rtZDf_:({ hJO~ t='fit;:; 1 rtf'~'F?C'iG';~L. C~IW' ialJTtlClf:'IZah'.i~~ ~':C'_F"I_it'JI=i wit= F~+I=> T l! t_. t `.; i_.. ~ £_ = n ~-;. ? T T `{ :[ PJ l" t-J f~ irti t11 i!~ i_i tJ T C"i =~ C~ r, t P-i ?. __. t: t 7 e :~ z°, cJ cJ Ec y' c:~ s E:~ ;:i t; i~ ni L, E' r' „ 1 ~i 9 ; t~ o rn in i ~ :.. i _~ r-~ ~_~'~- % ~_ t-, :t ~~'.- ~ : ;_ c iz 7'r ci ~- ri r~'~ C,.~ to m _ ,::~:;r_t'i'i: unanimo~.tsly approved by a vote of r ~ ci ~{" Lt T`t ~ f. i ~ F-1 CI id :_i .~ C! Y' E? RA e i=i }; t~ fi~ ~~ Ci .._ [:' ~. i.:i F:? ~_ . '» : ' a ~f ~' t . t. ,'' ~ ~ 'i ~ i-i CJ Y'r.." i:j , T i..i C3 i:1 i7? f: T's t „ 4'f~~LCtE'Et~t T~~~,E +_i ~ ~ %i T"i ffl G 't 7. O it fli ci E:i E? is ~ ':' T >..t t: t• ~' ]. i? ~.' ri E:' c( iii L! s_'t''1 t Ci ~ LAW OFFICES CALAME LINEBARGER GRAHAM & PEI~A, L.L.P. 1949 South I.H. 35 P. O. Box 17428 Austin, Texas 78760 (512147-6675 FAJt(512}443-3494 Judith A. Hargrove June 4, 1997 Mr. David Oehler Chief Appraiser Ken Central Appraisal District F. O. Hox 1885 Kerrville, Texas 78029-1885 ~~ ~ .gun u d 1~~( 11 ~; ~~~.:~ :J ..---•--...............r~ RE: Cause Number 9538A; Leslie S. Tutty v. Kerr Central Appraisal District Dear David: Enclosed for your files is a copy of the Agreed Judgment in the above referenced case. It was signed by the Judge on June 2, 1997. You may now consider this case being officially "closed", and you should correct the appraisal records acc:wrdingly. As standard practice, upon the completion of a lawsuit you should inform the taxing jurisdictions as soon as possible in case a refund is due to the taxpayer. You should also remind your taxing entities that Section 42.43 requires that interest be paid on the refunds, calculated from the delinquency date. As a reminder, the interest rate will be calculated based upon the market rate of U. S. Treasury Bills for the week of the delinquency date for the taxes, pursuant to Section 42.43(b). Please let our office know if we may assist further in any way Sincerely. ~ 71.~.' Judith A. Hargrove Attorney at Law jah/mc enclosure - LESLIE S. TUTTY VS. KERR CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT ~op~, LEI THE DISTRICT COURT KERB COUNTY, TEXAS 215TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CAME ON TO BE HEARD Leslie Tutty, Plaintiff herein, and Kerr Central Appraisal District, Defendant herein, appearing by and through their respective attorneys of record, and announced to the Court that the parties herein desired to resolve attd settle the matters in controversy, and avoid the trouble, expense and uncertainty of litigation, and have reached an agreement :o that effect. Having heard these announcements and reviewed the ev:deace and arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that such terms and conditions aze well taken and should form the basis of judgment. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the following stipulations aze agreed by the parties and entered by the Court as its judgment. f ~iL.F~. JUN 2 X997 uNOf+ u~cx~ l istrlet~.t~t et.~e ~~~JL.~r ~• 7W~ NO. 953$A i. The undersigned parties agree and stipulate that bona fide disputes and controversies exist between the parties concerning the market or appraised value of the subject property. These stipulations are entered into by the parties solely for the purpose of compromising and settling their various claims, each as to the other. No other use of this Stipulation may be made by the parties hereto as concerns the claim of either party as to the other, whether having arisen in the past, now pending, or to arise in the future, including, without limitation, subsequern disputes as to the market yr appraised value of the subject property within Defendants' appraisal jurisdiction is any subsequent years. This agreement is not intended by either party as an admission of the market value of the subject property, nor shall same be represented by either parry as to the other, as an admission. Further, the existence, terms, and contents of this Agreed Judgment shall not be admissible in any judicial or administrative proceeding as against either party except as may be necessary to enforce the terms and conditions of said judgment, either party as to the other. 2. Pursuant to Section 42.41 of the Texas Property Tax Code Defendant Kerr Central Appraisal District shall revise the 1994, 1995, and 1996 appraisal rolls to reflect open space Land appraisal pursuant to the terms of §23.51, et seq. of the Texas Property Tax Code for the following property: Accottn~, Nnmbe; Prog~ty DescriQtion 1735-1578-000500 A1735 GC&SF RY, Sur 1578, Acres 264.60, (exclusive of 1 acre homesite aad improvements} 0905-1577-003600 A0905 GC&SF RY, Sur 1577, Acres 2.69 2 3. The undersigned parties shall, as soon as possible following execution of this agreement, do, or cause their attorneys to do, whatever is reasonably necessary to effect this agreement, including compliance with the provisions of Sections 42.41 through 42.43 of the Texas Tax Code. 4. All costs and attorney fees are to be borne by the party incurring sarne. S. All other relief not specifically granted herein is denied. Signed this ~ day of ~-~ , 19 Sa3,r~ NDGE P ING 3