!-a F-~ F ` ° i_+ ~~ t`-i t_.. u ~ r<r_ r- ~ a ri d? ~! t- i-i l? 4` l-~l L.. ~.l r•: t= iy 1 ! ~-a ?;
i tJ 1.1 ):=c:_r~ 4'!'ii_.I__t.'t ~._! !~e F-)~: F-'c:_r~. FIf7!'C1:_~1~ .!'_?i_l:?_I~ilic_I`~y.l.
{~I'(; is '} 'r. f1 '!: !-t E .L ~:::'+_ ~? ~I Et y Ci f' I° r:'L':'r`~ +. ciir`' ~y ]. `.?'_~ Ca y ~_t I:i C~'i "t i'a; r, i;; .). ii Tl t~! ~ CJ •~ t ~'y'
1... C! !T! !TI .L "ii :, a. (? ?-1 i~_ $ f f it ,i. E'3 h: c "ril F:) ~ _ .: L. w ~ : Cj ~_' ~:~ ~.'S ~r ._ ~_~ i.'. iVo a i_ ._ 3. ?? i't {i?'r J ~? I `t :L :' .f . ~ l :_
~a+_~r t +_manima+_~sly approved by a vote of 4-~-~-, Co r~~f+_trl;_
: _~ ~ :± . ::+ :9 !-1 r-} v' c? t. =i f"' 3 ffl ~: =~.t ;:; E' c: ~". f j T_) G~ +-~ r 4' r_r,. i i. p " L_ ~L~ CI . cl S F~ E' r'' ~.j C] r°' t: E L.I
.~i ~_l t_l I:J ~? m ~~ Tl ~_ a
NO. 95-48-A
DEER VALLEY, LTD. § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff, §
VS. § KERB COUNTY, TEXAS
KERR CENTRAL APPRAISAL §
DISTRICT. §
Defendant. § 216TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
~iLE~~
A('7RFED FIN I. TiTn ~MF,NT A`~-=~~ ~'c!c~~.-_~ M
~~ C s 1~9~
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE 216TH DISTRICT COURT: ~!~~~~ :~~ ~ ~ ~~"
• ` ur,t
y. T•x
On this date, the Court called this case to trial. The parties, Deer Vall~~y;~ "
and Kerr Central Appraisal District, Defendant, each appeared by its counsel of record and
announced to the Court that the parties reached an agreement to compromise and settle this case,
which agreement resolves all issues in controversy before the Court. In accordance with the
settlement agreement, the parties stipulated that the correct appraised value of the properry~'which
is the subject of this case for tax year 1994 is $385,000 (improvements only). The parties further
stipulated that the total correct appraised value for tax year 1994 for Ken Central Appraisal
District account number 10531729000300, which includes the land and improvements, for tax
year 1994 is $386,750.
Having reviewed the pleadings on file in this case and having reviewed the stipulations and
the terms of the settlement agreement as announced by the parties, the Court finds that the
CAUSE NO. 9~-38-A
AGREED JUDGi~1ENT -- PAGE 1
settlement agreement and this Agreed Judgment should be approved.
It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that for tax year 1994 ad
valorem tax purposes, the appraised value of Plaintiff's property which is the subject of this suit
and of the account which includes the subject property shall be as follows:
A~cou~[TNo
T~ YEAR 1994_APPRAICFn V~j„[~
10531729000300
Improvements
Land
Total Account
$385,000
$1,750
$386,750
It is further ORDERED that the Chief Appraiser of Defendant Kerr Central Appraisal
District shall perform the post-appeal administrative procedures provided in sections 42.41 of the
Texas Tax Code. TEx. Twx CODE A.*1N. § 42.41 (Vernon 1992).
It is further ORDERED that all costs are assessed against the party incurring same.
It is further ORDERED that a penalty will not be due the taxing units by Plaintiff under
section 42.05(b) of the Tax Code. TEx. TAX CODE ANN. § 42.06(b) (Vernon 1992).
It is further ORDERED that each party shall bear its own attorney's fees.
All relief reques*.~ by a parry but aot granted in Lhis Agreed Final Judgment is DENIED.
SIGNED this da of ~ ~ ~ • , 1995.
~_ Y
6. /~
J
CAUSE NO. 95-48-A
AGREED JUDGMENT -PAGE 2
Paula Rector-		TAX RECEIPT x
"	
Kerr Co. Tax Assessor*CailecEor	_	~ ;
`	° ; '	
700 IiAam $L		Y~	nEC~wr No.	

Kerrville, Texlrs 78028 ~.				~~
.;{:~=	_			
ENTITY STATEMENT ID.	ORIGINAL TAX	DISC./PENALTY/INT.	ATTORNEY FEES/QTHER
				
Rfi COUNTY .2941	3295b	1630.18	0.00	0.00
TERAL TOADS .0572	32956	317.06	0.00	0.00
F~E~, GUADALUF'E fiIVEfi .021.1	3295b	116.96	0.00	0.00
ADWATEF~S UNDERGC;OUN .0046	-32956	25.50	0.00	0.00
~~
20312 (46320)
A1053 A1053 T&SL kY, SUk
729, ACHES 5.00
053-1729-000300 820312
sir
554, 296 1630. 18 ~ ~,3 ~ ~ 3
554, 296 ~`-317: 0E __ ,2 /,~,Z
554, 296 -I7.-b. 95 ~~ ~ ~,
554,296 25.50 ?~
--._ _ ..__---~-- .1~ .__.~...
~,~ ~ ,~
~~ e~ ~
oPeRn,TDR eArcH
G 03/08/5
PAYMENT METHOD
ti~
~~y~ 7~
_ 45 ~
~~5:~~
~,