85
will to probate was void. Wagner v. Urban
(Civ.App.1943) I70 S.W.2d 270.
Where county clerk who posted notice of
hearing of application for admission of will to
probate was not a deputy under sheriff, and
could not have bren such because law prohibit-
ed him from holding two such positions, sher-
iff could not delegate his official duty of post-
ing the citation to the county clerk, notwith-
standing that a custom to that effect may have
existed. Id.
Sheriff is required to execute all processes
directed to him by legal authority, whether
land is owned and possessed by judgment deba
or or another, and even though lery might
involve litigation. Henry S. Miller Co. v. Ev
ans (Sup.1970) 432 S.W.2d 426.
Sheriff has duty to execute process and is not
entitled to determine doubtful questions of fact
as [o whether land is owned and possessed by
judgment debtor. Id.
A sheriff has the statutory duty to execute
process directed to him by legal authority.
Any failure to perform such duty could subject
the sheriff to a fine and/or possible damages.
Op.Atty.Gen.1975, No. H-595.
The sheriff does not have the exclusive au•
thorny to execute process. Id.
2. Custody of property
Sheriff was entitled to retain money claimed
by different parries, and have question of title
thereto determined by the court, and could not
be subjected to statutory penalty for failing to
pay over [he same. W. T. Rickards & Co. v. J.
H. Bemis & Co. (Civ.App.1904) 78 S.W. 239.
3. Indemnity bond
Makers of sheriffs indemnity bond were en-
titled to contest right of plaintiffs to recover
statutory penalty from sheriff for failure to pay
over proceeds of execution sale. W. T. Rick-
ards & Co. v. J. H. Bemis & Co. (Civ.App.I904)
78 S.W. 239.
Sheriffs have a right to demand an indemni-
ty bond in proper cases before levying on per•
sonalty. Where sheriff was directed to seiu
string of tools in possession of a party not
named in writ of execution, where string of
tools were not so described as to distinguish
them from numerous other similar strings in
same county, sheriff had a right to demand an
indemnity bond before lerying. Head v, Car-
lin (Civ.App.1922) 240 S.W. 1051.
Generally an officer is bound to obey the
legal orders of a court and is not entitled to be
indemnified for so doing. Where writ of pos-
session, in action to recover stolen Ford car,
commanded sheriff to take possession of it as
4
§ 85.021
Note 4
against defendant and all persons claiming
same under or through him, and sheriff, after
obtaining indemnity bond, took car from S.,
who claimed ownership of it otherwise than
through defendant (as against the contention,
in an action by S. against a sheriff for conver-
sion, that since the writ did not authorize the
sheriff to take the car from S., he had no legal
right to require indemnity against the conse-
quences of his own illegal act), held, the sheriff
was not required to determine ownership of
the car at his peril, but was within his rights in
requiring of one petitioning for writ to assume
such responsibility by requiring him to execute
an indemnity bond. Craven v. Buchanan (Civ.
App.1923) 24g S.W. 89.
Plaintiff in execution cannot be required to
indemnify officer in a levy on real property,
since officer will not thereby be subjected to
suit for damages. Fant Mill. Co. v. May (Civ.
App.1951) 240 S.W.2d 445, ref. n.r.e.
Officer has right of indemnity before levying
on personal property upon reasonable ground
of apprehension that levy would result in claim
against him for wrongful seizure. Id.
Levying officer may require indemnity bond
before levying execution when, as mater of his
discretion, he has reasonable doubt as to own-
ership of property, enforcibility of judgment,
or other matters affecting propriety of execu-
tion. Rankin v. Belvin (Civ.App.1974) 507
S.W.2d 908, ref. n.r.e.
Constable's reliance on county attorney s
opinions as to officer's right to demand indem-
nity before levying execution did not remove
requirement that he have reasonable doubt as
to propriety of execution. Id.
Claimed defects in writ, which did not ren-
der it void, existence of prior liens on property
sought, and third person's possession of prop-
erty, did not justify constable's exercise of dis-
cretion to require bond before levying execu-
tion: constable and his surety were liable for
amount of judgment. Id.
The sheriff is not justified in refusing to levy
execution under the judgment in favor of the
Texas Unemployment Compensation Commis-
sion on chattels of a judgment debtor because
he has not been furnished an indemnity bond
by the state. Op.Atty.Gen.1939 No. 0.862.
4. Liability on bond-In general
When the plaintiff in execution or his actor
ney withholds from the officer knowledge in
his possession which would enable him to
make a levy, that fact would exonerate him
from liability. Batte v. Chandler (1880) 53 T.
613.
The failure of an officer lerying execution to
make an inventory of the property levied upon
33
Art. 2.15 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
fine shall be enforced in the same manner as fines
for contempt in civil cases.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art 2.17. Conservator of the Peace
Each sheriff shall be a conservator of the peace in
his county, and shall arrest al] offenders against the
laws of the State, in his view or hearing, and take
them before the proper court for examination or
trial. He shall quell and suppress all assaults and
batteries, affrays, insurrections and unlawful as-
semblies. He shall apprehend and commit to jail all
offenders, until an examination or trial can be had.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, ¢ 1, eff. San. 1, 1968.
Art 2.18. Custody of Prisoners
When a prisoner is committed to jail by wartant
from a magistrate or wort, he shall be placed in jail
by the sheriff. It is a violation of duty on the part
of any sheriff to permit a defendant so committed
to remain aut of jail, except that he may, when a
defendant is committed for want of bail, or when he
arrests in a bailable case, give the person arrested a
reasonable time to procure bail; but he shall so
guazd the accused as to prevent escape.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art. 2.19. Report se to Prisoners
On the first day of each month, the sheriff shall
give notice, in writing, to the district or county
attorney, where there be one, as to all prisoners in
his custody, naming them, and of the authority
under which he detains them.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art. 2.20. Deputy
(b) Any firearm or contraband received by a clerk
as an exhibit in any criminal proceeding may be
placed by the clerk in the hands of the sheriff for
safekeeping at any time during the pendency of
such proceeding or thereafter.
(c) The sheriff shall receive and hold such exhib•
its and release thorn only to the person or persona
authorized by the wort in which such exhibits have
been received.
Acts 1985, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, ¢ 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Amended by Acts 1979, 66th Leg., p. 212, ch. 119, § 1, eff.
Aug. 27, 1979.
Art. 2.22. Power of Deputy Clerks
Whenever a duty is imposed upon the clerk of the
district or county wort, the same may be lawfully
performed by his deputy.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art 2.23. Report to Attorney General
The clerks of the district and county courts shall,
when required by the Attorney General, report to
him at such times, and in accordance with such
forme as he may direct, such information in relation
to criminal matters as may be shown by their
records.
When any district clerk has failed, neglected or
refused to make any such report after being re-
quested in writing by the Attorney General to make
such report, the Attorney General shall notify in
writing the Comptroller of Public Accounts of such
failure, neglect or refusal, and said Comptroller
shall not thereafter draw any warrant in favor of
said clerk until said report has been filed with the
Attorney General.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Wherever a duty is imposed by this Code upon the
sheriff, the same duty may lawfully be performed
by his deputy. When there is no sheriff in a county,
the duties of that office, as to all proceedings under
the criminal law, devolve upon the officer who,
under the law, is empowered to dischazge the duties
of sheriff, in case of vacancy in the office.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art. 2.21. Duty of Clerks
(a) Each clerk of the district or county court shall
receive and file all papers and exhibits in respect to
criminal proceedings, issue all process in such cases,
and perform all other duties imposed upon them by
law.
Art. 2.24. Authenticating Officer
(a) The governor may appoint an authenticating
officer, in accordance with Subsection (b) of this
article, and delegate to that officer the power to
sign for the governor or to use the governor's
facsimile signature for signing any document that
dcea not have legal effect under this wde unless it
is signed by the governor.
(b) To appoint an authenticating officer under
this article, the governor shall file with the secre•
tary of state a document that contains:
(1) the name of the person to be appointed as
authenticating officer and a copy of the person's
signature;
12
,~~„~ ,:,.w:,__, N.bkl

_ Art. 15.01
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Article
15.23. 15me of Arrest
15.24. Nhat Force May be Uaed.
15.25. May Break Door.
15.26. Authority to Arrest Must be Made Known.
15.27. Repealed.
Att 15.01. Warrant of Arrest
A "warrant of arrest" is a written order from a
magistrate, directed to a peace officer or some other
person specially named, commanding him to take
the body of the person accused of an offense, to be
dealt with according to law.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, § 1, eff. Jaa. 1, 1966.
3
I
' ;t~
~: -
,
_ ~ . xa
~.. ~'~
... o, tyi=
.-'k. .
Art 15.02. Requisites of Warrant
It issues in the name of "The State of Texas", and
shalt be sufficient, without regard to form, if it have
these substantial requisites:
1. It must specify the name of the person whose
arrest is ordered, if it be known, if unknown, then
some reasonably definite description must be given
of him.
2. It must state that the person is accused of
some offense against the laws of the State, naming
the offense.
3. It must be signed by the magistrate, and his
office be named in the body of the warrant, or in
connection with his signature.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art 15.03. Magistrate May Issue Warrant or
Summons
(a) A magistrate may issue a warrant of arrest or
a summons:
1. In any case in which he is by law authorized
to order verbally the arrest of an offender;
2. When any person shall make oath before the
magistrate that another has committed some of-
fense against the laws of the State; and
3. In any case named in this Code where he is
specially authorized to issue warrants of arrest.
(b) A summons may be issued in any case where
a warrant may be issued, and shall be in the same
form as the warrant except that it shall summon the
defendant to appear before a magistrate at a stated
time and place. The summons shall be served upon
a defendant by delivering a copy to him personally,
or by leaving it at his dwelling house or usual place
of abode with some person of suitable age and
discretion then residing therein or by mailing it to
the defendant's last known address. If a defendant
fails to appear in response to the summons a war
rant shall be issued.
Acts 1966, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art 1b.04. Complaint
The affidavit made before the magistrate or dis-
trict or county attorney is called a "complaint" if it
charges the commission of an offense.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, § 1, eff. Jan. i, 1966.
Art. 16.06. Requisites of Complaint
The complaint shall be sufficient, without regard
to form, if it have these substantial requisites:
1. It moat state the name of the accused, if
known, and if not known, moat give some reason-
ably definite description of him.
2. It moat show that the accused has committed
some offense against the laws of the State, either
directly or that the affiant has good reason to
believe, and does believe, that the accused has com-
mitted such offense.
3. It must state the time and place of the com-
mission of the offense, as definitely as can be done
by the affiant.
4. It must be signed by the affiant by writing
his name or affixing his mazk.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art 15.06. Warrant Extends to Every Part of the
State
A warrant of arrest, issued by any county or
district clerk, or by any magistrate (except mayors
of an incorporated city or town), shall extend to any
part of the State; and any peace officer to whom
said warrant is directed, or into whose hands the
same has been transferred, shall be authorized to
execute the same in any county in this State.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Amended by Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 666, § 1, eff. June
14, 1985.
Art. 15.07. Warrant Issued by Other Magistrate
When a warrant of arrest is issued by any mayor
of an incorporated city or town, it cannot be exe-
cuted in another county than the one in which it
issues, except:
1. It be endorsed by a judge of a court of record,
in which case it may be executed anywhere in the
State; or
3S

COMMISSIONERS' COURT AGENDA REQUEST
PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINA AND FiV COPIES OF THIS R QU ST AND
_ DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEW D BY THE COURT
MADE BY: xERR 9-1-1 DISTRICT
OFFICE: 79z-s9tt
MEETING DATE: _, _ _,.~-I~' -9`f- TIME PREFERRED:Fj~t~~~,Aic~oR/
SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC) ravisinn COURT ORDER zoaza of 3/9/92
EXECUTIVE SESSION REQUESTED: YES NO pl;
PLEASE STATE REASON FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION
ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION: /s mi n~_ „n~ ess court desires questions
answered.
PERSONNEL MATTER - NAME OF EMPLOYEE:
NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT: Board Member Arran'/~~~~A
and possible Consultant
Dean Fitzgerald.
Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter is posted 1n accordance
with Artlcie 6252-17 1s as follows:
* Meetings held on Monday: 12:00 P.M. previous Wednesday
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED BY:
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON
All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine if
adequate information has been prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action
at time of Court m eetings. Your cooperation will be appreciated and contribute towards
your request being addressed at the earnest opportunity. See Agenda Request
Guidelines.