w
x
U
z
x
H
0
w
a
a
H
a
a

M
N
rn
rn
N
r
O
Q
a
o~
~r
H
U
E
F' H ~
w ~ z ~
o ~ w ~
rh a~i ~ o
a E1 a rn
~ N o
a U ~
~ o
H a
a ~ a rn
a a o '~
,'~ H
~ W U cis ~
~ H
~ ~ ~ ~ a
N H H O ~
U U h
• fYa H
o w w a -
z a o ~ ~
~ o ~ Q
w w c~ z
Hzuwi ~~
COMMISSIONERS' COURT AGENDA REQUEST
*PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND COPIES OF THIS REQUEST AND DOCUMENTS
TO BE REVIEWED BY THE COURT
MADE BY: Franklin Johnson P.E.
OFFICE: Kerr County Road 8~ Bridge
MEETING DATE: July 12. 1999
TIME PREFERRED:
SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC): Consider Preliminary Replat of Tract 47 Kerrville South
Ranches No. 2. Pct. 1
EXECUTIVE SESSION REQUESTED: (PLEASE STATE REASON)
NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT: Franklin Johnston. P.E./Gary Brandenburg
ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION: 10 minutes
PERSONNEL MATTER -NAME OF EMPLOYEE:
Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter is posted in accordance with Title 5, Chapters
551 & 552 of the Government Code is as follows:
Meetings scheduled for Mondays: 5:00 P.M. previous Tuesday
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED BY:
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON: n
All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine if adequate information has been
prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of Court meetings.
Your cooperation will be appreciated and contribute towards your request being addressed at the earliest
opportunity. See Agenda Request Rules Adopted by Commissioners' Court.
KERR COUNTY
ROUTING SLIP
2s~-~3g3
1. Submit four (4) copies to the Kerr County Engineer for review fifteen (15) days
--~ prior to Commissioners' Court Date.
Received by: _ C.l 2~
Da
2. Submit one (1) Copy of Preliminary Plat to County Clerk and arrange for payment
of fees per Kerr County Subdivision Rules & Regulations.
[ ]Preliminary Plat [~ Preliminary Replat
~.) , n ~ Amount Paid $
!L- ~~-ty ~Q Signatur ~~`/Q
y„~_.„, ,~ ~~ . ~ _( ,County Jerk) ~ Date
3. Submit one (1) copy of Preliminary Plat to Environmental Health Department.
[ ]Permit application and support data for On-site Sewage Facilities
[ ]Flood Plain information
Fee Amount Paid $ ~ ~ . Received by:~ ~~ ~ " a~_c~ 9
Date
(over)
OB/30f99 23: Q1 FAX
poi
ti
• ~~ +~
4. 911 STREET NAHIES~('if ap, ticsb[e):••.The •attached Plat is for~'iti •:- `.:-:•. ,.
Review. T'he ~}~i , `" Y'~ sliest aaines shown on `tfic`p1nt:•iu'e' -
duplicates, . , ~~~~~ ~ ecaording'to~Al~l ~`. ~guidclines~~(A~`'.
J ~ ••~•....::.
this as signature block oti plats.) Discuss`with Siirveyor/Euugin~T .y, . ~ fea~ l•
~~•=•~~'~'~; ''"~pro~leiiu and assign strut numbers. ~ ~" ~ -. _,,,;.,: •:•,
5 > 1 . ..,.~ •. y t
. , ;2.;~ ::iQS7'.r',iea.a~r,:~:.... . ,...,~- , -1 .D~!~o7 MFt`r "ll~~~fL~•~~~f".".:':rf~*w.~fllll~~~•'`:~y,-.
.3 w~faco ~~ ~ ~1~ur gn8 e: w ~ ~ ~7 q
uNJ air .fi• "Bu~R~ uX1J ~v~vlydcctTtO (911 ~ hector)"~~- - Datb~~`. • ~.
S_ If Platting includes nay utility easanents or charges to an~;clasting easeirient., •-:
~noti$cation of the Util'es involved are required for Prc~icnc"'aaiy~laE~ ~;CJt~ity shall
•Surveyor/Engineer easement notes regtictbd. '
1. LloCtric Utility: ~ ~ - =i ~ , .
2. Telephone Company: ~ - ~~
(T1tis shall be added to Final Piat if mylar applicable) FAX copics'accaptable.:. ~6 - a~~ ~
_ .~....
6, If Platting has access to Texas Department Of Transportation Roadway a copy of
..-. preliminary Plat must be reviewed by the TXDOT Engineer. Signature on this
form indicates receipt of Preliminary Plat, sign mylar for final approval.
Signature:
- (Sill Tucker, p.E.) Date .
"R ?"kls completed jorm must be returned to flu. Courtiy~Engi~titr'Sevui~(~ days
before Comnussioners' ~'orrrt Agenda bola If flay an not received before 9:00
a.m on Monday, thcry will beheld until tke Hari meeting.


;,._.,.
Jun-30-99 01:17P kpub
257 8078 P.O1
..
" <_
..
4. 911 STREET NAMES (if applicable}: The attached Plat is for prelirninary
Review. The Subdivision riame and.street names shown on the`plaf..are~not
duplicates, and are approved for the Final Plat, according to 911 giudetiries. (All
this as signature block on plat's:) Discuss with Siirveyor/13ngineer.any "otential
~.. .. ' ~prolilems aad assign street numbers. .~„~ Y ~"~,~=''3~'` ~-
... .~~. . ,:?,Gi+a'1yis.-t ....... .... .. .. ~~:... ,. :!•. . '1.~.,.,'!^::Y:'."'t ?_ ~:::C,~ "y.r; .~9'h'1`«~:'~f't~:"~.{ :....,
a
Signature: ~ '
' .. (911'Director) "• .IDa e
5. If Platting includes any utility easements or,changes"to an existing easement
~notiScation of the Utilities involved are requued for Pi-eliiruriaty Plat.` Utility shall
givd`SurveyorlEngineer easement tes reduired. ~;;" '_.~ ,, f , ,
1. Electric Utility: -~ :+ G~~
2. TGlephane Company:
(This shad be added to Final Plat ifmylar applicable) FAX copies acceptable. 8`~G- ~`~'a l
6. If Platting has access to Texas Department Of Transportation Roadway a copy of
"" Preliminary Plat must be reviewed by the TXDOT Engineer. Signature on this
form indicates receipt of Preliminary Plat, sign mylar for final approval,
Signature:
-(Bill Tucker, P.E.) Date
. ~.
"" This completed form must be returned to the County Engineer Seven (7j days
before Commissioners' Court Agenda Dates If they are not received before 9:00
a. m. on Monday, they will be held until the nett meeting.

Post•It'~ brand fax transmittal memo 7671 ~ r of psg~s .
~'
~°`'~ .
~~
TCI(~S L811d
Texas Land Boundaries
BO~~~ 1003 Temple Drive, Kerrville,
Texas
78028
Phone: 830257-3839
FAX: 830 896-6.417
email: Wndbnd®ktc.com
Friday, June 18, 1999
Mr. Franklin Johnston
Kerr County Engineer
Frank
Please find attached a copy of a proposed subdivision, Replat of Tract 47,
Kerrville South Ranches No. 2. It is owned by Mr. George L. Williams.
Tract 47 is bounded by Buffalo Drive, a platted roadway of 40 foot width which
has never been built and is barely noticeable on the ground. It was designed (on paper)
to serve Tracts 46, 47, 48-A, 48-B and 48-C, all of which have a second roadway. Mountain
Drive or East Buffalo Drive to serve them access. Buffalo Drive in reality, was never
really needed and probably might explain why it was never built.
East Buffalo Drive does presently exist and is a gravel and caliche all weather
road serving Tract 49, 41, 42 and 47. Mr. Williams desires to subdivide Tract 47 into four
parcels, keeping Tract 47-A thereof to himself and selling Tracts 47-B, 47-C, and 47-D. I
have subdivided this tract in such a way that all three "sell-off' tracts front a minimum
of 200 feet along East Buffalo Drive, the existing roadway. This proposal is an attempt to
avoid the expense of building Buffalo Drive allowing the fact that it would not be
necessary for tract access. The plat is also designed to give Kerr County an additional
ten (10) feet of land adjacent to the existing forty (40) foot rights of way for future road
purposes; the metes and bounds conveyance would describe a thirty (30) foot wide strip
from Mr. Williams to the existing centerlines of Buffalo Drive and East Buffalo Drive.
Mr. Williams also owns Lot 6 of Mountain Ridge Estates. He purchased this tract
because it adjoins the portion of Tract 47 his is going to retain and to drive across it as
driveway access from Mountain Ridge Spur to his hilltop site. Even ff Buffalo Drive was
installed (built), the terrain is forbidding to get to the hilltop site. In Mr. Williams deed
to Lot 6, there is a clause, granting if you will, of a perpetual right of access across Lot 6
for access to Tract 47; I've enclosed a copy of that deed.
Please review this plat and circumstances for recording purposes and let me
know your comments. I have in addition, the following questions:
1) Due to the common ownership of Lot 6 with Tract 47-A, can Tract 47-A serve as
access from Mountain Ridge Spur as long as Mr. Williams retains ownership of Lot 6?

2) If Mr. Williams, in the future, wishes to sell the unused portion of Lot 6 he
doesn't drive across, would he have to do a replat of just Lot 6, or would it have to be a
replat of Mountain Ridge Estates involving that developer?
3) Due to the new tract frontages along East Buffalo Drive, can improvements to
Buffalo Drive be avoided?
4) Being that East Buffalo Drive is currently in place and used in it's current
condition, does it have to be rebuilt to county specs; and if so, because a new paved road
is to be placed that would benefit existing adjoining property owners, do they share in
the expense or does the burden rest entirely with the developer Mr. Williams.
5) If East Buffalo Drive will need to be rebuilt, will this also include building
outward (northeast) to where it intersects Mountain Drive and inward (southwest) past
the end of Tract 47 to the terminus of E. Buffalo Dr.; or would the rebuild only be along
the Tract 47 frontage?
6) What would the Commissioner's Court agenda be for this plat be if it happens
to be in an acceptable form at this point?
Thank you Frank for your time in this matter.
Gary Max Brandenburg
Owner
...Kerr Count~;~Texas . ~------------=--- y~~-~
Y _ ...-.~. _._.--_-- Kerr bounty; [exa's~ ~.
REPEAT OF TRACT 47 OF KERRVILLE SOUTH
RANCHES N0.2, KERR COUNTY, TEXAS
COMPRISING A TOTAL OF 19.94 ACRES OF LAND, BEING 4 LOTS CONTAINING 18.13
he ACRES AND ONE (1) 1.81 ACRE TRACT COMPRISED OF A TEN (10) FOOT WIDE PUBLIC
~~ ROADWAY DEDICATION AEONG BUFFALO DRIVE AND BUFFALO DRIVE WEST AND THE
EXISTING TWENTY (20) FOOT (ONE-HALF ROADWAY WIDTH) STRIP TO THE EXISTING
CENTERLINES THEREOF ASSOCIATED WITH AND A PART OF SAID TRACT 47
'G~ BEING ALL OF TRACT 47 OF KERRUIELE SOUTH RANCHES N0. 2 OF RECORD
IN VOLUME 3, PAGE 62 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF KERR COUNTY, TEXAS. BEING THAT
SAME TRACT CONVEYED FROM THOMAS S. STEVENS TO GEORGE L WIEHAMS AND
SANDRA B. WIEEIAMS PER INSTRUMENT RECORDED -N VOLUME 813, PAGE 225 OF
THE REAE PROPERTY RECORDS OF KERR COUNTY, TEXAS. BEING ALL IN ORIGINAL
- SURVEY N0. 118, THERCSA PAGE, ABSTRACT N0. 858