.~"~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ol'N/~
"' {{{ / `~
COMMISSIONERS' COURT WORKSHOP
DRAFT ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN OF REDISTRICTING
COMMISSIONERS' COURTROOM
KERR COUNTY COURTHOUSE
~~C~~°-1
June 20, 2001
10:07 a.m. to 10:39 a.m.
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
s
C
C
n
z
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A P P E A R A N C E S
COUNTY JUDGE -- Fred Henneke
COMMISSIONER, PRECINCT 2 -- William "Bill" Williams
Ms. Penny Redington
BICKERSTAFF, HEATH, SMILEY, POLLAN,
KEVER & McDANIEL, L.L.P.
816 Congress Avenue
Suite 1700
Austin, Texas 78701-2443
Phone: (512) 472-8021
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ZO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(Open court.)
THE COURT: Good morning. Let me
call this workshop to order. We have a presentation
by Penny Redington from Bickerstaff, Heath law firm
in Austin regarding a draft illustrative plan for
redistricting. I sent to each of you in the mail a
copy of -- a small copy of the plan. Penny has
brought some larger copies where we can actually see
something, and she will tell us the changes that
have been made since the first plan and also respond
to any questions and talk about any concerns that
their firm may have regarding the potential for
redistricting here in Kerr County. So Penny
Redington.
MS. REDINGTON: Thank you, Judge.
Good morning. Good morning, Commissioner Williams.
It's nice to see you here today.
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: Good morning,
Penny.
MS. REDINGTON: And, ladies and
gentlemen, it's wonderful to have this kind of
turnout. So often this sort of thing just passes
somewhat unnoticed as hard as we try to involve the
community. Sometimes it's difficult to do that, and
I'm very pleased to see the level of participation
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
here in Kerr County, and in large part that's due to
the efforts of the Judge, the commissioners, and
their staff, and we're happy to have that.
I have come today with a draft plan, an
illustrative plan, we call it, to present to the
commissioners' court and to the members of the
community as an example of a plan that would help to
correct the imbalance in population in the various
commissioners' precincts and that we feel would
comply with the requirements of the Voting Rights
Act.
If you were here several months ago when
we made our first presentation to the county, when
we came down here with our assessment of your
current situation and the population in your current
-- the current population in your precincts, you
remember that Kerr County was somewhat out of
balance. You have had growth in your county, and
just by way of a refresher, Judge, if you don't
mind, I'd like to just bring -- go over that and
sort of bring everyone up to date on this.
In your county, as I look at the map of
your current commissioners' court precincts, you
have seen considerable growth, and you have now a
total population, according to the 2000 census, of
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
43,653 people. That means that your ideal precinct
size would be 10,913 people in each precinct. That
would be your ideal precinct size. So if you -- if
you could be perfect, you would have exactly that
number of people in each precinct.
Well, that's very difficult to do when you
have a lot of other considerations. So you can't
reach that level of perfection, but we -- we will
strive to do that, and that's what we attempted to
do as we developed this illustrative plan for the
commissioners' court to consider.
Now, with the population that you have, it
was not evenly divided or distributed among your
precincts. In fact, the deviation from the ideal
precinct size between your largest precinct and your
smallest precinct had reached 17,43 percent. You
were definitely out of balance, and that needed to
be addressed, and so as we began to work on a map to
bring your commissioner precincts back into equal
population, we tried a number of different things.
We had input from the Judge and from the
commissioners, and, in fact, one of the
commissioners came and worked with us one day on our
computers to address some of the issues concerning
his precinct, and we -- after several rough starts,
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
we came up with this illustrative plan 1 to present
to you today, and it's fairly large scale. I think
-- I hope that you can see from where you are or
you can see on one of the copies that's -- sort of a
mid-size copy that's floating around out here, but
it's -- it's a plan that does, in fact, bring your
precincts into balance.
Judge, is that big enough for you all to
see, what you have there?
THE COURT: Uh-huh. Yes. That
helps.
MS. REDINGTON: Okay. I would just,
I guess, begin by calling your attention to the
areas of change. One of our basic criteria adopted
by the Court at our last meeting was that we would
attempt to use existing lines wherever possible.
The changes should be minimal wherever possible, and
we did, in fact, start with your existing plan. We
didn't just toss everything and start from scratch.
We -- we looked at the lines as they are, and we
attempted to make most of our changes within your
population center.
We're fortunate because your precincts do
come into the City of Kerrville, and that gives us a
little bit more flexibility, and so we -- and when
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
7
r^
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ZO
lI
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
you change lines within the city for county
commissioners' precincts, it doesn't affect things
like the number of county road miles that a
commissioner might have or something like that, and
it does not affect as many -- well, it may affect as
many constituents, but it doesn't have the same
impact as moving a line out here. Like you would
have to move this line a long way to pick up enough
people to make much difference, and you could move a
line in the city very minimally and have a much
larger change in the population.
So we worked, first of all, with your
existing voting boxes, election boxes. We call them
VTDs, voting tabulation districts because that's the
terminology that the Census Bureau uses when they
create the census geography that we have to work
with, and it's all in computerized format. We
worked with your voting boxes wherever we could, but
in places we had to qo down to the census block
level, and as I explained last time, the census
block in the city may be a city block, but a census
block out in the county may be much larger and very
irregular in shape, having maybe one or two or
sometimes no people living in them, and you had a
little -- I wouldn't call it a problem, but you had
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
8
,,,~ 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
,,,` 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
a situation that is not uncommon in that you had
some census blocks that were actually split by lines
that were being used, and so we tried to correct
those split census blocks wherever we could, and
that's something that will stand the county in good
stead in the future. It will be easier to make
changes in the future because we are using the
census geography lines.
So let's just -- I'm trying to think where
we might start. Perhaps -- perhaps with precinct 1
which is a precinct which comes through the county
in a sense, and the largest change, I believe, for
precinct -- well, there are actually two for
precinct 1 that I would want to point out to you,
and you can see it best. It's this inset 1, and you
can see it best up here. The current line -- the
existing line is shown in sort of a bluish purple
color. You see it here? Okay.
We had tc -- Precinct 1 -- let me just get
my notes here. Precinct 1 was underpopulated just a
little bit at -- it was -2.5 below the ideal
precinct size, and Precinct 4 was overpopulated by
seven percent. Precinct 3 was underpopulated by 10
percent. Precinct 2 was overpopulated by 5.5
percent. So there had to be some trading. We had
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
to do some trading, and we actually gave up some --
excuse me. We gave up some of Precinct 4, because
it was overpopulated by four percent, and added it
to Precinct 1 in this area here bounded by Doris,
West Crest, Mountain Laurel and Glen. That
population was moved out of Precinct 4 and into
Precinct 2.
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: One.
MS. REDTNGTON: Excuse me, into
Precinct 1. That's one of the first major changes
that I would point out to you. So the line moved
from what was Mockingbird and Warbler. It moved to
the northwest to become Doris, West Crest, Mountain
Laurel and Glen.
This line remained the same along
Crestwood and Junction. That was not changed, but
in the city additional population was given to
Precinct 1 to bring it up a little bit.
Yes, sir?
JUDGE ELLIOTT: I notice on your --
THE COURT: Excuse me. We're taking
this down, so would you all please identify
yourselves when you have a question.
JUDGE ELLIOTT: I'm Vance Elliott, JP
1, Precinct 1. I notice in the inset proposal it
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
looks like the existing line in the navy blue was
the old line, but the new line is shaded pink and
does not go up into the courthouse where the old
line was, and since my office is here at the
courthouse, I believe I need to be in Precinct 1.
MS. REDINGTON: Well, now what we are
showing is a draft plan for the commissioners'
precincts, to get the commissioners in balance.
JUDGE ELLIOTT: Uh-huh.
MS. REDINGTON: And that's our
starting point. If we need to make adjustments --
if the Court wishes to make adjustments to justice
precinct lines, that will be another step, and it's
just -- and I recognize that this could be -- could
be a problem for certain justice precincts. The
incumbents would not be living in them. We
attempted, where we could, to run checks and to be
sure that your residence was within the precinct,
but your office --
JUDGE ELLIOTT: The office and I use
the courtrooms here at the courthouse. All I'm
pointing out is, you see that the little inset there
by Sidney Baker, the old line, it came across
Junction Highway. What that does is come right into
the front of the courthouse to accommodate Precinct
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1 Justice of the Peace to be in the courthouse.
MS. REDINGTON: Judge, I don't know
where Sidney Baker is.
JUDGE ELLIOTT: Counselor, would you
like for me to show you?
MS. REDINGTON: Oh, here it is.
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: At the bottom
right corner, right there.
MS. REDINGTON: If you would not
mind, Judge, letting me just sort of work around
through this --
JUDGE ELLIOTT: That's fine.
MS. REDINGTON: -- and then we can
talk about this --
JUDGE ELLIOTT: I just wanted to
point that out.
MS. REDINGTON: -- in general.
That's fine, and Z appreciate that, and we -- we
certainly -- the Court is -- this is only an
illustrative plan. The Court may want to make
adjustments for various reasons as we go along, but
we first of all have to get the commissioners'
precincts in balance. As I said, last time when I
was here, the justice precincts do come under the
Voting Rights Act, but they are not under the
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830j 537-4223
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
I6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
constitutional one person, one vote.
JUDGE ELLIOTT: I understand.
MS. REDINGTON: Okay. So -- so what
we were doing was looking at commissioners'
precincts first of all. So as I said, to add some
population to Precinct 1, this is one of the changes
that was made. I think that the other lines on
Precinct 1 remain the same except for an area right
over here. Coltress Hollow, I believe there's one
line, and then Denlu would be a -- is that a street?
Denlu is a road?
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: Uh-huh.
MS. REDTNGTON: There was a -- I
think that was a split census block in that area,
and so we just brought that into conformity with the
census geography right in that area.
Then working on around Precinct 1 coming
down from the north on Interstate 10, there were no
changes in that area until we got into town and the
-- the old line was Pershing to -- I don't know
this street here, but you see where Lincoln is and
Water and then I -- I'm assuming that's the curve of
a creek that's not labeled -- to Sidney Baker, and
then the change that was mentioned by the Judge.
The old line is here, and then population
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
was actually taken out of that precinct to be placed
in Precinct 3, which is as I said earlier, was
underpopulated by about 10 percent. So there is a
change right here of several blocks.
Then I think the remaining lines are the
same until we get to this area of Inset 1, and this
is this blowup right up here. This comes from this
point. There is a change here to follow what I
believe is the line of the river; is that right?
And then -- to eliminate that gap right there, and
then in this area we followed Ranchero Road from the
Medina Aighway over to Calcote and then Nixon and
Codrington. Is that Codrington? Yes. Okay.
So those are -- that's just the boundaries
of Precinct 1 and as that impacted 4 or 2 or 3, you
could tell as we went through there, because the
changes that we made from one really had an effect
on the others.
There was an additional change to the
boundary between Precinct 2 and 3 which involved
some population in this area. I believe there was a
split census block here, a split census block near
Wilson Creek in this area, and then there was a
split census block here.
We ran into an interesting situation down
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
in this area where Commissioner Letz lives, and he
lives in an a area that was split, and this was done
probably 10 years ago or 20 years ago, and when we
-- when we tried to unsplit that and put that
census block back together, we drew him out of his
precinct, which was really a shock to him when he
saw the first draft of this, so we got that
straightened out.
He was a good sport about it, but that
kind of thing can happen, because while you know the
population total in a census block, you don't know
where each house is in a census block, and so when
we allocated block to Precinct 2, he ended up not
being in his precinct. So we got that straightened
out, and, in fact, there was very little population
in this area, and it was suggested that we simply
bring a line down in here, and this looks funny
because that is a census block that just sticks out
like that.
We like to make all these clean and neat,
but we have to work with the census blocks. That's
the lowest Level we can work with, and so that line
is not as pretty as we would like for it to be, but
it is a split census block in there.
So with this plan we were able to get up
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ZO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
the population deviation between the largest and the
smallest precincts -- our deviation £rom the ideal
down to 3.18, which I think is a very -- very good
figure, and it leaves us a little bit of room if we
need to make some adjustments.
There is a chart that is connected to each
one of these maps, which you might want to look at,
which really breaks down the population figuring
under a plan like this. We have Precinct 1 now with
10,694 people, and remember the ideal precinct size
would be 10,913. So 10,694 in Precinct 1. The
deviation is -2.01.
The population in Precinct 2, 11,041 means
that that deviation is 1.17, very close also to
zero, and then even better in Precincts 3 and 4 with
10,972 people in Precinct 3. That's a deviation of
.54 percent. That's less than one percent
deviation, and even closer to zero in Precinct 4
with 10,946, the deviation is .30 percent. So your
total deviation is 3,000 -- 3.18 percent, and that's
-- there are no prizes for getting all the way down
to zero, as I told a couple of the commissioners and
the Judge. They don't award prizes for that, but it
gives you a little bit of room if you need to adjust
certain lines, and as the Judge pointed out, we may
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
want to do some adjustment to accommodate offices
and other needs that the county might have.
But I'm happy to answer questions, Judge,
about any of this and --
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: Penny, let me
ask you one question with respect to the residents
of Justice of the Peace 2. Judge Wright, can you
tell us with certainty that you are still within
Precinct 2 by looking at this map?
JUDGE WRIGHT: Yes. Yes, I'm still
there.
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: Okay. Just
wanted to be sure.
JUDGE WRIGHT: And my office is too.
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: Just one of
the things we needed to make certain about.
MS. REDINGTON: It is not unusual to
have a little bit of a disconnect between the
justice residences and when you're trying to get the
commissioners' lines in balance, so we -- we just
work through that as we --
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: Good. Thank
you.
MS. REDINGTON: Just want everyone to
make -- just check their own residence, make sure
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ZO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
they know which precinct they're in at this point.
THE COURT: Does anyone have any
questions or comments or -- yes, sir? Identify
yourself, please, for the record, if you would.
MR. TENANT: My name is Bill Tenant.
I live in Precinct 1, but my question is, what's the
next step? What's the process now?
MS. REDINGTON: Well, the
commissioners' court will take some time to look at
this. They'll take some time to hear comments from
the public, maybe written suggestions of other plans
that they may want to consider. After that, when
they are comfortable with this, if we need to make
other adjustments, we can certainly do that for
them, and then they will hold a public hearing, and
after that public hearing, either at the same
meeting or later, they will adopt the plan.
At that time we will look at the impact on
election precincts and the adjustments that we would
need to make to election precinct boundaries to
comport with this new plan, and then we would
prepare a submission for the Justice Department in
which we present to them the changes that were made.
MR. TENANT: In Washington?
MS. REDINGTON: In Washington, D.C.,
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2?
29
2°
yes, and we explain to them the changes that were
made and why they were made. We demonstrate that we
have not violated the Voting Rights Act in any way,
and we ask them to give us what is called
preclearance to go forward and hold an election
under this plan.
MR. TENANT: Is there anything that
is going on in Austin that will change this?
MS. REDINGTON: Yes. We did discuss
this last time, and that's a very good question and
something that we need to be mindful of.
Unfortunately, not enough went on in Austin during
the regular session of the legislature. They did
not -- did not adopt a plan for their own
redistricting in their legislative boundaries or for
congressional lines and State Board of Education
lines, so we are -- we have a little bit of a vacuum
there. We are not sure what they will do.
Everything is now before the Legislative
Redistricting Board.
If they act, then we will -- and they
decide that they will take a line through Kerr
County, we will need to conform our election
precincts to that line. In other words, we can't --
if one of their lines came through and cut through
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2]
2i
2.
2~
2.
one of our election box precincts, we would need to
split that because you cannot have --
MR. TENANT: Split.
MS. REDINGTON: -- you cannot have
one of those lines that we're talking about cutting
through an election box so --
MR. TENANT: And if things go
reasonably well, are we looking at September or
something for final?
MS. REDINGTON: No. We would hope to
submit the request for preclearance to the Justice
Department by the -- I would say the first of
October, mid September to the first of October.
They have 60 days automatically to consider our
request for preclearance. Very often they will
request additional information and that gives them
another 60 days, so they have 120 days in which to
consider this and then act. We hope to hear back
from them in plenty of time, so that anyone wanting
to file for any office in 2002 would have ample
notice of their -- the new precinct lines.
MR. TENANT: Thank you.
MS. REDINGTON: Good questions. Any
other questions. Yes, ma'am?
MS. PIEPER: I'm Jannett Pieper,
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2~
29
2`
County Clerk. If we don't get the preclearance
approval by November 6th, do I go on with my normal
election precinct lines?
MS. REDINGTON: Yes, you do. That's
another very good question. You need to go
forward. Someone could attempt to enjoin the
election, because we did not have preclearance, but
we -- I don't anticipate a big problem, so -- but
you just need to go forward. In fact, State law
requires that the commissioners' court appoint
election judges in July, and that state law doesn't
fit very well with the Voting Rights Act
requirements,	and,	you	know	-- but we --	we just
attempt to do	this	the	best	we can. It'	s not a
perfect system. It doesn't always work logically,
but if you have -- if you look at this and you have
some ideas about how you want to change election
precincts, we can work with you in the next few
weeks to get some of that down on paper, and the
Court then would have an idea of where they would
maybe need to appoint different election judges or
something. It's all sort of happening at the same
time.
Yes, ma'am?
MS. BOLIN: I'm Diane Bolin, Deputy
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
29
2_
Voter Registrar. Down where you have 215 -- I'm
sorry -- Precinct 1 and 4 together at Denlu, the
little arch that comes up.
MS. REDINGTON: Here?
MS. BOLIN: Uh-huh.
MS. REDINGTON: That's Denlu7 That's
how you say it?
MS. BOLIN: Yes.
MS. REDINGTON: Okay.
MS. BOLIN: The current line was
drawn because those people have to go past three
different polling places to get to Ingram to vote,
so the ones that you have in blue now need to be put
back in the red.
MS. REDINGTON: Okay. I think that
that is a -- I think that's a split census block.
If you want to split a census block, we can do that.
MS. BOLIN: Uh-huh.
MS. REDINGTON: It's not a good
idea. It's not considered good practice, good
districting practice. We can do that, but we would
have to go out and on the ground count everyone,
figure out where the houses are located, get a head
count of -- actually not -- not voting age
population, but total population --
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
29
2`
MS. BOLIN: Right.
MS. REDINGTON: -- and then draw that
line sort of almost by hand. You can't do it on the
computer, and allocate those people to one precinct
or another.
MS. BOLIN: Okay. The problem that
we've had in the past with that is that with them
living there, they have to go all the way around
town into Ingram, which is about 40 miles for them,
and they actually do pass three polling places, and
that's why we moved them into that other precinct.
MS. REDINGTON: Well, there -- that
makes sense to me what you're saying. There are
many ways to handle something like that. You could
create a polling place for them.
MS. BOLIN: Okay. How big -- how big
would the census block maybe be in that area,
because most of that is just ranch land. There's
just a little division right there that probably has
35 to 40 people in it.
MS. REDINGTON: I can't say with
certainty, but I will tell you that if it is mostly
ranchland or very rural and rugged country --
MS. BOLIN: Uh-huh.
MS. REDINGTON: -- that census blocks
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2]
22
2.
2~
2`
tend to be much bigger
MS. BOLIN: Okay.
MS. REDINGTON: -- and irregular.
MS. BOLIN: Right.
MS. REDINGTON: And so we can look at
that.
MS. BOLIN: Okay.
MS. REDINGTON: And we'd be glad, if
you want to come to the office or something and sit
down with us and look at all of this on the
computer, it would help you.
MS. BOLIN: Right.
MS. REDINGTON: We'd be glad to do
that.
MS. BOLIN: Okay.
MS. RECTOR: I just wanted to make a
comment on that. That was --
THE COURT: Paula, Paula.
MS. RECTOR: I'm Paula Rector, the
County Tax Assessor/Collector. Excuse me. That was
one of the areas that we did apply to the Justice
Department last census to have that changed. There
was a lot of very unhappy people in that area, so
that's something we probably want to look at again.
MS. REDINGTON: Okay. We're happy to
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
24
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2?
29
2`
work with -- with the Court on that kind of thing.
THE COURT: I think Diane has the
practical solution is take a look at what it would
be if we just took that whole census block into
one. They're not talking about people, many
people. The irregularity would make more sense.
MS. REDINGTON: Yeah, because you may
just take it all into one and it -- we have a little
bit of room here --
THE COURT: We have some room there.
MS. REDINGTON: -- we can add some
people to one without having a problem, so that may
be the very simplest and best, and the simple
solutions are usually the best solutions.
MS. BOLIN: Okay.
MS. REDINGTON: I'll just make a note
of that because --
THE COURT: Any other questions or
comments? I'll remind everyone that the schedule
that the Court adopted was to cut off plans by June
the 30th. That is, if anyone out in the county
wants to present a plan, they'd have to present it
by June the 30th, and we'll have a public meeting,
actually a public hearing in July, and we're
targeting July 23rd at four o'clock in the afternoon
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2]
2:
2~
2~
2.
for that public hearing.
At that public hearing we'll take official
public testimony, and if there's no serious
objections to the plan that's on the table and
considered on July 23rd, we'll take action
immediately thereafter and adopt that plan on behalf
of the commissioners' court. We do intend to keep
the JP and constable lines the same as the
commissioners to avoid that disturbance among the
voters, and then hopefully we'll been in the
position to get the packet off to the Justice
Department for preclearance for the commissioners'
lines by early August. So that is the timeline that
we're operating on, and then we'll go back and work
on the voting precincts themselves.
Jannett Pieper, our County Clerk, has
talked to me about trying, if possible, not to
increase the number of voting precincts because of
the difficulties in getting judges and clerks for
the various elections. I'll just throw that out in
general.
Does anyone have any comments or concerns
about that issue. Diane?
MS. BOLIN: The only concern I would
have is that this is the mass mailout year in
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
it
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2~
2~
2`
December, and if we are going to change those, I
would really like to change them before I do my mass
mailout. I know that we've -- that some of the
precinct boundaries, before we get preclearance,
won't be able to change, but if we are actually
going to change voting box numbers, I would like to
get those done before I do the mass mailout to
prevent mailing a second set of cards.
THE COURT: Particularly out in the
west -- Wayne and Jack, I mean, those are huge
voting election precincts out there. Do you think
they work fairly well the way they are, or do we
need to look at those closer?
MR. PARKS: I think they're working
fairly well.
MS. REDINGTON: Judge, there may be
some situations where with these changes you can
actually eliminate a voting box or two. That
sometimes happens without it causing a lot of
inconvenience, especially in the more urban areas.
THE COURT: Justice Elliott?
JUDGE ELLIOTT: Vance Elliott. I
think that's -- just to echo your comment there
about Jannett's problem with the voting precinct,
that would be another argument why we would want to
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2?
29
2.
keep that block in Precinct 1 as opposed to -- I
think, there was -- one of the solutions that you
offered was it could be his own voting precinct in
4. Well, that would just create more problems and
more precincts and voting ballots as opposed to just
making that block into 1.
THE COURT: Anyone else? Any
questions or comments? A question I had for what
you said, Penny, was about the state board of
election lines. Are we not permitted to cross over
state board of election lines or commissioners or
voting election boxes?
MS. REDINGTON: Your commissioners'
lines can, but your voting box can't contain
territory from more than one State Board of
Education district or congressional district or
state legislative district.
THE COURT: Okay. Any other
questions or comments?
Well, thank you all for coming today. If
-- as you study them and think about the materials,
if you have any questions, I urge you to contact
either myself or the commissioner in your precinct.
We really are interested in working together to do
this right. This is probably the most fundamental
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
thing that government does is to provide the
opportunity to vote and vote equally, and if there
are any questions or concerns, please bring them
forward at your earliest opportunity so that we can
do this once.
As Diane and Paula had pointed out when
they redistricted in '90 and '91, they set up the
lines between 1 and 2 such that people out there had
to drive 40 miles to vote, and then we had to go
back subsequent to the initial preclearance and get
additional preclearance to change those lines so
that those people could exercise their franchise.
That's the kind of practical solution that
we're really relying on you all to bring to us so
that we -- we do it right and do it right the first
time. So I thank you again for coming out. We'll
be in touch.
Tentatively plan on July 23rd at four
o'clock for the formal public hearing. If there are
any plans that are presented by the public, we will
get those reproduced and sent out to you all so you
can have a chance to look at them and prepare
anything at all possible, and we are adjourned.
Thank you again.
(Hearing concluded at 10:39 a.m.)
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223
29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
STATE OF TEXAS X
COUNTY OF KENDALL X
I, Lisa C. Greenwalt, Deputy Official
Court Reporter in and for the County Court of Kerr
County, State of Texas, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing contains a true and correct
transcription of all portions of evidence and other
proceedings requested by counsel for the parties to
be included in this volume of the Reporter's Record,
in the above-styled and numbered cause, all of which
occurred in open court or in chambers and were
reported by me.
I further certify that this Reporter's
Record of the proceedings truly and correctly
reflects the exhibits, if any, admitted by the
respective parties.
I further certify that the total cost for
the preparation of this Reporter's Record i-sy-$ ~/'~
and was paid/ will b paid by n~
WITNESS MY OFFICIAL HAND this the ~ '~
day of Z~ , 2001.
LISA C. GREENWALT, ;£~ ~~g7 `•,. •_
Expiration Date: ~~/~]./p/ ~1 ~_ ~*
Greenwalt Court Reprsr~i~/ o
P.O. Box 294191 ; ~' ." ' r
Kerrville, Texas 7$,~2¢»}419.`° -
(830) 537-4223
,.,
,...-- ,
GREENWALT COURT REPORTING
(830) 537-4223