:[tern c.6 Consider and :[nterface Speei'Fic:ations I~etween
Co~.ari;ho!tse computer system {Software Group! and Law
Enforcement Center iSecurity '1"elecomi. (C:o!mty .7~.adge~
fhi.s item was disc!!ssed 6y tl'ic Co!~rt and this item is 'tn be
p~.st bacit on tt-.e agenda far hlor-~day, ,?~.xne iN, iy~3i. and to h~:ave
Sof-'tware G;r•aup and Secur-i.ty l"el.ecom at the rtIP_E't171[f. 'tU talk
with the depa'r~tment t-ieads aL3ou'L- 'the I_~rofalems with :[nterfa~cc-~
Speci.fi.r_ations t3etween Software Group and Security Telecom.
SECURITY TELECOM ID:2149883774 MAY 31'96 13:10 Nc.011 P.02
Se=:unity Telecom Corporation
Jeff Rothell
President
Security Telecom Corporation
W. North Carrier Parkway
C3rand Prairie, Texas
May 30, 1996
Thomas Pollard
951 Main Street
Kerrville, Texas 78028
Dear Mr. Pollard:
~~
W. Natlt CiurM- PnrkrnY
Onnd PrWI~. Tms
214ABB.370T
F~7c 21~.pp~.3774
~~ D;`~:,
L
In reference to your Fax that was sent to me on 5-31-96 from Ivli•. John Thomas I felt it
important that this issue be addressed quickly. I feel that Mr. Thomas as made a decent
easement of the problems, and solutions exetpt who should havt financial responsibility.
Listed below are some relevant facts that have not been addressed, but will be my'
argument as to who should pay.
FACT I: STC has provided an extensive network to tht caunt}~ which includes
Hardware, SoRware, Installation, anal Free Service and Support for the life of our inmate
phone contract. I can prove that over 5 years this will save the Kerr an identifiable
revenues of $250.000.00 .
FACT 2: The cost as outlined in Mr. Thomas's letter is around $25,000.00 total to
give the Caunty their solution, as seen by an independent consultant.
FACT 3: STC has not Charged Ktrr Gounty a sinlge Cent for any service's or
Labor just as we had agreed, for the data conversion programming done.
FACT 4: STC has also agreed to provide the Kerr County an additional PC for
Dial up access to the STC Lems system. This will provide Partial or full access to the
STC Lems syatera from the court house. We also at this rime agree to pay the $25.00
phone line charge.
Z0'd 6t6ttSZ0TZ z~am~yoS 210 Peel lod
SECURITY, TELI=CDM ID :2149883774 MAY 31'96 13:11 No .011 P.03
. '1'ti~s Pollard
Page 2
Mey 30, 1996
FACT S: TSG has not to the best of my knowledge done one hour of work on this project
for which they haven't billed the Kerr County For.
FACT 6: STC has met and EXCEEDED our contractual agreement to Kerr County, and
agree with the findings of Mr. Thomas's letter dated 5-21-9fi except for who should incur
the cost, mainly STC.
I ask you, to please tell ma where STC has not pulled their load on this project. It's time
TSG sup up and assist their customer and this problem and cover those cost. If that
could be done we could ail move forward. If nothing else TSG should at the very
minimum offer a discount or at cost option, or simply finance the charge at no interest to
the county for a period of time.
Also 1 am willing to come down and address the commissoners court or speak to any and
all parries via phone regarding this matter. Our position all along is to help the county in
what ever way possible and I feel the stated facts prove that.
cc: John Thomas, Consultant
Robert Denson, County Judge, Kan: County
Frances Kaiser, Sheriff, Kerr County
Glenn Smith, President, Sof?xva~e Group
~e•d
610l.tSZOTZ
z lam 14'~S ~JO I~-+n I I od
President