COMMISSIONERS' COURT AGENDA REQUEST PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND NINE COPIES OF THIS REQUEST AND DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE COURT. MADE BY: Fred He OFFICE: MEETING DATE: Au st 13 2001 SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC) County Judge TIME PREFERRED: Consider and discuss creation of committee or working group to develop a Kerr County Economic Development Program for adoption by Commissioners' Court. EXECUTIVE SESSION REQUESTED: (PLEASE STATE REASON) NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT: ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION: IF PERSONNEL MATTER -NAME OF EMPLOYEE: Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter is posted in accordance with Title 5, Chapter SS I and 552, Government Code, is as follows: Meeting scheduled for Mondays: THIS REQUEST RECEIVED BY: THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON: All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine if adequate information has been prepazed for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of Court Meetings. Your cooperation will be appreciated and contribute towazds you request being addressed at the eazliest opportunity. See Agenda Request Rules Adopted by Commissioners' Court. 5:00 P.M. previous Tuesday. County Judge DATE: 3 AUGUST 2001 TO: FRED HENNEKE, KERR COUNTY JUDGE FROM: TRAVIS LUCAS, ASSISTANT KERR COUNTY ATTORNEY RE: DOES THE COUNTY HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT WITH KEDF IF THE COUNTY CREATES A LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM? Answer: The county is legally authorized to contract with KEDF if the county creates an "economic development program° authorized under the Texas Local Government Code. Reason: The key to doing this is set forth in Texas Local Government Code Section 381.004 (see statute enclosed). Essentially, this statute provides authority for a county to contract with "another entity" (which is defined in the statute - TX.LOC.GOV. 381.004(a)(1)) as long as the county has created an "economic development program° pursuant to the Texas Local Government Code. Interestingly, TX.LOC.GOV. 381.004(b) suggests that the "economic development program° could be a generic one. In other words, the program could be something other than an Industrial Commission or Board of Development (programs the local government code specifically set forth); it could be a program that is dreamed up by the commissioners court. Texas Attorney General Opinion No. 98-007 is critical to understanding the law in this area (see A.G. Opinion enclosed). Essentially, it states that the only way counties can contract with other entities regarding economic development is if the county has initiated the economic development program. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (d) This section dues ncrt authorize a commissioners court to exercise any ordinance-making authority not otherwise specificallp~ granted by state law. Att, ]987, 50th Leg.. ch. 149, h 1, eff. Sept. 1. 19Ri. tlmend- ed by Acts 1591. 72nd Leg., ch. 14Q § ], etT. Aug. 2ri. 1991: Act, 1547. 55th Leg., ch. NSft, S 3, eft. June 15, ]995- ~4E [!-S.C.d. C 3301 e1 seq. ""1p LL~LA. 4 Lint et seq. § 3R1.011~1. Community and Economic Develop- ment Yrngrams in Certain Counties la) ]n this section: (U "Another entity" includes the federal govern- ment, the State of Texas, a municipality, school or other special distict, finance corpm•atioq institution of higher nducation, charitable or nonprofit organi- zation, foundation, board, council, commission, or any other person. (21 °Minority" includes blacks, Hispanics, Asian Americans, American Indians, and Alaska natives. (3) °fviinoritp business" means a business con- cern, more than 50 percent of which is owned and controlled in management and drily operations by members of one or rnm~e minoti&es. (4) "Women-owned business" means a business concern, more than 50 percent of which is owned and cont-olled in management and daily operations h ~ our m' more tvumen. (b) To stimulate business and commercral activity In a county, the commissioners court of the county may develop and administe a ro ram: (1) fur state m~ local economic development: (2) fur small m~ disadvantaged business develop- ment; (3) to stimulate, encourage, and develop business location and commercial activity in the county; or (4) to improve Che extent to which women and minority businesses are awarded county contacts. (c) he commissioners court rnay: (]) contract tiith another entity fur the adminis- tration of Lhe program; (2) authorize the program to be administered on the basis of counts commissioner precincts; (:3) use county employees or funds fur the pro- gram; and (4) accept contributions, gifts, or other resow-sec to develo ~ and administer the program. (d) A rog'ram established under this section ~m~a~ be deli ed to rnasonably increase participat.ir>n- 6y minority ant tromenawned busme~ses in public con- 4§ 3RZ.U:31 to 882.038 Expired tract awm-ds by the counq~ by establishing a contract percentage goal fur those businesses. (e) The legislator tnay appropriate unclaimed mon- ey the comptroller receives under Chapter St, Fropnr- tv Codn, for a counh~ to use in carrydng out a program established tinder this section. To receice money for that pw-pose for au}~ fiscal year, the county must request the mono' for that fiscal year. The amount a emmR' may receice under this subsection fw• a fiscal year may not exceed an amount equal to the value of the capital credits the comptroller receives 6-om an electric cooperative corporation on behalf of the corpo- ration's members in the county eequesting the money less xn amount sufficient to pay anticipated expenses and claims. The comptoller shall transfer money iu response to a request after deducting the amount the comptroller determines to be sufficient to pay antici- pated expenses and claims. Added by Acts 15F9. 71~t Leg., ct:. lOnO, § 3. e[1'. Aug. 2$ 1989. Amended be Ac[s 1997, 7:Sth Leg., ch. 1087. 3 R, eff. Sept. ].1997. CHAYTF.R 382. COUNTY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES I EXY[RED 1 SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAI. PROVISIONS ~§ 382.001 to 382.0113. Expired C hnpter aR?. relating to rounp' re=earth and decelnpmem airthori- ties, tsi iced under tlu terms of § ;`~ Jli~ ~chieh pt 'idta P. "This chapter espu ' 'n Septernh ~ 1 1)5a, unl teauthurized by the It~(klature heCm~e hs expiration dete_ L( [hlr chapter is oat reuuthnrizcd by the legislanme, each aulhnritc rrealtid tinder this chapter shall he abolished on Septkmher 1. 1'1!r,. by the cnuutc or cnuntics that eatahlishrJ the authmi[c. Ha~raccr, it an autbm'ih' has b~nda ~,ut=omdinp a- nl' Sepmmhw~ L RYAS. the am h~nitc shall ran[imic ~o operate uuM1l all bonds mrtnandiug .:s of Ihat date have been paid :md dischergeJ:' SUBCHAPTER B. CREATION OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ~4 382.011 to 382.(115. Expired ('hapter 3N'L, relating to county research and detelupment authori- ties. espn'ed under the terms of 4 3H'L0T?, u'hldt prncided. "'this chapter eapires ou Ceptember 1, 1911.1, wiles reauthorized by the Icgixl:mn'e hc0 n'e its expiration date. If thin chap) er i= not anthmived by the IegiJa[un•, each authm9h' treat nd under this chapter shall Le abnfisbed on Scptemher ]. IA!Li, hg the euunh' or counties that esGhlished the authurih. Hmvecer, i(an authurit7 has bands nutsuu¢Iing as ~,1' irp¢•mher 1, IIIAF. the authn:'itr shall euntinue in ~~parate until all h~~ndd nuntanding as of that date have been paid and due hargnl... SUBCHM'ER C. POWERS OF AUTHORITY 4S 3R'L.031 to 38'?.038. Expired (haitu BA'_-:'elaY:tit •nunh:t.e~airh end le-,-0upnv=nt. authori~ ties. expir I undo tht tai is ul p s2 n ", schicl: provided- S89 Morales Letter Opinion No. 98-007 ~~~=per F ~ •:~^ e .^"• '~ u M ~. ~-. •~'Ex `'~ Office of the Attorney General State of Texas February 13, 1998 The Honorable Joe F. Grubbs 'Letter Opinion No. 98-007 Ellis County and District Attorney Ellis County Courthouse Waxahachie, Texas 75165-3759 Dear Mr. Grubbs: Re: Whether Local Government Code section 381.004 authorizes a commissioners court to provide funds to a small business development center (RQ-960) You ask whether Local Government Code section 381.004 authorizes a commissioners court to provide funds to a small business development center. We conclude that section 381.004 does no authorize a mmissioners court to appropriate funds to a proeram that wasrnort evelooe the county_and is not administered either by the county or by another entity un er contract with the county. Chapter 381 of the Local Government Code sets forth various mechanisms by which a commissioners court may promote economic development in the county. You inform us that the commissioners court in your county has not appointed a county industrial commi si n pursuant to section 381.001 or created a board of de~vel~opme~nt under section 381.002. You do not indicate that the small business eves -Iopment center is a community and economic develo ment ro'ect authorized under federal aw or purposes o section 381.003. Therefore, we do not address those provisions. Your inquiry focuses on section 381.004, which provides in pertinent part as follows: (b) To stimulate business and commercial activity in a county, the commissioners court of the county may develop and administer a~rogram: (1) for state or local economic development; Page 1 of 4 http://www.oag.state.tx.us/opinopen/opinions/1o48morales/1o98-007.htm 5/9/2001 Morales Letter Opinion No. 98-007 Page 2 of 4 (2) for small or disadvantaged business development; (3) to stimulate, encourage, and develop business location and commercial activity in the county; or (4) to improve the extent to which women and minority businesses aze awarded county contracts. (c) The commissioners court may: (1) contract with another entity for the administration of the program; (2) authorize the program to be administered on the basis of county commissioner precincts; (3) use county employees or funds for the program; and (4) accept contributions, gifts, or other resources to develop and administer the program. Local Gov't Code § 381.004 (emphasis added). For purposes of section 381.004, "another entity" includes "the federal government, the State of Texas, a municipality, school or other special district, finance corporation, institution of higher education, charitable or nonprofit organization, foundation, board, council, commission, or any other person." Id. § 381.004(a)(1). Information included with your request states that "Small Business Development Centers aze located throughout the United States, operated under a cooperative agreement among Universities, Community Colleges and the Small Business Administration. The Navarro Center is a unit of the North Texas Network, governed by the fiduciary agent, Dallas County Community College District... . The Navarro Center Personnel are employees of Navarro College...." Subsectio (b) f section 381.004 authorizes a commissioners court to "develop and admrmster a pro am" to stimulate business and commercial activity in the county. Subsectio (c) uthorizes a county to contract with another entity to administer the prog and to use county funds for the program. Based on the language of these rovisions~'we believe he u ose of section 381,004 is to authorize count initiated coun sed ro rams. The -anguage in subsection (c)(1) authorizing a county to contract with another entity to administer a program is cleazly limited to a program``~~uthorized by subsection (b), that is a program that the county has developed~We do not believe that a county's /+ . authority to contract for the administration of a program permits a county to, l~/~M~ subsidize a program develo ed and administered b another emit In sum, we conc u e t at section 381.004 authorizes a county to firnd a program dev^ elo~d by the county and administered either by the county or by another entity under contract with the county does not authorize a county to provide funds to an~ other program. http://www.oag.state.tx.us/opinopen/opinions/1o48morales/1o98-007.htm 5/9/2001 Morales Letter Opinion No. 98-007 From the information you have provided, it appears that the small bus_ i` new, development center at issue is not a program developed by the county and ~o.~, : ~ administered either by the county or another entity under contract with the C • t~.p'SN99es~S county. For this reason, we do not believe that section 381.004 authorizes the ~.ox commissioners court to appropriate funds to the center. We do not address ~ A ~ whether the expenditure you describe is authorized under any other law. .w~~ a „a,-fy381•~li SUMMARY j¢I•oo2~~~'~ r o • Local Government Code section 381.004 does not authorize a commissioners court to appropriate funds to a small business development program that was not developed by the county and is not administered either by the county or by another entity under contract with the county. Yours very truly, Mary R. Grouter Assistant Attorney General Opinion Committee Footnotes 1. Because we conclude that section 381.004 is inapplicable to the situation you describe, we need not address your questions about its constitutionality. This office has not yet addressed whether section 381.004 was enacted to implement Texas Constitution article III, section 52-a. See Letter Opinion No. 96-035 (1996) at 2 n.2; see also Attorney General Opinion DM-185 (1992) (concluding that Local Govemment Code section 380.001, a similar statute applicable to cities, implements article III, section 52-a). We note, however, that this office has stated that article III, section 52-a does not alter certain constitutional limitations applicable to use of public funds. See Attorney General Opinion JM- 1255 (1990) at 8-9 ("[T]here is no language in either section 52-a or in the relevant commentary to suggest that the amendment was intended to change the requirements that public resources and powers be used for 'the direct accomplishment of a public purpose' and that transactions using such resources and powers contain sufficient controls 'to insure that the public purpose be carried out.' ... It merely adds to the purposes for which the legislature may authorize the loan or grant of public funds."). Texas OAG home oase ~ Opinions & Open Government Page 3 of 4 http://www.oag.state.tx.us/opinopen/opinions/1o48morales/1o98-007.htm 5/9/2001 Morales Letter Opinion No. 98-007 Page 4 of 4 http://www.oag.state.tx.us/opinopen/opinions/1o48morales/1o98-007.htm 5/9/2001