1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ~' 2 4 25 KERR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT Emergency Session Friday, September 3, 2004 8:45 a.m. Commissioners' Courtroom Kerr County Courthouse Kerrville, Texas PRESENT: PAT TINLEY, Kerr County Judge H.A. "BUSTER" BALDWIN, Commissioner Pct. 1 WILLIAM "BILL" WILLIAMS, Commissioner Pct. 2 JONATHAN LETZ, Commissioner Pct. 3 DAVE NICHOLSON, Commissioner Pct. 4 ~- O ~` 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I N D E X September 3, 2004 PAGE 1.1 Consider, discuss, and accept "Certification of Unopposed Candidates" and issue an Order declaring the General Election Cancelled and the unopposed candidates elected 3 1.2 Consider and discuss ordering the General Election as required by Section 3.004 and 3.005, Texas Election Code -- --- Adjourned 12 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 On Friday, September 3, 2004, at 8:45 a.m., an emergency meeting of the Kerr County Commissioners Court was held in the Commissioners' Courtroom, Kerr County Courthouse, Kerrville, Texas, and the following proceedings were had in open court: P R O C E E D I N G S (Commissioner Letz not present.) JUDGE TINLEY: Let me call to order the special emergency Commissioners Court meeting posted for this time and date, Friday, September 3, 2004, at 8:45 a.m. There were a couple of matters that had a very, very short fuse that were called to the attention of the Court yesterday which required this meeting to be posted, relative to upcoming election matters. And, at this point, Item 1 is consider, discuss, and accept certification of unopposed candidates, and issue an order declaring the general election canceled and the unopposed candidates elected. Ms. Pieper, can you enlighten us on that, please? MS. PIEPER: Yes, sir. This is a new law that came into effect last legislative session, and their methods are correct, but their procedures are wrong. So, this is just -- we're going to have to go back and get this bill corrected, because the law requires that y'all order an election. However, with the law, the Unopposed Candidates section, the law is as long as I fill out this form and file it, then that automatically cancels the election. Anyway, 9-3-04 emg 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 so it's kind of odd. I talked to the Secretary of the State yesterday, and -- and said I'm going to go ahead and present mine to the Commissioners; I feel it should be their decision and not mine. If we do this -- if y'all do an order declaring the election canceled and the unopposed candidates elected, that is just for the local candidates only. And their names will still go on the ballot, but there just will not be an oval for the voter to mark in that candidate. COMMISSIONER BALDWIN: Would there be -- would their names be in each precinct? MS. PIEPER: Yes. COMMISSIONER BALDWIN: We're not talking about grouping them on a separate page or anything like that? MS. PIEPER: At the bottom -- well, you start out with a particular ballot order, with the president and so forth down, and then the local candidates will be below that. And -- and beside their name with their office, it will have, "Unopposed candidate declared elected." So, the name is still on the ballot; the voters will still see it. JUDGE TINLEY: What fiscal or administrative advantage do we gain by doing this? MS. PIEPER: We will be able to save money by doing this. 9-3-04 emg 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 "' 2 4 25 JUDGE TINLEY: That's a fiscal advantage. And what -- in what manner do we -- do we gain that? MS. PIEPER: Well, because, rather than a precinct name -- Commissioner Baldwin, instead of his name going just on Precinct 1 ballots, he will go on every ballot for every precinct, because I don't have to do what they call formats, and make sure his just goes on Precinct 1 ballots. Therefore, when they are printing the ballots and programming our chips for our machine, they don't have to go in and key four different ones. JUDGE TINLEY: So we save in programming costs for how they format the machine that counts the ballots and so forth? MS. PIEPER: Plus the printing cost, because they don't have to set up four different ballot styles on that as well. JUDGE TINLEY: Okay. You may want to move back to Precinct 4. COMMISSIONER BALDWIN: No. I'm going to try to get -- do you have any control? Can you get my name on the Bandera ballot? (Laughter.) MS. PIEPER: No, just Kerr County. COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: Do you believe that this will, perhaps, cause confusion for voters? MS. PIEPER: No. Most of the voters, their 9-3-04 emg 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 comments -- COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: In my precinct, if he's on the ballot, it's going to cause confusion. MS. PIEPER: No, it's going to state what his office is. COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: I understand. MS. PIEPER: And then most of the voters, when they do comment -- not all of them do, but when they do comment, they will ask me, "Do I have to mark this?" They're unopposed; they're going to win anyway. COMMISSIONER NICHOLSON: So, when I go to vote in November, I'm going to get a ballot, and it's not going to have the Sheriff on there as a candidate, or Rex Emerson as a candidate? MS. PIEPER: It will have them on there. COMMISSIONER NICHOLSON: Or Bob Terrill? MS. PIEPER: It will have them on there. There just will not be an oval. There will be a clause right before that that these have been declared -- those that's unopposed candidates have been declared elected. COMMISSIONER NICHOLSON: What do you think of that, Bob? MR. TERRILL: It's certainly just all a new concept to me, and I haven't -- I'm digesting. I prefer -- I would prefer -- if I were having a long career in the 9-3-04 emg 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 office or something like that, I'd kind of prefer to have people actually see it and consider it. But I don't know what the difference in cost is or how much that would outweigh the savings, but having the name where it's -- someone actually has to look at it and consider that name on the -- on the ballot. COMMISSIONER NICHOLSON: So, my choice -- if we don't do that, my choice would be just to not vote for you; to leave -- I could leave that blank, and you would get fewer votes than some other candidates, so that there is a -- there is a vote-counting implication to not having the oval there to check. Same with the Sheriff or Commissioner Baldwin. SHERIFF HIERHOLZER: Yeah. It's -- in talking to Jannett about it, as long as the names are on there and they're unopposed, I agree. And if it has out there what office and, "Unopposed, declared elected," wouldn't it save a lot on the tabulations? Even though it's -- MS. PIEPER: It will. SHERIFF HIERHOLZER: On reading that, 'cause you don't have any of those local ones that you have to actually, like they do every year, come in here and give the count for. All you're going to have is your other ones, but yet the local candidate's still on the ballot. So, it 9-3-04 emg 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 may -- besides the printing cost, and all the ballots can look identical throughout the county. And then the -- MS. PIEPER: Right. And we use the three-ply NCR paper, and so when we're printing out all of our reports, our reports will be shorter. COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: You're satisfied this -- you're satisfied this satisfies the letter and spirit of the law? MS. PIEPER: Yes. COMMISSIONER NICHOLSON: W write-in declarations? Is there a cutoff MS. PIEPER: September the (Commissioner Letz entered MS. PIEPER: September 8th will have to certify to me that there are believe the 2nd is actually the deadline. at my calendar. gat is the law on time? 8th, I believe. the courtroom.) is when the Judge no write-in -- I I'd have to look COMMISSIONER NICHOLSON: But, beyond a certain date, if someone decides to run against an unopposed candidate, it's too late? MS. PIEPER: Right, exactly. But, however, should one file, then that would go on the ballot as such, as long as they're filing in a timely manner. COMMISSIONER BALDWIN: What do you want, an order? 9-3-09 emg 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MS. PIEPER: Yes, an order declaring the general election canceled and the unopposed candidates elected. COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: Jannett, the general election for local candidates? MS. PIEPER: For local candidates, right. Because the governor is the one that calls the election for the state and federal, presidential. COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: I don't want there to be any confusion that the national election is canceled. MS. PIEPER: No. No. We will still have an election here. COMMISSIONER NICHOLSON: Commissioner, these names will appear on the ballot as elected. COMMISSIONER LETZ: Right. COMMISSIONER NICHOLSON: You already knew that, okay. COMMISSIONER BALDWIN: I'd like to make a motion, whatever the -- the verbiage that the Clerk has chosen. Do you want to repeat it so we can plug it into my motion? MS. PIEPER: Issue an order declaring the general election for Kerr County local candidates canceled, and the unopposed candidates elected. COMMISSIONER BALDWIN: That's my motion. 9-3-09 emg 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: I'll second it. JUDGE TINLEY: Motion made and seconded, as stated. Any further questions or discussion? All in favor of the motion, signify by raising your right hand. (The motion carried by unanimous vote.) JUDGE TINLEY: All opposed, same sign. (No response.) JUDGE TINLEY: That motion does carry. COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: Congratulations. COMMISSIONER BALDWIN: Thank you very much. Do I get any votes or not? (Laughter.) COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: No, you win zero to zero. COMMISSIONER NICHOLSON: If September 8th is the deadline, there may still be somebody. MS. PIEPER: Okay. Judge, we can pull the next item, then. JUDGE TINLEY: The next agenda item is to consider and discuss ordering the general election, as required by Section 3.004 and 3.005 of the Texas Election Code. MS. PIEPER: So that item can be pulled, because we're not going to order the election. We just canceled it. COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: Okay. That was easy. 9-3-04 emg 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 """ 2 4 25 JUDGE TINLEY: Okay. COMMISSIONER LETZ: I have a question, which you could probably answer. How much money does this save? MS. PIEPER: I haven't completely figured it up, but as we were speaking earlier, it's going to save on what they call ballot styles, because your name will go on every ballot, not just Precinct 3. It will also save money on programming of the chips, and then it will save money on our reports that we do. We have that three-ply NCR paper, which is real expensive, and our reports won't be near as long. COMMISSIONER LETZ: Okay. JUDGE TINLEY: So, what you're telling me is, by virtue of our action on Number 1, you don't need Item Number 2 considered? MS. PIEPER: That is correct. JUDGE TINLEY: All right. MS. PIEPER: And, gentlemen, just for your information, I am also contracting with Headwaters, so they're going to pick up probably $2,500 or $3,000 of our election expense, and that money will be placed in a separate line item for election equipment. COMMISSIONER LETZ: Have they -- you don't handle who -- isn't their filing deadline over? MS. PIEPER: Yes, the filing deadline was 9-3-09 emg 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 over yesterday at 5 p.m. COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: Four candidates out of Precinct 2. JUDGE TINLEY: Anything else, gentlemen? This meeting will stand adjourned. (Commissioners Court adjourned at 8:59 a.m.) STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF KERR I The above and foregoing is a true and complete transcription of my stenotype notes taken in my capacity as County Clerk of the Commissioners Court of Kerr County, Texas, at the time and place heretofore set forth. DATED at Kerrville, Texas, this 3rd day of September, 2004. Certified Shorthand Reporter JANNETT PIEPER, Kerr County Clerk B Y : _ _ __ ~ r`~~i~i'Z ___ Kathy Ba ik, Deputy County Clerk 9-3-04 emg ORDER NO. 28788 ELECTION CANCELLED UNOPPOSED CANDIDATES ELECTED Came to be heard this the 3`d day of September 2004 with a motion made by Commissioner Baldwin, Seconded by Commissioner Williams, the Court unanimously approved by a vote of 4-0-0 to accept the Certificate of Unopposed Candidates and declare the election cancelled with each name printed as such on the ballot.