~ ~ ~;; ~ ~~ COMMTSSIOIVERS' COURT COIVVEhiED IN WORI',SHOp' SESSIC}h! C]Irf Monday, Febr+_iary b, 1995, with all Officer^s present and the following proceedings were had. fudge Densan called the meeting to arder ancf z workshop session was held discussing the progress on the Animal Control Facility with Architect Mike Walker. Mike Walker^ addressed the Coi_~r^t stating there was a Programming Recommendation for^ the first phase of F'rafessional Services- Preliminary phase. Req+_~est approval to proceed with Schematic Design phase. Soil has not yet been tested. We need layout of parkinei ar^ea. Commissioner Holekamp and Mike Walker are to talk to City of Kerrville about the sewage and water cannectians. Tapo map is needed cli= the area. Commissioner Oehler^ suggested the Kennel cages be reduced to be smaller than 4XE+ and to make b+_~ilding expandable to add cages as needed. The Court decided to ga out da request far pr^apa5alS on the Animal Shelter Facility and to be p+_~t on the Agenda for Febra+_iry 13, 1995. February 6, 1995 ARCHITECT The Honorable Robert Denson, County Judge Kerr County MICHAEL Kerr County Courthouse NEAL Kerrville, Texas 78028 WALKER Attn: The Honorable Glenn Holekamp, Commissioner The Honorable T.H. Lackey, Commissioner - RE: Programming for Ken County Animal Shelter -Architect's Project: KCAS and our letter and Preliminary Programming of February 3, 1995 Please find the enclosed Prograrming Recommendations far our first phase of Frofessional Services -Preliminary Phase. Upon your acceptance (with any modifications) of the Recommendations, we request your approval to proceed to the Schematic Design Phase. We have been delayed from the schedule outlined in our memorandum of January 18, partly due to a need to take in more diverse input than originally planned, to visit considerably more facilities than anticipated, and additional time required to assist in site and utility data coordination. As your professionals, attempting to grasp an as-of-yet-to-be-defined system, we will absorb these additional hours to stay within our projected fee percentages. Hopefully, the investment in time will be beneficial to the County and our firms, as the project progresses. We would suggest that progress might be expedited, if a single representative of the Owner ~}e appointed, per our Proposal and Agreement. Now that data has been gathered from many parties, coordination would be better managed and misinformation less likely, if it was mostly funneled through a single source. As soon as all the parties that you deem proper have reviewed the enclosed (or corrected) Programming Recommendations, it would be helpful if the suggested revisions could go through the Owner's representative. Alternatively, perhaps one or two meetings or workshops could be held of those with input. With our time line so critical, it is very important that we not misunderstand, be confused, nor draw more than necessary, which will also save the County fees. Secondly, we would recommend that if it is not already underway, that a written policy for the animal shelter be undertaken. Also, it may not be too early to start a preliminary operations manual. Some issues may surface from these processes which will impact the facility, and we may still be able to incorporate these minor revisions while in production. Sincerely, filc:kcas}tr.005 i3o3 VESPER LANE KERRV[LLE, TEXAS 7808 (zio) 895•ARCH KERR COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL FACILITY PRELIMINARY PHASE -PROGRAMMING -Submitted February 6, 1995 The Architect is requesting of anyone who reviews this information to please route corrections and differences in interpretation, from that stated herein, through the Judge or the County's designated representative to avoid miscommunications. The following is data gathered from meetings with Commissioners Lackey and Holekamp, Environmental Health Director Litke, Animal Control officer Wright, numerous shelter officials in other counties, and Veterinarians Cardwell, Dittmaz, Thomerson, and others since my memo of January 18, 1995. To date, suggested facilities visited as research resources are: City of Boerne Animal Shelter, Fritz Clinic in Fredericksburg, Austin Humane Society, New Braunfels (separate City operation). Many of our recommendations are based on data retrieved from these visits, the applicable standards set forth in the "Training Guide" of (NACA) National Animal Control Association ,adjusted to the demographics of Ken County, and the preferences of the county officials, the Owner. Action requested of Owner or others: * Indicates information or action requested of the Owner by the Architect. ** Indicates information or action urgently requested of the Owner by the Architect. SITE * * 1. SITE DEFINED. Architect met with 2 Commissioners, City Engineering, and Voelkel Surveying to help delineate where the property lines on the 1.5 acre site might be drawn, nearly parallel with the contour lines. Architect needs topography, existing structures, and approximate tree locations to do a Preliminary Site Analysis; County has arranged for Voelkel to provide an updated topographical survey to tie in the latest data to that on the previously furnished State Loop 534 survey. Specifically, we need to tie-in the new road, entry gate, modified contours and approximated remaining tree locations. Lee Voelkel told us that he could furnish field notes to us which we will convert on the computer into a 3-D site model. This will be used to accurately communicate the design to the County. Also, we would like to have a hard copy of the survey. 2. SOIL TESTING. Soils investigation and foundation recommendations will be arranged with a San Antonio testing lab by Architect. We are attempting to find a reliable lab with another project in our area to save some trip charges; Owner pays for report. An approved Site Analysis is necessary to locate where the test holes will be drilled. County has cleared the site and made a test cut with a bulldozer to reveal a possibly acceptable subgrade at about 24" depth. * 3. IMPORTED BACKFILL. County has postponed spoils relocation from excavations on other sites for backfill on this site. Architect will see if lab will test sample of imported soil for suitability or County may elect to use testing lab on Jail. This question may be better resolved after the design is more finalized. KCAS - KERB COUNTY ANIl4tAL SHELTER -Page 1 ~~~ ~~~~ ~, ~ C: i~** 4. VARIANCES, NEGOTIATIONS. County will negotiate gate entrance modifications with ° City, based on Site Analysis; County will seek any variances from City on driveway and setback requirements, if needed. ~1~`~ 5. SITE CONDITIONS. Architect and Cmn. Lackey went to site several times to review ~~ ~'~ actual conditions. Preliminary review indicates very usable space, but a prehnunary Srte Analysis is needed, based on an updated topographical survey, to insure good site usage, expandability, room for parking, etc. Site clearing and demolition work was done by the County on February 2. * * 6. CITY UTILITIES. County will resolve the conflict with the City over which will arrange ~~' ~ sewer and water extension and to what points services will be delivered. City Engineer Dower ~,~ stated that a larger fire line and fire hydrant will be across Loop 534; therefore, it is not a concern for this site. A 2" water line will be extended to property by the City (to where?). City wants the County to use 2" force main sewer to southeast end of property to a sewer they will extend in the Loop 534 right-of--way; this was not our original instruction. Please clarify. 7. OTHER UTILITIES. Architect will discuss service for electrical power with KPUB and advise the Owner if there are any problems. Architect determined from Lone Star Gas Engineering Department in Round Rock that gas service to the site is not feasible, because the nearest location is the Veterans Hospital. Possibly LPG will be a feasible option, since so much of the heated air must be exhausted. 8. ORIENTATION. The location and orientation of spaces is very important due to the odors and exhausting of the kennels which must be placed to minimize public nuisance. .~'' * * 9. EFFLUENT AND WASTE. It is assumed that animal waste from wash-down maybe LO~ ~ mixed with normal sanitary sewer. Animal waste will possibly be taken to the landfill for the neaz future, but may be part of the incineration/cremation solution in the future. ~°~ ~4 GENERAL CRITERIA SANITATION drives the success of an animal facility, as it prevents the contact of healthy and diseased animals, diminishes spread of disease, minimizes staff needed, reduces maintenance and remedy costs, and lessens adverse public reaction. Therefore, the ability to keep this facility sanitary should be anover-riding consideration for its design. Hot water or steam wash-down would be better, but it would considerably increase cost; perhaps it could planned for future, if standazds stiffen or policies change. KENNELS, cages, runs, and equipment must be easily cleaned and maintained on a daily basis, or more often, as required. Most animals will be given a means of being moved without direct personnel handling to another dry space, while restraining space is being disinfected. The layout should be considerate of sanitation, so that employees do not contaminate clean azeas in the process of their duties and cleaning of other areas. KCAS - KLRR COUNTY ANII1dAL SHELTER -Page 2 SPECIFIC CRITERIA SCOPE AND FUNCTION REVIEW (based upon Owner's preliminary plan, interview with county officials, and numerous outside sources, including NACA Training Guide): 1. Scope. Architect will attempt to adhere to Cmn. Holekamp's request to try to cut total scope 20% (3,850sf down to 3,080sf from owner's sketch) to get the project into budget. The actual scope and cost is based on our analysis gleaned from the research data -see Space Analysis below. Anticipated space needs: 2. Administration: a. Chief officer -private or semi-private office (1 CPU); Animal Control OfTcers - 2 max. work stations (1 CPU); Reception counter/f"des/copy (1 CPT,; Public surrenders; Adoptions. ACO, reception, processing azea could be combined or reconfigured for more efficiency. Officer Wright doesn't think Storage Room is necessary; files, except public health issues, azen't kept, thus reducing space required. b. Veterinarian exam, neutering "clean" room may need to be added in the futwe. For now, an area where a visiting vet could work in an emergency would be welcome, if budget allows. Therefore, it is assumed that veterinarians will perform most surgery (neutering, etc.) in their clinics. 3. Holding Wards: ** a. 32 4'x 6' kennels shown on Owner's plan + 8 puppyllitter/cat, double-stacked or mobile cages = 40 total; 48 would be desirable + receiving room + cat adoption. 3'x5' spaces could be used for most dogs with smaller stacked pens for puppies and kittens. Occupancy counts furnished from existing facility were difficult to comprehend and may not be reflective of a new facility, under a different system (Policy?). ** b. As many as affordable (10-1b) will be isolation type kennels (4'xb'xb') with full height demising walls for quarantine and to minimise spread of disease; it's indefinite whether cages are in Construction Cost or by Owner? T-kennels bid was $37,000 for 40 mixed units, which will probably not fit in assigned budget. Architect is looking for ways to save on this cost and still use this system, similar systems, or parts thereof? Restraining space type must be decided as soon as possible, as it heavilX impacts the confi¢uration, sanitation, thus scope and budget. ** c. All kennel cages must be: sturdy -masonry, stainless steel, heavy plated metal, or heavy plastic; no chain link that big dogs can damage. There must be an easy and thorough wash down, balanced with cost of units, with almost all floors sloped to drains. Wright prefers continuous T-grate Polydrain; he will get costs and details from suppliers; this must be in Cost due to build-in features. d. Use gas-fired, forced air space heaters. Provide minimum of 14 air changes per hour for ventilation and heating; cool ,heat, and isolate administration office spaces for odors and noise separation. No HEPA filters should be required, but they might need to be accommodated in the future. KCAS -KERB COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTTR -Page 3 e. Provide smooth and sealed floors and walls for ease-of-cleaning and sanitation. Ceiling may be exposed structure, but well insulated and easy to clean. Need hose reels (preferably low, so as not to damage hose) and sloped floors to drains. f. This space needs at least one telephone outlet. * g. DippingBathing tub can be floor mounted; or perhaps (semi-) recessed or ramped so workers would not have to lift large, dangerous, or dirty animals. Inside bathing is planned for hose-bathing very dirty animals and allow others to drip and shake. Dipping and bathing of cleaner animals could be handled in the same ordinary tub, but it would limit the function and increase processing time. Also an outside hose-down area would be helpful to clean/disinfect trucks and perhaps very dirty animals. Hot water is needed for either. Dipping/bathing should be positioned where diseased or unknown condition animals are not transported by clean or healthy animals, or vise versa. NACA recommends all animals be dipped before exposing them to the general population. h. According to NACA all animals should first be in one of 2 isolation wards (appazently healthy and obviously sick) until their condition may be determined. i. For general holding ward Automatic feeders and watering systems are not recommended, due to initial cost and problems with sanitation between occupancies; therefore, probably stainless steel bowls are best option, although many facilities use plastic. Resting boazds are desirable. No feeding, watering or boards aze in our Cast. 4. Food Storage is about right size as given by Owner; it may be moved, combined with Food Prep and Utility for space savings. Possibly this needs to be expandable. 5. Open unnamed area on Owner's plan could be absorbed into storage spaces in a more efficient arrangement, but some receiving and stack space is needed. 6. Flow for employees log-in/service entry needs to be studied; varies greatly in other facilities with no set pattern. Refer to attached Animal Flow diagram. 7. Some room's "walk-through feature" on Owner's plan may not be necessary? Eliminate doors and walls to only those necessary, to save space and cost, and to maximize flexibility. 8. Cat Adoptions (14+/- cages} could be narrower. We have cage specs for reference; these will not be in Construction Cost. Single floor drain would be helpful for clean-up, but it is not a necessity. Probably this needs to be expandable. 9. 3'x 3' double-stack movable litter/puppy cages (by Owner); area may need fo be expandable. 10. Restrooms need to be larger than Owner`s sketch for handicap; sepazate men, women. KCAS - KERB COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER -Page 4 11. Functions that might be consolidated without sacrificing function: Maintenance -janitorial, mop sink. Mechanical -Heat and cooling unit. 'Utility -Washer, dryer by Owner; mud sink? " Food prep -deep, large double stainless sink, ample counter, dish storage, refrigerator (by Owner) with icemaker; resolve sanitation requirements. Expandable? '~ Food, medicine storage -could have room for vet emergencies; could combine with Food Prep. Expandable? 12. Euthanasia room size given was a little small, as sink for head removal was added; Owner will probably opt to reuse carbon monoxide unit from Freeman-Fritts. Owner will pursue disposal question (incinerator, landfill, etc.?). There should be no door duect to Kennels; enter through Receiving Room. Overhead and people door, or double door, to a possible dock-height loading is desirable; room may require freezer to hold dead animals pending disposal. Room probably needs sepazate exhaust fan; must have 240v, 30amp outlet. If crematorium is installed later, it will not be in building, but needs planning with 240v, 70amp available to exterior. 13. Receiving (cat) Room could be reduced slightly; mostly portable cat cages by Owner for uncontrollables and new arrivals. 14. There is some concern on public perception of drop-off cages, which will be off public area; perhaps detached behind masonry gate wall with directional signs would be possible; gates on 2 dog units will be automatic lock to limit drop-offs; pens must be covered; cat pen will have several portables inside without automatic door lock. There needs to be a method of having the person dropping off to leave a reason or history and circumstances of surrender. 15. Quiet, small exterior fenced space is desirable for adoption; this may be in Cost. 16. It is desirable to have a separate high chain-link fenced azea for unloading; this needs to be in Construction Cost. 17. Most of balance of property, not under building or parking, shall be high fenced for exercise and security; architect will plan site, but perimeter fence is mostly not in Construction Cost. Security lighting must be included in Construction Cost. KCAS - KPRR COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER -Page S TIME SCHEDULE/CONTRACTING METHODS OPTIONS: Revised optional Time Schedule for Owner's consideration (set to coincide with regularly scheduled Commissioner's Court Meetings, but special meetings may be called by Court): a. If normal conditions, competitive bidding among qualified general contractors, then reasonably anticipated Court date approvals might be Preliminary Phase February 13 Schematic Design Phase February 27 Design Development Phase March 13 Construction Documents Phase March 27 Bids accepted, enter contract Apri124 Completion -allowing 3.5 months for construction and acceptance of project August 14 b. If fast track method is legal (re: County Attorney's letter of 3anuary 25} apre-selected general contractor who assists by working with azchitect and pricing during planning and production with final competitive bids taken, Court approval dates might be (best case scenario): Preliminary Phase February 13 Schematic Design Phase February 27 Design Development Phase March 13 Construction Documents Phase March 27 Bids complete, enter contract March 27 Completion -allowing 3 months for construction and acceptance of project June 26 KCAS - I{I;RR COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTT:R -Page 6 SPACE ANALYSIS -RECOMMENDED AREAS nvTERIOR Administration: Area Sub Est. Cost Chief Animal Control Officer 120sf Reception/counter/files/copy/2-ACO 300 Public surrenders/waiting 100 Adoptions/waiting 180 Restrooms 90 Circulation 50 Subtotal 840 Cost @ $SSisf $ 46,200.00 Kennel including direct access space Quarantine, isolation, large dogs 16 @ 44sf 704 General holding pens 16 @ 30sf 480 Puppy/litter/kittens 16/2=8 @ 18sf 144 Dipping, bathing 70 Cat adoption 14/2=7 @ 18sf 112 Food/medicine storage, prep 144 Euthanasia 168 Receiving 120 Subtotal 1,942sf Cost @ $4Ssf 87,930.00 Service Maintenance, Mechanical, Utility 120 General, circulation, flexible space 120 Subtotal 240 Cost @ $50/sf 12,000.00 Total interior space 3,022sf Subtotal interior cost 146,130.00 EXTERIOR Drop-off cages 140sf 2,100.00 Fenced adoption space w/o landscape 200 1,000.00 Fenced unloading, wash-down 400 2,400.00 Parking, drives 10 cars 3,000 15.000.00 SUBTOTAL ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST 166,630.00 Contingency - 5% 8.330.00 TOTAL ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST $174,9b0.00 KCAS -KERB COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER -Page 7 QUALIFICATION STATEMENT The above estimates do not include the cost of kennels, cages, large fenced exercise area on balance of site, landscaping, furnishings, euthanasia chamber, or other specialized equipment. The Costs are approximate, based on the Architect's current knowledge of the construction industry and the comparative open market costs for similar types of construction. The Architect is not a contractor and these are not guaranteed costs, as the Architect has no control over market conditions and what contracting situations the Owner may elect. Respectfully submitted, Michael Neal Walker, Architect OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE The Owner approves with noted exceptions- (disapproves-) the above for the Preliminary Phase and authorizes (does not authorize _) the Architect to begin the Schematic Design Phase. EXCEPTIONS: Owner: Date: file:kc~sprc1.003 KCAS -KERB COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER -Page 8 DNMa- COI~~' Pl~~ pFFiCIAL ~~tNARY ~ cAR~ AT Vt~T OR N-M~ RC~~ ~OI,ATION WARDS U~CI~CK1~ AM- q~lA6S i C65~VATION YYM+AA,~~ ~WI`~ O f'~^" TTI ~RR~~~"` q SICK S ~T ~~ ~ ppOPTtON o ~+~ SN~-~ CARS AI~MAL ~L4`N,~ T C4~~Y q~Mp,L SI.~L-TF~ K~ HO>A'~`~ WARDS DOGS CATS AD DOGS <.AR~ DOGS CATS AT VET OR N- EaOI~ - -•~ ~ iatTe~s ~ Y3~ } ~ ---"1 ~` -? '1 ~-! oT~ ~ .y' oTlt~ _ ~- BJMN~'' L ~ J L SPE~~S ..I ~~~~.~ ~OS~ CARS t+~~ SPAY, VACa`l G~ W~-~-~ ,. H E A. At E R I C A A [ N S T i T U T E ~- > } '~ .. J O f A R C 11 1 T E C T S ~IIA Uuctnttettt ~3tJ5 Contractor's Qualification statement 1986 EDITION 711is form rs crj)/»•or~e~r! au~l recr)rtrtttettrlc~~l hip 77)e.ittrericatt tnstitttte rj~irc%)ilecls (nrt) ~ru~t 77.re 1tssclcrrrrrrr ccr,rrrtl Gi)tttrrtctorc nj~ltrtericn (~1GC)•/~»'trct? iu c~t•rrttrctt- itt~ thc~ ~ltmlifk-~rtiotts o~ rotttrurtot;c. Nn etrrlot;~etttteut of the subnrittitt~7 pcrrtp or t~erifrcatio~t of tL)e itrf'or»tatiou is ttut~te by the Aln or nGC. The Undersigned certifies under oath that tlic information provided herein is true and suffi- ciently complete so as not to be misleading. SUIlMCi"T'[iU '1'U: Michael Walker Architect AUURESS: 1303 Vespal Drive Renville, Texas 78028 SUIlMl7'T'EU i3Y: R. B. GR);EN CONSTRUCTION, INC. Cc)rporation NAh1E: R. B. GRE);N Partnership P.O. BOX 7461, Station wAw AUURESS: San Antonio, Texas 78207 indlvicfual PRINCIPAL OI~I~iCE: 421 W. Ceval los Joint Venture Other NAMF. OP PROJ[iCI• (lf a)7pliral)Ic): TYPE OF WORK ((ile separate fc7rm f<)r each Classiticatie~n c)[ W<)rk): X Gcncral Constnrctic)n IiVAG Plumbing Elcctr{cat Other (pICaSC SpCCitY) ~l d d O Ct~pyriRht ItX~•1, ItXt9, 1979, n 19N~ b)• 'l he An-cric:ui InN Sl'Allit,IfiNl • I')tM; Li)171t)N •AIA^ • lt)19Nti TIIF. AMERICAN INti1rr1~TE OF ANt:r117EC1ti, t71S NF. W' Yl)RK AVENUE. N.\'t'., VI'ASiIINIi'li)N, 17.(:. 2nINKi A305.1986 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Ilow n)any years has your orf;:nlization been in business as a Contractor? Eleven Years 1.Z llow many years has your orK:uliz:ltion bCCn ill btI51nC5S Undef Il5 prCSett[ OtlSlt1e55 I1a111C? Eight Years 1.2.1 Under what other or fonllcr names h:IS yUUC UrKanizati(m opcratctl? Construction Specialist 1.3 if your org:ulization is a cl)rpor:uion, anscvcr the following: 1.3.1 bale of incorlxxati<)n: July 1, 1980 1.3.2 State of incorporation: Texa s 1 i.3 I'resi(Icnt's name: R. B. Green 1.3.4 Vicc-president's name(s): Gary Battreall 1.3.5 5ccretary's Warne: Caro], L. Green 1.3.G Treasurer's Hanle: Carol L. Green 1.4 If your orR:ulization is a hartncrsl{ip, answer the followillR: 1.4.1 Datc of org:lnizati(m: ' 1.4.2 'Type of partnership (if applicable): 1.4.3 N:Inlc(s) oC general paru7cr(s): 1.5 If your organization is individually owned, answer the following: 1.5.1 Datc of orK:utization: 1.5.2 Name of owner. AIA DOCUMENt A~OS • t:()N7RA<;1()R'S (11~A1.111(:AI'1()N ti'IA'I"I:FII:N1' • 1')!1(~ hnil'll)N • AIA' • l~)I')H(~ TIIF. AFtEA1t:AN INFI'{1'l'lF: <>F AAt:l11'rF.t:75, 1715 N}.~' 1't)AK A~'Y'.NI'F.. NVr'., Vt'Ati111N(:1't)N, 1).(:. 11NAKi A305.1986 1.6 If the form of your organization is other than those listed above, describe it and Warne the principals: 2. LICENSING 2. I List iurisclicaions and trade catcl;orics in which your orR:u)ization is Icf;aily (fUallfled IO CIO i)USInCSS, and indicate rebistration or license numbers, if applicable. Texas 2.2 List jurisdictions in which your orf;ani•r..uion's partnership or trade name is filed. Texas 3. EXPERIENCE 3• t List the categories of work that your organization norrnafly performs with its own forces. All phases of carpentry, concrete and interior finish-out work. 3.2 Claims and Suits. (If the answer to any of the yucstlons I)clow is yes, please attach details.) 3.2. I f las ycntr org:miration cvcr failed to conthicte any work awarded to it? No 3.2.L Arc there any judgments, rlaints, arbitration proceedings or suits Ixnding or outstanding against your organization or its officers? No 3.2.3 I las your organhation filed any law suits or rcyuested arbitration with regard to construc- tion contracts w1lllln the Iast f1VC yCafs? No 3.3 Within the last five years, has any officer or principal of your organization cvcr Ixen an officer or principal of another organi~~nion when it failed to complete a construction contract? (If the answer is yes, please attach details.) No AIA OOCUAAENT A305 ~ (:()N'1'ItA(~I'()R'ti (JIIAI.IrI(:A'I'I()N ti'1'A'I't:MI:NI' • I~~i F.I)n'1<)N ~ AIA~ • t71~7H(~ ' 1'tIF. AFIf:RI(:AN INSTI'1'ttl'F. ()F AR(:1111'1'.[:1'~, 1715 NF.W Y()RK AYF.N{tt:, N.W , WAtiti1N(:Tt)N, 1).t:. 2111Ntfi A305 ~~986 3 3.4 On a separate sheet, list nla(or constnlction projects your organization has In progress, giving the name o[ project, owner, architect, contrlet anwunt, percent eonlplete 1n(I scheduled completion dart. 3.4.1 State wtal worth of work in progress and under contract: 3.5 On a separate sheet, Iist the major projects your organization has conlplcte(I in the past five years , giving the name of project, owner, architect, contr.ct anwunt, date of cony)Ietion and percentage of the cost of the work performed with your own forces. 3.5.1 State avcrlgc annual amount of construction work pcrfonucd during the past five years: 1,750,000.00 3.6 On a separate sheet, list the conslnlction cxpcrlcnrc an(I present a)nmlitnlcnts of the key individ- uals of your organization. 4. REFERENCES 4.1 Trade References: ' Nucor Building Products Hart Lumber Co. P.O. Box 3379 559 W.W. White Rd. Grapeland, Texas 75285 San Antonio, Texas 78220 T ~ D Moravits Allen 8 Allen Lumber 10511 Shaenfield 1621 N. Comal San Antonio, Texas 78254 San Antonio, Texas 78284 Iiarrell Plumbing Co. Lynwood Building 1321 N. San Jacinto 1201 W. Elsmere San Antonio, Texas 78207 San Antonio, Texas 78201 4.2 Uank Itcfcrcnces: Jefferson State Bank P.O. Box 5190 • San Antonio, Texas 78284 Attn: Mr. Sam Eiale . Executive Vice President 4.3 S urcty: 4.3.1 Name of bonding company: CNA Insurance 4.3.2 Nantc and address of agent: Mr. David Sund CNA Insurance Co. 9203 Woodcock Drive San Antonio, Texas 78228 AIA DOCUMENT A~OS • C(IN1 RA(:'IOR'S QI)AL11'I(:AfH)N tilAl'IiAlliNl' • 171Kr I:1>111(1N • AIM • It)17)1(r TI IF. AMF.RIf:AN IN511T1~"1'F. of AR(:1117F.(a i, 17{S Nlivt' Y