I COMMISSIONERS' COURT AGENDA REOUEST
PLEASE FURNISH ONE ORIGINAL AND NINE COPIES OF THIS
REQUEST AND DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE COURT
MA BY: Jonathan Letz OFFICE: Commissioner, Pct. 3
MEETING DATE: Apri125, 2005 TIME PREFERRED: 2:00 p.m.
SUBJECT: Road and Bridge and Subdivision Rules Workshop.
EXECUTIVE SESSION REQUESTED: (PLEASE STATE REASON)
NAME OF PERSON ADDRESSING THE COURT: Commissioner, Pct. 3
ESTIMATED LENGTH OF PRESENTATION:
IF PERSONNEL MATTER -NAME OF EMPLOYEE:
Time for submitting this request for Court to assure that the matter is posted in
accordance with Title 5, Chapter 551 and 552, Government Code, is as follows:
Meeting scheduled for Mondays: 5:00 P.M. previous Tuesday.
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED BY:
THIS REQUEST RECEIVED ON:

All Agenda Requests will be screened by the County Judge's Office to determine if adequate
information has been prepared for the Court's formal consideration and action at time of Court
Meetings. Your cooperation will be appreciated and contribute towards you request being
addressed at the earliest opportunity. See Agenda Request Rules Adopted by Commissioners'
Court.
Subdivision Workshop
Apri125, 2005
The current Kerr County Subdivision Rules and Regulations were adopted when the
county had a county engineer. The reason for this workshop is to determine what
adjustments to the process should be made to the current rules to accommodate this
change. Other areas concerning the subdivision platting process should also be discussed
so any changes can be added to the new subdivision rules.
Some topics and questions I have identified are as follows:
1. Concept Plans and original contact by a potential developer. Is the current
process working properly ?
2. Coordination between the Commissioner and Road and Bridge
Department concerning subdivisions and the platting process.
3. Required certifications on the final plat. Do we need all of the current
certifications on the final plat ?
4. Revision of Plat currently requires submission of subdivision covenants
and restrictions. Do we want to continue this requirement ?
5. Should Revision of Plat be treated any differently than a new subdivision
plat the platting process ?
6. When, if ever, do we need to hire a consulting engineer and what process
do we use to hire this engineer.
7. Alternate plat approval process. Is the alternate platting process helpful
and should we continue to use it ?
8. Potential illegal subdivisions and how should we handle these situations.
9. How is the subdivision inspection process working ?