THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE AIA Document A101 OF ARCHITECTS ~~~3~~ Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor where the basis of payment is a STIPULATED SUM 1987 EDITION THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES, CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEYIS ENCOURAGED WlTHRESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION The 1987 Edition ofA7A Document A201, Genera[ Conditions of the Contract for Construction, is adopted in this document by reference. Do not use with other genera[ conditions unless this document is modified. AGREEMENT made as of the 27th day of May in the year of Nineteen Hundred and Ninety Eight. BETWEEN the Owner: and the Contractor: Kerr County, Texas 700 Main Street Kerrville, Texas 78028 Mart, Inc. 1503 Perry Road Irving, Texas 75060 The Project is: Demolitron and Alterations of previous Detection Facilities Second Floor, Kerr County Courthouse Annex 700 Main Street Kerrville, Texas 78028 The Architect is: Michael Neal Walker 1303 Vesper Lane Kerrville, Texas 78028 The Owner and Contrac4or agree as set forth below. AlA DOCUMENT A101 -OWNER-CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT -TWELFTH IDITION - AIA" - 1987 THE AMERICAN 1NSTIrIITE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVKNUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 2fxtflfi file:kc20-agr.edl A101-1987 1 ARTICLE 1 THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The Contract Documents consist of this Ageement, Conditions of the Contract (General, Supplemerttary and other Conditions), Drawings, Specificafions, Addenda issued prior to execution of this Ageement, other documents listed in this Ageanent and Modifications issued after execution of this Ageem~t; these form the Contract, and areas fully a part of the Conract as if attached to this Ageement or repeated herein. The Contract represents the entire and integrated ageement between the parties hereto and supersedes prior negotiations, representations or ageemants, either written or oral. An enumeration of the Contract Documents, other than Modifications, appears in Article 9. ARTICLE 2 THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT The Contractor shall execute the ®ttre Work described in the Contract Documents, except to the extent specifically indicated in the Contract Documents to be the responsibility of others. ARTICLE 3 DATE OF COMMENCEMENT AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION 3.1 The date of commencement is the date from which the Contract Time of Paragraph 3.2 is measured, and shall be the date of this Age®ent, as first written above, unless a different date is stated below or provision is made for the date to be fixed in a Notice to Proceed issued by the Owner. 3.2 The Contractor shall achieve Substantial Completion of the carve Work not later than Eighty Five (85) Days from the Date of Commencement in the Notice to Proceed, subject to adjustments oY'this Contract Time as provided in the Contract Documerrts. ARTICLE 4 CONTRACT SUM 4.1 The Owner shall pay the Contractor in current funds for the Contractor's performance of the Contract the Contract Sum of One Hundred Eighty Four Thousand Five Hundred Twenty Sevenand No/100 Dollars ($184,527.00), subject to additions and deductions as provided in the Contract Documents. 4.2 The Contract Sum is based upon the following alternates, if any, which aze described in the Contract Documents and aze hereby accented by the Owner: None. 4.3 Unit prices, if any, aze as t'ollows: None. ARTICLE 5 PROGRESS PAYMENTS 5.1 Based upon Applic;atrons for Payment submitted to the Architect by the Contractor and Certificates for Payment issued by the Architect, the Owner shall make progess paym~ts on account of the Contract Sum to the Contractor as provided below and elsewhere in the Contract Documents. 5.2 The period covered by each Application for Payment shall be one calendaz month ending as scheduled in 5.3, as related to the Commissioners' Court semi-monthly meeting dates. 5.3 Provided an Application for Payment is received by the Architect not later than ten (10) calendaz days before the last regulazly scheduled Commissioners' Couri meeting of the month, the Owner shall make payment to the Contractor not late than three (3) days after said last regulazly scheduled monthly meeting. If an Application for Paym~t is received by the Architect after the application date fixed above, payment shall be made by the Owner not later than twenty seven days (27) after the Architect receives the Application for Payment. AIA DOCUMENT AI01 -OWNER-CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT-TWELFTH ®ITION - AIA" - 1987 file:kc20-agr.edl TI~AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCFIITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N. W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 2(1006 A101-1987 2 5.4 Each Application for Payment shall be based upon the Schedule of Values submitted by the Contractor in accordance with the Contract Documents. The Schedule of Values shall allocate the entire Contail Smn among the various portions of the Work and be prepazed in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its acau-acy as the Architect may requve. This Schedule, unless objected to by the Architect, shall be used as a basis for reviewing the Contractor's Applications for Payment. 5.5 Applications for Payment shall indicate the percentage of completion of each portion of the Work as of the end of the period covered by the Application for Payment. 5.6 Subject to the provisions of the Contract Documents, the amount of each progess payment shall be computed as follows: 5.6.1 Take that portion of the Contrail Sum properly allocable to completed Work as determined by multiplying the percentage cempletion of each portion of the Work by the shaze of the total Contract Sum allocated to that portion of the Work in the Schedule of Values, less rilainage of Tea percent (]0%). Pending final detemtination of cost to the Owner of changes in the Work, amounts not in dispute may be included as provided in Subpamgaph 7.3.7 of the General Conditions even though the Contract Sum has not yet been adjusted by Change Order. 5.6.2 Add that portion of the Contract Sum properly allocable to materials and equipment delivered and suitably stored at the site for subsequent incorporation in the completed construction (or, if approved in advance by the Owner, suitably stored off the site at a location ageed upon in writing), less retainage of Ten percent (10%). 5.6.3 Subtract the aggegate of previous paymants made by the Owner and amounts in dispute. 5.6.4 Subtract amounts, if any, for which the Architect has withheld or nullified a Certificate for Payment as provided in Pazagaph 9.5 of the General Conditions. 5.7 The progess payment amount detemtined in accordance with Paragraph 5.6 shall be further modified under the following circumstances: 5.7.1 Add, upon Substantial Complilion of the Work, a sum sufficialt to increase the total payments to Ninily percent (90%) of the Contract Sum, less such amounts as the Architect shall determine for incomplete Work and unsiltled claims. 5..7.2 Add, if final completion of the Work is thereafter materially delayed through no fault of the Contractor, any additional amounts payable in accordance with Subparagraph 9.10.3 of the General Conditions. 5.8 Reduction or limitation of retainage, if any, shall be as follows: None. ARTICLE 6 FINAL PAYMENT Final payment, constituting the entire unpaid balance of the Contrail Sum, shall be made by the Owner to the Contractor when (1) the Contrail has beat fully performed by the Contractor except for the Contractor's responsibility to correct nonconfomting Work as provided in Subparagmph 12.2.2 of the General Conditions and to satisfy other requirements, if any, which necessarily survive final paymcet; and (2) a final Certificate for Payment has been issued by the Architect; such final paymatt shall be made by the Owner not more than 30 days after the issuance of the Architect's final Certificate for Paymcet. ARTICLE 7 NIISCELLANEOUSPROVISIONS 7.1 Where reference is made in this Ageement to a provision of the General Conditions or another Contract Document, the reference refers to that provision as amended or supplemented by other provisions oY--the Contract Documents. 7.2 Payments due and unpaid under the Contract shall beaz interest from the date payment is due at the rate stated below, or in the absence Thereof, at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the place where the Project is located. AIA DOCUMENT AI01 -OWNER-CONTRACTOR AGREEA7fiNT-TWII.FTH EDrr10N AIA" 1987 file:kC20-egt.edl THE AMERICAN INSTLR7TE OF ARCHTTECTS, 1'/35 NEW vGRxAVENUE, N.W., WASHA'GTON, D.C. 2000fi A101-7987 3 7.3 Other provisions: None. ARTICLE R TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 8.1 The Contract may be terminated by the Owner or the Contractor as provided in Article 14 of the General Conditions. 8.2 The Work maybe suspended by the Owner as provided in Article 14 of the General Conditions. ARTICLE 9 ENUMERATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 9.1 The contrail Documents, except for Modifications issued after execution of this Ageement, aze enumerated as follows: 9.1.1 The Ageement is this executed Standard Foml of Ageement Between Owner and Contractor, AIA Document A101, 1987 Edition. 9.1.2 The General Conditions aze the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, AIA Document A201, 1987 Edition. 9.1.3 The Supplementary and Another Conditions of the Contract aze those contained in the Project Manual dated March 23, 1998, and are as follows: Document Title 00600 Bonds 00700 General Conditions 00800 Supplementary General Conditions Pages 1 1 4 9.1.4 The Specifications aze those contained in the Project Manual dated as in Subpazagaph 9.1.3, and aze as follows: SeMion Title Pages DMSION 1-GENERAL DATA 01045 Cutting and Patching 2 01090 Refer~ce Standards 8 01340 Product Options 2 01500 Temporazy Facilities, Controls, Coordination 1 01640 Product Handling 1 01700 Contract Closeout 1 01710 Cleaning 2 01720 Record Documents 1 01740 Warranties (Guarantees) 1 DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK 02072 Demolition 1 DP/ISION 3 -CONCRETE 03730 Concrete Rehabilitation 3 DIVISION 4 -MASONRY (Not used) DIVISION 5 -METALS 05500 Metal Fabrications 4 DIVISION 6 -WOOD & PLASTICS 06000 Lumber and Rough Carpealhy 5 DIVISION 7 -THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION 07620 Flashing and Sheet Metal 4 07900 Joint Sears 6 DIVISION 8 -DOORS & WINDOWS (Not used) DIVISION 9 - FINISIIES (Not used) AIA DOCUMENT A101-OWNER-CONTRACTOR AGREEM&NT-TW6I,FTH EDTTION-AL4" 198'1 flle:kC20-82t.ed1 TE~AMERICAN INSTTTU7E OF ARCHITECTS,t'l35 NEW YORKAVENUE, N. W., WASmNGTON, D.C. 20006 A101-1987 4 Section Title DNISION 10 -SPECIALTIES (Not used) DMSION 11 -EQUIPMENT (Not used) DMSION 12 -FURNISHINGS (Not used) DIVISION 13 -SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION (Not used) DMSION 14 -CONVEYING SYSTEMS (Not used) DMSION 15 -MECHANICAL - On Dlawings DNISION 16 -ELECTRICAL - On Drawings 9.1.5 The Drawings areas follows, and aze dated March 23, 1998: Number Title Al Demolition Floor Plan A2 Wall Sections and Notes MPl Demolitron Plan -Mechanical and Notes El Demolition Plan -Electrical and Notes 9.1.6 The Addenda, if any, aze as follows: Addendum 1. 9.1.7 Older documwts, if any, forming part of the Contract Documents aze as follows: None. Pages This Ageement is entered into as of the day and year first written above and is executed in at least three original copies of which one is to be delivered to the Contractor, one to the Architect for use in the administration of the Contract, and the remainder to the Owner. OWNER: CONTRACTOR: ~i (Signature) Lta~.~~(i.~sr~ C~a~Z.- J peas , (Printed name and tit[eJ AIA DOCUMENT A301- OldNER-CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT -'IWQ,FTH ®1T[ON - AIA" - 1987 THE AMERICAN INSTIT'[7TE OF ARCHTTECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N. W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 file:kc2o-agr.edl A101-1957 5 ~~ ;~ ~.) ~ C~( a~~f ul THE COUNTY COURT COUNTY IUDGE ROBERT A. DENSON COMMISSIONERS COURT H. A. ~~BUSTER~~ BALD WIN, PCT. 1 T. H. ~~BUTCH ~ LACKEY, PCT. 2 JONATHAN LETZ, PCT. 3 BRUCE OEHLER, PCT. Q TO: Mart, Inc. 1503 Perry Road Irving, Texas 75060 OF KERR COUNTY, TEXAS 7OO MAIN KERRVR.LE, TE%AS 78028 TEL: (830)792-2211 FAX: (830)792-2218 CLERK PATRICIA DYE ADMINISTRATIVE ASST. 1NEA SOVIL May 20, 1998 NOTICE TO PROCEED RE: Demolition and Alterations of previous Detention Facilities, Second Floor, Kerr County Courthouse Annex, 700 Main Street, Kerrville, Texas 78028 Mart, Inc., is hereby authorized to begin the Work as described in the Contract Documents for the above Project on May 27, 1998, subject to the receipt of a current, properly completed Certificate of Insurance from the Contractor and Performance and Payment Bonds, acceptable to the Owner, and other documents required by the Contract Documents prior to commencing any Work on the site. Subject to modification, as provided in the Contract Documents, Time of Substantial Completion shall be August 20, 1998 eighty five (85) calendar days from May 27, 1998. Sincerely, ~~ obert A. Den on Kerr County Judge For Ken Cou the Owner file:kc2nutic.002 5~~~9~ TEX61S STATUTORY PERFORMANCE l3gND (Public Works) Bond # 150 37 75 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT, Mart, Inc., P.O. Box 170983, Irving, TX 75017(hereinafter called the Principal), as Principal, and Insurance Company of the West, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, licensed to do business in the State of Texas and admitted to write bonds, as surety, (hereinafter called the Surety), are held and firmly bound unto Kerr County, Texas, 700 Main Street, Kerrville, TX 78028 (hereinafter called the Obligee), in the amount of One Hundred Eighty Four Thousand Five Hundred Twenty Seven and no/100 Dollars ($184,527.00) for the payment whereof, the said Principal and Surety bind themselves, and their heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain contract with the Obligee, dated the day of May, 1998, for demolition and alterations of previous Detention Facilities, Second Floor, Kerr County Courthouse Annex which contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof as fully and to the same extent as if copied at length herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH ,that if the said Principal shall faithfully perform the work in accordance with the plans, specifications and contract documents, then, this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that this bond is executed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 2253 of the Texas government Code and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in accordance with the provisions, conditions and limitations of said Chapter to the same extend as if it were copies at length herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal and Surety have signed and sealed this instrument this day of May, 1998. MAR I C. 1 JJ~,~ ,, ~./ ~ ~~~;(Seal) ~. ~~ INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST /~ Michele Degnon, Attor y-in-Fact ITNESS: TEXAS STATUTORY PAYMENT BOA (Public Works) Bond No. 150 37 75 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT, Mart, Inc., P. O. Box 170983, Irving, TX 75017(hereinaftercatled the Principal), as Principal, and Insurance Company of the West, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, licensed to do business in the State of Texas and admitted to write bonds, as surety, (hereinafter called the Surety), are held and firmly bound unto Kerr County, Texas, 700 Main Street, Kerrville, TX 78028 (hereinafter called Obligee), in the amount of One Hundred Eighty Four Thousand Five Hundred Twenty Seven and no/100 Dollars ($184,527.00) for the payment whereof, the said Principal and Surety bind themselves and their heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain contract with the Obligee, dated the day of May, 1998, for demolition and alterations of previous Detention Facilities, Second Floor, Kerr County Courthouse Annex which contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof as fully and to the same extent as if copied at length herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the said Principal shall pay all claimants supplying labor and material to him or a subcontractor in the prosecution of the work provided for in said contract, then, this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that this bond is executed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 2253 of the Texas Government Code and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in accordance with the provisions, conditions and limitations of said Chapter to the same extent as if it were copied at length herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal and Surety have signed this instrurnbnt this day of May, 1998. ,I MA~INC. / B ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~, _ . y.; a INSURANCE COMPANY/~OF THE WEST Michele Degnon, Atto('ney-in-Fact NESS: Insurance Company of the West -- HOME OFRCE SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN EY THESE PRESENTS Tr,a; INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, a Caldomia COfDOfa UCn, noes nereby appoint. MICHELE DEGNON ifs tNe antl lawful Atlpmeyl5i-m-Fatt, w,^.P. full power anc atdnonN, to execute, on be7al! of th¢ Company floehN anc Surety bonds. unaertakmcs, anc diner contraes o1 surerysnia of a simcar nature. This Power o! ALOmev is cramec anc is sbneC antl sealeC by `ac5imile unde• the authonry of :he followme ResoNtion adopted by the 9oani of Duettors on lne ~?nd day D! NOVem Der, 195:. wniGn SaiC ReSOlUbon has not Deen dmenped or reSC~noec and of whtcn the 10110wmg 6 a 7Ne CDDy' 'RESOLVED ina: the Cna~.^~an o`tne 6oare. ;ne Fresoen;. an Execuuve Vce Pres;een; or a Senior Vice President of the Company. anc earn o! them, a nereby auinonzeC to ezecute Powers of Anomey dualr!ymg the adomey namec in the riven Power o! Attorney to execute on behalf c`. the Company, fidelity and surely bones unoeraK~nes. or Diner contra es of suretv5hip of a simtlar natu re ~, anc to ar,acn inereto the seal of the Company, provider however, Ina: the absence o1 the seal snali not afleC the valid ry of the instrument. FURTHER RESOLVED. ina! Ne s~cna!ure5 C! SUG~ Offipers and Ne Seal Of th@ Dompany, anc the sicnalute5 Of any w~tne55@s, the 5rgnaEUr¢5 and seal G any no:arv, anc ;ne signatures c! anv o`SCers cerofying the vahdry o' the Power o! Attorney, may be aNlxetl Dy tacsimii¢." IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Ih'$URANCE COMPANY GF THE VYEST has wuseC these presents to be signeC by h5 tluly authotrZeC officers this 19th day of June 1995 o~n~ INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST /.~[l~~U4)/O ~ 4e" ~ ~~f. ~~0~ ~ ~ STATE OF CALIF URNIA / John L. Hannum. Senior Vice Fresipen: s $ /` J/ COUNTY OF SAN DIEuO Or June 19th, !995 before me, personalty apcearec John L. Hannum Senior Vice President of INSU nANCE COtdPAN1' OF HE WEST, personally known t0 m¢ Ib Ce the inpiwDU21 anp pRldet wn0 eX¢CJteC [ne wQNn mSWmen;, anc aCTnpwleDDed tD m¢ ina: h¢ exeCNeC tpe same in Ns ofii Cial wpa GN and Ipat by nb 5idpat urB On the m5trumeh:, lne COrporatton, Dn Denal} of WNCn he aaeC, ¢xedUted Ine ih5lNmed: WITNESS my hand anc Dttic:a'. seal. n~~?MA P~, ~.R U ~Gy 5-" CIEUO cCUNTY n ~.... ~ J t..~ GC 1C'aS~Cn ExrylBi CERTIFIC:-' ( S-T' ..•.,wnT 1., 19So '~ / t ~ /~ y No:ary FLDI¢ i~: I E Hamer Oav~s Vice Presipent D! W SUR:,N'CE COMPANY OF THE V/=ST, Co nereby cenrN~ ;r.a: Ine ondmal POW ~R OF ATTORNEY, o! wnicn Ne fOredDlnC B a :Ne pDD^)', is SUII m }ull !Dr C¢ an^. eHeC, and tna; Ih6 ce Nficale may be LaneC Dy to DSimue Uncer the aU:nonTy d• the aDOVe CUD;ed resolution IN \'JI7NESS l'.'HE RE O=, I nave supsc~bec my name as Vice Presicen;, on this ray or May ,s 98 re.....- '~~ IC`A' 3" INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST y~ l G // , / E. hamed Davis, Vice Presipent .. m a m N 6 t ro m w N 0 E w a w 0 N w a s a s a m m ro r a E ScHeouc~ of vacua=s ~~ ~~m~ KC2 - De+nolfi°n of p~yioua ..~ Kerr Co. ~' ITEU OESCR1PT10N Of WORK NO. 2 4 5 8[ Tl 8 9 10 iS FROM SCtIEWLEO ~P ~ OH VALUE pelnol'Ition 8 CeNing DemWibon ate pemolition Crete PaTChing ~pstels & Haul-~ cast Panea RerrlwaUReplacmt S1o,o001 $25 500 585,000 515.0001 54,000 52,500 55,000 52,500 Ab.~ 3i~' NO" ~~ G H :TED MATERIALS TOTAL BADE GOMPIETED THIS PRESENTLY STORED To ATIO STORED PERCENT FlNISH PERpD NDT N TO DATE (ClG7 RETAINAGE MART, INC. PO Box 170983 Irving, Texas 75017 SL/BCONTRACTOR/SUPPL/ER LIST /PROJECT. KCZ Demolit/on of Prev/ous Detention Facilities Kerr County Courthouse Annex -Second F/oor T00 Main Street, Kerrville, Texas b0'd /TEM .~ MO PANY CONTACT Concrete Sawing Holes of San Antonio George Majors 1 t8 Braniff (210)349-5256 San Antonio, TX 78216 Demolition Absolute Demolition Larry Gabel PO Box 789 (512)918-1989 Cedar Park, TX 78630-0789 Plumbing Whelan Plumbing Charlie Whelan 2104 Memorial 81vd. (830)257-2104 Kerrville, TX 78028 Elettrical Cypress Electric 2210 Junction Nwy #1 (830)895-4850 Kerrville, TX 78028 Mechanical d Mart, inc. David Dixon Sheet Metal PO Box 170983 (972)721-1552 Irving,lX 75017 Crane Service Crocker Crane Rental 12112 FM 2769 (512)258-1323 Cedar Park, TX 78613 Dumpster 5ervlce Texas waste Systems Terry Degrood PO Box 200404 (800)883-371 1 San Antonio, TX 78220 066 L~ST6~ZTS flW3Q 31t1'1058C Wd £Z=£0 86-bT-.ltlW ac~r~:~r® /~~ww ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ' ~~~~ ~ _ DATE (MMIDDfM ~~ ~~~~~ ..... Y l Rf i ..... :. Y i i 05/11/98 ; E Y Air PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE MCQueary Henry Bowles HOLDER. THIS CER71flCATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR Troy, L.L.P. ALTER THE COVERAGE AFF RUED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 12700 Park Central Dr Ste 1700 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Dallas TX 75251 COMPANY p Employers Mutual Companie INSURED COMPANY Mart, InC. B Great American Insurance PD BDX 170989 COMPANY Irving TX 750170000 C NaBOnal Union Fire Inc. COMPANY D G#~tEAA±~EB <. :: _. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, E%CLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIMTK)N LIMBS GATE (MMRJD/VY) MTE (MM,DD/VY) A GEN ERAL LIPBILITV 1DE470390 10/04/97 10/09/98 GENERAL AGGREGATE E 2,000,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGO § 2 000 000 , , CLAIMS MADE ~ OCCUR PERSONAL 8 ADV IN,AIRV § 1 000 000 , , OWNER'S 8 CONTRACTORS PROT EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fre) $ 50 000 , MED FJ(P (Any one pereon) $ 5, 000 A AUT OMOBILE LIABILITY 1EH470398 10/04/97 10/01/98 X PNV AUTO COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT § 1, 000, 000 ALL OWNED AUTOS BOOILV INJURY $ SCHEDULED AUTOS (Par person) X HIRED AUTOS X BODILY INJURY $ NON-OYJIJED AUTOS (Per eccitlenU PROPERLY DAMAGE E GARAGE LIABILIN AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY EACH ACCIDENT g AGGREGATE E C EXCESS LIPBILRY BE3H]1]26 10/04/97 10/04/98 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 4,000,000 X UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE OTHER 1}WJ UMBRELLA FORM $ WGRKERS COMPENSATION ANU WC 5TATV- 0TH- EMPLOYERS' LIABILRV B WCP0069939-OS 04/01/98 04/01/99 EL EACH ACCIDENT g 1,000,000 THE PROPRIETON INCL PAATNERSrE%ECUTIVE EL DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT E 1, 000, 000 OFFICERS ARE: E%CL EL DISE/SE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 1, 000, 000 OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS,LOCATIONSNEHIG-E55PECIAL ITEMS RE: 2ND FLOOR KERB COUNTY COURTHOUSE ANNEX CERtIFTCAT@ HOE,OER CANCELLATION ,. .. ~~ SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE KERB COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL KlRR COUNTY COURTHOUSE 1D DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEA 1309 YlSPER LN ATTN MR WALKER , KERRYILLE TX 78D28 BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO ATIgJ OR LIFBILffV OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OFi E AUTHORRED REPRESENI'ATNE MCgUEARY NlNRY BOWLES TR , L.L.P A.CORD 23.5 17pS- ' ~ 6! ORB ~ . pt?HAII ~w 1988 37 MART, INC. P O Box 170983 living, Texas 75017 May 13,1998 Kerr County Commiasioncra Court c% Mike Walker Architect 1303 Vesper Lane Kerrville, TX 78028 Re; Kea County Courthouse Second Floor Detention Facilities Demolition ALTERNATE PROCEDURES PROPOSAL Dear Sits: As specified, we intend to saw-cut into manageable pieces the walls and ceilings of the concrete jail cell structures. The whining vibration on a concrete aaw will moat cettaittly requvt °a8er hours" work. Working after hours poses some noteworthy restrictions. There are thrcc areas of concern we wish for the Commissioners Court to consider that we believe they may appreciate the benefits of alternate methods to complete. BBEBKI2pWNS AND EMERGENCIES Being familiaz with nighttime work conditions, one of the most limiting factoro is responding to unexpecud needs. if a water line is brokrn or a hydraulic line is snapped or even just a question about an existing syattm scheduled to remain; the ability to respond becomes exponentially more difficult and usually fa deferred to a "daytime entity" to properly react. :Most serious or high cxpoaure concetma are much more effectively deah with during regular business hours. It is therefore our desire to propose an alternate acceptable method of demolition that woutd allow our forces to work from 7 a.m. unti13:30 p.m each day, concurrent with County work foreea. We believe their input and cooperation would ultimately be brneficia! to both partite ae we communicate, correct, and wpe with the inevitabilities of construction in an occupied bur7ding, WATER CONTROL Concrete cutting requucs a steady supply of water flowutg at the cutting edge; always mobile and difficult to contain. As we have a "slab over slab" condition, water seepage rosy be difficult to rccogttiu and contain until it "shows up" down below, One of the moat potentially damaging concerns of this project is the accidental release of water to the floor below, The alternate method we propose would reduce the amount of concrete rutting required by up to 75% and thereby reduce the necessity for VOLUMES of water. COST HENEFTfS Daytime work allows a more effective and efficient use of our IIIS'JH which will expedite the project and reduce our collective "sufferings" as the demobtion processes are added to the daily grind at the county annex. Reduced FxtrOtLruF benefits both occupants, adminiatratoro and contractors. ey saving time, redue:ing exposure, and eliminating concrete cutting I believe we can Savo MONEY as is detailed on the following offering. SB'd 066T+8T6~Z iS OW3Q 31f110Sfitl Wd ZZ: £0 86-bi-AtlW Alternate Demolition Method Kerr County C:ourthouae Page 2 As opposed to sawing into slabs and removing the concrete jail cell structures, we propose to use a hydraulic shear on a skid steer loader to remove virtually all the walls and ceilings and steel by "nibbling" through the concrete and steel and removing it az rubble. I7ria is NOT a pcrc;ussion toolH It is the equivalent to a pair of scissors designed to cut concrete and steel. Not only will this significantly reduce the need for water use but also reduce the tree of an acetylene torch which also has associated exposure concerns. Tfie aheaz is capable of tuning 6" concrete in 10^ "bites" and can cut steel tubing up to 4" across. It is mounted on a Bobcat diesel powered skid steer loader desigrtted for use in mining operations and has a Lower hydrocatbon?soot output than propane combustion engines. CONSIDERATIONS ANi) CONCERNS TOO R O The skid steer and shear wiU weigh about 8500 pounds. 'ibis load transferred to few wheels is 2135 pounds per wheel. Un previous projects we have found that shoring poste (2" pipes with att adjustable ratchet) carr be added to the floor below in minimal strategic locations so as to significantly reduce the carrying capacity of the post tension slab above. 1f familiar engineering practices are acceptable in thin building we are suggesting that approximately 8 - 10 poste would be Located ae is convenient for the County Clerk for approximately 6 weeks of the project. For compazative data, a parking garage consttttcted of lightweight concrete beams (2 1?2 "thick} with a 4" concrete topping is typically rated for 2500 pounds per wheel. The annex budding slab, with a minimal amount of additional support may be able to perfomt much more substantially than previously thought. Further benefit toward adequate support would be to reduce the majority of the non-concrete materials prior to introducing the approvmate weights of construction materials already in place and performance to date: Plaster and finish-out materials 140,000# Steel fixtures and doors 150,000# Concrete walls and ceilings 550,000# Concrete Horn- topping-2" avg. 375,000# current load on the floor by removing the skid steer aheaz. We have calculated the offer this favorable data vetifvine the slabs If we fiat remove the plaster walla, ceilings, and futish-our materials and disassemble steel fixtwes, we could significantly redact (as much as 200,000#) of the existing load. Again, this is prior to bringing in the skid steer shear. Additionally, the 2" concrete topping slab with 6x6x10 w.w.m. reinforcement will act as a mat to spread the point load to the support beams. Z9'd 066 T+g I6+ZTS OW3Q 31(110SHtf Wd ZZ: £B S6-bi-ACW Alternate Demolition Methods Kea County Courthouse Page 3 NnISF ,~gATFMFNT We aze cutrentty working >R hospitals, ensile, computer trtanufacturing facilides and office towers where concurrent daily operations of chose facilities are negotiated with the occupants. In some cases we have started demolition st 5 a.m. and by 10 a.m. only clean-up Aesa potential for sharp naiaes) continues until 2 p.m. At other locations, security and control factors aro b,.rier dealt with during 8 a.m. -S p.m. scheduling. The point being, we quickly ]cam what is allowable and what ie not. The tenants alto loath that what was thought to be an unmanageable conflict is not so imposing and possibly even entertaining to monitor progress and processes. COST CONSIDERaTIONS We have budgeted 535,000 for concrete cutting and coring. There will still be a need to cut at "existing to remain" atlas. We can reduce the amount of cutting by 7i% using a sheaz. Additionally, we would expect a reduction in time and labor to work during daylip~tt hours which could save 53,500. Zn consideration of the additional equipment cosU and additional shoring that may be required, we are offering a shared cost savings rebate to rho owner of FIFTEEN TFfOUSAND DOLLARS (SI3,000). We believe this innovative approach to concrete removal will allow va to work safer, cleaner and faster. 1£ all goes wed we could potentially reduce the entire time in progress by 2 weeks. Tn summary, so offer our beat efforts, control rho excesses ere efficiently as possible, respond immediately to the incidental circurnstancea and SAVE T1ME AND MONEY for both parties, we ask you to consider our alternate proposal to demolish and remove the sxond floor detention facility. Sincerely, T KL[ ~ t' wrence J. Qabel, Jr. £0'd 065Y+SY6+ZYS OW3Q 3111'10S8tl Wd £Z=£0 86-by-AtlW ~ N r ~ , ,~' ~~. ~ - ^,4~.- ~ih rr >r~ ` MSD7/MSD7R _ A cn Y m ti s,.~+° ~(1) EXCAVATOR VJEIGMT , (t) EXCAVATOR WEIGHT i (Q)ATfACHMENT 9HEAR i SHEAR (3) MODEL APPROX 2ntl Member APpROX are Member WgGFiT APPROX i OPENING ~ DEPTN ~ REACN MSD T l 6,000 3 i 12.000 5 I @50 q31 10 2'4 11 279 ~ 4' -1" 7.q MSD 7R 7 SCO 3 I 15,000 7 ! 1,100 499 10 254 ' 1 279 5' - 0' 1.5 {I) htaupter wYiC!M1 ncDlmendeCmi is tesec in pYnddN ui:aou[Dr wepM1b rd beam PIMYdr um knDrna, A1: yD11CeLGnt mWi LB lG7tNYd bV Lv3nYXfl .NenWamfap Drip 10 de. nl iXeeM1manl wli0bl tin of ry tluDtndt^0 tl49n ipurvnd CnGl.t .gp,oirlC[! GYdndar reDYirCQ ID mMlmG[a DiE! mCL:,M eperel,ni DptiJrlY, !nd vry ODYOn1 it W Id en eb! MIN. n{ rPDit.l rytCM1 Or DpQpT led luck h!yky, K !119d. P9giM1 c„in ylf{ dpDCid'`1D YDDn IIrC brDdD[ nPiDBd 101 N,9 fitt IMCIdnI. rNi rtt Yb lIH'/ bt tlabaCYlindr in LIGYCCY G/ R,eunnfQ InG v:fY-'IYI9lI IC YI9 tllEl rd bucYq ~InHYDe K D mrt! bee me -~<< ~~~ ~t THE COUNTY COURT OF KERR COUNTY, TEXAS 700 MAIN KFARVILLE, TExgS 7$O2$ TEL: (830)792-2211 FAX; (830)792-2218 May 15, 1998 NOTICE TO PROCEED CLERK PATRICIA nY6 ADMINISTRATIVE ASST. THEA SONIC RE: Demolition and Alterations of previous Detention Facilities, Second Floor, Ken County Courthouse Annex, 700 Main Street, Kerrville, Texas 78028 Mart, Inc., is hereby authorized to begin the Work as described in the Contract Documents for the above Project on May 21, 1998, subject to the receipt of a current, properly completed Certificate of Insurance from the Contractor and Performance and Payment Bonds, acceptable to the Owner, and other documents required by the Contract Documents prior to commencing any Work on the site. Subject to modification, as provided in the Contract Documents, Time of Substantial Completion shall be August 14, 1998 eighty five (85) calendar days from May 21, 1998. Sincerely, V R bert A. Denson Kerr County Judge For Kerr County, Texas, the Owner file:kc2notic.(102