ORDER I~fO. `c J.:,~
A~'F='ROYAL OF REVISED F+'REL.IMINflR'Y GF-IflSE
RECOMh~IEP.IDf~I"TOIL! FOR THE k~;ERR COUVk1TY f~IVIMf~L SHELTER
On this the i..:,th day of Febr-~~.iar^y 199 ~, ~_~poT~ matioz-~ made by
Commissinner^ Holeliamf~, seconded by Cnmmis<sioner OehlE~r, the
Co~_~rt unanimously approved by a vote of 4-Q~-Q~, to appr^nwe the
revised Preliminary 1='hase Ftecnmmendations for the k'.er^r Oo~_tnty
tanimai Shelter.
COMMISSIONERS' COURT AGENDA REQUEST
PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND FIVE COPIES OF THIS REQUEST AND DOCUMENTS
TO BE REVIEWED BY THE COURT.
MADE BY: T H "Butch" Lackey OFFICE: Commissioners' Court
MEETING DATE: February 13 1995 TIME PREFERRED:
SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC) Consider and discuss approval of revised Preliminary
Phase Recommendations for the Kerr County Animal Shelter.
EXECUTIVE SESSION REQUESTED: (PLEASE STATE REASON)
ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION:
IF PERSONNEL MATTER -NAME OF EMPLOYEE:
NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT: Mike Walker/Commissioner Pct. #3
Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter is posted in accordance with Title 5,
Chapter 551 and 552, Government Code, is as follows:
Meeting scheduled for Mondays
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED BY:
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON:
5:00 P.M. previous Tuesday.

All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine if adequate information has
been prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of Court Meetings. Your cooperation will
be appreciated and contribute towards you request being addressed at the earliest onnort~~nity SPe Agenda
Request Rules Adopted by Commissioners' Court.
~ , `~
ARCHITECT
February 7, 1995
Commissioners' Court MICHAEL
Kerr County NEAL
Kerr County Courthouse WALKER
Kerrville, Texas 78028
Attn: The Honorable T.H. Lackey, Commissioner
RE: Programming for Kerr County Animal Shelter -Architect's Pro}ect: KCAS
and our letter and Preliminary Programming of February 3, 1995
Commissioners' Court Workshop -February 6, 1995
Pursuant to the review of our Programming Recommendations presented at the above Workshop,
please find our updated response to the court's request to reduce the amount of kennels to 35-40
and the sizes for most of the units to 3'x5'. The results is a further reduction in area, thus a
reduction in overall Estimate of Probable Cost, although the final type of kennels and inclusion in
budget remains unresolved. We intend to make a recommendation during Schematic Phase.
Upon the Court's acceptance (with modifications) of the Recommendations, we have concluded
the Preliminary Phase. We request your approval to proceed to the Schematic Design Phase.
We appreciate the appointment of a single representative of the Owner, Commissioner Lackey.
Although we have exceeded our allotted time in this phase (fee) to study this matter, we still offer
our services to discuss in a meeting or workshop format with those who may feel that they have
input to improve the facility. It is better to know now than later. We believe that this single
source channeling of information is a more efficient means of project management.
Also please find a copy of our suggestions on a Request for Proposals for a Contractor. Due to
our time situation, this probably should be acted upon as soon as possible. We recommend that
this be further reviewed by your legal counsel. I will be pleased to meet with you and counsel.
The questions on sewer and water need to be resolved with the City as soon as possible, because
that will impact the cast to the County. Please let me know when you want me to meet with you
and the City Engineer. I may want to have Mr. Lux, our Mechanical Engineer at that meeting.
1
Again due to timing, the soil testing must be decided; if we are going to have the results in time to
finish on schedule. If you wish me to get proposals, other than the attached from Drash & Focht,
please advise. Meanwhile, I would suggest that tlia consideration of Soils Investigation and
Recommendation Services be placed on tl~e on ~e next. Commissioners' Court Agenda, along
with approval of revised Preliminary Phase Recommendations and Request for Proposals for
Contractors.
Sin erely,
file:kcasikt.006
i;o3 VESPER LANE KERRV[LLE, TEXAS 78oz8
(zio) 895-ARCH
~.~~.~
I~ERR COC'~`T~~ ~:~I1i~L CC)~TROL F_-~CILIT~~
PI2Et.I~tIN~RY PHASE - PROGR-~~IIIING -Submitted Februa~~_• 6. 199.5_ re`-iced and
resubmitted February 7, 1995.
The Architect is requesting of anyone who reviews this information to please route corrections and
ditJerences in interpretation, froth that stated herein. through the County's designated representative.
Commissioner T.H. L.ackev to avoid miscommunications.
The following is data gathered trom meetings ~ti-ith Commissioners Lackey and Holekamp,
Environmental Health Director Litke. Animal Control officer Wright, numerous shelter officials in
ether counties; and Veterinarians Cardwell, Dittmar, Thomerson, and others since my memo of
January 18, 1995. To date, suggested facilities visited as research resources are: City of Boerne
Animal Shelter, Fritz Clinic in Fredericksburg, Austin Humane Society; New Braunfels (separate City
operation) 'tilany of our recommendations are based on data retrieved from these visits. the applicable
standards set forth in the "Training CJuide" of (NACA) National Animal Control Association .adjusted
to the demographics of Kerr County, and the preferences of the county officials. the Owner.
Action regnc~~cd of (hrner o: others:
tndicates intbrmalion or action requested of the t7wner bti the Architect.
** tndicates irlonuation ~;r action urgenttc requested of rho O~~ner b~ the Architect.
SITE
1. SITE DEFINED. Architect met with 2 Commissioners, City En~ineerin~. and Voelkel
Surveying to help delineate where the property lines on the 1.5 acre site might be drawn. rearhr
t?arallel with the contour lines. Architect needs topography, existing structures. and approximate
tree locations to do a Preliminary Site Analysis; County has arranged for Voelkel to pru~ ide an
updated topographical survey to tie in the latest data to that on the previously furnished State
Loop 531 survey. Specifically, we need to tie-in the new road, entry gate, modified contours and
approximated remaining tree locations. Lee Voelkel told us that he could furnish field notes to
us which we will convert on the computer into a 3-D site model. This will be used to accurately
communicate the design to the County. Also, we would like to have a hard copy of the survey.
SOIL TESTING. Soils investigation and foundation recommendations will be arranged with
a San Antonio testing lab by the Architect We are attempting to find a reliable lab with another
project in eur area to save some trip charges; Owner pays for report. An approved Site Analysis
is necessan to locate where the test holes will be drilled. County has cleared the site and made a
test cut with a bulldozer to reveal a possibly acceptable subgrade at about ~4" depth.
3. i~'~1PORTED BACkFILL. County has postponed spoils relocation from excavations on
other sites for backfill on this site. Architect will see if lab will test sample of imported soil for
suitability or County may elect to use testing ]ab on Jail. This question may be better resolved
after the design is more finalized.
KCAS - KERR COUNTY AI~iIMAL SHELTER -Page 1
'~`* . -1 ti"ARL~NCES, NEGOTIATIONS. County will ne~~otiate irate entrance modifications with
City, based on Site Analysis; County will seek any variances from City on driveway and setback
requirements, if needed.
5. SITE CONDITIONS. Architect and Cmn Lackey went to site several times to review
actual conditions. Preliminary review indicates very usable space, but a preliminary Site Analysis
i5 needed, based on an updated topographical survey, to insure ~~ood site usage, expandability,
room for parking, etc. Site clearing and demolition work was done by the County on February _'
*~ 6. CITY UTILITIES. County will resolve the conflict with the City over which will arrange
sewer and water extension and to what points services will be delivered. City Engineer Dower
stated that a larger fire line and fire hydrant will be across Loop 531; therefore, it is not a concern
for this site. A ?" water line will be extended to property by the City (to where). City wants the
County to use 2" force main sewer to southeast end of property to a sewer they will extend in the
Loop X34 right-of--way; this was not our original instruction. Please clarify.
7. OTHER UTILITIES. Architect will discuss service for electrical power with KPUB and
advise the Owner if there are any problems. Architect determined from Lone Star Gas
Engineering Department in Round Rock that gas service to the site is not feasible, because the
nearest location is the Veterans Hospital. Possibly LPG will be a feasible option, since so much
of the heated air must be exhausted.
8. ORIENTATION. The location and orientation of spaces is very important due to the odors
and exhausting of the kennels which must be placed to minimize public nuisance.
** 9. EFFLUENT AND ~'ASTE. It is assumed that animal waste from wash-down may be
nuxed with normal sanitary sewer. Animal waste will possibly be taken to the landfill for the near
future, but may be part of the incinerationicremation solution in the future.
GENERAL CRITERIA
SANITATION drives the success of an animal facility, as it prevents the contact of healthy and
diseased animals, diminishes spread of disease, minimizes staff needed, reduces maintenance and
remedy costs, and lessens adverse public reaction. Therefore. the ability to keep this facility
sanitary should be an over-riding consideration for its design. Hot water or steam wash-down
would be better, but it would considerably increase cost: perhaps it could planned for future, if
standards stiffen or policies change.
KENNELS, cages, runs, and equipment must be easily cleaned and maintained on a daily basis,
or more often, as required. Most animals will be given a means of being moved without direct
personnel handling to another dry space, while restraining space is being disinfected. The layout
should be considerate of sanitation, so that employees do not contaminate clean areas in the
process of their duties and cleaning of other areas.
K('AS - KLRR COi1NTY ANIMAL SI II'sLTI/R - Pale 2
SPECIFIC CRITERI
SCOPE AND FUNCTION REVIE`ti' (based upon O~~ner's preliminary plan. inteltiieti~ with count
officials, and numerous outside sources, including NACA Training Guide).
1. Scope. Architect has attempted to adhere to Cmn. Holekamp's request to try to cut total
scope ''0°'0 (3,850sf down to 3,080sf from owner's sketch) to get the project into budget. The
actual scope and cost is based on our analysis gleaned from the research data -see Space
Analysis below Anticipated space needs. V
''. Administration:
a. Chief officer -private or semi-private office (1 CPU); Animal Control OfifScers -
2 max. work stations (1 CPU); Reception/counter/files/copy (1 CPU); Public
surrenders: Adoptions. ACO, reception, processing area could be combined or
reconfigured for more efficiency. Officer Wright doesn't think Storage Room is
necessary; files, except public health issues, aren't kept, thus reducing space required.
b Veterinarian exam, neutering "clean" room may need to be added in the future.
For now, an area where a visiting vet could work in an emergency would be welcome,
if budget allows. Therefore, it is assumed that veterinarians will perform most surgery
(neutering, etc.) in their clinics.
3 Holding Wards:
** a. 32 -I'x 6' kennels shown on Owner's plan + 8 puppy/litterlcat, double-stacked or
mobile cages = -10 total; 40 would be maximum + receiving room + cat adoption. 3'xS
spaces could be used for most dogs with smaller stacked pens for puppies and kittens.
Occupancy counts furnished from existing facility were difficult to comprehend and
may not be reflective of a new facility, under a different system (Policy?).
* * b. As many as affordable (4-6) will be isolation type kennels (-I'x6'x6'} with full
height demising walls for quarantine and to minimize spread of disease. T-kennels bid
was $37,000 for 40 mixed units, which will not fit in assigned budget. Architect is
looking for ways to save on this cost and still use this system, similar systems, or parts
thereof° Owner wants architect to investigate locally or job produced kennels; also do
not completely fill all the kennel space with cages in the initial phase. It's indefinite
whether cages are in Construction Cost or ~v Owners Restraining. space type must be
decided as soon as possible~as it heavily impacts the configuration sanitation, thus
sco~~ and budget.
* * c. All kennel cages must be: sturdy -masonry, stainless steel, heavy plated metal,
or heavy plastic; no chain link that big dogs can damage. There must be an easy and
thorough wash down, balanced with cost of units, with almost all floors sloped to
drains. Wright prefers continuous T-grate Polydrain; he will get costs and details
from suppliers; this must be in Cost due to build-in features.
d. Use gas-fired, forced air space heaters. Provide minimum of 1 ~ air changes per
hour for ventilation and heating; cool ,heat, and isolate administration office spaces for
KCAS - KI?RR C'()(JNTY ANIMAL, SI Q'sLTI;R - Pala 3
odors and noise separatism, No HEPA filters should be reduired. but the` might need
to be accommodated (spare electrical power) in the future
e. Provide smooth and sealed floors and walls floors sloped to drains for ease-of-
cleaning and sanitation Ceiling may be exposed structure, but well insulated and easy
to clean. Desirable to have hose reels (preferably low, so as not to damage hose) .
f This space needs at least one telephone outlet. V
* ~. Dipping/Bathing tub can be floor mounted; or perhaps (semi-1 recessed or
ramped so workers would not have to lift large, dangerous, or dirty animals. Inside
bathing is planned for hose-bathing very dirty animals and allow others to drip and
shake. Dipping and bathing of cleaner animals could be handled in the same ordinary
tub, but it would limit the function and increase processin~~ time. Also an outside
hose-down area would be helpful to clean/disinfect trucks and perhaps very dirty
animals. Hot water is needed for either. Dippingibathing should be positioned where
diseased or unknown condition animals are not transported by clean or healthv animals.
or vise versa. NACA recommends all animals be dipped before exposing them to the
general population.
h. According to NACA all animals should first be in one of 2 isolation wards
(apparently healthy and obviously sick) until their condition may be determined.
i. For general holding ward Automatic Feeders and watering systems are not
recommended, due to initial cost and problems with sanitation between occupancies;
therefore, probably stainless steel bowls are best option, although many facilities use
plastic. Resting boards are desirable. No feeding, watering or boards are in our Cost.
-1. Food Storage is about right size as given by Owner; it may be moved, combined with Food
Prep and Utility for space savings. Possibly this needs to be expandable.
5. Open unnamed area on Owner's plan could be absorbed into storaUe spaces in a more
efficient arrangement, but some recziving and stack space is needed. v
6. Flow for employees log-inlservice entry needs to be considered; this varies greatly in other
facilities with no set pattern. Refer to attached Animal Flow diagram that we are using for
design. v
7. Some room's "walk-through feature" on Owner's plan may not be necessary? Eliminate
doors and walls to only those necessary, to save space and cost, and to maximize flexibility.
8. Cat Adoptions (1-I+/- cages) could be narrower. We have cage specs for reference: these
will not be in Construction Cost. Single floor drain would be helpful for clean-up, but it is not a
necessity. Probably this needs to be expandable.
9. 3'x 3' double-stack movable litter/puppy cages (by Owner); area may need to be expandable;
these should have plumbing.
10. Restrooms need to be larger than Owner's sketch for handicap; separate men, women.
KCAS - KL'RR C()[ JNTY A.NIM111, SI iLLTI:R - Pale 4
1 1. Functions that -ni~ht be consolidated without sacrificinU function
itilaintenance -janitorial, mop sink
Mechanical -Heat and cooling unit.
*Utility -Washer, dryer by Owner; mud sink?
* Food prep -deep, large double stainless sink, ample counter, dish storage.
refrigerator (by Owner) with icemaker; resolve sanitation requirements. Expandable?
* Food. medicine storage -could have room for vet emergencies; could combine with
Food Prep. Expandable? y
1'. Euthanasia room size given was a little small, as sink for head removal was added: Owner
will probably opt to reuse carbon monoxide unit from Freeman-Fritts. Owner will pursue
disposal question (incinerator, landfill_ etc.?). There should be no door directly to Kennels; enter
through Receiving Room. Overhead and people door, or double door, to a possible dock-height
loading is desirable; room may require freezer to hold dead animals pending disposal. Room
probably needs separate exhaust fan; must have 2~Ov, 30amp outlet If crematorium is installed
later, it will not be in building, but needs planning with 2~lOv, 70amp available to exterior.
13. Receiving (cat) Room could be reduced slightly; mostly portable cat cages bv_ Owner for
uncontrollahles and new arrivals.
14. There is some concern on public perception of drop-off cages. which will be off public
area; perhaps detached behind masonry gate wall with directional signs would be possible; gates
on Z dog units will be automatic lock to limit drop-offs; pens must be covered; cat pen will have
several portables inside without automatic door lock. There needs to be a method of having the
person dropping off to leave a reason or history and circumstances of surrender. y
15. Quiet, small exterior fenced space is desirable for adoption; this may be in Cost.
1 b. It is desirable to have a separate high chain-link fenced area for unloading; this needs to be
in Construction Cost.
17. Most of balance of property, not under building or parking; shall be high fenced for exercise
and security; architect will plan site, but perimeter fence is mostly not in Construction Cost.
Security lighting must be included in Construction Cost.
kC'1~S - ItI:f2R C'O[ 7NTY ~NtMAL SI IlL"I'I/R - PaKe ~
TIIaE SCHEDi`LEICONTRaCTItiG METHODS OPTIOtiS:
k Revised optional Time Schedule for Owner's consideration f set to coincide with re~ularl~
scheduled C'ommissioner's Court ~Ieetin~s, but special meetings may be called by Court
a. If normal conditions. competitive bidding anion, qualified general contractors- then
reasonably anticipated Court date approvals might be
Preliminary Phase
Schematic Desiun Phase
Design Development Phase
Construction Documents Phase
Bids accepted, enter contract
Completion - allowin_ 3. ~ mont
Februarv 13
February ~7
1~Iarch 13
March 27
April ~~
hs for construction and acceptance of project
August 14
b. If fast track method is iegai (re'. County Attorney's letter of January's j apre-selected
general contractor who assists by working with architect and pricing during planning and
production with final competitive bids taken, Court approval dates might be (best case scenario l:
Preliminary Phase February 13
Schematic Design Phase February ?7
Design Development Phase march 13
Construction Documents Phase March 27
Sids complete, enter contract March 27
Completion -allowing 3 months for construction and acceptance of project
June 2G
KCAS - KI?RR C(>tTNTY ANIMAL. SIII:LTI;R - Page 6
SPACE ANALYSIS -RECOMMENDED AREAS
INTERIOR
Administration:	Area	Sub Est. Cost
Chief Animal Control Officer	120sf	
Reception/counter/files/copy/2-ACO	300	
Public surrenders/waiting	100	
Adoptions/waiting	180	
Restrooms	90	
Circulation	50	
Subtotal		840
Cost @ $55/sf		$ 46,200.00
Kennel including direct access space		
Quarantine, isolation, large dogs 6 @, 35sf	210	
General holding pens 16 @ 30sf	450	
Puppy/litter/kittens 16/2=8 @ 18sf	144	
Dipping, bathing	70	
Cat adoption 14/2=7 @ 18sf	112	
Food/medicine storage, prep	144	
Euthanasia	168	
Receiving	120	
Subtotal		1,418sf
Cost @ $45sf		63,810.00
Service		
Maintenance, Mechanical, Utility	120	
General, circulation, flexible space	120	
Subtotal		240
Cost @ $50/sf		12,400.00
Total interior space		2,498sf
Subtotal interior cost		122,010.00
EXTERIOR
Drop-off cages 140sf 2,100.00
Fenced adoption space w/o landscape 200 1,000.00
Fenced unloading, wash-down 400 2,400.00
Parking, drives 10 cars 3,000 15,000.00
SUBTOTAL 142, 510.00
Cage Allowance 13000.00
SUBTOTAL 155,510.00
Contingency - 5% 7790.00
TOTAL ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST $ 163,300.00
KCAS - KLRR COiJNT'Y ANIMAI, SHLLT)iR -Page 7
~ ~i3ALiFICA'TiC~N h•'i"A'TEMENT .
'~-~/i 'i~-e above estimat~'.s da ztot ~ciude.the cost of`kewiets, cages, urge fenced axerasa area on baiattce of
site, hundscaping, iiuYeishittgs, euthanasia cha:nlicr; or other specialized equipment. 'T'he Goats are
approximaie, based on the Are~utect`s current Ledge ofthe construction industry annd t&e
comparatitve open mar.~eE costs far snniiar type. of construction. The Archi~taet is not a cautractor an~1
t.~l05iD 3[C TIQ~. ~llAi#tntPE~f~ ~x21i4, ~S f~e 1~I~hl[~t:1188 n0 CR323tT0; ~V81" tI;arket condmons and What
~17Ribtii[[t~ ftiuwL~~iio iif-~ ~WAf.T T+~ji ~`.
Realty gubueittecf,
~~u~a~
Michael Neal Walker; Architect
owrn~a~s Acc~r.~-.r~cE
The E)vvner approves vrith noted exceptions_,' (disa~ppra~+es~,..~.,} the above for the Preliminary Phase
and a-.tthoriz~es (does not atttharize .,,,_..} the Architect to begin the Schematic t~ign Phase.
~+CCI'IOlw15:

~.._ ~, ..
KERR COUNTY
700 MAIN STREET
KERRVILLE, TEXAS 78028
FACSIMILE MESSAGE SHEET
Date: FAhnias~-15, ~ 19-95-
To : Mike Wal kar
Phone # 895-2724
Fax # 895-3297
From : County Clerk' ~ Offi cP
Dept : Coiranissioners' Cr~l~rt C`1 Prk--(Esther)
Fax # 210/896-2868
Remarks : Mike This will be put in the gaper
to be run on
February 1~., 1995
F _hr~~ar~~ 7F, 199,
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS ONE) 3
IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS, QUESTIONS OR THIS TRANSMISSION IS
ILLEGIBLE OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CONTACT US AT (210) 896-2844
or ( 214 ) 25 7 - 6181. PATRI IA D , CLERK
B ~ ,
Si tune
Esther R. G a
KERB COUNTY
700 MAIN STREET
KERRVILLE, TEXAS 78028
FACSIMILE MESSAGE SHEET
Date : February 15 , 19~~
T o: KERRVILLE DAILY TIMES
ATTN: Margaret
Phone ~ 896-7000
Fax # 896-1150
From: County Clerk's nffir-P
Dept : ComnissionPrs' C'c,,,rt ~1 erk (Esther)
Fax # 210/896-2868
Remarks : S nd B; 11 to Cnrrvn; sinners' Cain
and F hn,an~ 2ti,. 199, P~ P~CG ~
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS ONE) 3
IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS, QUESTIONS OR THIS TRANSMISSION IS
ILLEGIBLE OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CONTACT US AT (210) 896-2844
or (21Q) 257-6181.
PATRI rD CLERK
B '~~
i nature
Esther R. a
INVITATIONS TO BIDDERS
Sealed Rid Pr^oposals in d+_-plicate, addressed to FSerr County
Commissioners' Gaur^t, 7~~ Main Str^eet, k'.er^rville, Tx 78-Z-~8
will be received in the Co+_-nty Clerk'y Office +_mtil 5:00 F'. M.
Fr~iday, Mar^ch 3, 1990 and p+_-bl icl y opened at 1~:0~ A. M.
Monday, hlarch 6, 199, d+_-r~ing a meeting of N.er^r^ County
Commissioner^s' Court for the CONSTRUCTIDN OF KERB COUNTY
ANIMAL SHELTER, KERRVILLE, TEXAS. All bids, whether~ mailed
or delivered, m+_-st be received by Commissioners' Court no
later than the above specified time. All bids must be sealed
and marked on the outside of the envelope: CONSTRUCTION OF
KERR COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER, with the name of the Bidder~.
No bid secur~ity is r^equir~ed. No deposit is r~equir~ed far~
Rid Doc+_-ments, which may be obtained from the office
of the Ar^chitect, Michael Walker~, 1a~~ Vesper, Y.err^ville, Tx
78~~8, l41~) 895-27w4.
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
THIS IS NOT FINAL BIDDING. P+_~rpase is to pre-select a General
Contr^actor~; commencing constr~uction ar~ound April 1, 1995.
Based on Bids, Commissioner~s Court will inter'view the
candidates. After selection of a general contr'actor or^
project manager said gener~al contractor ar^ pro.ject
manager wi 11 wor~k with Ar~chitect to make suggest ions for~
adjustments to mater^ials, methods, timing, casts. Far General
Contractor, type of final contract for construction will be
cost pl+_-s a fee, with a g+_-aranteed maximum construction cost,
based an final construction dac+_-ments. Dur~ing r_anstruction
phase Bidder~ wa+_~ld act as a general constr+_~ction coordinator
and manager.
Required infor~matian far^ evaluating Contractor's bids:
1. G+_~ar~anteed Maxim+_~m Cast for~ the Basic F'r~o.ject, based on
F'reliminar^y F'ragram and other data.
;~. Acknowledge ability to meet the tentative sched+_-le,
descr~ibed in F'r~eliminar~y F'r~o gram. Deadline is J+_ily 1, 1995,
for^ final completion.
3. M+_-st carry insurance: Workmen's Compensation,
Contr~actor~' s Gener~al Liabi 1 ity; Builder^' s risk.
4. Provide Perfor^mance and Payment Banding far~ 10Q~~ of cost
of project.
5. F'r~ovide pr~eliminar~y infor~mation far selection: Descr-~ibe
method of s+_-pervision; List other~ ar~chitects and owners with
whom worked an projects of similar type and scope in the last
3-5 year~s; Prefer~ence far^ the method of calc+_-lating fee.
6. S+_-bmit AIA document A-3-Zi5, Contractor^'s G!uaiification
Stat ement.
Description of Project:
Administration offices and kennels of ;',5~~ s. f., X150 -
175, ~~~ budget, concr~ete and vinyl floor~ing, smooth finish
walls and ceilings, painted or~ glared CMU, wallbaar^d office
constr^+_-ction, hollow metal door~s and fr~ames, al+_imini+_-m,
ins+_~lated glazing windows, ceilings of lay-in acoustical file
35-4G kennels, heated and cooled offices, heated kennel areas
with high vol!~me exha!isting, aver^si ed electr^ical.
REG~UEST FOR F'ROF'DSALS
RROJECT MANAGER
As an alternative to the above Invitation for^ Pidders, sealed
F'r^oposals, in duplicate, addr^essed to Ker^r^ Co!tnty
Commissioners' Court, 7Q~~ Main Street, Kerrville, Texas 7B~`8,
will be received in the Office of the County Clerk until 5:~0
F'. M. Friday, March ~, 1995, and publicly opened at 1~-:~Q~
A. M. Monday, Mar^ch 6, 1995, d!ir^ing a meet ing of Ker^r^
County Commissioners' Co!-rt for the CONSTRUCTION OF I'.ERR
COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER, IiERRVILLE, TX. All pr^oposals whether^
mailed or~ deliver^ed, m!~st be r~eceived by Commissioner~s' Caur^t
no later^ than the above specified time. All proposals must be
sealed and marked on the outside of the envelope:
CONSTRUCTION OF N.ERR COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER, with the name of
the F'r^oposer.
No proposal recur^ity is requir^ed. No deposit is r^eq!-ir^ed for^
F'r^apasal Documents, which may be obtained fr^am the office of
the Architect, Michael Walker, 13~.~ Vesper, Kerrville, Tx
78+Z~;~B, (~1~) 895-E7~4.
Purpose is to pre-select a F'r^o.ject Manager^, commencing
construction ar^o!ind Apr^il 1, 1995. Paced on F'r^oposals,
Commissioners' Court will interview the candidates. Dne
selected F'r^o.ject Manager^ will work with Ar^chitect to make
suggestions for adjustments to materials, methods, timing,
costs. Type of final contract for construction will be
individual contracts with a fee paid to the F'ra.ject Manager^.
D!~r^ing construction phase F'ro,ject Manager would act as a
genet^al construction coordinator and project manager.
Requir^ed infor^mation far evaluating Contr^actar^'s bids and
proposals:
1, Acknowledge ability to meet the tentative schedule,
described in preliminar^y Program. Deadline is ,I!tly 1, 1995,
for final completion.
~. F'r^ovide pr^eliminar~y information for^ selection: Descr^ibe
method of supervision, List other architects and owner^s with
wham war^ked on pr^ojects of similar type and scope in the last
-5 years, Pr^eference far the method of calc!tlating fee.
3. Submit AIA document A-3~5, Contractor^'s Qualifications
Statement, Applicable Section.
Description of Rraject: Same as above.
C ' .:
~ .
~tE~UEST ~'4R PROPOS~A~S FUR~~'R~t3JT ~A1~AG~~t '
As an alternative to the above lnvitatioti fix: , Soled proposals ~ ~xplieatc,addressed
°~LK ~5 ~ m 40;~ain °Sbroet, Kaxv4lo, 'I'ces ?8028, will be t~aoeivod im the
~°,~V~~ ~ Oft"ioe of COMMISSIONERS' CCXJR'I' mrtil 5:00 p~m; ~xiday Fc~ruary 24,1995; end pubfldy opoeed at.l~a.xn. / ~ : ° ~
h+Ionday, Febrnaxy 27,1995, dttriuoig a a~etimg of K.ctr C6unty: ~on~era' Cauxt .~ t>~e CONSTRUCTION OF
KERR COUNTY AI~TIMAL SHEL'TER.; Kp,RRVILLE, 'i"BX~$: At1 Proposals, whether mod a deIiv~ercd, must be
recedved ley ~onera' Coiat no Iaber than the move sped~ied dime. Alt. bidsll'rppisals must ba seabd amd
a~arksd on the outside of the enveIop~e: CONST'RUCTICjN O~ ~~CERR COUNTY ANIlVtAL SHELTER, with the
mm~c ot'the B~ditrlPnoposdr_
No~~aitity is regturod, Nu deposit i$ zcquired fcr;Bi~l/Prvposal Doctmx~s, which may be obtauned ~ the
office ofthe ,Architect, h+fichael ~Valloer;:1303 V,~~~;,7"X 78025, (214)595-2724.
-~ •.
Purpose is Wpre-select a Fret Mana~r; caig~ around Apait I '~ on
~lii~s/Proposals, Conaomissiamiars Coma virilX~ immrview:tlte:cati~dates• One sdoctod ~ wilt work with At+c~itoct
tea maloe sugges#ions far adjts to.materials, mstho,'~s, itnoai~g, costs. Type of final oo®tract fear canstrueiiot, will
be il~ividtml corttrac~s with a fec paid 1:o th ages, .~ phas~Mariager would act as a.general
Requir+Bd iafarmataor~ ~ eval~~atimg r~8 blds' ~ pt~oposals:
I . Admawks~e ability a meet the tentatiiv~c ~ed,uie,':tlc~'l in ~Prelimvaary Program. ~ is Inly I,199s,
Eor fmat ~.
z rro~id~ preliminary information ior~~ection: l'ticfbod ~ sup~~a~. List other ~ as~d awnars
with wltan worked cat projccts of simil:ax'i and in t~`lsst 3-5 years. Prefe~noc !'or~the m~hod of
calculating fee. ~ `~ .
3. Submit AIA doaaooent A-305, Cc~ttador's C~u~n'~St~ttemdn~t.
Aescriptian of 1'rvjoct: Adn~adation Vices and 2~4t1 e.t:, S 130-175.400 budget; +e and vinyl
flooring; smooth finish walls and reiling~t, pained r~r g~1t~LT, waiIhoa~tt o~ cnushuctian; #raIIowv metgi doors
and francs; altm~inoYn, insulaeed glazing windows;. ~s_o~tAy :in afloust3icat tits; 35-40 lse~ig; heated and cooled
ofriceg; heAtcd kamel areas,. with high ~vohtme ~cli~iusti c{rical sexvitC vn%ll ~be slightly aveRSi~ed far future
additions and ~ ~ ~ .
.~,.
• _y
. s°
• ~ 3.
I .
,~~ r
~.
$,:
c:
~'d :?.` ----SXH.~-S68-0I~~31 ZZ:ZZ S6. St 53.E
	
	
.	sai~s~ ] s~lnugns~ ] s~arM~iP~ ~
.~	~ .. =Jlr~l4"X'~0.~ ~
.	~Sil~.~~ aU3i[iWLYJ 78 MOtM"13E I Pl~~l I
	uo~dxF ~ ~ ' co~c~u~s~Pl I ~ ~enouid~~ ]
	~2T114X~ ~t?.~'
	.: as~nha~xno~ y~Yx- aouep~ca~o~e ur( ]
	. ~ .:a~+af' adas raPun[ ] y~?~+sanJ~ ]
	. ~ ~Q~.LLII~iSl~t~.
	. ; ~ ~ ~.~ =s~~ra~a x~o
	
	~~.
	
7~IH~IYrI	~.~?~Q-9b8 -~ ~~f5 - ~~b~ ~'~ i ~o~,
	
.~,a~1IH~~1~	
7~1~~'7~ ~7~.~
	
INVITATIONS TO KIDDERS/_REQUEST FOR P'ROP'OSALS
Sealed Pid Proposals in duplicate, addr-essed to V'.err Co+_~nty
Commissioners' Co+_~rt, 7~+~ Main Street, lerrville, Tx 78~Z-28
will be received in the County Clerk's Office +_~ntil 5:Q~0 F'. M.
Friday, Febr•+_iar^y c4, 1995, and p+_~bl icly opened at 10:0 A. M.
Monday Febr+_iary ~7, 1995, d+_-ring a meeting of Kerr County
Commissioner^s' Co+_~rt for the CONSTRUCTION OF KERR COUNTY
ANIMAL SHELTER, I'.ERRVILLE, TEXAS. All bidsJpraposals, whether
mailed or delivered, m{_tst be received by Commissioners' Court
no later than the above specified time. All hidsf-~~-~{ansals
must be sealed and marked on the outside of the envelope:
CONSTRUCTION OF KERR COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER, with the name of
the BiddertGr^oposer.
No bid security is r^eq+_~ir-ed. No
Pidf-P'ts~optisal Doc+_~ments, which may
of the Architect, Michael Walker,
78`8, (~ 1 ~> 895-~7;~4. ~ .,
~;,
deposit is required far
be obtained from the office
133 Vesper, Kerrville, Tx
~r
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
THIS IS NOT FINAL RIDDING. Purpose is to pre-select a General
Contr^actor; commencing construction around Apr-il 1, 1995.
Erased on Bids, Commissioners Court will interview the
candidates. A.~ter^ selection of afcontr^actor^ or project
manager; ~G+re~g%"will work with Architect to make suggestions for
adjustments to materials, methods, timing costs. For General
~,,,.-~Contr^acto~ype of final contract for constr+_~ction will be
cost plus's fee, with a guaranteed maximum construction cost,
based an final construction documents. During construction
phase Pidder would act as a general construction coordinator
and manager.
Requir^ed information far eval+_~ating Contractor's bids:
1. Guaranteed Maxim+_~m Cost far the Basic Pr-o.ject, based on
Preliminary Program and other- data.
`. Acknowledge ability to meet the tentative schedule,
described in Preliminary Program. Deadline is July 1, 1995,
for final completion.
,~. M+_~st carry ins+_~r-once: Workmen's Compensation,
Contractor's General Liabi 1 ity; Builder^' s risk.
4. Provide Performance and Payment Banding for iQti~~ of cost
of project.
5. Provide preliminary information for selection: Describe
method of supervision. List other architects and owners with
whom worked on projects of similar type and scope in the last
3-5 years. Preference far the method of calc+_ilating fee.
6. S+_tbmit AIA document A-3Qt5, Contr-actor's Q+_~alificatian
r~,f Statement. /' ~.P;~
~ Description of Pr^o,ject: Administration offices and kennels of
" ~:, 5~~ s. f. , ~15~-175, OHO b+_~dget; concrete and vinyl floor°ing;
smooth finish walls and ceilings, painted or glared CMU, wall-
board office constr-+_~ction; hollow metal doors and frames,
alum ini+_im, ins+_tlated glaiing windows; ceilings of lay-in
acoustical tile; 35-4+Z~ kennels; heated and coaled offices;
heated kennel areas, with high volume exhausting, electrir_al
service will be slightly oversized for- f+_itur-e additions and
eq+_iiprnent.
REDDEST FOR P'ROP'OSALS ~'~(Rl P'RO.IECT MANAGER
BAs an alter^native to th above Invitation for^ Hidder^s, sealed
Proposal ~i duplicated addr^essed to I',er^r^ County
Commissi rs' Co+_~rt, 7~0 Main Street, Y,errville, Texas 78tZ~28,
will be received in the Dffice of the County Cler^k +_tntil 5:~~
F'. M. Fr^iday, Febr^+aar^y E4, 1995, and p+_~bl icly opened at 1:00
A. M. Monday, Febr+_~ary ~'7, 1995, d+_iring a meeting of Y,er^r
County Commissioners' Co+_irt for the CONSTRUCTION OF 1',ERR
COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER, KERRVILLE, TX. All pr^oposals whether^
mailed or^ deliver^ed, must be r^eceived by Commissioners' Co+_irt
no later than the above specified time. All pr^oposals must be
sealed and marked on the outside of the envelope:
CONSTRUCTION OF t',ERR COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER, with the name of
the F'ropaser.
No proposal secur^ity is r^equired. No deposit is required for^
F'r^oposal Documents, which may be obtained fr^om the office of
the Architect, Michael Walker, 103 Vesper, Kerrville, Tx
78~E8, t 21 ~-> 895-E7E4.
Purpose is to pre-select a P'ra.ject Manager^, commencing
constr+_~ct ion around Apri 1 i, 1995, Based an Pro pawls,
Commissioners' Court will interview the candidates. One
selected F'r^o.ject Manager^ will war^k with Ar^chitect to make
s+_iggestions for^ adjustments to materials, methods, timing,
Ca5t5. Type of final contract for construction will be
individ+_-al contracts with a fee paid to the Rr^o.ject Manager.
D+_iring canstr+_ict ion phase Pr^o.ject Manager would act as a
gener^al constr^+_~ction coor^dinator^ and project manager.
Required infor'motion for^ evaluating Contr'actor^'s bids and
pr^oposal s
1. Acknowledge ability to meet the tentative sched+_~le,
described in preliminary F'ragram. Deadline is 3~.~1y 1, 1995,
for^ final completion.
~:. P'r^ovide pr^eliminar^y
method of super'vision.
whom worked on pr^o.jects
3-5 years. Preference
3. S+_~bmit AIA doc+_~ment
information for^ selection: Descr^ibe
List other' ar^chitects and owner^s with
of similar type and scope in the last
for^ the method of calc+.tlat ing fee.
A-,:;~5, Gantr'actor's G!ualifications
Statement.
Descr^iption of F'r^o.ject: Same as above.
INVITATIDNS TD L~IDDERS
Sealed Bid Proposals in d+_tplicate, addressed to Kerr County
Commissioner~s' Co+_ir^t, 70-~ Main Str~eet, 1'.er^r~ville, Tx 78:::8
will be r~eceived in the Ca+_~nty Cler~k's Office until 5:~~ F'. M,
Fr~iday, Febr^uar~y 24, 1990, and publicly opened at 1~:0~ A. M.
Monday March 6, 1995, d+_~r^ing a meeting of N.er~r^ County
Commissioners' Co+_~rt for the CONSTRUCTION OF KERR COUNTY
ANIMAL SHELTER, t'.ERRVILLE, TEXAS. All bids, whether mailed
ar~ deliver~ed, m+_~st be r^eceived by Commissioner^s' Court na
later than the above specified time. All bids m+_ist be sealed
and marked on the o+_~tside of the envelope: CONSTRUCTION OF
KERR CDUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER, with the name of the Bidder.
No bid sec+_ir~ity is r~equir~ed. No deposit is r^eq+_Rir~ed for~
Bid Doc+_iments, which may be obtained from the office
of the Architect, Michael Walker, 13~C Vesper, N.err^ville, Tx
78~ 8, (~ 1 Qr) 895-L724.
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
THIS IS NOT FINAL BIDDING. F'+_~r^pose is to pr~e-select a Gener~al
Contr~actor~; commencing construction ara+_md April 1, 1995.
Based on Bids, Commissioners Co+_~rt will interview the
candidates. After selection of a general contractor or
pr^a.ject manager~ said gener~al contr~actar^ or^ pr^o.ject
manager^ will wor^k with Ar~chitect to make suggest ions for~
adjustments to mater~ials, methods, timing casts. For~ Gener^al
Contr^actar~, type of final cantr~act for~ constr+_iction will be
cost pl+_~s a fee, with a guar~anteed maximum construction cost,
based on final construction doe+_~ments. D+_~ring construction
phase Pidder~ would act as a gener^al constr~uction coordinator
and manager.
Required information for evaluating Contractor's bids:
1. G+_~aranteed Maximum Cast far the Basic Project, based on
Preliminary Pragr~am and other data.
~. Acknowledge ability to meet the tentative sched+_~le,
descr~ibed in Pr^eliminar^y F'r^ogr^am. Deadline is J+_~ly 1, 1995,
for final completion.
3. M+_~st carry insurance : Workmen's Compensation,
Contr'actor~' s Gener^al Liabi 1 ity; Builder^' s risk.
4. F'ravide Performance and Payment Bonding for^ 1f1~Q~X of cost
of project.
5. F'ravide preliminar^y information for~ selection: Describe
method of s+_~per^vision,; List other^ architects and owner~s with
whom war^ked on pr~a.jects of similar' type and scope in the last
3-5 years Preference for^ the method of calc+_~lating fees
E. S+_~bmit AIA document A-3~5, Contractor^' s C~ual i f icat i on
Statement,
Description of Project:
Administration offices and kennels of ~, 502 s. f.; ~15~- -
175, 000 budget; caner^ete and vinyl floor^ing{~ smooth finish
walls and ceilings, painted or glared CMU, wallboard office
constr<ction; hollow metal doors and fr^ames, alumini+_~m,
insulated gla~.ing windows; ceilings of lay-in acoustical the
35-4~ kennels; heated and cooled offices; heated kennel
~~~~.c
areas d~t'~"~ ~~
with high vol~_tme exhausting, electrical,.set~wzre^' e
_ y ove ~ _ .
REQUEST FGR F'RGF'GSALS
PROJECT MANAGER
As an alter^native to the above Invitation for Pidders, sealed
F'r^oposals, in duplicate, addr~essed to Ker^r^ County
Commissioners' Court, 7tZt~t Main Str^eet, N.errville, Texas 78G`B,
will be received in the Gffice of the County Clerk ~_tntil ~:~-~-
F'. M. Friday, February :4, 1995, and publicly opened at 1~:+Z+~
A. M. Monday, Mar^ch 6, 1995, d~_tr^ing a meeting of Kerr
County Commissioners' Court for^ the CGNSTRUGTIGN GF KERR
CGUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER, F{ERRVILLE, TX. All proposals whether
mailed or^ delivered, must be received by Commissioners' Court
no later than the above specified time. All proposals must be
sealed and marked on the o~.ttside of the envelope:
CONSTRUCTIGN GF IiERR CGUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER, with the name of
the F'r^opaser.
No pr~oposal recur~ity is r^equir^ed. No deposit is r^equir^ed for
Pr^oposal Documents, which may be obtained fr^om the office of
the Architect, Michael Walker, 133 Vesper, Kerrville, Tx
78`8, (yiG)895-E7E4.
F'~_trpose is to pr^e-select a F'ro.ject Manager^, commencing
construction aro~_tnd Apr^il 1, 1995, Rased on Pr^opasals,
Commissioners' Co~_trt will interview the candidates. One
selected project Manager will work with Architect to make
suggestions for adjustments to materials, methods, timing,
costs. Type of final contr^act far constr^uction will be
individ~_tal contr^acts with a fee paid to the F'ra,ject Manager.
D~_tr^ing construction phase F'r^o.ject Manager~ wo~_tld act as a
general constr^~_tct ion coon~dinator^ and pr^o,ject manager^.
Req~tir^ed infor^matian for^ evaluating Contr^actar~'s bids and
proposals:
1. Acknowledge ability to meet the tentative schedule,
descr^ibed in pr^eliminar^y F'r^agram. Deadline is J~_tly 1, 1995,
for^ final completion.
~. F'r^ovide pr^eliminary infor^matian for^ selection: Descr^ibe
method of super^visionl List other^ ar^chitects and owner^s with
whom worked an projects of similar type and scope in the last
,:,-v years Preference for the method of calc~_~lating feed
3. S~_tbmi~ AIA doc~.tment A-~05, Gontr^actor~'s Qualifications
St atement~ ~~lrC'A~~ ,~ee~/a ti'
Description of Project: Same as above.
it ..
INVITAT~NS 3'O B~DDE~EQtrE~~'~':~ ~'ROPOS,A-..~,SS
Sealed Bid Proposals in dup., ad~ssed to I~R1~ C+,DUN'1'~ C~IMMISSIa1~i,~tS` COURT, 700 Main Sheet,
o ~~~~,~~ Karndle, Texas ?8028. wiU'be reoeiv~ed is tmtii S:OC~ p-m., ~iid~ay
~ ~ •. o~ ~ ~~,199s, and publicly opened at Ji~oo a.m nay, Fe~uaary 27, i99s, dwri~ag t- meeting o~'~KCxr Camay
cone~s~ Cast ~ the CpNSrRUCTIaN o~ I COUNTY ~AN1M~A,T;. SHELTER, IRVit,I.~,
texas. All 13ids/PropOSals, whc~Iaear m~a~ted ~ de~vered musC be receivod by ~ouExs' Count ~o tic
a~ .b~~ ~ time. Ait b;~dalPropcx5s+la mush be seed a~sY:aiarlczd.an ~ analde ol'trie ~:
caNs~rttucTfaN o~ xt~~ccxr~rr~ ~-xn~aL s:rE~.w~ih mo name of the Bidder/Proposer.
~~1Vo sea ily is rcquimed./NQ dtpo~it is;rEquidod ~o~` BidlPtoptlsal Iaacameats, w may be obtai~ped fira~n
officx of the Architect, MichaOl Walleer; 1303 Vesptse,: K~fi~ville; TX 78028, (210}895-2724.
This is not final bxdc~g;} Purpose ins to pre-s~ecl-a Ci~t' C~ttac~or; cerag 1,r~,~Po` ~~ P ~ r
1995. used ort , Cammdssioners Cuuit ~'tl interview the candidatca. ` ~ .~ /YCR~.'R C e~
watic with ~4 rchitect to malcie sa$gestions~ i~` ~,1§ ~IO.iQO~ria1"s, t~dhOd~t, timigg, ovate. Y'~pt of ft~al oGz~tt'act t<.~ r ~ ~
fb[' ~ vrill be oval ;plus a tl~e, vvttlt; a guarani ~ ~ based nn eaattm ~ , ~ ~ C f u r ~ ~
docunxmts. Daring oaasbnuxian phase BidderJser'~wibnId'aix a4 a general ~ coa~dim~or and
~'D uT~2l~cTa ~
m~oittgCr.
Requited info nation for ovahu~ng carrttacta''s bids e~iewL-:
1. Guata~eied NlBximunt Cost for Ilse B Prajod, bd:cn'hr`dioi~'~Pro~ramci and other data...
2. Aclatowledge ability co:~ the tenestive sodtedul~, `cn~eil is ~rt~tinary Progaram. Deadline is July 1, ~ 199s,
for 1'inat catnP '; .'
3. Must carry insurancce: Worlmaen's Csabion; Cd~ttrsciait's mineral Inability; Budda''s's Risk.
4. Pirnridc P~ and Payment Bc~diaig far 100~o°c3f cxst:tif.pmjax.
S, Provide preliminary in~fornoation for selecrion: me~to$ of sumvision. List other aa~cb~rDetBs and owners
with whom ~orlcod oti parojocta'of sitrnilar typo a~ uai tlie;~ast 3-3 year8: Prefer~anoe ~ the method of
~g foe. ..
6. Snbtnit A1A doaunatt A X05, Cc~ntracta~'s Q~lificslori Ststietnsnt.
4;
Description of Project Administrariaat oiBcCS amid>ls o~2SD0 s.f., S)50r175,00t1 budget; c~oncreto and vinyl
llaoring; sr~aooth finish walls at~d cealings,.pairtted or~gl~ed Clyil, wallboard oboe const~nu~ion; bDtlow metal=doors
and frames; ahrmuinum, insulat~dd S~'~8 wi~a~dows.ceiIi~tigtr of`tay=in, acoustical tie; 35=40 loeautels; be~sl and cooled
aff~cea; heated l~rmd areas, wi$1 high volume ~achtntstii+g;.eleericat~ 9c~rviae will ba sli~v ove+rsi~ed ~ firh~re
additions and egaipment 1: `:' ~'~ ,, .
-. -
~.
.;i_ .
,. ~,
F.
ICGA~. ~ i~RR Cd~N'~`~ :~iL S~I~~.'ER
~•d •.. ~ ---SXH~-S68-0Z~~31 Ez:ai ~~ si~H3~