ORDER N0. X7890
AF'F'ROVRL OF REFUND TO AMERIF'RRI'. KERRVILLE CORP.
F'ER AGREED JUDGMENT
On this the 9th day of December, EQQ~c, upon motion made by
Commissioner Let z, seconded by Commissioner Baldwin, the Caurt
unanimously approved by a vote of 4-0-0, of r•ef~and to
Ameripark Kerrville Cor-poration per Agreed J~_idgment in the
amount of X59, 88:. E'3.
COMMISSIONERS' COURT AGENDA REQUEST
~~~,~~%~
PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND NINE COPIES OF THIS REQUEST AND DOCUMENTS TO BE
REVIEWED BY THE COURT.
MADE BY: Paula Rector OFFICE: Tax Assessor-Collector
MEETING DATE: Dec ._ 9 , 2 0 0 2 TIME PREFERRED:
SUBJECT: (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC)
Approval of refund to Ameripark Kerrville Corp. per Agreed Judgement.
EXECUTIVE SESSION REQUESTED: (PLEASE STATE REASON)
NAME-OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT:
ESTIIvIATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION:
IF PERSONNEL MATTER -NAME OF EMPLOYEE:
Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter is posted in accordance with Title 5, Chapter
551 and 552, Government Code, is as follows:
Meeting scheduled for Mondays:
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED BY:
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON:
5:00 P.M. previous Tuesday.

All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine if adequate information has been
prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of Court Meetings. Your cooperation will be
appreciated and contribute towazds you request being addressed at the earliest opportunity. See Agenda Request Rules
Adopted by Commissioners' Court.
~a,u.~,a ~,ec~oti
Assessor and Collector of Taxes
County of Kerr
Kerrville, Texas 78028
Phone (830) 792-2242
Fax (830) 792.2253
November 22, 2002
Kerr County
Re:Ageed Judgement
In the lawsuit styled Ameripark Kerrville Corp. vs. Ken• Central Appraisal District and
Kerr County Appraisal Review Board, Cause No. 01-6564A and No. 01-558A, a
settlement was reached between the two parties on dispute of value for tax years 99-2002
as set out in the Ageed Judgement. A refund was calculated based on the agreed value
and includes applicable statutory interest recoverable under Section 42.43 of the Texas
Property Tax Code. Parties ageed refunds would not be given as credit against payment
of the 2002 taxes on subject property. Refunds from entities involved should be made as
quickly as possible to avoid any further accrual of interest.
Refund amount is attached and should be mailed to: Ameripark Kerrville Corp., 175
Bloor Street East, South Tower #601, Toronto, Ontario M4W3R8.
If you have any question regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact me.
Si e ly, ~~
Paula Rector,RTA
Tax Assessor-Collector
Kerr County
Kerr County
Acct # Orig Value Agreed Value Orig Tax Pd
R47157
1999 15,279,321 10,190,290 47,992.35
2000 15,279,321 10,223,650 50,406.48
2001 15,279,169 10,868,730 53,278.46
Total
R47158
1999	179,031	119,410	562	.34
2000	179,031	119,793	590	.62
2001	179,031	127,360	624	.28
Total				
R26152				
1999	30,438	20,300	95	.61
2000	30,438	20,367	100	.42
2001	30,438	21,655	106	.14
Total				
P48115
2000 60,974 40,800 201.15
2001 60,974 43,373 212.62
Total
P62207
2000 82,776 55,390 273.08
2001 82,776 58,882 288.64
Total
Adjusted Tax Diff
32,007.70 15,984.65
33,727.82 16,678.66
37,599.26 15,379.20
Int
3,612.53
1,556.11
921.82
6,090.46
Refund
19,597.18
18,234.77
16,301.02
54,132.97
375.06	187.28	42.43	229.71
395.19	195.43	18.23	213.66
444.10	180.18	10.79	190.97
		71.45	634.34
63.76	31.85	7.21	39.06
67.19	33.23	3.10	36.33
75.51	30.63	1.83	32.46
		12.14	107.85
134.59	66.56
151.24	61.38
182.73	90.35
205.32	83.32
Total Refund
6.21 72.77
3.68 65.06
9.89 137.83
8.43 98.78
4.99 88.31
13.42 187.09
$55,200.08
Lateral Rd's
Acct #	Orig Value	Agreed Value	Orig Tax Pd	Adjusted Tax	Diff	Int	Refund
R47157							
1999	15,279,321	10,190,290	5,683.91	3,790.78	1,893.13	427.84	2,320.97
2000	15,279,321	10,223,650	3,269.77	2,187.86	1,081.91	100.94	1,182.85
2001	15,279,169	10,868,730	3,575.33	2,543.28	1,032.05	61.86	1,093.91
Total						590.64	4,597.73
R47158							
1999	179,031	119,410	66.60	44.42	22.18	5.02	27.20
2000	179,031	119,793	38.31	25.63	12.68	1.18	13.86
2001	179,031	127,360	41.89	29.80	12.09	0.72	12.81
Total						6.92	53.87
R26152							
1999	30,438	20,300	11.32	7.55	3.77	0.85	4.62
2000	30,438	20,367	6.51	4.35	2.16	0.20	2.36
2001	30,438	21,655	7.12	5.06	2.06	0.12	2.18
Total						1.17	9.16
P48115							
2000	60,974	40,800	13.05	8.73	4.32	0.40	4.72
2001	60,974	43,373	14.27	10.14	4.13	0.25	4.38
Total						0.65	9.10
P62207							
2000	82,776	55,390	17.71	11.85	5.86	0.55	6.41
2001	82,776	58,882	19.37	13.77	5.60	0.34	5.94
Total						0.89	12.35
					Total Refund		$ 4,682.21
~;~ ~
NO. 01-654-A G~
AMERIPARK KERRVILLE CORP. § IN E D TRICT COURT
VS. § KERB COUNTY, TEXAS
KERB CENTRAL APPRAISAL § 216TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
DISTRICT and KERB COUNTY §
APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD §
AGREED JUDGMENT
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
Now come Ameripark Kerrville Corp. , Plantiff, and the Kerr Central Appraisal District,
et al., Defendants in the above-styled and numbered cause of action and hereby announce to the
Court that they desire to resolve and settle the matters in controversy, and avoid the trouble,
expense and uncertainty of litigation, and have reached an agreement to that effect. Having
heard these announcements and reviewed the evidence and arguments of counsel, the Court is
of the opinion that such terms and conditions are well taken and should form the basis of
judgment.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the following
stipulations are agreed by the parties and entered by the Court as its judgment.
1. The undersigned parties agree and stipulate that bona fide disputes and controversies
exist between the parties concerning the market or appraised value of the subject property.
These stipulations are entered into by the parties solely for the purpose of compromising and
1
settling their various claims, each as to the other. No other use of this Stipulation may be made
by the parties hereto as concerns the claim of either party as to the other, whether having arisen
in the past, now pending, or to arise in the future, including, without limitation, subsequent
disputes as to the market or appraised value of the subject property within Defendants' appraisal
jurisdiction in any subsequent years. This agreement is not intended by either party as an
admission of the market value of the subject property, nor shall same be represented by either
party as to the other, as an admission. Further, the existence, terms, and contents of this
Agreed Judgment shall not be admissible in any judicial or administrative proceeding as against
either party except as may be necessary to enforce the terms and conditions of said judgment,
either party as to the other.
2. Pursuant to §42.41 of the Texas Property Tax Code Defendant Kerr Central Appraisal
District, et al. shall revise the appraisal rolls as necessary for tax year 1999 to reflect that the
market value of the property described in Plaintiff's Original Petition is as follows:
CAD Account No.
R47157
R47158
R26152
Total
1999 Agreed Value
$10,190,290
$ 119,410
$ 20,300
$10.330.000
3. The undersigned parties shall, as soon as possible following execution of this
agreement, do, or cause their attorneys to do, whatever is reasonably necessary to effect this
2
agreement, including compliance with the provisions of Sections 42.41 through 42.43 of the
Texas Tax Code.
4. All costs and attorney fees are to be borne by the party incurring same.
5. All other relief not specifically granted herein is denied.
Signed this ~ day of / y J U , 2002.
J GE SIDIN
3
NOU 14 '02 15 31 FR POPP IKARD 512 479 8013 TO 4766685 P.(d9i09
.~, .., ~., ~.._ ,~,.-~~ ~u~+i~,~~~w Lww u~ ~ 14L-/ rHUk 1C/117
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND SCTSSTANCE:
Raymond R. C3ny
State Hax No. 08328250
Mark Hutcheson
State Bar No. 00796805
Popp & Ikard
402 West 7th Street
Austin, TX 78701
512-373-2661
(fax) 512-479-8013

FOR PL.AIIVTIFF
>3y: e
Peter William Low
State Isar No, 12619300
3305 Northland JJxive
Suitc 500
Austin, Texas 78731
512_,02-34AR
(fax) 512-476-6685
ATTORNEX FOR DEFENDANTS
4
~,~ ~
NO. 01-558-A
AMERIPARK KERRVILLE CORP.	§
	
	
VS.	§
	
	
KERB CENTRAL APPRAISAL	§
DISTRICT	
AGREED JUDGMENT
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
IN T DI RICT COURT
KERB COUNTY, TEXAS
216TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Now come Ameripazk Kerrville Corp., Plantiff, and the Ken Central Appraisal District,
Defendant in the above-styled and numbered cause of action and hereby announce to the Court
that they desire to resolve and settle the matters in controversy, and avoid the trouble, expense
and uncertainty of litigation, and have reached an agreement to that effect. Having heard these
announcements and reviewed the evidence and arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion
that such terms and conditions are well taken and should form the basis of judgment.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the following
stipulations are agreed by the parties and entered by the Court as its judgment.
1. The undersigned parties agree and stipulate that bona fide disputes and controversies
exist between the parties concerning the market or appraised value of the subject property.
These stipulations are entered into by the parties solely for the purpose of compromising and
settling their vazious claims, each as to the other. No other use of this Stipulation may be made
by the parties hereto as concerns the claim of either party as to the other, whether having arisen
I
in the past, now pending, or to arise in the future, including, without limitation, subsequent
disputes as to the market or appraised value of the subject property within Defendants' appraisal
jurisdiction in any subsequent years. This agreement is not intended by either party as an
admission of the market value of the subject property, nor shall same be represented by either
party as to the other, as an admission. Further, the existence, terms, and contents of this
Agreed Judgment shall not be admissible in any judicial or administrative proceeding as against
either party except as may be necessary to enforce the terms and conditions of said judgment,
either party as to the other.
2. Pursuant to §42.41 of the Texas Property Tax Code Defendant Kerr Central Appraisal
District shall revise the appraisal rolls as necessary for tax years 2000, 2001, and 2002 to reflect
that the market value of the property described in Plaintiff's Original Petition is as follows:
CAD Account No. 2000 Agreed Value 2001 Agreed Value 2002 Agreed Value
R47157 $10,223,650 $10,868,730 $10,868,730
R47158 $ 119,793
R26152 $ 20,367
P62207 $ 55,390
P48115 $ 40,800
Total $10.460.000
$ 127,360
$ 21,655
$ 58,882
$ 43,373
$11.120.000
$ 127,360
$ 21,655
$ 58,882
$ 43,373
$11.120.000
3. The undersigned parties shall, as soon as possible following execution of this
agreement, do, or cause their attorneys to do, whatever is reasonably necessary to effect this
2
agreement, including compliance with the provisions of Sections 42.41 through 42.43 of the
Texas Tax Code.
4. All costs and attorney fees are to be borne by the party incurring same.
5. All other relief not specifically granted herein is denied.
Signed this ~ day of ~ v =' U ' , 2002.
PRESIDING
3
NOV 14 '02 15 31 FR PDPP IKFIRD 512 479 8013 TO 4766685 P.BSi09
i1/li/G17b~ 1G70y S1LA /bbbFib LAW Uf-F'1CES PaGE 06/10
APPROVED AS TO FORM ANA SUBSTANCE:
Raymond R. Gray U ~_
State Bar No. 08328250
1Vlatk Hutcheson
State Baz No. 00796805
Popp 8t Ikard
402 West 7th Street
Austin, 7'X 78701
512-473-2661
(fax) 512-479-8013
FOR PLAIlVTI~'F
,~ ~~~'~
Fetcr William 'Low
State Bar No. 126I9300
3305 Northland Arive
Suite 500
Austin, Texas 78731
512-302-3403
(fax) 512-476-6685
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
4