1 1 2 3 KERR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' COURT 4 Special Session 5 Monday, August 19, 2019 6 9:00 a.m. 7 Commissioners' Courtroom 8 Kerr County Courthouse 9 Kerrville, Texas 78028 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PRESENT: HARLEY BELEW, Commissioner Precinct 1 TOM MOSER, Commissioner Precinct 2 24 JONATHAN LETZ, Commissioner Precinct 3 DON HARRIS, Commissioner Precinct 4 25 2 1 I-N-D-E-X 2 NO. PAGE 3 1.1 Public Hearing regarding revisions to the 3 Kerr County Subdivision Regulations. 4 1.2 Pay Bills. 18 5 1.3 Budget Amendments. 19 6 1.4 Late Bills. 20 7 1.6 Consider, discuss and take appropriate 20 8 action to authorize the County Judge to execute Change Proposal 71.1 to the East 9 Kerr County/Center Point Wastewater Project to rectify sewer main and pavement repair 10 quantities. 11 *** Reporter's Certificate. 25 12 * * * * * * 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 1 COMMISSIONER LETZ: Good morning. Let me 2 call to order the August 19th Special Commissioners' 3 Court Meeting at 9 a.m. First thing on our agenda we're 4 going to go into a public hearing regarding subdivision 5 revisions -- or rules revisions. I'm going to go ahead 6 and open the public hearing. Charlie, do you have any 7 opening comments? 8 MR. HASTINGS: Yes, I do. Thank you. Okay, 9 so here's a schedule just so everybody knows where we're 10 at. On July the 8th we set a public hearing for today, 11 August the 19th. On August the 5th, we had a workshop, 12 and August 16th, I did a final draft, which was Friday. 13 And I e-mailed it out to -- it hasn't been posted on the 14 website yet, but I e-mailed it out to the County 15 Surveyor, and Erik Ashley, and some other folks that 16 have been involved in this process, including 17 Headwaters, Gene Williams, and also to the Department 18 Heads that had given me comments. I wanted them to see 19 how I incorporated their proposed changes. 20 So when we met on August the 5th, we had 21 some changes suggested by the different department heads 22 and I made those changes into the document that's in 23 front of you, and I'll summarize what they are. We had 24 changes from the County Attorney. She had listed a 25 number of typos, or just better wording. Made those 4 1 changes. She also recommended that we remove Section 2 232.0095, and Sections 212.013 through 016 that had to 3 do with platting, different alternative platting 4 procedures. She said that we weren't eligible to use 5 those. 6 From the Clerk -- the Clerk had some issues 7 with some of the language in regard to fees. The Court 8 had adopted court orders through the years that had 9 changed which fees should be paid and when. And so I've 10 got some changes in there. I'm going to need the Clerk 11 to confirm, not necessarily today, but over the course 12 of the next few weeks, that the changes I made are going 13 to work. 14 Also, we had changes from Environmental 15 Health. They had some language that was going to 16 clarify what the planning materials are that are 17 submitted in plats. I don't think anything has changed. 18 This is just State Law. 19 MRS. BADDERS: Correct. 20 MR. HASTINGS: But we're more explicit in 21 our subdivision regulations as to exactly what we're 22 asking for, broke it down. But it's the same material 23 we've always been asking for. So broke that down. 24 And then also, I had visited with Headwaters 25 pursuant to our workshop on August 5th, spent some time 5 1 with them, and based on that meeting with them, went 2 back -- and I know we need to have a workshop to discuss 3 this in more detail, but I wanted you to know that I 4 made changes on -- let's see where they are. There we 5 go. I went back to some changes where we had discussed 6 about the average -- 7 COMMISSIONER MOSER: What paragraph? 8 MR. HASTINGS: Go to page 16, total number 9 of lots permitted in a subdivision. We had discussed 10 the total number being the acreage divided by one half 11 was what was proposed last time. It was previously the 12 acreage divide by two. 13 I visited with Headwaters, and they 14 discussed with me where that average, the two acre 15 average, came from. And it's based on the allowable 16 permitted water that when they -- when someone asks for 17 a well how much water they can permit you to have, which 18 is 80 thousand gallons per acre per year. And so in 19 order to make sure you have enough water for your 20 subdivision, you need to have an average of two acres 21 per lot if you're going to be getting a permit for 22 water, so that's where that came from. I changed it 23 back to two. We can discuss this in a workshop and we 24 can have Headwaters there and they can walk us through 25 that language, and walk us through how those numbers 6 1 come about, and then at that time discuss and consider 2 whether or not it needs to be changed. 3 But I felt so strongly about it that I 4 needed -- I felt I needed to put it in this document to 5 highlight it so that we make sure and have a discussion 6 on that in a workshop. 7 I, also on Page 17, we were talking about as 8 small as a quarter acre lot, I think was original 9 language. We changed that to a third. I believe it 10 needs to be a half. If our average acreage is two -- 11 really a half acre, I think that also solves issues with 12 State Law as far as what the smallest lot you can have 13 and still have a septic system, it's a half acre. If 14 you go less than a half acre the State Law says you got 15 issues. 16 And I think if our regulations have nothing 17 smaller than a half acre, I just think it's wise to do 18 that. We can discuss that though. Still -- 19 COMMISSIONER MOSER: So when are we going to 20 have a workshop? What I'd like to do on workshops is -- 21 today's the 19th, we're having our public hearing. I'd 22 like to have one on September the 16th, and then on 23 September 23rd regular meeting want to set our final 24 public hearing for November the 4th. I'd like to have a 25 second -- 7 1 COMMISSIONER LETZ: That's not going to work 2 with the Judge's idea. I visited with the Judge, and he 3 would like a series of workshops that are very narrow in 4 focus. One workshop will only be OSSF. They'll be 5 another one, you know, on some other topics. He and I 6 visited after our last meeting. 7 He really wants to go into depth so he 8 completely understands our rules. Go into one probably 9 be on roads, one will be on OSSF, one will be on lot 10 sizes, water. He wants to go into a little bit more 11 detail, so I expect we're going to have three to four 12 workshops. 13 MR. HASTINGS: Three to four. My schedule 14 was -- I had one more for September the 30th. But we 15 should be able to squeeze some in October as well. So 16 maybe if we have two in September and two in October, 17 that would give us time to have our final public hearing 18 and adopt by November the 4th. 19 COMMISSIONER BELEW: The 16th is taken. 20 MRS. GRINSTEAD: That's the City/County. 21 MR. HASTINGS: That's the joint city. Can I 22 work with Jody and figure out when the workshop should 23 be? 24 COMMISSIONER LETZ: Yeah. But it'll be good 25 to do them on -- an off Monday is a good time to do 8 1 these workshops. And I think the idea when I visited 2 with the Judge a little bit was to have those workshops 3 so that we can just focus on one item; not have them 4 real long necessarily, but just so that we can go 5 through it and not try and tackle all this at one time. 6 COMMISSIONER BELEW: And we don't have a 7 deadline for this, do we? Be nice to finish it by the 8 end of the year, and be nice to have a nice little neat 9 package for 2020. 10 COMMISSIONER LETZ: I like packages. 11 MR. HASTINGS: When we met last, the 12 different categories I had for workshops would have been 13 OSSF would have been one. Water availability, a second 14 one. 15 COMMISSIONER MOSER: Lot size. 16 MR. HASTINGS: Lot size. 17 COMMISSIONER LETZ: That probably goes in 18 with water availability. 19 COMMISSIONER BELEW: That goes together, 20 yes. 21 MR. HASTINGS: Okay. Model Subdivision 22 Regulations, do we want a separate workshop for that? 23 COMMISSIONER LETZ: No. 24 MR. HASTINGS: Drainage, do we need a 25 separate one for that? I think we can combine that. 9 1 COMMISSIONER LETZ: No. 2 COMMISSIONER BELEW: Isn't the Model 3 Subdivision, shouldn't that be the last after all the 4 rest of this, got a bow on it and we're ready to move 5 forward? Or why would that be before the end? 6 COMMISSIONER LETZ: Well, because the Model 7 Rules are incorporated as part of our rules, so I guess 8 more of an educational thing. And it would be good to 9 try to get the City's Development person over here for 10 that one, because we're not in total agreement with City 11 on how those are interpreted, I don't think. 12 MR. HASTINGS: I'll tell you what, can I 13 just work closely with Commissioner Letz, and Jody, and 14 the Judge and schedule the four workshops, and after the 15 third one if we need the fourth, we have it and maybe we 16 get done. 17 COMMISSIONER LETZ: That's right. 18 MR. HASTINGS: Okay, we'll do that. Again 19 the goal would be to adopt these on November the 4th as 20 opposed to later in November, because we have 21 Thanksgiving. Or if we need to maybe adopt it at the 22 beginning of December and avoid trying to adopt it at 23 Christmas time. My preference would be November 4th. 24 We put a lot of work effort into it. I think we're 25 close enough. 10 1 COMMISSIONER MOSER: Is any subdivision 2 pending this revision? 3 MR. HASTINGS: No, Sir, not right now. You 4 had a concept plan that you adopted for a gentleman in 5 Center Point to go with some smaller lot sizes, and he 6 gets to move forward with that. 7 COMMISSIONER MOSER: Oh, he does? 8 MR. HASTINGS: Yes, Sir. He's not relying 9 on us, because your regulations allows you to do that. 10 Your existing regulations allows you to do that on a 11 case by case basis. And it's a small subdivision; it's 12 not like a two hundred lot subdivision that will make a 13 huge difference. It's very small, eight lots. 14 Okay, those are my comments. 15 COMMISSIONER LETZ: Audience? Who wants to 16 go first, or anybody? 17 MR. ASHLEY: I'll be happy to. 18 COMMISSIONER LETZ: Okay, you get us 19 started. 20 MR. ASHLEY: Thank y'all for your time. We 21 are not being paid to be here as surveyors; we're here 22 to argue for a simpler system that covers 90 percent of 23 the subdivisions that come through the county so that we 24 can charge less money. But the problem is this is a 25 wonderful ordinance. It's taken from every county that 11 1 surrounds us, but do we always want to be a follower? 2 For instance, my understanding is Gillespie County 3 allows three acres to be platted with a well and septic, 4 so we require five. I question that. 5 Commissioner Letz, you mentioned the five 6 acre exemption to platting, that you saw no reason to 7 plat a five acre tract if it was a one-lot subdivision, 8 but I don't see anything in here about that. Is that 9 still your opinion? 10 COMMISSIONER LETZ: That's in my opinion, 11 and it's a discussion point that we'll have at one of 12 the workshops. 13 MR. ASHLEY: At the workshop, okay. An 14 amending plat, the reason Don suggested that we had the 15 amending plat process is because it would allow Charlie 16 to say this is so simple, I can make the judgment call 17 that moving this lot line from these two lots to be 18 approved in-house, and prevent it from having to go 19 before the Court. And that saves two months, three 20 Commissioners' meetings, y'all's wasted time, our wasted 21 time, the charges we have to give to our clients. Two 22 months to save to that for a simple problem that has 23 simple solutions that Charlie and Bobby are fully 24 capable of saying there's no issue with this. 25 COMMISSIONER BELEW: Don't you mean up to 12 1 two months? 2 MR. HASTINGS: Up to two months. I'm not 3 sure I understand the question. Are you talking about a 4 revision of plat and -- 5 COMMISSIONER BELEW: It's not automatically 6 two months. It's up to two months depending on when the 7 Commissioners' meetings are. So that's not correct. 8 MR. ASHLEY: So we finish our work, we go to 9 Charlie to submit it. If it's two weeks before the next 10 meeting, it puts is us on the agenda. 11 COMMISSIONER BELEW: That's up two then. 12 MR. ASHLEY: That's two. 13 COMMISSIONER BELEW: Okay, I'm just 14 clarifying that, just trying to help. 15 MR. ASHLEY: 13 days before the 16 Commissioners' meeting, we have another two weeks, 17 because that's how long it takes Charlie to review it 18 under the current rules. 19 COMMISSIONER BELEW: I get it. You 20 explained the last time, but it's not always two months; 21 it can be. 22 MR. ASHLEY: No. Then we gotta wait six 23 weeks for the public hearing. Is that correct? 24 MR. HASTINGS: We put it on an agenda as 25 soon as we can to set the public hearing, and then 13 1 review your stuff in between. 2 MR. ASHLEY: And a six week wait. 3 MS. HOFFER: Sometimes it's 35 days. 4 COMMISSIONER LETZ: I think your point's 5 valid, Erik, on this. 6 COMMISSIONER BELEW: Yeah, it's a valid 7 point. 8 MR. ASHLEY: If we'd have argued this 30 9 years ago, which we've been arguing for 30 years, and 10 succeeded, how many people would have saved thousands of 11 dollars? I'm going to suggest to you hundreds, maybe 12 even thousands. A thousand people waste a thousand 13 dollars, that's a million dollars. That's why we're 14 here. 15 And I understand the County Attorney has not 16 agreed with amending the platting process, but I also 17 heard Mr. Letz say if the County Court wanted to do it, 18 we could adopt it. We could be a leader instead of 19 following -- we can follow Hays County, we can follow 20 Boerne, we can follow Gillespie County's lead, or we can 21 be leaders to simplify the process. The bureaucratic -- 22 and nothing's simple about it. There's nothing simple 23 about platting. 24 So this document covers subdivisions, which 25 is streets, roads, subdivisions in our view, the way we 14 1 see it, and Charlie is excellent at doing that, and 2 Commissioner Letz. This is an excellent document. But 3 the problem is that only five percent of what goes 4 through here is subdivisions. 90 percent of it is very 5 simple deals, two lot deals, three lot deals, and it's a 6 waste of the taxpayer money because the system is 7 inefficient. That's why we're here. 8 So another -- 9 COMMISSIONER MOSER: Do you have some 10 proposed language that you would inject into this 11 subdivision rule that would -- 12 MR. ASHLEY: Exactly what Don -- I'm sorry 13 to interrupt you. 14 COMMISSIONER MOSER: I'm saying, do you have 15 some proposed wording that would -- 16 MR. ASHLEY: Don has proposed the wording 17 for the amending plat. It was in the last draft. 18 COMMISSIONER MOSER: So my question is, 19 there's some words to describe what you're saying? 20 MR. ASHLEY: Yes, Sir. And that's why Don 21 suggested it. 22 COMMISSIONER LETZ: A point of clarification 23 there. What I've said is that we may be able to figure 24 out a way to do that. We can't do it under the 25 authority granted that Don brought up. That doesn't 15 1 apply to it. We may have discretion -- and this will be 2 up to County Attorney looking at, discretion to do 3 something similar outside of 212. But we can't -- so 4 it's yes and no. There is some language that we can 5 maybe able to adopt, but not under the legal authority 6 that Don presented to us. 7 MR. DON VOELKEL: Thank you for pointing 8 that out. I was wrong again. 9 COMMISSIONER LETZ: But your idea was right. 10 MR. DON VOELKEL: Well, let me just 11 interject. I'm Don Voelkel, Kerrville, Texas. What 12 he's referring, and what she said we can't to is adopt 13 part of the 212, the city's. 212, the parts I'm talking 14 about allows -- and I've been doing this a lot in 15 Comanche Trace. And Comanche Trace, somebody buys a lot 16 and builds a house and they don't want a neighbor, or 17 they buy an adjacent lot, and then they don't want to 18 pay two homeowners fees so they combine them. 19 Well, the section that we can't adopt allow 20 staff level approval when you're just combining two 21 lots, or moving a lot line five feet, because there's an 22 encroachment. It doesn't -- what Erik's saying is 23 readopt the thing and allow the County Engineer and 24 allow his staff to approve it. It would just be a final 25 plat. And it wouldn't take a revision of plat. What 16 1 Erik's talking the time and effort just for a revision 2 rule where you have to put it on the agenda and have a 3 public hearing. And these minor things in 212, it says 4 if you're moving a lot line or combining lots you don't 5 have to have notification and publication. 6 COMMISSIONER MOSER: So there's some 7 language. 8 MR. DON VOELKEL: If we could adopt similar 9 language, and also it doesn't have to have the clerk to 10 make notification and do all the things that -- 11 COMMISSIONER MOSER: We got it, we got it. 12 MR. DON VOELKEL: If we have a lot and cut 13 it into ten tracts, I -- 14 COMMISSIONER MOSER: Okay, I think we got 15 it. 16 MR. DON VOELKEL: -- hate to see this 17 happen. 18 COMMISSIONER MOSER: Okay. I think we got 19 it. 20 MR. DON VOELKEL: To simplify things -- 21 COMMISSIONER MOSER: We got it. We got it. 22 MR. DON VOELKEL: Okay, I'm done. 23 MR. ASHLEY: And we have too. 24 COMMISSIONER MOSER: I was getting ready to. 25 MR. ASHLEY: Well, I'll keep talking until 17 1 I'm told. Let's see, page 6, item H. 103-H. This is 2 an exemption to platting that we've been arguing to get 3 for 30 years. We have failed as surveyors to convince 4 Commissioners, we failed to convince the County 5 Attorneys, we failed to convince whoever's in charge of 6 subdivisions. It's been many people over the years. 7 But now I see this finally put in here, and 8 you can read it yourself, but a division of a tract into 9 two or more parts where the part or parts are conveyed 10 to take adjacent property owner and no part or parts of 11 the tract are located within an existing subdivision, 12 plat shall not be considered a subdivision and shall not 13 be subject to platting requirements of these rules and 14 regulations. 15 MR. HASTINGS: That was I; not H, right? 16 MR. ASHLEY: Yes, Sir, I. 17 MR. HASTINGS: And, Erik, that was adopted 18 three years ago. 19 MR. ASHLEY: Okay. But had we succeeded in 20 convincing powers to be 30 years ago that this was the 21 law, which it is and it's always been. We're just now 22 coming around to understanding the law, and accepting 23 it. 24 COMMISSIONER BELEW: Doesn't this address 25 that. 18 1 MR. ASHLEY: This addresses it. Here's my 2 issue. We didn't succeed 30 years ago, and if we don't 3 succeed with some of these other little points now, the 4 public's going to suffer for the next 30 years. 5 That's why this document fails to address 90 6 percent -- maybe 50 percent now, because of the 7 exemptions. But most of what goes through this Court is 8 so simple it's a waste of y'all's time in all due 9 respect. Thank you. 10 JUDGE KELLY: Anybody else? All right, no 11 one else. Public hearing's closed. We'll announce the 12 next workshop. Thank y'all. 13 Item 1.2 pay the bills. 14 MR. ROBLES: For the Court to consider for 15 approval, we have Kerr County $494,133.51. Airport, 16 $6,561.86. 17 COMMISSIONER MOSER: Hey, Gene, hold on for 18 a second, I just wanted to ask you something. 19 Go ahead. 20 MR. ROBLES: Adult Probation, $73,291.66. 21 Juvenile Probation, $36,623.59. Fund 78, 469. And fund 22 95, $6,512.50. 23 COMMISSIONER BELEW: I move for approval of 24 the Treasurer's disbursements. 25 COMMISSIONER HARRIS: Second. 19 1 COMMISSIONER MOSER: Second. Go ahead. 2 COMMISSIONER LETZ: Motion by Commissioner 3 Belew, second by Commissioner Harris to approve the 4 disbursements as presented by the Auditor. Any 5 discussion? All in favor raise your right hand. 6 Unanimous, four zero. 7 Budget amendments? 8 MR. ROBLES: Yes, we have five today. The 9 first two are certifying new revenue, these are 10 insurance proceeds. The first one's for hail damage, 11 mostly at the airport. The second one's for damage to 12 Constable 2 vehicle. We have moving money around in 13 Road & Bridge operating equipment to capital outlay. 14 Number four, this is moving money from the 15 CPS court-appointed attorneys to the County Court at Law 16 court-appointed attorneys. And the last one is Little 17 League, the parks fund. 18 COMMISSIONER HARRIS: I move for approval of 19 the budget amendments as read. 20 COMMISSIONER MOSER: Second. 21 COMMISSIONER LETZ: Motion from Commissioner 22 Harris, second from Commissioner Moser to approve budget 23 amendments as presented. Any further discussion? All 24 in favor raise your right hand. Unanimous, four zero. 25 Late bills? 20 1 MR. ROBLES: We do have one today. We got 2 one late Friday afternoon. This is the second half and 3 final payment of the playground installed at the Flat 4 Rock and Lions Park. This will officially close out all 5 of our capital project money issued from prior 6 Certificates of Obligation. 7 COMMISSIONER MOSER: Move for approval of 8 paying the late bills. 9 COMMISSIONER BELEW: Second. 10 COMMISSIONER LETZ: Have a motion from 11 Commissioner Moser, second from Commissioner Belew to 12 approve late bills as presented. Any discussion? All 13 in favor raise your right hand. Unanimous, four zero. 14 Court orders. Can we put these off for a 15 week? Just pass on those today. 16 Item 1.6 consider, discuss and take 17 appropriate action to authorize the County Judge to 18 execute change proposals 71.1 to the East Kerr 19 County/Center Point Wastewater Project to rectify sewer 20 main and pavement repair quantities. Charlie, change 21 order? 22 MR. HASTINGS: Change order, I didn't bring 23 an agenda bill with me. I apologize. 24 MS. HOFFER: Here you go, Charlie. 25 MR. HASTINGS: Thank you. These Kerr 21 1 County/Center Point Wastewater Project sewer main 2 installation is nearing completion, and leaving pavement 3 repair, final sewer connections, lift station 4 completion, and final clean-up as the remaining work to 5 close out the project. So we're getting close. 6 COMMISSIONER MOSER: For Phase 1. 7 MR. HASTINGS: For Phase 1. And we're 8 scheduled -- that's scheduled for February 2020, so it's 9 right around the corner. Since the final quantities of 10 the sewer main and pavement repair are known, change 11 proposal 71.1 rectifies both quantities resulting in a 12 net reduction in the project of $373,692.49. 13 The County Engineer recommends that the 14 Court authorize the County Judge to execute change 15 proposal number 71.1 to the East Kerr County/Center 16 Point Wastewater Project to rectify sewer main and 17 pavement repair quantities. Precincts 2 and 3. 18 COMMISSIONER MOSER: And these are the 19 repairs that we discussed that have been -- describe the 20 repairs real quick. 21 MR. HASTINGS: The repairs would be to do a 22 full width level up and chipseal on only the roads that 23 have sustained extensive damage, where it needs to be 24 done full width. We've got some really narrow, very 25 thin roads that are out there in Center Point, and also 22 1 in the Comfort area of Kerr County, and those roads just 2 couldn't handle the construction, and they need a level 3 up full width. We've got that, a detail approved 4 through the Texas Water Development Board to do that. 5 And so this let's us know what the quantities are from 6 both. 7 COMMISSIONER MOSER: Move for approval of 8 the proposal change 71.1 for a net reduction of 9 $373,692.49 to the contract. 10 COMMISSIONER BELEW: I have a question about 11 that, Charlie. What you just explained, and this is 12 something we've covered before, that we're supposed to 13 return the road to the original condition, but some of 14 them are substandard, so the money is coming out of the 15 grant to -- 16 MR. HASTINGS: The money's coming out of the 17 grant to put them back to preexisting conditions. Those 18 roads were -- 19 COMMISSIONER BELEW: Basically to build a 20 road. 21 MR. HASTINGS: It's not building the road, 22 no, Sir. It's leveling up. It needs to be leveled up. 23 It needs a final level up. It's not rebuilding the 24 road. 25 COMMISSIONER BELEW: What does that mean in 23 1 practical terms, is the road going to be improved? 2 MR. HASTINGS: No. It's not improvement. 3 COMMISSIONER BELEW: That's what I've been 4 asked about. 5 COMMISSIONER LETZ: We're basically -- 6 they're going to go back and re-sealcoat the entire road 7 as opposed to doing a bunch of patches on it. So it 8 would be the same as if we -- you know, we're not 9 improving the road; we're just putting it back to the 10 way it was, in good shape. 11 MR. HASTINGS: Before the project. 12 COMMISSIONER BELEW: Some of them weren't in 13 very good shape, so we are just sealcoating the roads 14 that weren't in very good shape. 15 MR. HASTINGS: The roads were in good shape. 16 The problem is none of those roads out there were 17 designed -- with the exception of a few. Some of those 18 roads around the elementary, around the school, in 19 Center Point have so much asphalt on them and they're so 20 wide that when the construction went through, the only 21 damage was it was limited to just the area that they cut 22 the road. But these other roads are so thin and so 23 narrow that just cutting the road and having equipment 24 rolling over it back and forth, and the assault not 25 being as thick, it damaged the road from edge to edge. 24 1 That's gotta be fixed. 2 COMMISSIONER MOSER: So the key word is not 3 improving; it's putting it back where it was. 4 MR. HASTINGS: It's putting back where it 5 was, right. 6 COMMISSIONER MOSER: With the grant money. 7 COMMISSIONER LETZ: We can't improve the 8 roads under the grant. 9 COMMISSIONER BELEW: I know. 10 COMMISSIONER MOSER: Motion's made. 11 COMMISSIONER LETZ: We have a motion. Do we 12 have a second? 13 COMMISSIONER MOSER: No, no second yet. 14 COMMISSIONER HARRIS: Second. 15 COMMISSIONER LETZ: Have a motion from 16 Commissioner Moser, second from Commissioner Harris to 17 approve change order 71.1 as a net reduction of 18 $373,692.49 to the Phase 1 of the East Kerr/Center Point 19 Wastewater Project. Is there any further discussion? 20 All in favor raise your right hand. It's unanimous, 21 four zero. 22 * * * * * * 23 24 25 25 1 STATE OF TEXAS * 2 COUNTY OF KERR * 3 I, DEBRA ELLEN GIFFORD, Certified Shorthand 4 Reporter in and for the State of Texas, and Official 5 Reporter in and for Kerr County, do hereby certify that 6 the above and foregoing pages contain and comprise a 7 true and correct transcription of the proceedings had in 8 the above-entitled Commissioners' Court Approval Agenda. 9 Dated this the 6th day of October, A.D., 10 2019. 11 12 /s/DEBRA ELLEN GIFFORD Certified Shorthand Reporter 13 No. 953 Expiration Date 04/31/2020 14 * * * * * * 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25