ORDER NO. 26880

REVISION TO THE KERR COUNTY  PERSONNEL POLICY

On this the 12th day of February 2001, upon motion made by
Commissioner Baldwin, seconded by Commissioner Letz, the court
unanimously approved by a vote of 4-0-0, to discuss revision
to the Kerr County Personnel Policies to (a) require annual
Employee Performance Reviews for all employees who work for
Commissioner Court or in County Departments not directed by
elected officials or perons not appointed by the
Commissioners' court including Road and Bridge Dept., Animal
control Dept., and Facilitiees Use and Maintenance Dept. Said
Performance review(s) to by completed by Jan. 31st of each year.
The County treasurer will be provieded with copies of
reviews for inclusion in employee personnel files; and (b)
recommended and encourage other Kerr County elected officials
to do likewise for employees in their Department.COMMISSIONERS' COURT AGENDA REQUEST
PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND NINE COPIES OF THIS RF,tOUEST
AND DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEWER BY THE COURT
MADE BY: William H. Williams OFFICE: Commissioner, Pct. 2
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2001 TIME PREFERRED:
SUBJECT: (Please be specific) Consider and discuss revision to Kerr County Personnel Policies
to (a) requee annual Empkryee Performance Reviews for all employees who work for the
Commissioners Court or in County departments not duected by elected officials or persons not
appointed by the Commissioners Court including, Road and Bridge Dept., Animal Control Dept.,
and Facilities Use and Maintenance Dept. Said performance review(s) to be completed by
January 31 of each year. The County Treasurer will be provided with copies of reviews for
inclusion in employee personnel files; and (b) recommend and encourage other Kerr County
elected officials to do tikewise for employees in their departments. Proposed review form
attached.
EXECUTIVE SESSION REQUESTED: (PLEASE STATE REASON)
NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT: Commissioner, Pct. 2.
ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION:
IF PERSONNEL MATTER-NAME OF EMPLOYEE:
Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter is posted in
accordance with Title 5, Chapter 55 t and 552, Government Code, is as follows:
Meeting scheduled for Mondays: 5:00 P.M. previous Tuesday
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED BY:
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON:
All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine if adequate
information has been prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of Court
meetings. Your cooperation will be appreciated and contribute towards your request being
addressed at the earliest opportunity. See Agenda Request Rule adopted by Commissioners
Court.
- KERB COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK -EMPLOYEE EVALUATION
EMPLOYEE'S NAME
HAS EMPLOYEE BEEN IN THIS JOB LESS THAN 6 MONTHS? YES () NO ( )
JOB TITLE: DATE OF EVALUATION
HAS EVALUATOR SUPERVISED EMPLOYEE LESS THAN SIX MONTHS? YES () No ( )
HAS EVALUATOR REVIEWED JOB DESCRIPTION FOR THIS POSITION? YES () No ( )
HAS EVALUATOR REVIEWED LAST PREVIOUS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (if nary) ON THIS EMPLOYEE?
YES () NO ( )
5 = exceptional 2 = Needs Improvement
4 = Exceeds Expectations 1 =Unsatisfactory
3 = Meets Expectations
1. Reliability -------------------
2. Enthusiasm-------------------
3. Accurncy-absence of errors - - - - - - - -
4. Alertness 6 ability to retnin - - - - - - - -
5. Initiative ------------------- I
6. Effectiveness under stress - - - - - - - I
7. Job knowledge 6~ job skill level - - - - - - I
8. Adaptnbility------------------ I
9. Quality of work produced - - - - - - - - - I
10. Volume of acceptable work - - - - - - - - I
11. Ability to make sound decisions and judgments
Resourcefulness ------------------ I
12. Ability to follow instructions - - - - - - - - - - I
13. Ability to accept responsibility- -- - - - - - - I
14. Ability to accept direction & or constructive
criticism------------------------ I
15. Orderliness, Organization of individual work
and workorea-------------------- I
16. Ability to operate equipment - - - - - - - - - - I
17. Ability to relate to and work well
with others---------------------
18. Courtesy with citizens, public relntions - - - I
19. Courtesy to fellow workers - - - - - - - - - - I
20. Oral Expression------------------- I I
21. Written expression (composition} - - - - - - I I
22. Efficient use of office time - - - - - - - - - - I I
23. Observation of safety rules & procedures- - I I
24. Observance of Attendance:
Workhouse and tardiness - - - - - - - - - - - I I
25. Observance of office policies & procedures I I
26. Attention to duties during work hours:
distractions-------------------- I (
27. Neat -well groomed-appropriate dress - -
28. Self-confidence------------------ ( I
SCORE = OF 140. When merit increases are o/located 6y the commissioner's Court, those emp/ogees
highest scores wil/be recommended for merit.
Evaluation reviewed with employee? Yes () No ( )
Supervisor's comments on ratings:
Supervisor's
Date:
Employee Comments: (optional):
Employee signature (optional):
Initial: I acknowledge receipt of evaluation 6 do not wish to respond.